Latest news with #gasstations
Yahoo
14-07-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Where do things stand with the Buc-ee's planned for Oak Creek? Here's the latest.
Buc-ee's is trying to build in Oak Creek but there's a delay in the final approvals for 'the Disneyland of gas stations.' Angela Janik, project coordinator for Buc-ee's, made the "Disneyland" comparison during an early meeting for the proposed 74,000-square-foot store which includes a fueling plaza of 120 gas pumps. It would be constructed on nearly 30 acres near West Elm Road and South 27th Street, just west of the interstate. Here's what to know: Buc-ee's is hoping to open its 24/7 store and fueling plaza in early 2027 and is expected to employ between 175 and 225 full-time workers. The City of Oak Creek put out a timeline for when various approvals for Buc-ee's were up for discussion. These dates have come and gone: Jan. 28 the Plan Commission passed resolutions to change the property to commercial use from business park in the city's comprehensive plan. It was also rezoned from primarily agricultural to B-6 Interchange Regional Retail District. March 18: Oak Creek's Common Council voted in favor of amending the city's 2020 comprehensive plan land use for the three properties and a rezoning application for retail use. May 20: Following the Plan Commission's recommended approval in April, a conditional use permit for the fueling plaza and convenience store was approved by the Oak Creek Common Council. The council also approved a certified survey map for the project combining the three parcels into two lots and an outlot. Oak Creek City Administrator Andrew Vickers told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel on July 2 the city's timeline for local reviews and approvals was to conclude June 10 with a site plan and building review in front of the Plan Commission. However, the timeline hit a speed bump with a traffic analysis. 'This final, public step has been delayed as (the Wisconsin Department of Transportation) and Buc-ee's continue working toward what the Traffic Impact Analysis will require for road improvements,' Vickers said via email. He noted city staff will create an agenda for the Plan Commission meeting once the DOT accepts the traffic impact analysis. Vickers said the city doesn't anticipate any issues with the analysis, noting "those traffic data exchanges and iterative engineering processes are mostly between DOT and Buc-ee's." Some neighbors who are opposed to the proposed project have decided to band together as Oak Creek Neighbors United and sue the city. The lawsuit was filed April 11 in Milwaukee County Circuit Court and alleges the rezoning and comprehensive plan amendment were only to benefit the property owner and called it 'illegal spot zoning.' The plaintiffs want a declaratory judgment that the 2020 comprehensive plan amendment approval and rezoning be voided by the court, according to the lawsuit. The suit is ongoing with the city filing a motion to dismiss the case and Oak Creek Neighbors United having until Aug. 4 to reply, according to online court records. Contact Erik S. Hanley at Like his Facebook page, The Redheadliner, and follow him on X @Redheadliner. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Here's the latest on the proposed Buc-ee's in Oak Creek
Yahoo
14-07-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Gas Stations Quietly Charging Drivers $1 More per Gallon for This 1 Reason
Paying at the pump with a credit card is a daily habit for most drivers, and a convenience that can cost more than you think. Across several states, including Florida, gas stations are increasingly charging higher prices per gallon for credit card users. The difference is often as much as $1 more per gallon compared to the cash price, a markup that can quietly add up on a full tank. While it's legal for businesses to charge extra for credit card transactions, most states require that these fees be clearly disclosed to customers. Some gas stations are skirting that line by posting notices in fine print on the pump or signage that drivers may not easily notice. The result? Many drivers swipe their cards expecting the advertised street price, only to find out after the fact that they've been charged significantly more. With gas prices already pushing budgets, an extra $10 or $20 per fill-up can make a real impact. Consumer watchdogs point out that while the surcharge itself may be legal, the lack of upfront transparency could border on deceptive business practices. And as long as stations get away with it, the hidden fee trend may continue to grow. The best way to avoid surprise charges is to pay close attention to posted pricing at the pump and read the fine print before fueling. Some stations make their cash-versus-credit prices obvious, while others bury the details in pump stickers or small signs. Apps and rewards programs can also help soften the blow. Ultimately, small habits—like checking for price differences or choosing stations that don't penalize credit card users—can save hundreds over the course of a year. With gas expenses averaging over $2,400 per driver annually, every dollar Stations Quietly Charging Drivers $1 More per Gallon for This 1 Reason first appeared on Men's Journal on Jul 13, 2025
CTV News
11-07-2025
- Business
- CTV News
Steep discounts at some Winnipeg gas stations
Steep discounts at some Winnipeg gas stations Some Winnipeg gas stations are selling fuel for roughly $1/litre and in some places, lower.
Bloomberg
10-07-2025
- Business
- Bloomberg
Aster Chemicals is Said in Talks to Buy Exxon Singapore Stations
Aster Chemicals and Energy Pte, a joint venture between Indonesia's Chandra Asri Group and global commodities trader Glencore Plc, is in talks to buy oil major Exxon Mobil Corp. 's gas stations in Singapore, according to people with knowledge of the matter. The explorer has emerged as the likeliest buyer after outbidding other global rivals, and is now hammering out details of the deal such as price and transaction structure, said the people, asking not to be named as the talks are private.
Forbes
30-06-2025
- Automotive
- Forbes
How Rational Is EV Fast Charging When Most Cars Are Parked All Day?
All the press is about fast charging stations, some of which are literally sited with gas stations ... More and run by oil companies There are many different views on how EV charging infrastructure should be built, and financed. Today, almost all discussion revolves around 'fast charging' at 50kW or more, which will usually refill a car in under an hour. This is due to the legacy of 'gasoline thinking.' For a century, we drove cars with gasoline around until the tank said 'E' and then looked for a place to fill-up, which took under 5 minutes. That's a good experience, and it's understandable why there's so much effort to duplicate it. The more important question is should we? Almost all news and investment activity in EV charging is around this gasoline fill-up problem. Faster chargers and more of them. 800v cars and chargers that can peak over 350kW. New battery designs that can get a usable charge in under 10 minutes. BYD's demo of a partial charge in just 5 minutes in China. Charging stations which look very much like gas stations in their placement and style. Everybody would like fast charging, all other things being equal. But they very much aren't equal. Fast charging is very expensive, and the faster it is the more expensive it is. Wiring in hundreds of kilowatts isn't likely to ever get cheap. 10 minute charges require a megawatt, and that's definitely not easy or cheap. Imagine having 10 chargers at a station. If you consider the inherent energy in gasoline, a gas pump delivers 20 megawatts. Per pump. (In reality, because gasoline cars are around 30% efficient, that's more like 6 megawatts worth, but it's still huge.) You're unlikely to ever duplicate that, or to want to pay the price to do it. Fast charging stations today use a lot of expensive electrical gear. Tesla is smart, and it costs them about $30,000/stall to put in their stations, while non-Tesla stalls only get put in thanks to very fat government subsidies, and routinely cost over $200,000 each. That means getting a charge at these fast stations is pricey. The cost is typically around 40 to 60 cents/kWh, while the average cost at home in the USA (which recently increased a lot) is 16.26 cents, though often under 10 cents at night, and even less for people who put in solar power. It's such a huge difference that while those who charge at home save large sums over what they used to spend on gasoline, fast charging stations can make your energy cost per mile be more than gasoline in a hybrid car. In addition, being expensive, it's precious. It has to go in far fewer locations, and generally one must leave the stall as soon as charging is done to make space for somebody else. So all other things are not equal. That's without counting the time spent waiting at these stations or detouring to them, compared to the home or office or hotel where you sleep or work while your car sits where it was already going to sit anyway. Office parking lots with solar panels nearby and slow charging for the cars that park there all day ... More are the biggest win The typical car is parked over 22 hours per day. And the average driver who drives 10,000 miles/year only needs to charge for under 2 hours/day, not at a fast charger, but at a slow 'level 2' one. In fact, it only needs to charge for 7 hours/day, on average, at on ordinary dedicated 120v household plug, called 'level 1.' Slow chargers are cheap. In fact, there's almost nothing in them, just a $5 computer, a switch, thick wires and a plug. The most expensive part is the wiring (if you want the Level 2.) Enough electricity is already present in almost every building in the world. Other than land cost, one can probably put in 50 to 100 slow chargers for the cost of a single CCS fast charging stall. In the ideal future of the EV transition, there's low cost, not particularly fast charging at just a subset of those parking locations cars spend just 2 to 8 of their 22 parked hours. Today, most EV drivers have that--over 80% of EV drivers can charge at home or work and never use fast charging in their home town, with very rare exceptions. If we can 'charge where we park, rather than park where there's charging' the EV experience becomes much better than the gasoline one in every way. When people ask me how long it takes to charge my EV, I tell them it takes less time than I spent getting gasoline in my last car. That's true at home, and it's almost true on road trips. It's hard to see wanting any other world. Yet many companies are building large EV gas stations hoping they can get in on being the 'gas station of the 21st century.' And today, they have customers, because there is a small cohort of EV drivers who can't charge at home or work, because they don't have a driveway, or don't own their home. But this is what we need to fix. All the subsidies and EV promotion laws should be aimed at trying to fix that, not at building EV versions of the gas station. Let's make it easy for apartments and condos to put in charging, and for tenants to demand it. Let's get curbside charging for streets where people don't have driveways and park on the street at night. Let's leave the gas-style EV stations for the few who can't get that. There's more good news. Under 20th century rules, many buildings could not add EV charging because they didn't have sufficient electrical service. New, smarter technologies (Disclaimer: I have investment in a company that provides this) allow any building to handle all its EVs without upgrading the electrical service. The Exceptions There are some cars that aren't parked 95% of the time. Professional drivers/cabs, and people on long intercity road trips. There are many types of road trips. In most, cars are still parked 10 hours at a hotel or other sleeping stop, and 1-2 hours for meals and breaks. For more leisurely road trips, they are parked many more hours at 'attractions' along the way. These cars also need much more charging during their day of long driving. Fast charging is needed, but it also should be located at the places people already stop, such as restaurants, some shops, and attractions. At restaurants, 100kW is more than enough for most--in fact, if it's too fast, you have to interrupt your meal to go move your car, because fast stations also don't let you sit idle after you are done. They're too expensive. The only cars that need really fast charging are those in a terrible hurry, who want to stop for a bathroom break every 2-3 hours and want to pick up 30-40kWh in the fastest time. (Most cars only charge fast when going from 0% to 50%.) If we build the world where there's EV charging in the places we already stop or park, the other needs are few. How many will pay large surcharges for 10 minute charges? Will they be enough market to justify building these cars and stations? Perhaps only if it gets cheaper. Most Uber drivers actually do under 300 miles/day, often under 200. If so, they'll need only a small amount of fast charging if they can get a cheap, slow 'sleep charge.' A short break, for lunch or otherwise, will keep them in place, as long as there is charging where they stop. Some Fleet vehicles (particularly heavier ones with shorter range) may want to run multiple shifts, or may need a larger recharge mid-shift. These do want their charging to be fast. If a fleet sees full utilization, and charging time is downtime, this is an instance where you want it to be as fast as possible. If utilization is not full, though, you just rotate vehicles so some are charging and others are working, and you don't need the charging to be as fast. The Future Tesla keeps promising their cars will fully drive themselves 'this year,' and has predicted that each year for almost a decade. But one thing that's actually coming is cars that can make short drives at off-peak times on quiet roads and in office complexes at low speeds. That's a car that can take itself to charging. as long as an attendant or robot (or the car itself, which is a robot) can plug it in. When that arrives, you no longer need charging where you park, you just need charging lots within a moderate distance of where you park. Cars needing a charge can slip off when their owner is asleep or working or staying for a while. Remember that the average car needs less than 2 hours of slow charging per day. Forget 'gasoline' thinking--this is a car that just is always charged as if by magic, with no electrical wiring, and very limited use of fast charging. Robotaxis, on the other hand, though able to drive to where they charge, actually do want faster charging to get back to work. Though in this case 25kW does the job--that is what Tesla has chosen for the CyberCab.
