Latest news with #non-AfricanAmericans
Axios
25-03-2025
- Politics
- Axios
Supreme Court to hear Louisiana redistricting case
Monday marks the beginning of the end of Louisiana's redistricting saga as the U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments over the state's congressional map. Why it matters: The decision could both reshape Louisiana politics and reframe how the Voting Rights Act is applied to redistricting in other states. The big picture: Key to the Supreme Court ruling will be whether Louisiana violated the Equal Protection Clause in its lawmakers' efforts to comply with the Voting Rights Act, two tough-to-balance landmark pieces of federal law. Friction point: The Voting Rights Act is meant to protect minority voters. In some cases, including Louisiana, congressional maps get redrawn to ensure minority voters represent a majority of those within a district. Yet the Equal Protection Clause in the 14th Amendment also says states can't draw maps based on racial gerrymandering. Catch up quick: Redistricting happens when updated census numbers are released every decade, but the congressional map that Louisiana lawmakers came up with after the 2020 census in caught the attention of civil rights groups. Those groups sued the state in federal court, arguing that the new map violated the Voting Rights Act by not fairly representing Black voters, who make up about a third of Louisiana's population, but a majority of one of the map's six districts. A federal judge sided with the civil rights groups in 2022 and ordered state lawmakers to redraw the maps. And they did. But then another group of plaintiffs who self-described as "non-African Americans" sued the state for relying too heavily on race when it was redrawn, the AP reported. A panel of three judges sided with the plaintiffs, setting up competing federal decisions over the same map, and told state to go back to the drawing board yet again. Yes, but: The Supreme Court did allow the state to use its latest map version for last fall's congressional election, which led to voters to send Cleo Fields to Congress, giving Louisiana its second Black representative and the second Democrat in its delegation. What they're saying: "The Supreme Court needs to provide instructions to state legislatures so states are not on a perpetual federal litigation roller coaster over good faith efforts at redistricting," Attorney General Liz Murrill said in a statement over the weekend. "It's very confusing to voters, it's expensive for taxpayers, and it's inconsistent with the Constitution.""
Boston Globe
13-03-2025
- Politics
- Boston Globe
Louisiana vs. the ‘non-African Americans'
But as Marina Jenkins, executive director of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, pointed out, it's the old legal racial switcheroo. And history is rhyming. 'The argument put forth by the plaintiffs seeking the requirement of race blindness, even in the course of remedying racial vote dilution, is not new,' Jenkins said Wednesday, previewing the March 24 argument to members of the press. 'It dates back to the civil rights movement, when opponents of voting rights protections for minority groups used the same argument to oppose addressing racial discrimination. The irony and hypocrisy is hard to miss.' The National Democratic Redistricting Committee was among the groups that Advertisement Meanwhile, the Supreme Court issued a ruling rejecting a similarly racially rigged map in Alabama. So rather than fight, Louisiana lawmakers decided to go back to the map-drawing board and try to comply with the justices' ruling. Lawmakers drafted and the governor approved a new map that included But then the state was sued by the 'non-African American' group, which said that the new map was forbidden because state officials drafted it primarily on the basis of race. Yes: They argued that the state violated the law by complying with a ruling that said you can't racially discriminate against Black people. Advertisement Now Louisiana officials are crying uncle, saying they will be damned with Black voter dilution lawsuits if they throw out the new map and damned with racial discrimination lawsuits from non-Afrian American voters if they don't. They asked the Supreme Court to sort it all out instead. Here's the bad news for democracy lovers: The Supreme Court has, for more than a decade, become increasingly critical of the racial components of the Voting Rights Act itself. In 2013, So the non-African Americans must be feeling pretty bullish. They'll make their case to the justices later this month. I'll let you know how it goes.
