Latest news with #patent
Forbes
8 hours ago
- Business
- Forbes
Strong Trump Support For Patent Rights Could Promote U.S. Innovation
An image of 7 light bulbs from the patent infringement court trials brought by the Edison Electric ... More Light Company in 1893 that are part of a collection of technology artifacts at the Museum of Science and Industry, Chicago, Illinois, May 5, 2010. (Photo by J. B. Spector/Museum of Science and Industry, Chicago/Getty Images) Recent Trump Administration actions point to enhanced support for patent rights. This could help accelerate American innovation in a time of growing international competition. Background As I explained in a previous Forbes article: 'The United States has the world's largest and most innovative economy, and our patent law framework has played a major role in this success story. At the beginning of the 21st century, the U.S. maintained the strongest system for patent protection. It was the envy of the world, but soon thereafter, it came under attack from problematic judicial and executive branch actions. The weakening of American patents has coincided with growing international challenges to U.S. technological leadership, particularly from China. Th[e] . . . administration . . . should reverse course and, in tandem with Congress, reinstitute a strong patent-policy framework to promote vibrant, innovation-driven American economic growth.' Congress is considering 3 bipartisan pro-patent bills that would: (1) limit abusive post-grant patent challenges, (2) clarify what is patentable, and (3) restore the presumption that a patent holder can enjoin (block) infringers from wrongfully using its patented technology. Passage of these bills would raise incentives for beneficial patenting that drives innovation. Patent legislation is, however, difficult to pass – similar reform bills have been repeatedly introduced in prior Congresses. Opponents of strong patents, including implementer companies that benefit from obtaining patented technology 'on the cheap,' have successfully opposed enactment of these proposals. Nevertheless, even absent statutory change, the executive branch can take valuable steps to promote stronger patents through policy pronouncements. Recent actions by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) and the Justice Department (DOJ) suggest that the administration has taken this reality to heart. Administration Takes Pro-Patent Steps Curbing Abusive Post Grant Challenges. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board is a subsidiary body within PTO that is empowered to review already issued patents at the request of third parties that seek to have the patents extinguished. It was created by Congress as part of broader patent legislation in 2011. It was hoped that PTAB would allow quicker resolution of patent disputes as a substitute for federal court litigation. Instead, PTAB proceedings, which allowed for repeated challenges to different patent claims, became a wasteful and costly add-on to judicial lawsuits. It reduced certainty as to whether patent claims would ultimately be struck down. This disincentivized beneficial R&D directed at obtaining patents. As a leading patent law expert, Scalia Law School Professor Adam Mossoff, explains: '[D] iscretionary administrative decision-making at the PTAB and its highly unbalanced decisions in canceling patents have shaken the formerly reliable, stable, and effective legal foundation of the U.S. innovation economy—patent rights. . . . It also undermines patents as a stable legal platform by which companies can develop new commercial systems for efficiently delivering incredible new products and services to consumers, like today's smartphones.6 Instead, all patents today have the pall of the PTAB hanging over them—what lawyers call a cloud on the title—threatening to cancel their property rights willy-nilly.' U.S. PTO Acting Director Coke Stewart has taken multiple actions in recent weeks to rein in the PTAB's excesses: O She issued a March 2025 memorandum that emphasized her role in issuing discretionary denials of requests for PTAB patent challenges and expanded the factors that could be weighed to deny PTAB reviews (including 'settled patent holder expectations' when a patent has been long in force). O In a June 2025 address, she placed greater emphasis on early challenges to validity and seeking to 'migrate away from' late PTAB challenges. O On June 6, in issuing 'discretionary denials' blocking PTAB review of 5 patents, Stewart relied heavily on 'the failure of the petitioner to challenge the patent[s] sooner and the 'settled expectations' of the patent owner.' O On June 25, Stewart denied 3 petitions for PTAB review, finding that it would be 'an inefficient use of resources to review a challenged patent that has been dismissed with prejudice from . . . [parallel] litigation.' She had also invoked the pendency of a parallel court proceeding in a May 2025 denial of PTAB review. O Also on June 25, Stewart vacated PTAB decisions to review 2 patents, finding that the PTAB 'abused its discretion in granting institution of two petitions challenging the same [patent] claims in this instance.' According to patent policy analyst Eileen McDermott, these recent developments reflect a new 'trend of patent owner-friendly decisions in PTAB proceedings.' Supporting patent holders' ability to get injunctions. Until 2006, patent holders could presumptively obtain a court injunction that ordered infringers to stop using their invention (akin to a landowner's legal right to eject trespassers camping on their property). But the Supreme Court's 2006 decision in eBay v. MercExchange eliminated that presumption in favor of an uncertain four-factor 'balancing test.' A study by Professor Mossoff finds that eBay 'resulted in a significant reduction in availability of injunctive remedies for patent infringements, especially in the context of patents on standardized technologies, such as standard essential patents covering WiFi or 5G telecommunications technologies in mobile devices.' This means a slowdown in key R&D needed to bring forth next generation innovations that drive American technological prowess. The Biden Administration DOJ did not support interpretations of eBay that favor injunctions. The new Trump DOJ, however, seems to have reversed course by putting forth new justifications for injunctive relief. On June 24 DOJ, joined by PTO, filed a 'Statement of Interest' (SOI) in Radian Memory Systems v. Samsung. Radian Memory Systems claimed that Samsung had purposely infringed Radian's flash drive technology patent. The SOI agreed with Radian that the firm had been 'irreparably harmed,' a key factor supporting the grant of an injunction under the eBay holding. The SOI stated that a valid patent is 'a unique asset . . . with the rights (like the right to an injunction) that the [patent] statute prescribes.' The SOI added that '[i]n cases of unique assets, courts have commonly found irreparable harm when damages are difficult to calculate[,]' as is the case here. The SOI also noted that an injunction gives patent owners important protections on how and to whom a license to their patented technology is given. What's more, the prospect of an injunction deters infringement by firms that otherwise would think they 'had nothing to lose' other than the risk of having to make future royalty payments. As noted patent law expert Gene Quinn puts it: '[I]t seems clear that the Trump Administration is advocating a new path forward and a return to the possibility of an injunction issuing to patent owners—even a preliminary injunction. And with the DOJ and USPTO intervening in this case so early, whatever the ruling, the case seems destined for the Supreme Court.' Next Steps Recent actions by the PTO and DOJ limiting PTAB challenges to patents and supporting the broader issuance of court injunctions for patent infringement are significant. They signal a move back toward the more patent friendly approach of the first Trump Administration. These changes, particularly if coupled with appropriate legislative reform, could give a strong boost to patent-based innovation – and thereby enhance the prospects for future American technological leadership.
Phone Arena
a day ago
- Business
- Phone Arena
Google faces trouble in Japan over Pixel phones, even as popular as they have become
A Japanese court has banned Google from selling Pixel 7 series smartphones in the country after ruling that the company violated a patent. This development comes as Pixel phones have become increasingly popular in Japan, where they recently became the second most popular brand behind Apple. According to a new report, the court found that Google had infringed on a patent related to control signal mapping technology. This patent covers the way an acknowledgment signal (ACK) is sent from a base station to a device in an LTE network, which is a core part of 4G communications. The court determined that this technology was used without permission in the Pixel 7 and Pixel 7 Pro. Because of this ruling, Google is now banned from selling, importing, displaying, or transferring Pixel 7 series phones in Japan. The judge also criticized how Google responded to the legal case, describing its approach as having an "insincere attitude," which reportedly influenced the decision to impose the sales ban. Google Pixel 7 Pro. | Image credit — PhoneArena What makes this more concerning is that the issue may not stop here. The company behind the complaint, South Korea-based Pantech, is also seeking to expand the ban to include the newer Pixel 8 and upcoming Pixel 9 series. It's not clear yet whether those efforts will succeed, but it adds pressure on Google in one of its most promising international markets. Japan has become an important region for Pixel. As we previously reported, Google saw strong growth in the country in 2023, largely driven by the popularity of the Pixel 7 series and the affordable Pixel 7a. A wider ban could disrupt that momentum and impact future sales. Pantech, the company involved in the case, no longer makes smartphones. The legal action was handled by IdeaHub, a group that focuses on monetizing patents. While Pantech has been inactive in the smartphone market, its intellectual property is now being used in court to challenge competitors. For now, only the Pixel 7 series is affected. But with more models potentially under review, Google's position in Japan could face more challenges ahead. We will continue to monitor how this story develops, especially if the dispute expands to other Pixel devices. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
Yahoo
a day ago
- Business
- Yahoo
AbCellera Biologics Secures Patent Validity Affirmation for Microfluidic Cell Culture Technology
AbCellera Biologics Inc. (NASDAQ:ABCL) is one of the best Canadian stocks with huge upside potential. Earlier in May, AbCellera Biologics announced that the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit/CAFC issued a Rule 36 Order, which affirmed the validity of its US Patent No. 10,087,408 ('the '408 Patent'). The patent specifically covers microfluidic devices and their application in culturing and selectively recovering cells. Previously, Bruker Cellular Analysis Inc., which is a subsidiary of Bruker Corporation (NASDAQ:BRKR), had challenged the claims of the '408 Patent. Bruker argued for the patent's invalidity based on allegations of anticipation and obviousness in light of prior art. However, the US Patent Trial and Appeal Board/PTAB rejected all of Bruker's arguments. The CAFC's recent decision further confirms the validity of all claims within AbCellera's '408 Patent. A research team analyzing data on a computer screen, uncovering details about the antibody discovery platform. The 408 Patent is an integral part of ongoing multi-patent infringement litigation between AbCellera and Bruker, which is currently pending in the US District Court for the Northern District of California. AbCellera intends to continue defending its intellectual property portfolio and looks forward to proving its infringement case against Bruker in the District Court. AbCellera Biologics Inc. (NASDAQ:ABCL) discovers and develops antibody-based medicines for indications with unmet medical needs in the US. Bruker Corporation (NASDAQ:BRKR) develops, manufactures, and distributes scientific instruments and analytical and diagnostic solutions. While we acknowledge the potential of ABCL as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
Globe and Mail
2 days ago
- Business
- Globe and Mail
Alpha Modus ($AMOD): The AI Retail Tech Challenger Taking on Rackspace, Cisco – and Winning Investor Confidence
With Major IP Lawsuits, Strategic Partnerships, and a $3M CEO Investment, Alpha Modus Is Emerging as a Powerhouse in AI-Driven Retail Infrastructure Alpha Modus Corp. (Nasdaq: AMOD) is proving it's more than just another AI startup. In a year defined by aggressive patent enforcement, strategic licensing deals, and a bold $3 million personal investment from its CEO, the company is making waves across the tech and retail sectors alike—and investors are beginning to take notice. From landmark lawsuits against giants like Cisco and Rackspace to rapid expansion of its fintech and AI-driven kiosk solutions, Alpha Modus is executing on a clear, aggressive playbook: monetize innovation, expand reach, and maximize shareholder value. The Heart of the Battle: IP Enforcement and Patent Monetization Alpha Modus isn't backing down from industry heavyweights. Its 7th IP enforcement action, filed June 24th against Rackspace (U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas), accuses the company of willful infringement on foundational patents involving Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE) technology—critical for cloud and enterprise data infrastructure. 'We are unlocking value for shareholders by defending what we built—our technology, our vision, and our future,' said AMOD CEO William Alessi. Rackspace now joins a growing list of companies—including Cisco Systems and Broadcom —facing similar claims from AMOD and its patent-holding affiliate, Alpha Modus Ventures. AMOD alleges unauthorized use of its patented data transport technologies, with potential damages expected to be significant. CEO's Bold $3M Personal Investment: 'No Derivatives, No Dilution' Just one day before the Rackspace announcement, CEO William Alessi doubled down on AMOD's future by pledging up to $3 million in personal capital to fund operations through the end of 2025. His move also included a swap of preferred stock for common shares, aligning his long-term interests directly with everyday shareholders. 'We've rejected every third-party derivative offer. This is about building real value—not dilution,' Alessi stated. With a robust pipeline of enterprise contracts and new product rollouts, the company expects to reach positive cash flow by year-end. Strategic Growth: From AI Media to Fintech Kiosks AMOD's aggressive tech commercialization strategy is gaining traction, particularly through strategic partnerships that leverage its proprietary AI and retail media technology: CashX Rollout with Genmega A nationwide reseller deal with ATM/kiosk leader Genmega gives AMOD a powerful distribution channel for its CashX AI-enabled payment terminals. The smart kiosks deliver retail ads, bill pay, mobile top-up, check cashing—and connect back to AMOD's patented retail tech stack. VSBLTY Licensing & Integration Deal A new licensing agreement with VSBLTY Groupe Technologies (OTC: VSBGF), a leader in AI security and analytics, paves the way for a broader strategic alliance. The partnership could see AMOD's IP integrated into Shelf Nine's in-store retail media networks. Settlement with Wakefern/Shelf Nine A recent legal settlement turned into opportunity: AMOD secured a perpetual licensing deal and opened the door to integrate with VSBLTY and Shelf Nine's network—validating AMOD's IP while accelerating its retail footprint. Market Timing: AI in Retail Is Booming With U.S. retail media spend projected to top $60 billion by 2025 and the global self-service kiosk market expected to double by 2030, AMOD is strategically positioned at the intersection of both megatrends. Its combination of patented technology, scalable fintech hardware, and real-time AI-driven analytics positions the company to dominate the in-store retail transformation space —right as retailers double down on data, automation, and personalization. Nasdaq Capital Market Uplisting in Sight With fundamentals strengthening and revenue streams maturing, Alpha Modus has also applied to transfer its listing to the Nasdaq Capital Market, anticipating full compliance with exchange standards. Management continues to stress operational efficiency, avoiding variable-rate financing to protect shareholder value. Bottom Line for Investors Alpha Modus is no longer a hidden gem. Its aggressive IP enforcement, bold executive leadership, and real-world AI solutions in retail are beginning to converge in powerful ways. For investors looking for exposure to AI, fintech, IP monetization, and retail transformation, $AMOD is a small-cap with outsized potential. As 2025 progresses, the company's performance in the courtroom and the marketplace alike may redefine how AI innovators create—and protect—value. For More Information Visit Website: Disclosure listed on the CorporateAds website Media Contact Company Name: Alpha Modus Corp. Contact Person: Investor Relations Email: Send Email Phone: (704) 252-5050 Address: 20311 Chartwell Center Dr Suite 1469 City: Cornelius State: North Carolina Country: United States Website:
Reuters
3 days ago
- Business
- Reuters
Samsung wins interim licence in UK patent fight with ZTE
LONDON, June 25 (Reuters) - Samsung Electronics ( opens new tab on Wednesday won a ruling from London's High Court in its attempt to get an interim licence to use ZTE's ( opens new tab patents, in the English leg of the firms' global licensing dispute over mobile phone patents. English courts have recently permitted parties to pursue short-term patent licences pending trial, including in Amazon's dispute with Nokia and Lenovo's battle with Ericsson, before both ultimately settled. Wednesday's ruling, though, is the first time in England that a court of first instance - the initial court where a case is heard - has made such an interim licence declaration. Disputes over the fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms of a patent licence have frequently led to global legal battles in the telecom industry. English courts can set global FRAND terms, following a landmark 2020 UK Supreme Court ruling, as can courts in China. Samsung sued ZTE in London in December 2024 seeking a determination of FRAND terms, with ZTE bringing parallel lawsuits against Samsung in China, Germany and Brazil. In London, Samsung sought a declaration that a willing licensor in ZTE's position would agree to an interim licence until FRAND terms were decided by the court. Both Samsung and ZTE had made competing offers for an interim licence, with ZTE's licence requiring FRAND terms to be those determined by a court in China. London's High Court ruled in Samsung's favour on Wednesday, with Judge James Mellor saying that "ZTE have acted in bad faith with their wave of unnecessary injunctive proceedings". The judge added that "ZTE's terms are designed to render this action (in London) pointless, so that Samsung effectively has to abandon it" in favour of accepting the outcome of ZTE's lawsuit in Chongqing in southwestern China. Samsung and ZTE did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
