logo
#

Latest news with #payperview

Jake Paul leaves interview with Piers Morgan after heated verbal sparring match
Jake Paul leaves interview with Piers Morgan after heated verbal sparring match

National Post

timea day ago

  • Entertainment
  • National Post

Jake Paul leaves interview with Piers Morgan after heated verbal sparring match

The jury is still out on Jake Paul in the boxing ring, but there's no debating his ability to throw some verbal jabs. Article content The YouTuber-turned-fighter might have met his match, however, when he went toe-to-toe with Piers Morgan while promoting his Saturday bout against Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. Article content Article content Paul abruptly logged off of his interview on Piers Morgan Uncensored after the host began to question the legitimacy of the influencer's opponents. Article content 'YouTube this, YouTube that, Disney that. This s*** is not a joke. I'm knocking out the best of the best. You vs. going to the gym… you're still a fat a**,' Paul said. Article content 'I think the problem here, Piers, is that you think that your opinion matters,' he added. Article content Jake Paul just dipped on Piers Morgan's show after getting cooked 😭 — Happy Punch (@HappyPunch) June 26, 2025 Article content Article content When Morgan questioned why Paul had come on the show, 'The Problem Child' responded that it was merely to gain more viewers for the pay-per-view event. Article content Article content 'I'm just taking your audience to sell pay-per-views. I don't give a f*** about your show,' Paul said. Article content 'You dumb a**. This is a f***ing business enterprise. Buy the pay-per-view on Saturday, June 28 — me vs Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. Thank you, tune in everybody.' Article content 'Cheers, Jake, really enjoyed that,' the host said. 'And good luck to Julio. Knock him out for all of us, will you?' Article content View this post on Instagram A post shared by Jake Paul (@jakepaul)

If Jake Paul is boxing's biggest draw, what does that say about the sport?
If Jake Paul is boxing's biggest draw, what does that say about the sport?

New York Times

time3 days ago

  • Entertainment
  • New York Times

If Jake Paul is boxing's biggest draw, what does that say about the sport?

Jake Paul has another boxing match on Saturday. Thousands will scream they don't care. However, millions more will pay for the privilege to watch. Love it or loathe it, Paul, who first entered the public eye by posting videos on social media of sophomoric pranks, has become the biggest draw in American boxing, and that's been great for him. Advertisement This weekend's pay-per-view bout on DAZN against former world champion Julio César Chávez Jr. in Anaheim, Calif., will be his eighth headline fight since 2021. Paul has reportedly earned more than $60 million in his brief in-ring career. What it says about the state of the sport is not so clear. 'I think Jake Paul is brilliant as a marketer and an influencer,' said Todd duBoef, the president of Top Rank, a boxing promotion company. 'And I think he's done an incredible job. But I don't really believe it has anything to do with boxing.' The numbers don't lie, though. An estimated 108 million viewers caught at least a live glimpse of Paul dancing around a 58-year-old Mike Tyson on Netflix last year in a bout that arrived with maximum hype but quickly devolved into an unsatisfying spectacle. Paul won the fight by unanimous decision. Many observers decried the event's very existence. However, it did little to dim Paul's drawing power. 'I've embraced the hate and done things consistently to push people's buttons, to build that hate even more,' Paul said in a recent interview. It's an old-school formula he's leaned into with new-school annoyance, and Paul is well aware that people will tune in hoping to see him get knocked out. 'In this sport, monetizing that hate can be very lucrative,' he said. 'You look at all the big people — they were all villains, from Floyd (Mayweather) to Mike Tyson to Muhammad Ali. People forget Muhammad Ali was one of the most hated figures in the world. I see myself as a similar story.' That Paul would be brazen enough to mention himself in the same breath as three of boxing's all-time greats is the type of antic that drives many to root against him. Ali, after all, came to prominence during the Civil Rights era, when his unapologetic confidence upended the expectation that Black athletes would be quiet and humble. He unleashed some of the most poetic trash talk the sports world has ever heard, but his anti-war stance cost him his champion belts and years of his boxing prime. Advertisement Paul faces nothing like that kind of pressure. His public career began with prank skits on Vine. He later skirted COVID-19 restrictions in California by throwing large parties and was sued by his neighbors for being a public nuisance. His résumé includes beating a retired NBA player and former MMA fighters years past their prime. It doesn't take a trained eye to know that Paul's talk of eventual world titles is all talk; the imperfection in his 11-1 professional record was a loss to journeyman-turned-reality star Tommy Fury. And yet the 28-year-old Paul believes he would be heralded as the next great American prospect if he weren't a YouTuber with Disney Channel roots. The sport's purists would scoff at that. Boxing's check-engine light may glow brighter with each of his ring walks, but he is undeniably a magnet for attention. 'I don't know why he set his sights on boxing,' said boxing historian and commentator Mark Kriegel, the author of Tyson's biography. 'But it was a pretty smart calculation.' Paul has become the rare promoter who straps on gloves and turns himself into the product. 'I think he might be one of three people in my lifetime who understand the media better than the media understands itself,' Kriegel said. 'The other two being Al Sharpton and Donald Trump. He just has an intuitive sense of what people want.' The greatest promoters have always built hype, provoked engagement and told stories. However, in a crowded media space where sports are competing with TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram, HBO and Hulu for attention, the modern-day promoter needs a breakthrough. Enter boxing, a sport in desperate need of an American disruptor. 'Content is king,' Paul said. 'And I think that's where I come into the picture — telling the stories, using my platform, promoting these events and promoting other fighters.' Advertisement Top Rank's duBoef sees it and calls Paul wonderful for the industry, but he draws a hard line between Paul's spectacle and the sport itself. When duBoef considers the health of boxing, he views it through a global prism. He starts in Japan, where there's a renaissance behind pound-for-pound king Naoya Inoue. In England, he points to Oleksandr Usyk and Daniel Dubois at Wembley Stadium on July 19. In North America, he cites Canelo Álvarez and David Benavidez, who draw massive crowds. The biggest fight in the sport in 2025 is likely to be Álvarez facing Terence Crawford on Sept. 13 in Las Vegas. For duBoef, Paul's fights live in a different bucket. An entertainment adjacent to boxing, in the same way that the PGA Tour shouldn't be concerned about Aaron Rodgers battling Tom Brady in 'The Match.' Paul would have been just as successful playing three-on-three basketball, chess, tennis or pickleball, DuBoef believes. In a moment of humble levity, Paul echoed duBoef, to a point. 'I think there are better boxers,' Paul said, acknowledging the Benavidezes and Inoues of the world. 'But outside of the ring, I'm one of the most important in boxing. Just because of the new eyeballs running to the sport.' The eyeballs Paul is drawing into boxing aren't just for him. He's helping to make names out of others, too, cultivating an ecosystem of potential future stars within his Most Valuable Promotions (MVP) brand, in the same vein as Mayweather Promotions and Golden Boy Promotions. The November rematch between Amanda Serrano, who is signed to a lifetime deal with MVP, and Katie Taylor thrived so mightily on the Paul-Tyson undercard in November that the women will headline their trilogy in Madison Square Garden on their own Netflix card this summer. 'It's too easy to dismiss him as just a provocateur,' Kriegel said. 'Promoters promote. There are too many promoters in this sport who just hang out a shingle and let someone with money pay for their promotion. You wouldn't have seen Serrano-Taylor 2 reach that audience if it weren't for that card.' Advertisement Whether that's inspiring, infuriating, repulsive or innovative, Paul's persisting existence in boxing is certainly not neutral. For those who believe boxing should be about skill, belts, rankings and legacies, Paul is a warning sign. For those who prize entertainment, reach and pop-culture relevance, then Paul is the adrenaline shot the sport needs. Either way, feeling anything is infinitely more valuable than apathy. 'That Gen Z category all got aware of the sport,' duBoef said. Yes, Paul has another boxing match scheduled for this month. Don't tune in for world-class footwork or heady feints. However, don't think ignoring it will make it go away. A man many boxing purists despise just might be essential to the sport's health. 'It seems to me like there's this elaborate dance,' Kriegel said. 'And most of the time he gets what he wants.' (Illustration: Will Tullos / The Athletic. Photo: Sarah Stier / Getty Images)

Confessions of a dodgy box owner: ‘It did give me pause for thought but the savings are incredible'
Confessions of a dodgy box owner: ‘It did give me pause for thought but the savings are incredible'

Irish Times

time21-06-2025

  • Entertainment
  • Irish Times

Confessions of a dodgy box owner: ‘It did give me pause for thought but the savings are incredible'

Anthony Maguire* has had his 'dodgy box' for just over two years. He resisted the temptation for a long time because he believed the quality of the streams would be patchy and the prevalence of pornographic pop-ups off-putting. A friend who sells and installs the boxes eventually convinced him to buy one so he handed over €300 for the hardware and paid an annual subscription of €150 to access pretty much all the content in the world. 'When I first looked at them years ago the quality was crap. I just couldn't watch a match with all the pixellating and lagging so I stuck with Sky Sports,' he says. 'But the bill was just astronomical, something like €160 a month.' His friend gave him a demo and he was sold. 'The quality was unbelievable, just excellent.' READ MORE He also watches pay-per-view boxing, and his kids have access to movies and television programmes from all the big platforms, often while they are still being screened in Irish cinemas. [ Dodgy boxes: Could I get in trouble for owning one after recent court cases? Opens in new window ] And then there is the ease of use and the portability. 'We went on holidays to Portugal last summer and all I had to do was plug the stick out of my TV at home and into the one on holidays and we had access to exactly the same content,' he says. 'I was able to watch the All-Ireland hurling final just like I was at home.' He says his pal 'who makes a few quid off these things in the background of his life' is not overly concerned he will face any sanctions. 'I suppose if he was caught he could just stop doing it but he has been selling them at a low level for 20 years.' Maguire is not oblivious to the moral and ethical questions of streaming content illegally. He is also old enough to remember the anti-piracy messages found on vinyl records in the 1980s when music fans were warned that home taping was killing music. 'I don't think my mixtapes did any harm to the Violent Femmes or Nirvana really,' he says. 'It does or did give me pause for thought and that is why I was so late to it but the savings are just incredible. When you add the sports to the cost of a terrestrial subscription and three or four streaming platforms, you'd be looking at €250 a month compared to the €150 a year that I pay. 'I know there is an ethical dilemma here; there's no doubt about it. But at the same time these corporations are making astronomical sums and this is just a drop in the ocean to them.' When asked if he has concerns about Sky's latest hints that it might come after end users such as him, he simply laughs. 'I wouldn't be losing any sleep over that,' he says. *Not his real name.

‘Game's gone' – Fuming fans just realising how much it costs to watch Nations League despite having Prime Video
‘Game's gone' – Fuming fans just realising how much it costs to watch Nations League despite having Prime Video

The Sun

time04-06-2025

  • Business
  • The Sun

‘Game's gone' – Fuming fans just realising how much it costs to watch Nations League despite having Prime Video

FOOTBALL fans have been left fuming after realising how much they will need to pay to watch the Uefa Nations League. Fans would have hoped to tune in tonight to watch Cristiano Ronaldo's Portugal take on Florian Wirtz's Germany in the first of the Nations League semi-finals tonight. 2 2 However, broadcaster Amazon Prime Video Sport had a nasty surprise for any fan wanting to watch. That is because on top of needing to have an Amazon Prime Video subscription - which costs £95 per year or £8.99 a month - fans are also being forced to pay an extra cost. Amazon announced in March that viewers would be able to watch Nations League games from £2.49, and they could be viewed without a subscription. But coming to the matches this week, fans were left furious to learn the pay-per-view policy was active, even if you already had a subscription to the streaming platform. Taking to social media, one fan said: "Btw that germany game being on Amazon prime pay per view for £2.49 even when you have prime is a f***ing scam." A second said: "Amazon Prime charging £2.49 per game to watch Nations League and WC qualifiers loool we are so so cooked." A third added: "I can watch it on a stream but the fact Amazon Prime is charging £2.49 to watch a Nations League match is absurd." Another said: "£3 pay per view to watch the Nations League on Amazon Prime, a platform you already have to pay for. Games gone," alongside an edited picture of Sean Dyche saying "Utter woke nonsense". A fifth said: "Ridiculous charging £2.49 to watch Nations League football! Especially when I already pay for Amazon Prime." A sixth added: "Sorry why are Amazon charging £2.49 to watch Germany v Portugal in the Nations League when I've got Amazon Prime? What a scam." THIS IS A DEVELOPING STORY..

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store