Latest news with #primarychallenges
Forbes
2 days ago
- Automotive
- Forbes
Musk-Trump Feud Reignites: Trump Responds To Musk's Spending Bill Attacks
The feud between President Donald Trump and his former ally, Elon Musk, was reignited once again on Tuesday after the world's richest person said he'll back primary challenges against GOP lawmakers voting for the president's signature spending bill, prompting Trump to retaliate by threatening to scrap government subsidies for Musk's firms. Tesla CEO Elon Musk speaks alongside U.S. President Donald Trump to reporters in the Oval Office of ... More the White House. Getty Images Musk attacked the spending bill in a series of post on X on Monday night and early Tuesday morning, saying: 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending,' and backed the mega bill 'will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth.' The billionaire then tweeted, 'If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day,' as he bashed what he described as the 'Democrat-Republican uniparty.' Musk later said that anyone who votes for the legislation after campaigning 'on the PROMISE of REDUCING SPENDING' will see their face on a poster of Pinocchio with the caption 'LIAR' followed by the text 'Voted to increase America's Debt by $5,000,000,000,000.' The X owner reshared the results of an unscientific poll he conducted on the platform last month during his public blow-up with the president and wrote 'VOX POPULI VOX DEI 80% voted for a new party.' Earlier on Monday, Musk had attacked the GOP and the spending bill, tweeting: 'It is obvious with the insane spending of this bill, which increases the debt ceiling by a record FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS that we live in a one-party country – the PORKY PIG PARTY!!' In a post on his Truth Social platform, the president responded to Musk's criticism of his signature spending bill by threatening to scrap government subsidies provided to the billionaire's companies. Trump wrote: 'Elon Musk knew, long before he so strongly Endorsed me for President, that I was strongly against the EV Mandate. It is ridiculous, and was always a major part of my campaign.' The president then claimed: 'Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa. No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE.' The president suggested that the Department of Government Efficiency—a brainchild of Musk, who also previously headed the agency—should 'take a good, hard, look' at the subsidies offered to companies like SpaceX and Tesla. Musk shot back on X, by daring Trump to slash the subsidies: 'I am literally saying CUT IT ALL. Now.' Tangent While criticizing the backers of the spending bill, Musk also boosted some of its prominent critics within the GOP, including some who have been the targets of Trump's ire. Musk retweeted a post by Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., who Trump called a 'Third Rate Congressman,' which said: ''BBB' = our credit rating if this bill becomes law.' Musk then vowed to support Massie's reelection bid next year. Musk also reshared posts made by Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., whom Trump threatened to primary before he announced his decision not to seek reelection. Tillis had reshared a Musk post which appeared to criticize the spending bill for targeting solar and battery tech, and wrote: 'Folks, Elon Musk is 100% right, and he understands this issue better than anyone. We should take his warnings seriously.' Musk, who left his role as a Trump administration 'special government employee' late in May, has since attacked the so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill' backed by the president and the House GOP. The billionaire, who had previously described himself as Trump's 'first buddy,' eventually directed his ire directly at the president by sharing older clips of the president bashing Republicans for raising the debt ceiling. The feud then escalated after the president accused Musk of having 'Trump Derangement Syndrome,' a phrase he often uses to target his critics. This began a back and forth social media war between the two, where Trump threatened to scrap Musk's government contracts. The billionaire retorted with a now deleted tweet alleging without evidence that Trump's name was in the 'Epstein Files.' Before this latest blow up both individuals appeared to have reached a detente, with Musk even tweeting that regretted some of his 'posts about President Donald Trump,' which he said 'went too far.' The Musk Vs. Trump Feud Timeline (Forbes) Musk Says He Regrets His Posts Bashing Trump Last Week—'Went Too Far' (Forbes)
Forbes
2 days ago
- Business
- Forbes
Musk-Trump Feud Reignites As Billionaire Attacks Spending Bill Backers
The feud between President Donald Trump and his former ally, Elon Musk, was reignited once again on Tuesday after the world's richest person said he'll back primary challenges against GOP lawmakers voting for the president's signature spending bill, prompting Trump to retaliate by threatening to scrap government subsidies for Musk's firms. Elon Musk looks on during a news conference with US President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the ... More White House in Washington. AFP via Getty Images Musk attacked the spending bill in a series of post on X on Monday night and early Tuesday morning, saying: 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending,' and backed the mega bill 'will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth.' The billionaire then tweeted, 'If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day,' as he bashed what he described as the 'Democrat-Republican uniparty.' Musk later said that anyone who votes for the legislation after campaigning 'on the PROMISE of REDUCING SPENDING' will see their face on a poster of Pinocchio with the caption 'LIAR' followed by the text 'Voted to increase America's Debt by $5,000,000,000,000.' The X owner reshared the results of an unscientific poll he conducted on the platform last month during his public blow-up with the president and wrote 'VOX POPULI VOX DEI 80% voted for a new party.' Earlier on Monday, Musk had attacked the GOP and the spending bill, tweeting: 'It is obvious with the insane spending of this bill, which increases the debt ceiling by a record FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS that we live in a one-party country – the PORKY PIG PARTY!!' This is a developing story.
Fox News
04-06-2025
- Business
- Fox News
Massie calls on Elon Musk to fund primary challenges against Republicans who backed Trump tax bill
Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., said Elon Musk should fund primary challenges against almost every Republican who voted for President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" last week. "I don't primary my colleagues, but I feel pretty good about him doing it," Massie told Fox News Digital on Wednesday. "There's a few others that should be spared," when asked to clarify if he meant all 215 House Republicans who supported the legislation. "But people want term limits, right? Elon can bring term limits." Musk came out against the massive Trump agenda bill that House Republicans passed last week. "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it," Musk first posted. It was followed by several posts on the national debt, and one that read, "In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people." Massie said on Wednesday, "I just think he made one mistake when misstatement – he said take them out in November. I would take them out in primaries if I were Elon Musk." Both House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and the White House have closed ranks around the legislation. Johnson issued a rare forceful response to Musk from the podium of his weekly press conference on Wednesday, calling the billionaire "flat wrong." "Elon and I left on a great note. We were texting one another, you know, happy texts, you know, Monday and then, and then yesterday, you know, 24 hours later, he does a 180, and he comes out and opposed the bill," Johnson told reporters. "And it surprised me, frankly. And, I don't take it personal…I think he's way off on this, and I've told him as much, and, I've said it publicly and privately." The massive budget reconciliation bill is aimed at advancing Trump's priorities on taxes, immigration, energy, defense and the debt limit. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projected it would add $2.4 trillion to the federal deficit over 10 years, but House GOP leaders have dismissed that modeling as inaccurate representations of economic growth. Massie was one of three House Republicans to vote against the bill. Rep. Warren Davidson, R-Ohio, also voted "no," while House Freedom Caucus Chairman Andy Harris, R-Md., voted "present." Massie is also no stranger to clashing with both Trump and Johnson. He has faced primary threats from the former and led an unsuccessful bid to remove the latter from House leadership. Massie has been consistent, however, in his opposition to legislation that would have any chance of adding to the federal debt – now currently nearly $37 trillion. Republican supporters of the bill, however, have contended that it is the best possible vehicle to radically reform government programs plagued with waste, fraud and abuse, and restore much-needed funding to the border, while extending Trump's 2017 tax cuts. However, the legislation is now in the Senate, where Republicans have already signaled they would want to see changes to the final bill. Fox News Digital reached out to the National Republican Congressional Committee for comment on Massie's remarks.
Washington Post
13-05-2025
- Politics
- Washington Post
DNC panel finds Hogg and another official weren't properly elected to leadership
A Democratic National Committee panel found that David Hogg and another vice chair were not properly elected earlier this year, setting off a process that could lead to Hogg's ouster amid backlash to his plans to support primary challengers to House Democrats. The Credentials Committee's recommendation will now get a vote from the full DNC membership. If approved, the two vice chair elections will be invalidated and new elections will be held as soon as practicable. The new elections will be limited to the same five candidates who were eligible at the February vote.
Yahoo
10-05-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
David Hogg tried pitching a compromise to the DNC. He was rebuffed.
David Hogg, the Democratic National Committee official who ignited a firestorm inside the party with his pledge to fund primary challenges to 'asleep-at-the-wheel' Democrats, privately pitched a compromise to the party head in recent days. Speaking with DNC Chair Ken Martin, Hogg proposed a so-called 'internal firewall' in which he would stay on as vice chair but be barred from accessing any internal DNC information about congressional and state legislative races as long as he was supporting challengers, according to three people familiar with their conversations and granted anonymity to describe them. Martin shot down the idea, the people said, expressing confidence that he would win the votes at the DNC to pass a rule requiring party officials to remain neutral in primaries — essentially forcing Hogg to drop his primary project or step down. Jane Kleeb, a Martin ally and another DNC vice chair, said she also spoke with Hogg about his proposed compromise. She called it 'nonsense' and argued 'it is not the DNC's job to create a firewall for one officer — it is the officer's responsibility to create a firewall. The exchange between Hogg and DNC leaders marked a breakdown in efforts to diffuse controversy surrounding his announcement that a group he co-founded, Leaders We Deserve, would spend $20 million in safe-blue Democratic primaries against incumbent House members. Martin has given Hogg an ultimatum, telling reporters that party officers 'can't be both the referee and also the player at the same time.' Martin told POLITICO that 'party bosses should not be involved in putting their thumb on the scale' and said, 'I campaigned on this,' while Hogg, in an interview, stood by his peace offering. He said the DNC 'doesn't really have a role in congressional races, and therefore there shouldn't be an issue or real conflict.' But Hogg is not backing down. Instead, he is mounting a charm offensive. The 25-year-old Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting survivor recently spoke at a fundraiser for state Democrats in Rhode Island. He donated $100,000 to the House Democrats' campaign arm. He is scrambling behind the scenes to win over Democratic activists and operatives, and he is finding some success. Even as Hogg has enraged many establishment-oriented Democrats, he is gaining the support of some others on the left, including state party leaders, labor officials and powerful media voices who view him as tapping into a more aggressive approach in the second Donald Trump era. Hogg has captured the attention of Charlamagne tha God, the influential radio host, who has publicly thrown his weight behind him. He said in an interview that Hogg 'is absolutely right — I don't know why people are acting like he's not,' and that Democrats 'who aren't willing to fight for democracy in the way that it needs to be fought for, they need to be banished.' James Carville, the longtime Democratic strategist who once dubbed Hogg a 'contemptible little twerp,' went from vehemently disagreeing with Hogg to posting on social media that the 'DNC needs him' because 'David Hogg fights.' Hogg said that after appearing on a podcast with Carville, he texted the strategist, saying that he respected the work he has done and would 'love to connect more.' Carville then called him and soon after took his side. Hogg is working to pull more Democrats along with him. Speaking at a fundraiser for the Rhode Island Democratic Party a few weeks ago, Hogg said, 'We need to show the reason to vote for Democrats isn't because we're the less bad of two options. It's because we're the best fucking option,' according to a video shared with POLITICO. Hogg addressed the dispute with the party, saying, 'I know that right now there is a movement to try to remove me from the DNC.' The crowd booed in response, in an apparent show of support for Hogg. His plans to oust some Democratic incumbents — and the uproar he's triggered — have exposed a painful rift among Democrats as they struggle to rebuild their party. And the messy conflict threatens to drag on for months, putting a spotlight on Democrats' internal disagreements over generational change and how aggressively to take on Trump. Martin has described the ultimatum he issued to Hogg, proposing to amend the party's bylaws to bar DNC officers from getting involved in primary campaigns, as part of an overall reform package that is not aimed at the vice chair. But it would effectively force Hogg to decide between leaving his vice chair post or walling himself off from the primaries launched by his group Leaders We Deserve. The overhaul is expected to come up for a vote this summer. Even some of Hogg's allies are skeptical that he'll be able to defeat Martin's proposal. 'Unfortunately, I do think it'll pass,' said Jeanna Repass, chair of the Kansas Democratic Party, who argued that Hogg should be grandfathered in 'because it really looks like we're bullying out a young Dem who's trying to be a change agent.' Kleeb said that as a Bernie Sanders supporter in 2016, she felt that the party influenced that primary — as leaked emails revealed that many DNC officials derided Sanders' bid against Hillary Clinton — arguing 'that is what we are trying to fix.' 'No quote-unquote charm offensive or media appearance of David,' she said, 'will change the fundamental fact of what we are trying to do at the DNC.' Stuart Appelbaum, a DNC associate chair, said that he and every other DNC officer — except Hogg — signed a 'neutrality policy' at a private party retreat in March. As president of the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, he said that 'meant a big change for me' but that 'it is crucial that the Democratic Party' be seen as impartial. But Hogg does not appear to be budging. He said he will refuse to wall himself off from his group's work on primaries, as the neutrality rule — if adopted — would require. 'If that's the rule that they implement, then they're going to have to vote me out if that's what they want,' said Hogg. 'I would prefer that we come to a deal here.' Hogg's group has pledged that it is moving forward with plans to target House Democrats in anywhere from 10 to 50 districts. When he was in Rhode Island for the state party fundraiser last month, Hogg met with progressive legislators and activists to discuss potential primary challenges, according to a person familiar with the conversation. Asked about the meeting, Hogg said Rhode Island is 'not currently' on his group's list of targets. But, he said, 'I can't write any state off at this point, because we're looking at all the districts around the country.'
