logo
#

Latest news with #pro-British

The great Afghan cover-up
The great Afghan cover-up

New Statesman​

time6 days ago

  • Politics
  • New Statesman​

The great Afghan cover-up

British armed forces work with the U.S. military to evacuate eligible civilians and their families out of the country on August 21, 2021 in Kabul, Afghanistan. Photo by MoD Crown Copyright via Getty Images On the great Afghan leak and cover up, where to start? The answer – the only decent answer – is with the principal victims, the volunteer soldiers, translators, support staff and their families who helped British forces during the so-called war on terror, and who did so in the hope of forging a better country but who were then betrayed by a butter-fingered official (still employed) and left in great danger. That their state enemy, the Taliban, did not use the leak of more than 18,714 names – and not just names but telephone numbers, personal details, family members' details – to institute a general slaughter of the up to 100,000 people thought to be affected in total, is fortunate. Although, come to think of it, how would we know if any of our former allies were killed or tortured because of the leak? All this is shrouded still in secrecy, and yet another government injunction. But this week I spoke to one former Afghan interpreter who told me of the recent public murder of the brother of a former pro-British soldier. Even as we lean on the possibility of an effective and assertive state to bring us greater economic growth and equality, we are left slack-jawed and embarrassed at the continuing incompetence of the actual British state as it exists today. From our military blunders to our shrivelled aid programme, British state failure has often been, as it were, foreigner-facing. In this case, at least the government tried to remedy things by bringing some 24,000 Afghans affected by the data breach to this country, either already or soon. The total cost, over time, could be up to £7 billion. At which point, however, the British state starts to remember the British voter, and panics. We can well believe that the original ordinary, non-super injunction, was a reasonable short-term precautionary step while the numbers of those in danger were established and swift measures were taken to get them out of harm's way. But what followed was, let's be clear, a cover-up. The true story was hidden from Parliament, journalists and the public, quite deliberately and for years. Why? Again, some of the hesitation must have been because of worry that release of the facts would put more people in even more danger. Only once the Rimmer inquiry decided that wasn't true did John Healey, the Defence Secretary, act. One of the few politicians left in public life who can command respect across the Commons, he sounded convincing about the difficulty of that decision. But much of this, particularly before the election last year, was about backside-covering. MPs are well aware that more migration is not popular, and that Afghans, despite all the heroism of some of them, are not a particularly popular group. In the first ten months of last year, foreign nationals were twice as likely to be arrested for crimes, and Afghans were among the top five nationalities for arrest rates. They were also among the most highly represented groups convicted for sexual offences. So the Tory cabinet knew a new scheme for Afghans, coming at great cost, would not be popular in an election year; particularly if it was the result of a government blunder. The new scheme, therefore, became a state secret. This was disgraceful. Ministers hate ruling things out because they don't know what's going to happen in the future. But the armed forces minister Luke Pollard came close to telling me this week he would never support another super-injunction of this kind. Indeed. Keir Starmer, now on his second career, should resolve to keep away from secret courts. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe And there is a far bigger lesson. Our most recent military adventures have brought only grief. The Falklands War was no model for anything. The Iraq War removed a bloodthirsty dictator but it brought civil war and devastation in its wake, plus waves of migration, and the arrival for a time of Isis, a genuinely Islamo-fascist regime which by the end of 2015 ruled an area in which some 12 million people lived. In all those ways, intervention failed. The war in Afghanistan also failed. It failed to dislodge the Taliban. What did not kill them made them stronger. It failed the women and girls of Afghanistan dreaming of a decent education. It failed to make the Middle East safer and it humiliated both the United States and Britain at a time when our enemies, not least in Russia, were closely watching. This probably contributed to the subsequent Russian invasion of Ukraine. So as Labour ministers contemplate this latest inherited state humiliation, can they please resolve to stop foreign wars – unless they are absolutely sure there is no alternative and that it is, existentially, in our national interest? For our modern experience, rammed home this week, is that warfare fails. [See also: The Tories are responsible for the Afghan resettlement fiasco] Related

Refugee effigy bonfire sparks outrage in Northern Ireland
Refugee effigy bonfire sparks outrage in Northern Ireland

The Sun

time11-07-2025

  • Politics
  • The Sun

Refugee effigy bonfire sparks outrage in Northern Ireland

MOYGASHEL (Northern Ireland): A model of refugees in a boat, placed on a bonfire in a pro-British town near Belfast, was set alight on Thursday night, weeks after migrants' homes were attacked nearby. The display prompted condemnations by politicians across Northern Ireland's political divides, and police said they were investigating it as a hate incident. Bonfires are lit across the British region in mainly Protestant 'loyalist' neighbourhoods on the eve of the July 12 commemorations of William of Orange's victory over the Roman Catholic King James at the Battle of the Boyne in 1690. Effigies of eight immigrants in life jackets were placed in a model boat alongside an Irish flag on top of the bonfire in the town of Moygashel, 65 km (40 miles) west of Belfast. Banners below the boat read 'Stop the Boats' and 'Veterans before Refugees.' A large crowd gathered, many filming on their phones, as the more than 50-wooden-pallet-tall bonfire was set alight at nightfall on Thursday. A pipe band played music and fireworks were lit beforehand. A member of the regional assembly for Irish nationalists Sinn Féin, Colm Gildernew, called the display 'deplorable' and a 'clear incitement to hatred'. Ulster Unionist Party leader Mike Nesbitt had joined Gildernew and others in calling for the effigies to be removed before the bonfire was lit and said he condemned them 'without reservation'. 'This image is sickening, deplorable and entirely out of step with what is supposed to be a cultural celebration,' Nesbitt, who is the region's health minister, wrote on X. Bonfires and parades to mark July 12 have often prompted violence, even after a 1998 peace deal largely ended three decades of sectarian conflict in Northern Ireland. In June, masked rioters attacked police and set homes and cars on fire in Ballymena, 65 km northeast of Moygashel. - Reuters

Effigies of refugees set alight on bonfire condemned in Northern Ireland
Effigies of refugees set alight on bonfire condemned in Northern Ireland

Mint

time11-07-2025

  • Politics
  • Mint

Effigies of refugees set alight on bonfire condemned in Northern Ireland

MOYGASHEL, Northern Ireland (Reuters) -A model of refugees in a boat, placed on a bonfire in a pro-British town near Belfast, was set alight on Thursday night, weeks after migrants' homes were attacked nearby. The display prompted condemnations by politicians across Northern Ireland's political divides, and police said they were investigating it as a hate incident. Bonfires are lit across the British region in mainly Protestant "loyalist" neighbourhoods on the eve of the July 12 commemorations of William of Orange's victory over the Roman Catholic King James at the Battle of the Boyne in 1690. Effigies of eight immigrants in life jackets were placed in a model boat alongside an Irish flag on top of the bonfire in the town of Moygashel, 65 km (40 miles) west of Belfast. Banners below the boat read "Stop the Boats" and "Veterans before Refugees." A large crowd gathered, many filming on their phones, as the more than 50-wooden-pallet-tall bonfire was set alight at nightfall on Thursday. A pipe band played music and fireworks were lit beforehand. A member of the regional assembly for Irish nationalists Sinn Féin, Colm Gildernew, called the display "deplorable" and a "clear incitement to hatred". Ulster Unionist Party leader Mike Nesbitt had joined Gildernew and others in calling for the effigies to be removed before the bonfire was lit and said he condemned them 'without reservation". 'This image is sickening, deplorable and entirely out of step with what is supposed to be a cultural celebration,' Nesbitt, who is the region's health minister, wrote on X. Bonfires and parades to mark July 12 have often prompted violence, even after a 1998 peace deal largely ended three decades of sectarian conflict in Northern Ireland. In June, masked rioters attacked police and set homes and cars on fire in Ballymena, 65 km northeast of Moygashel. (Reporting by Clodagh Kiloyne and Amanda Ferguson; Editing by Conor Humphries, Andrew Heavens and Sonali Paul)

Effigies of refugees set alight on bonfire condemned in Northern Ireland, World News
Effigies of refugees set alight on bonfire condemned in Northern Ireland, World News

AsiaOne

time11-07-2025

  • Politics
  • AsiaOne

Effigies of refugees set alight on bonfire condemned in Northern Ireland, World News

MOYGASHEL, Northern Ireland — A model of refugees in a boat, placed on a bonfire in a pro-British town near Belfast, was set alight on Thursday (July 10) night, weeks after migrants' homes were attacked nearby. The display prompted condemnations by politicians across Northern Ireland's political divides, and police said they were investigating it as a hate incident. Bonfires are lit across the British region in mainly Protestant "loyalist" neighbourhoods on the eve of the July 12 commemorations of William of Orange's victory over the Roman Catholic King James at the Battle of the Boyne in 1690. Effigies of eight immigrants in life jackets were placed in a model boat alongside an Irish flag on top of the bonfire in the town of Moygashel, 65 km west of Belfast. Banners below the boat read "Stop the Boats" and "Veterans before Refugees". A large crowd gathered, many filming on their phones, as the more than 50-wooden-pallet-tall bonfire was set alight at nightfall on Thursday. A pipe band played music and fireworks were lit beforehand. A member of the regional assembly for Irish nationalists Sinn Fein, Colm Gildernew, called the display "deplorable" and a "clear incitement to hatred". Ulster Unionist Party leader Mike Nesbitt had joined Gildernew and others in calling for the effigies to be removed before the bonfire was lit and said he condemned them "without reservation". "This image is sickening, deplorable and entirely out of step with what is supposed to be a cultural celebration," Nesbitt, who is the region's health minister, wrote on X. Bonfires and parades to mark July 12 have often prompted violence, even after a 1998 peace deal largely ended three decades of sectarian conflict in Northern Ireland. In June, masked rioters attacked police and set homes and cars on fire in Ballymena, 65 km northeast of Moygashel. [[nid:718996]]

Effigies of refugees set alight on bonfire condemned in Northern Ireland
Effigies of refugees set alight on bonfire condemned in Northern Ireland

Straits Times

time11-07-2025

  • Politics
  • Straits Times

Effigies of refugees set alight on bonfire condemned in Northern Ireland

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox A drone view shows a loyalist bonfire pyre is seen with a model effigy of a boat containing mannequins portrayed as migrants in lifejackets with a sign reading \"stop the boats\", ahead of the pyre being lit as part of the annual loyalist bonfire events marking the 1690 Battle of the Boyne, in Moygashel, Northern Ireland, July 10, 2025. REUTERS/Clodagh Kilcoyne MOYGASHEL, Northern Ireland - A model of refugees in a boat, placed on a bonfire in a pro-British town near Belfast, was set alight on Thursday night, weeks after migrants' homes were attacked nearby. The display prompted condemnations by politicians across Northern Ireland's political divides, and police said they were investigating it as a hate incident. Bonfires are lit across the British region in mainly Protestant "loyalist" neighbourhoods on the eve of the July 12 commemorations of William of Orange's victory over the Roman Catholic King James at the Battle of the Boyne in 1690. Effigies of eight immigrants in life jackets were placed in a model boat alongside an Irish flag on top of the bonfire in the town of Moygashel, 65 km (40 miles) west of Belfast. Banners below the boat read "Stop the Boats" and "Veterans before Refugees." A large crowd gathered, many filming on their phones, as the more than 50-wooden-pallet-tall bonfire was set alight at nightfall on Thursday. A pipe band played music and fireworks were lit beforehand. A member of the regional assembly for Irish nationalists Sinn Féin, Colm Gildernew, called the display "deplorable" and a "clear incitement to hatred". Ulster Unionist Party leader Mike Nesbitt had joined Gildernew and others in calling for the effigies to be removed before the bonfire was lit and said he condemned them 'without reservation". Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore S'pore boosts nuclear viability, safety research with new institute and $66m in additional funding Singapore More than 14,300 people checked during 7-week-long anti-crime ops Singapore Over 12,000 lower-income households to receive $60 in transport vouchers by end-July Singapore NDP 2025: Leopard tank transmission fault identified, vehicle to resume role in mobile column Life Anti-smoking advisory in new plaque for controversial samsui woman mural World Trump nominates 'alpha male' influencer to be ambassador to Malaysia Business CEO salaries: At Singapore's top companies, whose pay went up and whose saw a drop? Business Popiah king Sam Goi makes $123.5 million offer to buy rest of PSC 'This image is sickening, deplorable and entirely out of step with what is supposed to be a cultural celebration,' Nesbitt, who is the region's health minister, wrote on X. Bonfires and parades to mark July 12 have often prompted violence, even after a 1998 peace deal largely ended three decades of sectarian conflict in Northern Ireland. In June, masked rioters attacked police and set homes and cars on fire in Ballymena, 65 km northeast of Moygashel. REUTERS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store