logo
#

Latest news with #publicconfidence

Build confidence in MyDigital ID, don't make registration mandatory, govt told
Build confidence in MyDigital ID, don't make registration mandatory, govt told

Free Malaysia Today

time4 days ago

  • Politics
  • Free Malaysia Today

Build confidence in MyDigital ID, don't make registration mandatory, govt told

On Monday, the Dewan Rakyat heard that the government was considering introducing legislation to boost the MyDigital ID system uptake. PETALING JAYA : The government should focus on building public confidence in its MyDigital ID initiative instead of making registration mandatory, says DAP's Charles Santiago. Santiago said the low uptake, which has prompted calls for legislation to help boost registrations, showed the government had yet to win public support for the endeavour. It also suggests that the government was not doing enough to promote the initiative, he added. 'It means you haven't done your outreach, you haven't done your stakeholder consultation, you haven't gone out and sold the idea. Charles Santiago. 'If the government is planning to legislate just because people are not voluntarily doing it, then it shows the problem is with the government,' the former Klang MP told FMT. Santiago also warned the government against taking a 'shortcut' via enacting laws to resolve issues, particularly as it may involve sensitive matters such as the right to privacy, access to information, and financial data. 'The government should inspire confidence in its policies and also in the apps that it is using. We should not lose sight of that,' he said. He went on to suggest that the government engage stakeholders and 'get people talking about it to hype it up'. On Monday, the Dewan Rakyat was told that the government was considering introducing legislation to regulate and boost the MyDigital ID system. Federal territories minister Dr Zaliha Mustafa said the current voluntary registration model was an impediment that the government was looking to address. 'Right now, the government is looking at the possibility of formulating an Act for MyDigital ID, to potentially make it mandatory for people to sign up,' she said in response to a supplementary question from Beluran MP Ronald Kiandee, who had raised concerns about public confidence in the initiative. Separately, former Malaysian Bar president Salim Bashir said while MyDigital ID could facilitate access to government services and reduce online fraud, it was not a foolproof system. 'The significant challenge to implement it mandatorily in Malaysia is the issue of breach of data privacy and security,' he said when contacted. However, Salim said, any legislation to make registration compulsory must be enacted by Parliament through a Federal Act and aligned with the Personal Data Protection Act, 2010. 'The widespread concerns are privacy issues, cybersecurity and government surveillance. A data breach could lead to unauthorised access and misuse of personal information. Any perceived weaknesses will erode public confidence and trust.' Salim reminded the government that not everyone owns a smartphone or has access to a computer. 'Poor internet infrastructure in rural areas will further exacerbate the problems.' He warned that rushing into mandatory registration without proper studies, test runs and coordination between ministries could lead to 'mishaps and adversity to the general public'.

Schiff, Democrats demand rationale on Bondi firing of ethics attorney
Schiff, Democrats demand rationale on Bondi firing of ethics attorney

Yahoo

time20-07-2025

  • Politics
  • Yahoo

Schiff, Democrats demand rationale on Bondi firing of ethics attorney

Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) asked Attorney General Pam Bondi for her rationale in firing the Justice Department's top ethics attorney, asking for details on who will provide ethics guidance to the department. Bondi fired Joseph Tirrell, director of the Departmental Ethics Office, on Friday after more than 20 years at the Justice Department and the FBI. The firing of Tirrell marks the removal of one of the last remaining career ethics leaders in the department. 'This latest dismissal of a career ethics official continues the Department's systematic dismantling of its internal ethics safeguards under your watch, which further undermines public confidence and congressional trust in the Department and its senior leadership,' Schiff wrote in a letter joined by Democratic Sens. Richard Blumenthal (Conn.), Mazie Hirono (Hawaii), Alex Padilla (Calif.) and Peter Welch (Vt.). Ethical matters are of top concern to Democrats given Bondi and other top Justice Department officials' background serving as part of President Trump's private legal team. Schiff noted that in confirmation hearings, Bondi and other top officials said they would rely on career ethics officials for guidance on matters where they may have a conflict of interest. 'You also stated in your own written responses to the Committee that you would 'consult with the appropriate officials at the Department of Justice, including career ethics officials, regarding any matters that raise conflict of interest concerns prior to making any decisions,' the lawmakers wrote. 'However, your removal of remaining career ethics officials renders these commitments meaningless and leaves the Department without the institutional expertise necessary to provide rigorous, impartial ethical guidance.' Shortly after Trump took office, Brad Weinsheimer, another top ethics official, resigned after he was reassigned to a new working group focused on cracking down on sanctuary cities. Jeffrey Ragsdale, the head of the Office of Professional Responsibility, which reviews the conduct of attorneys in the department, was fired in March. 'The dismissal of a career official who has dedicated his professional career to public service without explanation sends a chilling message to the entire federal workforce about the value this administration places on institutional knowledge and ethics expertise,' Schiff wrote. 'You subsequently transferred these responsibilities, traditionally assigned to senior career DOJ officials, to inexperienced political appointees.' DOJ did not respond to request for comment. In a post on LinkedIn titled 'Fired from DOJ without cause,' Tirrell attached his termination notice signed by Bondi, which like others fired, cites only the article of the Constitution establishing the presidency as the authority for doing so. The letter to Bondi asks for the 'specific legal justification' for firing Tirrell, who will now have responsibility for providing ethics guidance, and how she 'reconcile[s]' her pledge to seek outside ethics advice with the firing of Tirrell and others in similar roles. 'The American people deserve confidence that ethics determinations are made by experienced career officials based on established precedent and legal principles, not by politically-motivated appointees who lack the necessary expertise or independence,' the lawmakers wrote. 'The removals of Mr. Tirrell and other career ethics DOJ officials create a dangerous vacuum in ethics expertise at a time when the Department and its officials face unprecedented ethical challenges.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Rafizi: AGC statement confirms concerns over judicial appointments, calls for royal commission
Rafizi: AGC statement confirms concerns over judicial appointments, calls for royal commission

Malay Mail

time08-07-2025

  • Politics
  • Malay Mail

Rafizi: AGC statement confirms concerns over judicial appointments, calls for royal commission

KUALA LUMPUR, July 8 — Economy Minister Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli today said the Attorney General's Chambers (AGC) has inadvertently confirmed key concerns raised by nine PKR MPs regarding recent judicial appointments, adding that the matter now warrants a Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI). In a statement, Rafizi said the AGC's response to a press conference by the PKR lawmakers yesterday appeared to validate claims of procedural lapses and unresolved allegations involving a Federal Court judge. 'The AGC's own statement confirms three things: that there were delays in appointments, that some Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) nominees were not acted upon, and that a JAC meeting was convened without the required 10-day notice,' he said. He added that the AGC also acknowledged that a meeting of the JAC had discussed allegations that a Federal Court judge had tried to influence case decisions and reassign judges. 'While the AGC believes these issues are not serious enough to plunge the judiciary into crisis, that's exactly what we're trying to prevent,' Rafizi said. 'This isn't about legality alone — it's about public confidence in the judiciary's independence.' The Pandan MP argued that while the prime minister holds constitutional authority over judicial appointments, delays in filling vacancies from the High Court to the Federal Court have fuelled speculation that the executive may be trying to influence the process. 'If the AGC itself says the JAC meeting discussed claims of interference, how can it also dismiss those claims as premature or speculative?' Rafizi said. He urged the government to take the lead in resolving the matter decisively, especially as criticisms mount from the opposition. 'We're not doing this to embarrass the government,' he said. 'We're trying to protect it — and the integrity of our judiciary.' Rafizi said only a Royal Commission of Inquiry could independently determine whether the allegations were credible, and whether judicial independence had been compromised. He added that the government should seriously consider the proposal to avoid further erosion of public trust and unnecessary political attacks. 'Judicial integrity isn't just about following procedures. It must be seen, felt and believed by the people,' he said.

Cases against Jersey Police staff lowest in a decade
Cases against Jersey Police staff lowest in a decade

BBC News

time27-06-2025

  • BBC News

Cases against Jersey Police staff lowest in a decade

The number of cases made against Jersey police officers has dropped to its lowest in a decade, according to the island's police Jersey Police Complaints Authority (JPCA) said there were nine new cases in 2024 compared with 12 the previous year and the highest in the past decade of 35 in 2014.A "complaint" is an individual allegation raised by a member of the public, compared with a "case", which is when a complaint is escalated and then comes under the supervision of the JPCA said in its annual report there were 56 complaints registered in 2024, with 44% resolved informally. This compared with 59 in 2023, 64 in 2022, 55 in 2021 and 80 in complaints in 2024 were from people who thought they had been harassed or threatened by police staff, with one complaint reporting serious injury, said the authority. No complaints were related to honorary police officers. JPCA chairman Chris Stephenson, who was appointed to the role in 2024, said the report aimed to instil belief in the system."Our primary function is to secure public confidence in policing and the complaints procedure by ensuring the police are accountable for their actions and lessons are learnt," he Stephenson said the authority would be transitioning into the Jersey Police Complaints Commission later this said the change would allow it to make recommendations and request information from the police force.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store