Latest news with #reciprocity
BBC News
08-07-2025
- Politics
- BBC News
New US visa policy go give Nigerians single entry visa for just three months
United States Department of State don announce new update to dia reciprocal non-immigrant visa policy, wey go affect many kontris including Nigeria. Di new change to di US Visa Reciprocity Policy for Nigeria, wey go begin wit immediate effect, go affect non-immigrant and non-diplomatic visas. From now, any Nigeria citizen wey wan apply for visa go only get single entry wey go last for just three months. Inside statement wey di US Embassy and Consulate in Nigeria post for dia website on Tuesday, dem say all non-immigrant visas wey dem bin issue before 8 July 2025 go retain dia status and validity. Di move na based on US reciprocity principle to match evri visa terms wey kontris set for dia kontri pipo wen dem apply for visa. Di embassy say visa reciprocity na di standard for di world, and na continuous process and diafore dis decision dey subject to review and change anytime. As part of visa reciprocity policy, kontris fit to increase or reduce permitted entries and duration of validity. We dey update dis tori...
Yahoo
08-07-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Latest Tariff Pause Shows Limits of Trump's Frenzied Dealmaking
(Bloomberg) — On 'Liberation Day' on April 2, Donald Trump gushed about how trade was finally going to tilt in America's favor after decades of its workers and companies being 'plundered.' For the president, unfettered tariffs would soon make the US 'an entirely different country.' Are Tourists Ruining Europe? How Locals Are Pushing Back Denver City Hall Takes a Page From NASA In California, Pro-Housing 'Abundance' Fans Rewrite an Environmental Landmark Can Mamdani Bring Free Buses to New York City? Spelling out his policy of so-called reciprocity with trading partners, he said, 'that means they do it to us and we do it to them, very simple, can't get any simpler than that.' Three months later, the transformation is proving harder and slower to execute than advertised. As Wednesday's tariff deadline approached with less than a handful of agreements — or mere frameworks of them — ready to announce, the Trump administration is effectively conceding that its self-imposed deadline was too optimistic for a full teardown and rebuilding of the old architecture of the US-led global trading system. This week's move to postpone the imposition of all the April 2 duties until Aug. 1 is partly an effort to shake loose the best, final offers from economies Trump deems are still willing to deal. 'This very much reads like the final squeeze,' said Kelly Ann Shaw, a partner at Akin Gump and former senior Trump trade adviser. But it's also an admission of a more practical reality: that the US negotiating team appeared stretched too thin to score the windfall of trade concessions Trump expected would come at the end of the 90-day tariff reprieve. In Asia and Europe on Tuesday, equity market moves were muted amid Trump's apparent willingness to keep negotiations going during the new extension period. US stock futures gained as initial jitters over his flurry of tariff warning letters gave way to optimism about the direction of existing talks. Deals with India, the European Union and Taiwan were nearly completed at the start of this week, according to people familiar with the matter, though anything amounting to a major breakthrough would be difficult to announce by Wednesday. 'The end game of any trade negotiation is messy and in this case the administration is negotiating with every country on earth at the same time,' said Shaw, who still expects agreements to be reached over the next three weeks. 'I think many of these rates will come down as more deals close out.' The 90-day clock was questioned by some of Trump's trade advisers as arbitrary and unrealistic from the outset. A stock market meltdown and a maneuver by most members of his economic team — over the objection of globalization critic Peter Navarro — helped convince him in the week after April 2 that a temporary pause would force countries to the table. And Trump, who famously likes round numbers, was once again persuaded that he should allow ongoing trade talks a bit more time to get them over the finish line. On Monday, he declined to say the new deadline was inflexible. 'I would say firm but not 100% firm,' Trump said when asked if his Aug. 1 deadline was the last chance for countries to avoid the higher duties. 'If they call up and say we'd like to do something a different way, we're going to be open to that.' The risk for the White House is that backpedaling and delays will erode Trump's aura of speed and decisiveness. Trump has confidently announced a number of times that he was imposing — and later temporarily pausing or lowering — duties on countries like Mexico, Canada, China, and the EU. He has publicly bristled at how Wall Street questions his nerve with the TACO trade — from the acronym for Trump Always Chickens Out. For countries facing his tariff hammer, though, some including the UK are choosing a level of certainty that comes with a partial deal, which outweighs the uncertainty of no agreement at all. So far they're also refraining from retaliating against the US. Meanwhile, the policy push-and-pull makes US importers worried about the burden on households. 'While there's a reprieve for a number of weeks, we're going to continue to see high duties and that will drive up prices for our consumers,' Matt Priest, president and CEO with the Footwear Distributors and Retailers of America, said in a Bloomberg TV interview. 'We need to understand the full bingo card before we can get back to making sourcing decisions that are critical to our businesses.' The opportunities for more policy twists are piling up, and the stakes are only getting higher. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on Monday sought to defend the tariff letter policy and said countries should not read the extra time as a lack of commitment to impose them. 'They will take the letters seriously because they have taken the president seriously, and that's why the president's phone, I can tell you, rings off the hook from world leaders all the time who are begging him to come to a deal,' she said on Monday. 'And this administration is working hard to ensure those deals are in the best interest of the American people.' QuickTake: A Guide to Trade Talks, Trump-Style Administration officials insist the effective date for the new rates will be Aug. 1 but for that to happen, Customs and Border Protection would need to start reprogramming computers accordingly — and a week or more prior to that date. Trump also faces a mid-August deadline with Beijing where tariffs on Chinese goods could snap back to 145%. A framework hailed by his Trade Representative Jamieson Greer as great for America quickly turned into a source of frustration, as China used its leverage on rare earths to dictate the terms of the tariff truce. 'The process will continue because Trump likes it,' said Derek Scissors, a China expert at the American Enterprise Institute. 'He likes to bluster, likes the attention, and he's going to get enough wins against smaller partners to make it seem worthwhile.' Such an approach doesn't work on China, he said. 'We can kick the trade can down the road and get more and more minor deals with small countries who will throw the US a bone in order to avoid trouble,' Scissors said. 'But the Chinese won't.' Will Trade War Make South India the Next Manufacturing Hub? 'Telecom Is the New Tequila': Behind the Celebrity Wireless Boom SNAP Cuts in Big Tax Bill Will Hit a Lot of Trump Voters Too For Brazil's Criminals, Coffee Beans Are the Target Pistachios Are Everywhere Right Now, Not Just in Dubai Chocolate ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Bloomberg
08-07-2025
- Business
- Bloomberg
Latest Tariff Pause Shows Limits of Trump's Frenzied Dealmaking
On 'Liberation Day' on April 2, Donald Trump gushed about how trade was finally going to tilt in America's favor after decades of its workers and companies being 'plundered.' For the president, unfettered tariffs would soon make the US 'an entirely different country.' Spelling out his policy of so-called reciprocity with trading partners, he said, 'that means they do it to us and we do it to them, very simple, can't get any simpler than that.'
Washington Post
27-06-2025
- Lifestyle
- Washington Post
Carolyn Hax: ‘Tight budget' takes on new meaning with friend's facelift
Dear Carolyn: I have a friend who claims she can't do activities because she works in a middle-income profession and is on a tight budget. We are both in our 50s, are in the same profession and make about the same. When she gets asked out to do simple activities, she says she can't afford it and asks that other people pay for her. When I treat her to dinner or an activity, she never reciprocates and doesn't even tip vendors. She accepts gifts of money, plane tickets, sporting gear, clothes, etc., from interested suitors. When she travels to meet family, they have to pay all her expenses.
Wall Street Journal
09-06-2025
- Politics
- Wall Street Journal
Protectionists Misread U.S. History on Trade
In his op-ed 'Where the Trade Court's Tariff Decision Went Wrong' (June 2), George E. Bodgen uses the technique of misrepresenting the words of respected historical figures to support his protectionist views. It's true, for instance, that Cordell Hull advocated reciprocal trade agreements as a means of reducing tariffs. But when he praised reciprocity for reducing 'excessive economic barriers to trade,' he didn't, contrary to Mr. Bogden's claim, refer to 'unfair trade practices targeting the U.S.' An internationalist, Hull hoped that U.S.-led efforts to reduce tariffs worldwide would promote peace. He understood that, for political reasons, governments will cut tariffs only in exchange for cuts by other governments. Moreover, the trade negotiations that Hull envisioned were from existing tariff rates. He would have been appalled by the U.S. suddenly jacking up rates and then bullying other countries into negotiating them back down.
