logo
#

Latest news with #shieldlaw

New York county clerk rejects Texas's effort to fine doctor in abortion pill case
New York county clerk rejects Texas's effort to fine doctor in abortion pill case

The Guardian

timea day ago

  • Politics
  • The Guardian

New York county clerk rejects Texas's effort to fine doctor in abortion pill case

A New York county clerk again rejected an effort by Texas to fine a New York-based doctor accused of shipping abortion pills across state lines, in a case that could tee up a US supreme court showdown between states that protect abortion access and those that ban it. On Monday, acting Ulster county clerk Taylor Bruck rejected a court filing by Texas attorney general Ken Paxton, which sought to collect a $113,000 penalty against Dr Margaret Carpenter. Paxton had sued Carpenter in December 2024 over allegations she shipped abortion pills to a Texas woman in defiance of the state's ban on virtually all abortions. When Carpenter didn't show up to a court hearing earlier this year, a judge automatically ruled against her and ordered her to pay the fine as well as stop mailing pills to Texas. However, New York is one of a handful of blue states that has enacted a 'shield law', which blocks state officials from extraditing abortion providers to other states or complying with out-of-state court orders. In his initial refusal to levy the fine, issued in March, Bruck cited the shield law. 'The rejection stands. Resubmitting the same materials does not alter the outcome,' Bruck said in his response to Paxton on Monday. 'While I'm not entirely sure how things work in Texas, here in New York, a rejection means the matter is closed.' As a signoff, Bruck added New York state's motto: 'Excelsior.' The word means 'ever upward' in Latin. Paxton's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. After the first rejection, Paxton said in a statement that he was 'outraged'. 'New York is shredding the constitution to hide lawbreakers from justice, and it must end,' he continued. 'I will not stop my efforts to enforce Texas's pro-life laws that protect our unborn children and mothers.' Shield laws like New York's, which sprang up in the years since the US supreme court overturned Roe v Wade, have never been tested in court. However, anti-abortion activists are trying to change that, as they have grown increasingly frustrated by the accessibility of abortion through out-of-state travel and the availability of abortions pills through telehealth. Despite the wave of state-level abortion bans unleashed by the fall of Roe, the number of abortions performed in the US is still on the rise, in large part thanks to providers' ability to facilitate the procedure through shield laws. In December 2024, shield law providers facilitated almost 14,000 abortions in states that ban almost all abortions or that restrict telehealth abortions, according to #WeCount, a research project by the Society of Family Planning. Experts widely expect that the Texas case, or another similar case involving shield laws, will ultimately be decided by the supreme court.

New York county clerk rejects Texas's effort to fine doctor in abortion pill case
New York county clerk rejects Texas's effort to fine doctor in abortion pill case

The Guardian

time2 days ago

  • Politics
  • The Guardian

New York county clerk rejects Texas's effort to fine doctor in abortion pill case

A New York county clerk again rejected an effort by Texas to fine a New York-based doctor accused of shipping abortion pills across state lines, in a case that could tee up a US supreme court showdown between states that protect abortion access and those that ban it. On Monday, acting Ulster county clerk Taylor Bruck rejected a court filing by Texas attorney general Ken Paxton, which sought to collect a $113,000 penalty against Dr Margaret Carpenter. Paxton had sued Carpenter in December 2024 over allegations she shipped abortion pills to a Texas woman in defiance of the state's ban on virtually all abortions. When Carpenter didn't show up to a court hearing earlier this year, a judge automatically ruled against her and ordered her to pay the fine as well as stop mailing pills to Texas. However, New York is one of a handful of blue states that has enacted a 'shield law', which blocks state officials from extraditing abortion providers to other states or complying with out-of-state court orders. In his initial refusal to levy the fine, issued in March, Bruck cited the shield law. 'The rejection stands. Resubmitting the same materials does not alter the outcome,' Bruck said in his response to Paxton on Monday. 'While I'm not entirely sure how things work in Texas, here in New York, a rejection means the matter is closed.' As a signoff, Bruck added New York state's motto: 'Excelsior.' The word means 'ever upward' in Latin. Paxton's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. After the first rejection, Paxton said in a statement that he was 'outraged'. 'New York is shredding the constitution to hide lawbreakers from justice, and it must end,' he continued. 'I will not stop my efforts to enforce Texas's pro-life laws that protect our unborn children and mothers.' Shield laws like New York's, which sprang up in the years since the US supreme court overturned Roe v Wade, have never been tested in court. However, anti-abortion activists are trying to change that, as they have grown increasingly frustrated by the accessibility of abortion through out-of-state travel and the availability of abortions pills through telehealth. Despite the wave of state-level abortion bans unleashed by the fall of Roe, the number of abortions performed in the US is still on the rise, in large part thanks to providers' ability to facilitate the procedure through shield laws. In December 2024, shield law providers facilitated almost 14,000 abortions in states that ban almost all abortions or that restrict telehealth abortions, according to #WeCount, a research project by the Society of Family Planning. Experts widely expect that the Texas case, or another similar case involving shield laws, will ultimately be decided by the supreme court.

New York official again rebuffs Texas judgment against doctor over abortion pills
New York official again rebuffs Texas judgment against doctor over abortion pills

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Health
  • Yahoo

New York official again rebuffs Texas judgment against doctor over abortion pills

By Daniel Wiessner (Reuters) -A county official in New York on Monday rejected for a second time efforts by Texas to enforce a $100,000 judgment against a New York doctor accused of violating Texas' ban on abortion by sending abortion pills to the state, further escalating an unprecedented interstate conflict. Acting Ulster County Clerk Taylor Bruck in a letter to the office of Republican Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton doubled down on his March finding that New York's so-called shield law precludes the enforcement of other states' abortion bans against New Yorkers. Paxton's office last week had asked Bruck to reconsider, arguing that he had a legal duty to enforce the judgment against New Paltz, New York-based doctor Margaret Carpenter. Bruck on Monday said Paxton's office had not presented any new information. "While I'm not entirely sure how things work in Texas, here in New York, a rejection means the matter is closed," wrote Bruck, who is running for county clerk as a Democrat. Paxton's office and the Abortion Coalition for Telemedicine, a group co-founded by Carpenter, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. New York Governor Kathy Hochul, a Democrat who championed the passage of the shield law earlier this year, praised Bruck for "defending the freedom generations of women fought to secure." "Our response to (Texas') baseless claim is clear: no way in hell. New York won't be bullied," Hochul said in a statement. Medication abortion accounts for more than half of U.S. abortions. It has drawn increasing attention since the U.S. Supreme Court's 2022 decision allowing states to ban abortion, which more than 20 states, including Texas, have done. A judge in Collin County, Texas, entered a default judgment against Carpenter in February after she failed to respond to the state's civil lawsuit alleging she illegally prescribed mifepristone and misoprostol, the two drugs used in medication abortion, to a Texas woman via telemedicine. Carpenter has also been indicted by a Louisiana grand jury for prescribing an abortion pill that was taken by a teenager there, in what appeared to be the first time a state criminally charged a doctor in another state for prescribing abortion drugs. Hochul in February rejected Louisiana's request to extradite Carpenter there.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store