Latest news with #soilHealth
Yahoo
30-06-2025
- General
- Yahoo
9 Plants You Should Never Grow With Tomatoes
Some plants help tomatoes grow, while others can steal nutrients and compete for moisture. Avoid plants that attract the same pests and diseases and any that may inhibit tomato growth. Choose companion plants that help manage pests and disease, control weeds, and keep the soil are one of the most rewarding plants to have in the garden. They're relatively easy to grow, which makes them great for beginning gardeners while still offering a challenge to established green thumbs. If all goes well, they produce gorgeous fruit to eat in sandwiches or throw on before you start cooking and eating your harvest, you must get your plants to grow. Just like surrounding them with the right companion plants can help with soil enrichment and management of pests and diseases, some plants can harm their growth. We've rounded up a list of plants you should make sure to avoid planting with your tomato plants to ensure they're fruitful. Planting a member of the brassica family, like cabbage, can stunt the growth of your tomato plant because they out-compete them for the same nutrients. Cabbage and tomato seeds both need a lot of nutrients to thrive, so the competition makes one plant suffer—and that's usually the tomato. In this case, tomatoes may not produce buds, resulting in no fruit and a wasted harvest. Corn and tomatoes may be great when combined in the kitchen, but not when planted together. This is because they both attract the same sort of pests and fungal infections. Moth larvae feed on both corn and tomato crops, which can destroy any possibility for growth. Putting the vegetables near each other in a garden makes them doubly attractive to bugs, and that will cause double the problems for a gardener hoping for a big harvest. Broccoli, another vegetable in the brassica family, isn't a good choice for planting alongside tomatoes. That's because tomatoes are notoriously hungry for nutrients, and broccoli will compete for the same selection of nutrients in the soil. Both plants are heavy feeders, so planting them separately is your best bet if you want them to thrive. Like brassicas, fennel will inhibit the growth of tomatoes. Fennel isn't a good companion for most garden vegetables and should be grown in a little patch or pot by itself. "Don't plant near bush beans, kohlrabi, or tomatoes because it inhibits their growth," according to the Colorado State University Extension Service. This licorice-scented plant may work well with other vegetables in your recipes, but not in the garden. While many herbs grow well with tomatoes, dill is an exception. Young dill plants can actually do quite well next to tomatoes because they are known to help repel aphids, a tiny pest that affects many plants in the garden. However, when dill matures and is ready to seed, the herbs can inhibit tomato plant growth. The mature plants can easily damage the roots of the tomatoes and stunt their future development. Tomatoes and potatoes are both members of the nightshade family, meaning they need the same nutrients to grow. According to the University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture Research & Extension Service, "Potatoes resemble tomatoes more than the other family members and often share the same disease and insects." If planted together, they will compete with each other, which doesn't benefit either species and can actually make them susceptible to the same diseases. These diseases can spread through the soil and ruin both plants if one is affected. Also, the proximity of these two plants matters as tomato roots can be damaged when harvesting. Like potatoes, eggplant is in the nightshade family, which making them a competitor to tomatoes. Eggplant is also susceptible to blight, a fungal disease that can rapidly spread through a harvested area via spores blown by the wind. Planting them together makes any tomatoes planted nearby more vulnerable to blight. When sudden browning, yellowing, spotting, or dying leaves appears on crops, this is a potential sign of blight. Choosing to plant tomatoes near a walnut tree may also negatively affect your crop. Walnut trees release chemicals in the soil that stunt the growth of surrounding plants. According to the NC State Cooperative Extension Service, "Tomatoes might grow successfully in the vicinity of a black walnut tree for a while but as the tree grows, so do its roots and eventually the roots will reach the garden." Once walnut wilt strikes, it won't take long for the disease to affect the tomato's fruits, and then the entire plant. This is another brassica to avoid when seeking out companion plants for your tomatoes. Cauliflower and tomatoes both feed heavily on the soil's nutrients. If they're planted close together in the garden, their competition for nutrients will likely result in smaller, less healthy plants. Keep them separate to ensure more opportunities for plant growth and produce development. Asparagus and tomatoes are the dynamic duos of the garden. With the help of the chemical solanine, tomatoes deter obnoxious asparagus beetles, which, can do harm to asparagus plants. According to the University of Minnesota Extension Service, "The common asparagus beetle and the spotted asparagus beetle feed on asparagus spears and cause browning and scarring." A symbiotic relationship exists between the two plants, because asparagus plants, in turn, repel nematodes in the soil. An infestation of nematodes can harm the plants by attacking tomato roots and inhibiting their growth. Not only are chive plants delicious herbs to have in the garden, but they can repel aphids, nematodes, and mites, making them excellent companion plants for tomatoes. They are members of the allium family and can help keep your tomatoes safe from pests by emitting a strong onion-like fragrance. According to the University of Minnesota Extension Service, "Chives thrive in full sun and well drained soil rich in organic matter. Their grass-like hollow leaves have a mild onion flavor and are common in salads and dips." If you're planning a garden that will provide you with salad stuffs, you're in luck, because lettuce and tomatoes are happy companions in the garden. When you plant lettuce near tomato plants, you will create a ground cover that will help keep the soil moist and cut down on weeds (and weeding). In return, the shade cast by rising tomato plants can help provide some protective cover for the lettuce and stop it from bolting (flowering, which turns the leaves bitter and dry) during the heat of summer. The bright blooms of marigolds attract insects like bees and ladybugs, which are good for a garden, but they also keep away pests like aphids, slugs, tomato worms, and snails, all of which love to munch on your growing tomato plants. These helpful plants also help keep the soil healthy for tomatoes. According to the University of Minnesota Extension Service, "A few studies show that basil and marigolds can be effective at reducing thrip populations in tomatoes in both field and greenhouse conditions." Basil and tomatoes are friends in the kitchen, and they can be chums in the garden too. "Basil is a great indicator plant for tomatoes," as described by the TexasA&M AgriLife Extension Service, "Basil will show powdery mildew and other diseases before it shows on a tomato plant. It may be too late to spray if you wait until the disease shows up on the tomatoes." According to the University of Minnesota Extension Service, "Intercropping with basil may even help to promote tomato growth." Read the original article on Southern Living
The Guardian
28-05-2025
- Business
- The Guardian
Can trade in soil carbon credits help farmers – and the climate?
On a blustery spring day, Thomas Gent is walking through a field of winter wheat on his family's farm, which straddles the Cambridgeshire and Lincolnshire border. Some of the green shoots reach his knees, while the ground between the plants is covered with clover. Sinking a spade into the soil, Gent grins as he points to the freshly dug clod of earth on the blade. 'Look at the root structure,' he says. 'It rained 20mm last night. The water has drained down because the soil structure is in the right format.' Unlike the vast majority of farmed fields in the UK, this one has not been ploughed for 17 years, ever since Gent's family switched to regenerative agricultural methods designed to increase soil carbon stores. Such practices are not just good for the environment; they are now becoming big business. Companies are springing up that evaluate existing carbon stocks in soil and track their improvement, allowing farmers to earn – and sell – carbon credits, which can provide them with an alternative income stream. Much of modern agriculture has damaged the earth's soils through repeated cultivation of the same crops and use of fertilisers. Regenerative methods include: tilling the soil less or not at all; growing cover crops such as clover; reducing the use of ammonia-based fertiliser to restore soil health; and keeping organic matter in the soil to help crops grow and sequester carbon. Back in 2008, when Thomas was just a boy, the Gent family were viewed as trailblazers for wanting to move away from conventional systems on their 800-hectare farm, where they grow cereals and other crops. Such an approach remains rare in the sector, yet the now 27-year-old youngest Gent believes that the movement's time has come. Given that food systems produce a third of human-caused global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, he believes that regenerative agriculture has a significant role to play in tackling the climate crisis while benefiting farmers financially. He also works for a Danish startup, Agreena, which aims to grow the regenerative movement as it develops what it describes as the 'largest soil carbon programme in Europe', building a model to produce credits that could be bought by companies for their climate change programmes. Agreena is one of a host of firms – including Soil Capital, Trinity Natural Capital Group and the largest global player, the US-based Indigo – who are trying to grab a slice of the voluntary carbon offsets market through soil carbon trading. Research from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development suggests that net soil carbon sequestration on agricultural land 'could offset 4% of annual global human-induced GHG emissions over the rest of the century'. However, even as the market grows rapidly, so does the scepticism around it. Much in the world of soil carbon is disputed, and scientists question whether regenerative practices actually increase the amount of carbon stored in soil, while others query the robustness of the data on which the market is based. The total voluntary offsets market was valued at nearly $2bn (£1.6bn) at its peak in 2022. However, it is estimated to have dropped to $723m in 2023, following a series of scientific and media reports that found many offsetting schemes did little to mitigate the climate crisis and biodiversity loss. Soil carbon projects are estimated to represent a small but growing part of the voluntary carbon market, according to Tommy Ricketts, co-founder of the carbon credit rating agency BeZero Carbon. 'If you include peatland, we estimate the value of soil credits issued to the market is upwards of $100m, or roughly 5%-10% of the global traded market,' Ricketts says. 'If you factor in the current project pipeline and growth of compliance demand, even at today's prices of $10-$20 per credit, we expect it to grow significantly to hundreds of millions of dollars, and billions by the mid-2030s.' While Agreena is yet to issue credits, it has secured its position as one of Europe's best-funded 'agritech' firms after raising €46m (£39m) in Series B funding in 2023, and plans to seek more funding in future. Simon Haldrup, Agreena's chief executive and a former banker who is not from a farming background, considers regenerative agriculture 'such a potent solution model, both in terms of climate change, but also all the other nature-related risks such as biodiversity and water quality'. When he helped to found Agreena in 2018, Haldrup says he realised there were 'millions and millions of farmers that literally have to change behaviour for [this] to scale'. It can take a significant period of time – often years – for farmers to transition away from conventional farming practices, including using nitrogen fertilisers, while crop yield and their profit can take a hit, at least in the short term. Agreena's plan is to help farmers by measuring and verifying their current soil carbon stores, calculating their carbon credits, and selling them to companies in sectors including food, transport and technology. Sign up to Down to Earth The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential after newsletter promotion Crop growers who sign a group of their fields up with Agreena are required to do so for 10 years. At the start, the company has to work out the soil's existing carbon stocks, using the MRV (measurement, reporting and verification) process favoured for calculating, tracking and verifying the amount of greenhouse gas emissions reduced by specific mitigation activities. Agreena's project is verified by Verra, a non-profit organisation that operates the world's leading carbon standard, which has previously been criticised for some of its own schemes. The way Agreena measures and models soil carbon stores differs from the standard methods of taking large numbers of soil samples across fields. 'We take a certain number of soil samples that statistically makes sense,' says the company's climate lead, Kanika Chandaria. 'We then use remote sensing and satellite imagery to understand from the aerial level, and specifically to each individual field, what is happening.' Farmers can keep their credits from such schemes, but many choose to sell. Haldrup says farmers can earn on average €20 to €50 per hectare, although this varies, depending on their baseline soil carbon levels and how many regenerative practices they follow. Agreena aims to take a 15% cut on the deal, with 85% going to the farmer. The company has large expansion plans. Already operating in 20 countries across Europe, it is working with 2,500 farmers to transition 4.5m hectares of land to regenerative agriculture and plans to take its operation global. Advocates of soil carbon trading say this market linking up corporates with cash-strapped farmers combines capitalism and environmentalism, tackling greenhouse gas emissions and allowing businesses to meet green targets. However, some soil scientists do not believe enough is known about how soil carbon stores are increased, or released, to accurately track improvements and generate carbon credits. Soil carbon methodologies are now being assessed by the Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market, a body that establishes and maintains standards for the global voluntary carbon market. The British Society of Soil Science (BSSS), a membership organisation for the study of soil, warns in a guidance note that 'there is limited UK evidence' on how soil carbon stocks can be changed through reducing tillage and planting 'cover crops', such as clover. Whether soil carbon levels can be forecast through modelling, Dr David Tompkins, a member of the society's board who co-authored the guidance note, says: 'That is the trillion-dollar question, and my one word answer is 'no'. 'Soil carbon levels can be predicted with models, where sufficiently robust, but the BSSS would encourage anyone approached with a view to monetising their soil carbon to take a good hard look at the evidence.' Some farming groups are also concerned about how long growers will be bound to an offsetting scheme, and what would happen if flooding or the sale of the farm left them unable to fulfil their contract. 'We understand that farmers are looking for alternative income streams,' says Liz Bowles, chief executive of Farm Carbon Toolkit, created by farmers to help them better understand greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture. 'However, it's perfectly possible for a farmer to be quite a high greenhouse gas-emitting business but still sell carbon offsets – we don't think that's a sensible way forward.' Haldrup rebuffs such criticism, saying Agreena has so far collected more than 400,000 samples to inform a model that follows international carbon market standards. 'We have a solid enough foundation that will improve over time as the science improves further. I don't think we should let perfect get in the way of good,' Haldrup says. 'I think we are well beyond good enough.'
Associated Press
27-05-2025
- Business
- Associated Press
Europe Regenerative Agriculture Practices Analysis and Forecast Report 2024-2025 & 2034: Opportunities in the Expansion of Carbon Markets - Focus on Germany, France, UK, Italy
DUBLIN--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 27, 2025-- The 'Europe Regenerative Agriculture Practices Market: Focus on Application, Types of Practice, and Country - Analysis and Forecast, 2024-2034" report has been added to offering. The Europe regenerative agriculture practices market, valued at $4.08 billion in 2024, is expected to reach $13.27 billion by 2034, exhibiting a robust CAGR of 12.51% during the forecast period 2024-2034 The growth of the regenerative agriculture market in Europe is driven by a strong focus on sustainability and soil health restoration. Government policies and initiatives supporting eco-friendly farming, along with increasing consumer demand for organic and sustainably sourced products, are key factors. Additionally, technological advancements and data-driven solutions enhance the efficient adoption of regenerative farming practices. Market Overview The growing emphasis on sustainability, soil health restoration, and climate resilience is propelling the market for regenerative agriculture practices in Europe. Initiatives like the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and the Farm to Fork Strategy encourage regenerative practices to increase biodiversity, improve soil fertility, and lower carbon emissions as the European Union (EU) strengthens its commitment to environmentally friendly farming. Another significant factor driving market expansion is consumer demand for food that is sourced sustainably and organically. Regenerative supply chains that support sustainability objectives are becoming more and more important to consumers and businesses as they become more conscious of the environmental effects of conventional farming. The use of regenerative agriculture is also being accelerated by technological developments such as data-driven decision-making, AI-driven soil monitoring, and precision farming. Farmers can increase yield and profitability while optimising resource use thanks to these innovations. Carbon sequestration methods, crop rotation, agroforestry, cover crops, and no-till farming are important regenerative practices that are becoming more popular in Europe. The market for regenerative agriculture practices in Europe is expected to grow further due to rising investments, government incentives, and corporate commitments to sustainable sourcing. This will help to shape the future of environmentally conscious and sustainable food production. How can this report add value to an organization? Practice/Innovation Strategy: The practice segment helps the reader understand the specific techniques and methodologies employed in regenerative agriculture, such as soil health management, water management, and biodiversity enhancement. It also provides insight into how these practices contribute to creating sustainable and resilient agricultural systems. Additionally, the study offers a detailed overview of the current state of various regenerative agriculture projects developed by companies and non-profit organizations. Growth/Marketing Strategy: The Europe regenerative agriculture practices market has seen major development by key participants operating in the market, such as business expansion, partnership, collaboration, and joint venture. The favored strategies of the companies have been partnership, collaboration, and joint venture activities to strengthen their position in the Europe regenerative agriculture practices market. Competitive Strategy: Key players in the Europe regenerative agriculture practices market analyzed and profiled in the study include project developers and accounting tool providers. The analysis covers market segments by distinct practices, applications served, regional presence, and the impact of key market strategies. Additionally, detailed competitive benchmarking has been conducted to illustrate how players compare, providing a clear view of the market landscape. The study also examines comprehensive competitive strategies, such as partnerships, agreements, and collaborations, to help identify untapped revenue opportunities in the regenerative agriculture practices market. Key Market Players Key Attributes: Key Topics Covered: Executive Summary Scope and Definition 1 Market: Industry Outlook 1.1 Trends: Current and Future Impact Assessment 1.1.1 Increasing Consumer Demand for Organic Foods 1.1.2 Rising Carbon Credit Prices 1.2 Research and Development Review 1.2.1 Patent Filing Trend (by Country and Company) 1.3 Stakeholder Analysis 1.4 Market Dynamics Overview 1.4.1 Market Drivers 1.4.1.1 Increasing Corporate Sustainability Goals 1.4.1.2 Rising Soil Health Degradation 1.4.2 Market Challenges 1.4.2.1 High Upfront Costs for Farmers 1.4.2.2 Lack of Standardized Measurement and Certification 1.4.3 Market Opportunities 1.4.3.1 Technological Advancements in Monitoring and Data Analytics 1.4.3.2 Expansion of Carbon Markets 1.5 Startup Funding Summary 1.6 State of Regenerative Agriculture Practice Adoption 1.6.1 Agri-food Companies Commitment to Regenerative Agriculture Factors 1.6.2 Regenerative Agriculture Program and their Acreage Coverage Data 1.6.3 Project Developers Acreage Coverage 1.6.4 Case Study 2 Region 2.1 Regional Summary 2.2 Europe 2.2.1 Regional Overview 2.2.2 Driving Factors for Market Growth 2.2.3 Factors Challenging the Market 2.2.3.1 Application 2.2.3.2 Practice 2.2.4 Germany 2.2.4.1 Application 2.2.4.2 Practice 2.2.5 France 2.2.5.1 Application 2.2.5.2 Practice 2.2.6 U.K. 2.2.6.1 Application 2.2.6.2 Practice 2.2.7 Italy 2.2.7.1 Application 2.2.7.2 Practice 2.2.8 Rest-of-Europe 2.2.8.1 Application 2.2.8.2 Practice 3 Markets - Competitive Benchmarking & Company Profiles 3.1 Geographic Assessment 3.2 Company Profiles 3.3 Project Developers 3.3.1 reNature 3.3.1.1 Overview 3.3.1.2 Top Projects/Initiatives 3.3.1.3 Target Customers 3.3.1.4 Key Personnel 3.3.1.5 Analyst View 3.3.2 South Pole 3.3.2.1 Overview 3.3.2.2 Top Projects/Initiatives 3.3.2.3 Target Customers 3.3.2.4 Key Personnel 3.3.2.5 Analyst View 3.4 Accounting Tool Providers 3.4.1 Soil Capital Ltd. 3.4.1.1 Overview 3.4.1.2 Top Programs/Program Portfolio 3.4.1.3 Top Competitors 3.4.1.4 Target Customers 3.4.1.5 Key Personnel 3.4.1.6 Analyst View 3.4.2 Agreena 3.4.2.1 Overview 3.4.2.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio 3.4.2.3 Top Competitors 3.4.2.4 Target Customers 3.4.2.5 Key Personnel 3.4.2.6 Analyst View 4 Research Methodology For more information about this report visit About is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends. View source version on CONTACT: Laura Wood, Senior Press Manager [email protected] For E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470 For U.S./ CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900 KEYWORD: EUROPE INDUSTRY KEYWORD: AGRICULTURE NATURAL RESOURCES SOURCE: Research and Markets Copyright Business Wire 2025. PUB: 05/27/2025 07:36 AM/DISC: 05/27/2025 07:35 AM
