Latest news with #sovereigncitizen
Geek Tyrant
26-06-2025
- Entertainment
- Geek Tyrant
Intense Trailer For Nick Offerman's True Crime Thriller SOVEREIGN — GeekTyrant
Here's the trailer for Nick Offerman's upcoming gripping true crime thriller Sovereign . The stopry follows Jerry Kane (Offerman), 'an out-of-work roofer and struggling single father who desperately tries to provide for his home-schooled 15-year-old son, Joe (Jacob Tremblay). 'Searching for control in an unforgiving world, Jerry embraces the sovereign citizen movement, indoctrinating Joe into believing that laws are mere illusions and freedom must be seized by force. 'As they travel around the country selling 'debt relief seminars' to desperate homeowners, Jerry's ideology becomes increasingly extreme and his grip on reality deteriorates. Meanwhile, Joe quietly begins to question his father's worldview, dreaming of a normal life beyond their constant travels.' The movie was directed by Christian Swegal, making his feature directorial and it also stars Dennis Quaid, Martha Plimpton, Thomas Mann, and Nancy Travis. It looks like a pretty intense movie and it's set to be released in select US theaters and on VOD July 11th, 2025.
ABC News
23-06-2025
- Politics
- ABC News
'Sovereign citizens' sentenced to prison term in Western Australia for defiance of court order
Two 'sovereign citizens' have been sentenced to a month in jail, with a judge warning their "extremely dangerous" ideas would not be tolerated. Jerald Martin and Emma Hazel Martin had been locked in a defamation battle with their former lawyer after the relationship soured in mid-2023. That led to them sending an email to a number of senior public officials suggesting there were grounds for investigating their lawyer for a number of crimes, including fraud. After being ordered not to repeat those claims, the pair were found guilty of doing so, and according to the court refused legal assistance to defend the breach. A sovereign citizen is someone who wrongly believes they are not subject to Australian federal, state or local law, because they think the laws are incorrect and therefore invalid. They often question the authority of the government, tax system and legal system, and they are usually self-represented litigants. The cohort are becoming an increasing burden on the Australian courts, a New South Wales Magistrate told the ABC. In this case, Mr and Ms Martin argued that the court is a "corporate entity" and "cannot instruct the living being". Earlier in those proceedings, Supreme Court Justice Paul Tottle found the pair relied on what were described as "pseudo law concepts … of the nature frequently invoked by those described as 'sovereign citizens". At their sentencing, Supreme Court Justice Marcus Solomon said it was "of grave importance that a message be sent not just to Mr and Ms Martin, but to the general community that views of this nature will not be tolerated". "Mr and Ms Martin have told me more than once they are not dangerous people," he wrote. "The ideas they express, however, can be extremely dangerous. "Dangerous ideas breed dangerous people, whether those people consider themselves to be peaceful, dangerous or otherwise." Court documents show the pair had originally approached a Perth-based lawyer for advice in May 2021 after their wellness business was impacted by roadworks associated with the state government's Metronet rail project. After the relationship deteriorated, Mr and Ms Martin sent an email to the Supreme Court, the Chief Justice, Government House, then-Attorney General John Quigley, the Police Commissioner, two Commonwealth MPs and others. The email was later described by the Supreme Court as "grossly defamatory" for suggesting there were grounds for investigating whether the lawyer had committed a range of crimes, including fraud. "[The claims] had no foundation in fact. They were wholly indefensible and never should have been made," Justice Paul Tottle found, ordering the pair not to publish those claims again. Justice Solomon found the duo had breached that order, including by repeating those claims in an online group called the "Sovereign Peoples Assembly of Western Australia", earlier this year. In defending the breach, the pair filed a number of further documents with the court with one reading: "The court is a corporate entity, it is not a living being." "As it is inferior jurisdiction, it cannot instruct the living being," another section read. 'If either JUDGE (sic) is found to be presiding over any matters, repercussions will be forthcoming," another document read. Justice Solomon described their rejection of the court's authority as "defiant and explicit", acknowledging both "have only been prejudiced by what they have done". "They explained that they had suffered enormous financial distress in terms of both their business, their income, their financial circumstances and their relationships," he wrote. "That is extremely regrettable. It is all the more regrettable because it was entirely avoidable." In deciding on the punishment to impose, Justice Solomon said "retribution" was required because it was essential to the functioning of the court system that orders are obeyed. "If they are defied or ignored, the whole system of dispute resolution by litigation breaks down," the judgement read. The duo were "quite entitled to their beliefs", Justice Solomon wrote, "even if they are regarded by some as irrational, irritating or even offensive". "In a tolerant and humane society, people must be entitled to hold such beliefs without fear of sanction or punishment from the state," he wrote. "However, at the same time, the court must be concerned with and must remain vigilant to protect the administration of justice from conduct, including on occasion, the expression of views that corrode public confidence in and respect for the courts and the justice system.
ABC News
27-05-2025
- General
- ABC News
Pilot involved in fatal Ball Bay plane crash arrested after walking out of court without bail
A north Queensland pilot involved in a fatal joy-ride flight near Mackay was arrested and brought back into court after walking out of his committal hearing today. Peter Thomas McDougall, 68, appeared in the Mackay Magistrates Court and is alleged to have been unlicensed when his plane crashed onto a beach at Ball Bay, 35 kilometres north of Mackay, on Christmas Eve in 2021. The crash happened soon after take-off, killing his passenger 83-year-old Gerardus "Gerry" Miltenberg. A charge of manslaughter was dropped in November 2024 and Mr McDougall has not entered a plea to another 17 aviation charges, including operating and maintaining unregistered aircraft dating back to 2011 and failing to surrender his pilot's licence. Mr McDougall, who was not legally represented, walked out of his court hearing today after disputing the legal basis for his charges. "I can't participate in this kangaroo court. I'll bid you all a very good day," he said before walking out of the building. Magistrate Bronwyn Hartigan ordered he be arrested for leaving without his bail being extended and he was detained by police on the courthouse steps. He was returned to court and committed to stand trial in the district court on 17 aviation charges. His bail was extended. Prosecutors have previously described Mr McDougall as a "sovereign citizen" who did not acknowledge that Queensland legislation applied to him. Crown prosecutor Dane Marley told the court that Mr Dougall's aviation charges could be proved in his handwritten pilot's logbook where he recorded flight routes and aircraft condition. During Tuesday hearing, Mr McDougall repeatedly interrupted proceedings and said the Civil Aviation Act 1988 was "unlawful" and claimed it applied only to "commercial pilots, not for an experimental aircraft".
