Latest news with #telecommunications
CNET
4 hours ago
- CNET
Protect Yourself From Sketchy Calls: Unknown Caller vs. No Caller ID
Like most of us, you're probably getting a lot of unsolicited calls that show up as either No Caller ID or Unknown Caller on your iPhone. Reflexively answering either one could lead to a scam -- or perhaps a call you've been waiting for. What are the differences between these two anonymous labels? Here's what to know about each type of call and how to keep yourself safe from potential scams. No Caller ID vs. Unknown Caller A call labeled "No Caller ID" means the caller has blocked their number from appearing on your screen. In other words, they want to keep their identity under wraps. This can be a privacy measure, but it's also a tool used by scammers -- if you can't quickly verify who the caller is based on their number, it can be easier to fall for their trap. "Unknown Caller," on the other hand, is the message that appears when your phone service provider doesn't recognize who's calling. This can come down to several factors, including network or technical issues, or receiving calls from foreign numbers. Oftentimes, these callers aren't intentionally trying to hide their identity, but it's still a good idea to be cautious. Scammers can also use this method to hide their identity by using a phone that isn't registered with the phone company, for instance. What to do if you get anonymous calls You should always proceed with caution if you can't identify a caller. This is especially important if someone rings you and "No Caller ID" appears on the screen, as they have intentionally kept their number hidden. But an Unknown Caller is also something to be wary of, since it becomes harder to truly identify who's at the other end of the line. Letting the call go to voicemail is often a good idea. Answering a call signals to scammers that your number is active, which could lead to more similar calls in the future. The Live Voicemail feature is particularly helpful for these situations because it allows you to pick up the call if the voicemail transcript indicates it's someone you want to speak with. Silence unknown callers on your iPhone You can even go a step further and silence unknown callers on your iPhone. That way, those mystery callers won't disturb you, and they can just leave a voicemail for you to check later. In your iPhone, go to Settings, then tap Apps followed by Phone and go to Silence Unknown Callers. Hit the toggle to turn it on. Watch this: Why You're Getting So Many Spam Calls 08:33 Use apps to block unidentified calls Though there isn't a way to block these anonymous calls within your iPhone's settings, your wireless carrier may offer apps to help with this. AT&T ActiveArmor, for instance, has a free version that blocks spam and fraud calls, and also lets you block all unknown callers. The advanced version, which costs $4 a month, includes tools like reverse number lookup and caller ID for unknown numbers. ActiveArmor is available for iOS and Android. Verizon's Call Filter app also offers spam detection, a spam filter and the option to report numbers, all for free. For an additional $4 a month, you'll also get caller ID, spam lookup, a personal block list and a spam risk meter. Call Filter is automatically enabled for Android users on a postpaid plan, and is available in the App Store for iPhone. T-Mobile's Scam Shield has a free option that includes full caller ID, scam reporting and scam blocking. There's also a premium option for $4 a month per line, which offers reverse phone number lookup and voicemail transcriptions that are automatically texted to you. You can download the Scam Shield app in the App Store or Google Play. Be sure to check with other wireless carriers to see if they offer something similar. Some wireless carrier plans may include access to the premium features as well. For more third-party apps to help limit robocalls and general tips, check out our guide on stopping spam calls.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Business
- Yahoo
RADCOM Secures Multi-Year, Eight-Figure Contract Renewal with Major North American Telecom Operator
RADCOM Ltd. (NASDAQ:RDCM) is one of the best telecom stocks to buy according to Wall Street analysts. Earlier in May, RADCOM announced a significant multi-year, eight-figure contract renewal with a leading North American telecommunications operator. The agreement extends the existing partnership and also expands the scope of RADCOM's intelligent assurance services. RADCOM is expected to optimize network performance and service quality for the operator's infrastructure under the renewed contract. The precise financial terms and the identity of the telecom operator were not disclosed at the time. Although the continuation shows the effectiveness of RADCOM's ACE platform in meeting the demands of large-scale telecom networks. A professional technician using specialized tools to maintain a modern 5G cell tower. The ACE platform, which is an automated assurance and analytics solution, uses AI and ML for automated network analysis. RADCOM's Network Intelligence suite, which includes Network Visibility, Service Assurance, and Network Insights, uses smart data collection and ML techniques to provide comprehensive network analysis and troubleshooting. RADCOM Ltd. (NASDAQ:RDCM) provides cloud-native and 5G-ready network intelligence solutions for communication service providers/CSPs. While we acknowledge the potential of RDCM as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Errore nel recupero dei dati Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati
CNET
21 hours ago
- Business
- CNET
T-Mobile Announces T-Satellite: Rapid Fire Q&A with T-Mobile Exec
T-Mobile Announces T-Satellite: Rapid Fire Q&A with T-Mobile Exec T-Mobile Announces T-Satellite: Rapid Fire Q&A with T-Mobile Exec Click to unmute Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Skip Backward Skip Forward Next playlist item Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 1:42 Loaded : 5.83% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 1:42 Share Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Close Modal Dialog This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button. Close Modal Dialog This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button. T-Mobile Announces T-Satellite: Rapid Fire Q&A with T-Mobile Exec T-Mobile Announces T-Satellite: Rapid Fire Q&A with T-Mobile Exec Jun 27, 2025 Wireless Plans Show Transcript Do you remember your first phone? We asked T-Mobile's head of marketing this and more at an event in Bellevue, where the company also announced the commercial launch date for T-Satellite, its Starlink-based satellite connectivity service (July 23).
The Verge
a day ago
- Business
- The Verge
Low-income broadband fund can keep running, says Supreme Court
The Supreme Court ruled that the funding mechanism behind a key broadband subsidy program for schools and underserved areas can continue operating. In a decision issued on Friday, the Supreme Court rejected claims that Congress and the FCC's implementation of the fund is unconstitutional. The program, known as the Universal Service Fund (USF), helps subsidize telecommunications services for low-income consumers, rural health care providers, and schools and libraries. It's administered by the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC), a nonprofit the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) named to run the program. But conservative advocacy group Consumers' Research, which encourages consumers to 'report woke' on its website, sued to upend that structure, charging that the way Congress and the FCC had delegated power over the program's funding was unconstitutional. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Consumers' Research, and the Supreme Court took up the case when the FCC petitioned the court to review it. Because of what it believes is an unconstitutional structure to fund the USF, Consumers' Research argued in its brief to the court, 'In essence, a private company is taxing Americans in amounts that total billions of dollars every year, under penalty of law, without true governmental accountability.' But USAC isn't running wild with public funds, the US argued. US Acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris told the justices the law 'leaves key policy choices to Congress and is definite and precise enough for courts to tell if FCC followed Congress's limits when filling in details,' according to SCOTUSblog. The Supreme Court agreed with this argument. Justice Elena Kagan wrote that Congress 'sufficiently guided and constrained the discretion that it lodged with the FCC to implement the universal-service contribution scheme,' adding that the FCC 'retained all decision-making authority within that sphere.' Kagan concludes, 'Nothing in those arrangements, either separately or together, violates the Constitution.' NCTA - The Rural Broadband Association, says the USF is critical to providing access to modern communications in rural areas and for low-income families. 'Without USF support, it is difficult to make a business case to invest in many rural areas, to sustain networks once they are built, or to keep service rates affordable,' it says on its website.
Al Arabiya
a day ago
- Politics
- Al Arabiya
Supreme Court OKs Fee That Subsidizes Phone, Internet Services in Schools, Libraries and Rural Areas
The Supreme Court on Friday upheld the fee that is added to phone bills to provide billions of dollars a year in subsidized phone and internet services in schools, libraries, and rural areas. The justices, by a 6–3 vote, reversed an appeals court ruling that had struck down as unconstitutional the Universal Service Fund, the charge that has been added to phone bills for nearly 30 years. At arguments in March, liberal and conservative justices alike expressed concerns about the potentially devastating consequences of eliminating the fund, which has benefited tens of millions of Americans. The Federal Communications Commission collects the money from telecommunications providers, which pass the cost on to their customers. A Virginia-based conservative advocacy group, Consumers' Research, had challenged the practice. The justices had previously denied two appeals from Consumers' Research after federal appeals courts upheld the program. But the full 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals, among the nation's most conservative, ruled 9–7 that the method of funding is unconstitutional. The 5th Circuit held that Congress had given too much authority to the FCC, and the agency, in turn, had ceded too much power to a private entity or administrator. The last time the Supreme Court invoked what is known as the nondelegation doctrine to strike down a federal law was in 1935. But several conservative justices have suggested they are open to breathing new life into the legal doctrine. The conservative-led court also has reined in federal agencies in high-profile rulings in recent years. Last year, the court reversed a 40-year-old case that had been used thousands of times to uphold federal regulations. In 2022, the court ruled Congress has to act with specificity before agencies can address major questions in a ruling that limited the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to combat climate change. But the phone fee case turned out not to be the right one for finding yet another way to restrict federal regulators. President Donald Trump's Republican administration, which has moved aggressively to curtail administrative agencies in other areas, defended the FCC program. The appeal was initially filed by President Joe Biden's Democratic administration.
