Latest news with #PTFE
Yahoo
25-06-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
The Future $2.63 Bn Market Face Raw Material and Regulatory Challenges Amid Growing Demand
The PTFE Anti-Corrosion Coatings Market is projected to grow from USD 1.48 billion in 2025 to USD 2.31 billion by 2032, at a CAGR of 6.6%. Key drivers include rising industrial demand for durable coatings in harsh environments, particularly in chemical, marine, and electronics sectors. North America and Europe dominate, while Asia-Pacific sees rapid growth due to expanding infrastructure. Advances in eco-friendly formulations and application techniques boost market potential. Challenges include raw material sourcing and regulatory concerns. The market offers opportunities for customized solutions to extend equipment lifespan and enhance energy efficiency. PTFE Anti Corrosion Coatings Market Dublin, June 25, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "PTFE Anti Corrosion Coatings Market Size, Share, Trends, Analysis, and Forecast 2025-2034 | Global Industry Growth, Competitive Landscape, Opportunities, and Challenges" has been added to offering. The Global PTFE Anti Corrosion Coatings Market is projected to grow from USD 1.48 billion in 2025 to USD 2.31 billion by 2032, showcasing a CAGR of 6.6% As industry sectors demand increasingly durable solutions for protecting surfaces against hostile environments, the market for PTFE (Polytetrafluoroethylene) coatings is on a robust upward trajectory. PTFE coatings are revered for their exemplary chemical resistance, low friction, and resilience against high temperatures, making them indispensable in protecting metal surfaces from corrosive elements. These properties are highly sought after across various industries such as chemical processing, oil and gas, marine, food processing, and electronics, where exposure to harsh substances and extreme conditions is prevalent. Moreover, aside from protection, PTFE coatings enhance energy efficiency and simplify maintenance by minimizing surface fouling and wear. The market dynamics in 2024 are influenced by increased infrastructure investment, strict environmental policies, and the demand for non-reactive components in complex systems. North America and Europe are at the forefront, driven by mature chemical processing industries and heightened awareness of cost-savings through preventive measures. Meanwhile, Asia-Pacific is emerging as a high-growth region with nations expanding their capacity in petrochemicals, water treatment, and pharmaceuticals. Innovations in fluoropolymer formulations and application techniques, such as electrostatic spray and thermal curing, enhance PTFE coating performance across various substrates. Yet, the market contends with challenges like sourcing raw materials, regulatory scrutiny of fluorinated compounds, and achieving uniform coating thickness. Moreover, the market is witnessing rising demand for dual-function coatings, which offer anti-corrosive, non-stick, thermal, or abrasion resistance capabilities. Significant opportunities lie in marine applications to counteract saltwater corrosion and biofouling. Additionally, the market players face cost and complexity challenges, particularly impacting SMEs lacking specialized equipment. As industries emphasize energy efficiency and asset longevity, preventive surface coatings adoption gains traction. The trend towards customized products to cater to specific industrial exposure profiles is advancing. Collaborative efforts between fluoropolymer producers and service providers are expanding outreach and technical reach, underpinned by government-led infrastructure upgrades that encourage market expansion. Comprehensive Analysis and Strategic Research Trending technological advancements, competitive landscape profiles, and comprehensive regional analysis are integral to understanding this market's potential. This research will benefit strategic planners, investors, and operational managers in charting the course for future growth and navigating competitive dynamics effectively. Key Takeaways - PTFE Anti Corrosion Coatings Market Utilized widely in industries for their resistance and stability, PTFE coatings maintain surfaces in aggressive environments. The coatings are prioritized in sectors where protective measures are paramount, including oil & gas and electronics. Pioneering regions such as North America and Europe are leading adopters, spurred by stringent regulations and standards. Asia-Pacific is becoming a vital market due to infrastructure expansion in key industries. Environmental concerns drive advancements in eco-friendly PTFE coatings. Key Attributes: Report Attribute Details No. of Pages 150 Forecast Period 2025 - 2034 Estimated Market Value (USD) in 2025 $1.48 Billion Forecasted Market Value (USD) by 2034 $2.63 Billion Compound Annual Growth Rate 6.6% Regions Covered Global Companies Featured PPG Industries, Inc. Akzo Nobel N.V. Axalta Coating Systems The Sherwin-Williams Company Whitford Corporation (a subsidiary of PPG) Daikin Industries Ltd. Dupont de Nemours, Inc. Solvay S.A. Fluoroseal Inc. Byk-Chemie GmbH Endura Coatings Precision Coating Company, Inc. AFT Fluorotec Ltd. Toefco Engineered Coating Systems, Inc. Thermoplastic Processes, Inc. For more information about this report visit About is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends. Attachment PTFE Anti Corrosion Coatings Market CONTACT: CONTACT: Laura Wood,Senior Press Manager press@ For E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470 For U.S./ CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900
Mint
14-06-2025
- Business
- Mint
India in anti-dumping crosshairs: US, Pakistan target Indian exports at WTO
New Delhi: The US, Brazil and Pakistan have initiated anti-dumping measures against India, which has been fighting its own battle against low-priced products flooding domestic markets. Trade experts suggest some of these measures may be strategic, signalling a growing wave of trade defense actions against India and aimed at influencing New Delhi's trade negotiations with key partners. Pakistan's anti-dumping charges against India are particularly baffling, as the two duelling neighbours have banned any trade between them. Yet, Pakistan has initiated an anti-dumping investigation against India over exports of sulfonic acid, which is used in manufacturing detergents, dyes, and catalysts, according to a World Trade Organization report released late on Thursday (12 June). The WTO document details preliminary and final anti-dumping measures undertaken by 11 members of the trade body, including major economies such as the US, Brazil, Pakistan, Indonesia, and the UK, against various countries. The report is based on notices submitted in May under Article 16.4 of the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement. 'Such measures reflect the growing wave of trade protectionism aimed at shielding domestic industries," said Abhash Kumar, a trade economist and assistant professor of economics at Delhi University, referring to the anti-dumping charges against India. 'The repeated targeting of Indian products highlights the need for India to adopt a more proactive trade defense strategy." The commerce ministry didn't immediately reply to Mint's queries on the development. Amid India-US trade talks India and the US concluded a fifth round of face-to-face talks on 10 June on streamlining tariffs and reducing non-tariff barriers towards finalising a landmark bilateral trade agreement. But New Delhi also approached the WTO over the US's steep tariffs on Indian steel, aluminium and auto component exports. Washington has rejected India's notices at the WTO against the US's 25% tariff on steel and aluminium—both of which have since been increased to 50%—as well as the 25% duty on auto components. However, as per a Mint report on 10 June, the US has agreed to discuss both issues with India outside the WTO framework. Amidst this, the US has initiated a broad set of investigations into Indian exports across critical sectors, according to the WTO report. These include ceramic tiles, cold-drawn mechanical tubing of carbon and alloy steel, and corrosion-resistant steel products, which are central to India's manufacturing and infrastructure export strategy. Also read | US puts hard terms on table, presents a take-it-or-leave-it offer India's total exports of ceramic products to the US stood at $403.87 million in 2023-24, but declined to $361.44 million in FY25, according to commerce ministry data. In the chemical sector, Indian-origin epoxy resins, glycine, melamine, and granular polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) resins are facing trade restrictions. The US has also listed Indian exports of 2,4-D herbicide and raw honey under anti-dumping scrutiny, pointing to growing tensions over India's role in global agricultural commodity markets. Exports of Indian-origin resins to the US increased from $358.07 million in FY24 to $448.73 million in FY25, while India's honey exports to the US jumped from $176.29 million to $204.58 million. Pakistan's puzzling charges India's challenges are not limited to Washington. Brazil has named India in an investigation into pre-painted steel, raising concerns over competitive steel pricing from South Asia. Pakistan, meanwhile, has initiated an anti-dumping investigation into sulphonic acid imports from six countries, including India. This development is particularly puzzling given that India banned exports to Pakistan after the Pulwama attack in 2019, and Pakistan banned all trade with India in August 2019 following India's decision to revoke Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir. With direct imports from India into Pakistan prohibited for nearly six years, analysts suggest that Islamabad's investigation may be aimed at Indian-origin sulphonic acid entering Pakistan through third countries such as the UAE, Singapore, or Malaysia. Also read | After US's 50% tariff blow, India now faces EU heat on steel quotas 'These shipments may have been relabelled to hide their Indian origin, raising concerns within Pakistan's domestic industry. It's also possible that the investigation is based on the injury caused by imports that took place before the trade ban came into effect," said Ajay Srivastava, co-founder of the Global Trade Research Initiative, a think tank. 'Alternatively, the move could be strategic, aimed at formally challenging India's pricing practices and laying the groundwork for future trade negotiations," he added. India's anti-dumping woes India's trade investigation body, the Directorate General of Trade Remedies (DGTR), has initiated 11 anti-dumping investigations and issued final findings in 13 cases—mostly targeting Chinese products—in FY25. In the past, India had launched an anti‑dumping probe on high‑speed steel imports from Brazil in 2018. In January this year, the DGTR launched anti-dumping investigations into imports of nylon filament yarn and sulphenamides accelerators originating from the US. 'As anti-dumping actions rise globally, including from key partners like the US, India will use both its legal rights at the WTO and the ongoing BTA negotiations to defend its exporters, push for fairer trade rules, and address protectionist barriers," a government official said. However, India did not file any new cases during the May reporting period.
Yahoo
11-06-2025
- Health
- Yahoo
Are States Gearing Up to Ban Nonstick Cookware?
Photo: Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images If frying eggs or bacon is a regular part of your morning ritual, take note. Soon, your ability to use nonstick cookware may come down to where you live. New York state lawmakers recently introduced a bill that would prohibit 'the manufacture, sale, and use' of cookware containing polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), the primary substance used to create a nonstick surface. Though the chemical compound, commonly known by the brand name Teflon, is approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration, New York has now joined a growing list of states that are proposing to ban—or in some cases, have already banned—nonstick cookware in their territories. Find answers about nonstick pans Is New York banning nonstick cookware? Are nonstick pans safe? What happens when PFAS accumulate in the body? Should consumers throw out nonstick pans? What other states have banned nonstick pans? In January of this year, two New York State senators introduced Senate Bill S1767, which if passed, 'prohibits the manufacture, sale, and use of cookware containing polytetrafluoroethylene.' In the bill's justification, the sponsors write that the chemicals used in nonstick pans are 'within the family of polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) which are known to have severe health effects such as harm to reproductive and bodily functions, developmental effects in youth, increased cancer risk and increased risk for high cholesterol and obesity.' It acknowledges that additional research is needed to determine the full scope of risk, but 'we should not leave people vulnerable to the potential negative health effects,' it concludes. The bill is currently in Senate committee, meaning it hasn't been brought to the floor for voting by the whole legislative body. Once on the floor, it needs to be approved by both the New York State Senate and Assembly, then signed into law by the governor. I Tried It I Tried It: Our Place's Cast Iron Always Pan Is The Real Deal Your favorite pan now comes in a sturdier version There is little debate about the safety risk of nonstick pans that do not use Teflon coating, for example ceramic or cast-iron pans. However, those that do use PTFE have raised concerns in recent years. 'PTFE belongs to a subgroup of what is known as PFAS,' explains Bruce Jarnot, PhD, global materials compliance expert, toxicologist, and product compliance advisor at Assent. PFAS are often colloquially called 'forever chemicals,' because they don't degrade over time, and the human body cannot metabolize them. In some instances, this can come in handy. PFAS are used to insulate leads in a pacemaker or used in hip joint replacements since they are inert. 'In these instances, it's fine, it's inert,' Jarnot says. 'But there are other considerations to take into account when considering potential laws like New York State Senate Bill 1767.' The first, he says, is the environmental waste and pollution that manufacturers of products containing PFAS make. 'We all have the monomers—the building blocks of polymers like Teflon—inside us from the manufacturing phase,' Jarnot says, adding that the waste ends up in water and soil, which eventually makes its way to the humans. 'So there's a strong argument against PFAS in general. Because they stay put in the body, and they can accumulate over time when they're in our environment.' In cookware specifically, that potential risk increases because the products are used with high heats. 'That's probably the highest heat environment that a material like Teflon is exposed to. So when you have a pacemaker implanted, it's at body temperature. If you're searing fish or steak in a fry pan, it's being exposed to much higher heat,' he says. Chemical reactions occur faster in hot environments, and, 'You could have decomposition of the polymer giving rise to some really nasty airborne PFAS. And there is probably some internalization of these decomposing products at high temperature.' According to the the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), exposure to PFAS could be harmful to human health. 'Scientists at EPA, in other federal agencies, and in academia and industry are continuing to conduct and review the growing body of research about PFAS. However, health effects associated with exposure to PFAS are difficult to specify for many reasons,' the agency says. For that reason, more research is required to determine the exact risks. As Jarnot explains, toxicologists often say that it's the dose that makes the poison. 'So here you have something that's not metabolizing and that is accumulating in your body, creating aggregate exposure. In that case, every bit you add to your exposure cup counts.' Even in states where nonstick pans are legal, some consumers may consider discarding theirs because of potential risk. 'As a toxicologist, I still use Teflon pans,' Jarnot admits. 'But you should never heat them without something in it, and should avoid very high heat.' That said, eliminating nonstick pans could be an easy way to minimize exposure to PFAS. 'You're getting exposure in almost all drinks—water, wine, beer, soda—because it's in the water these drinks are made from. But you need water, you need food. So one of the places you could easily omit exposure is in cookware,' Jarnot adds. Multiple states have passed or are considering legislation about polytetrafluoroethylene in their territories. California, for example, passed a law that states cookware with intentionally added PFAS must be disclosed on product labels; however, it hasn't passed a full ban. Others, like Connecticut, Maine, Vermont, and Rhode Island have passed laws that go into effect over the next few years and ban products with intentionally added PFAS. Minnesota passed a law banning PFAS in a number of consumer goods, including cookware, which went into effect in January of this year. Originally Appeared on Architectural Digest More Great Stories From AD Not a subscriber? Join AD for print and digital access now. This Lower East Side Loft Is a Sexy Riff on '90s Basements How a Financial Influencer Upgraded Her Brooklyn Apartment on a Budget 13 Best Platform Beds of 2025 We Use In Our Own Bedrooms
CNET
05-06-2025
- Health
- CNET
Can Your Nonstick Pan Make You Sick? We'll Explain
A great nonstick pan can do wonders for your cooking. Nonstick cookware is coated in teflon, which makes it easy to use and clean. However, some question the safety of the chemical-coated dishes: PTFE and PFAS (used in the coating) can potentially mix with your food during use. CNET Last year, the US saw an increase in reported cases of "Teflon flu." If that raises questions in your mind, you're not alone. Several Reddit users expressed the same concerns, with some wondering whether inhaling Teflon fumes while cooking is dangerous. The good news is that if your cookware was made after a certain year and you use it properly, you should be in the clear. But there's also a bit more to the story. Here's what you need to know about Teflon flu and using your nonstick kitchenware without health worries. Read more: Never Raise Your Air Fryer Above This Temperature What is Teflon flu? Air fryer baskets are often made with a synthetic nonstick coating. David Watsky/CNET The chemical polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), found in Teflon and similar nonstick surfaces, is common in air fryers, pots and pans and other kitchen appliances. When these materials overheat, they can release synthetic compounds that pose health risks. Polymer fume fever, or Teflon flu, has reignited a debate about nonstick cookware safety. The illness occurs when fumes from an overheated Teflon or nonstick pan are inhaled. Nonstick pans are made with polytetrafluoroethylene (also known as PTFE). PTFEs are known as "forever chemicals" because they take decades or sometimes even hundreds of years to break down. Read more: I Upgraded to This PFAS-Free Glass Fryer and You Should, Too Under normal use, PTFEs aren't thought to cause a health risk, but when heated to above 500 degrees Fahrenheit, there are increased emissions and the resulting polymer fume fever. Polymer fume fever causes a range of reported symptoms including fever, chills, muscle tension and headache. Symptoms of Teflon flu are temporary and generally start within 12 hours of exposure but can take up to 24 hours to take hold. How to avoid Teflon flu Teflon and nonstick cookware are easy to use, clean and maintain, but it should be used only for low to medium heat cooking. Never heat your nonstick cookware over high heat or medium heat for long periods of time. Try to keep the surface temperature at or below 450 degrees Fahrenheit, or emissions from the PTFE coating are likely to increase. What is Teflon and does it cause cancer? Nonstick or Teflon is a popular choice for home cooks. The biggest advantage is that food won't stick to pots and pans coated with Teflon the way it does to other metal materials, so it's easy to flip a pancake or remove a cooked egg. Nonstick is also very easy to clean, generally taking no more than a few seconds to wash by hand. Teflon is a brand name for a synthetic chemical called polytetrafluoroethylene that's used in many household products, from wire coatings to fabric protectors and kitchen cookware. The knock on Teflon is that it's unsafe if consumed or absorbed into the body and can increase the chances of cancer and other diseases. Studies have shown some connections (more on that below), but Teflon still exists and is used to make cookware, and the safety concerns around Teflon are mostly a thing of the past. I stress mostly. Here's why… The brand Teflon may be associated with a risk of cancer, but it's actually a chemical formerly used in the making of Teflon called PFOA that's to blame. According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, perfluorooctanoic acid is a manufactured perfluorochemical developed in the 1930s and used to make fluoropolymer coatings and products that resist heat, oil, stains, grease and water. Thanks to a federal ban, all Teflon and nonstick cookware made after 2013 should be free of harmful PFOA. Europe enacted the same ban in 2008. All-Clad What are the negative effects of PFOA? In some studies, PFOA has been linked to cancer, immune deficiency and a host of other medical problems. It has also been shown to affect growth and development and injure the liver in laboratory animals. As recently as 2017, chemical giant Dupont settled a lawsuit for more than $670 million for its role in contaminating drinking water with PFOA (also referred to as C-8) in the mid-Ohio Valley. A previous class-action suit from 2004 in the same area led to a study that found PFOA was linked to cancer and compromised immune function, even in small doses. Teflon cookware made before 2013 may be toxic All that was enough for most manufacturers to halt the production of nonstick coatings using PFOA around 2002. Teflon using PFOA wasn't officially banned in the United States until 2014. Europe banned it in 2008. That means if you own Teflon nonstick cookware from 2013 or earlier, there's a chance it contains PFOA. Nine years is typically longer than the average lifespan of a nonstick pan, but if you're not sure, it's probably best to replace any Teflon-coated pots or pans. If you're concerned, look for PFOA-free cookware Because of the ban, all nonstick cookware made in the US should be PFOA-free, but you'd be wise to make sure. Be extra cautious about buying cheap or off-brand cookware, especially if it's not produced in a country with an active PFOA ban. PFOA is still produced elsewhere, largely in China, and used to make consumer products. The good news is that PFOA-free nonstick cookware is cheap, so there's no reason to risk it with anything that might contain the chemical. You can nab a 10-inch skillet from a trusted cookware brand like Misen for $99 or Tramontina for about $30. Luxury cookware brand All-Clad makes a two-piece nonstick cookware set for $60. The Always Pan is a nonstick ceramic alternative to Teflon cookware. Our Place The best natural nonstick cookware alternatives If you're ready to ditch Teflon and chemical-based nonstick pots and pans, there are plenty of more natural nonstick alternatives. The most nonstick of the bunch is ceramic cookware, which has seen a boom in popularity since concerns about Teflon first surfaced. A few popular ceramic cookware options include The Always Pan (read my full review here), Caraway and Greenpan. Cast iron is another cookware material that develops a natural nonstick coating over time, especially if you season it well and care for it properly. It won't likely ever become as nonstick as Teflon, but cast iron has loads of other culinary benefits that are worthy of a few extra seconds of scrubbing in the sink after use. Lodge is a tried-and-true cast-iron cookware producer: You can scoop up a 10-inch skillet for as little as $20. Cast iron develops a nonstick patina over time and is a natural alternative to Teflon. Angela Lang/CNET Carbon steel is yet another option and functions similarly to cast-iron cookware, although it's not quite as heavy, slightly more sensitive to corrosion, and typically more expensive. Carbon steel hasn't really popped off here in the US but is a favorite of professional chefs, as well as yours truly. Cookware startup Made In produces some excellent carbon steel cookware with prices starting around $89, but there are cheaper options out there. FAQs Should I worry about buying Teflon nonstick cookware? The Teflon brand stopped using PFOA, the offending chemical behind Teflon flu, in 2013. That means that it should be safe to use new Teflon cookware any way you see fit -- although it couldn't hurt to continue being cautious when using new nonstick cookware. Can I only catch Teflon flu from Teflon products? No. The name Teflon flu originates from the Teflon brand because they famously used PFOA chemicals in the process of creating its cookware before 2013. However, that doesn't mean your cookware is PFOA-free. If your cookware is created in the US, it should be free of harmful chemicals. But cheap companies and off-brands that create cookware in countries without PFOA bans often still use the chemical in their products, and those might still wind up in your hands.
New York Post
02-06-2025
- Politics
- New York Post
NYS lawmakers want to ban nonstick cookware over chemical that feds say isn't dangerous
Tough luck, Teflon. New York lawmakers are pushing to ban the sale of nonstick cookware over a chemical coating they say is dangerous — but that the federal government has deemed safe for decades. The popular – and typically cheaper – style of pots and pans could be wiped off store shelves by the start of 2027 because the kitchen items contain a type of plastic made from 'forever chemicals.' Advertisement 3 The ban would affect nonstick pans. Fred – The proposed bill that would ban the chemicals used in the cookware and a slew of other products, the latest in a series of nanny-state legislation Empire State officials have passed with or considered in recent years. New York would follow a handful of other states like Rhode Island, Minnesota and Connecticut with a ban, but a trade group lobbying against said lawmakers are misunderstanding the science. Advertisement Steve Burns, of Cookware Sustainability Alliance, said the same type of chemicals are coated with pacemakers and other electronics that are not being attacked by state lawmakers. 'What we try to say is that exact chemical that a cardiac surgeon has been putting into bodies for 60 years, how can that possibly be dangerous?' he told The Post. 'But somehow the same chemical when used to coat a frying pan is deemed to be dangerous. 'If we're gonna go around the state of New York and point at things in everybody's home and say that good, that's good, that's bad,' he added. 'What's it based on?' Nonstick cookware is made from polytetrafluoroethylene, PTFE, a subset of the synthetic chemicals group called per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The ban wouldn't just affect pots and pans. Advertisement The sale of some architectural paints, car parts, cleaning products, rugs, ski wax textiles and polish containing PFAS would also be prohibited, according to the proposed law. The legislation passed the state Senate in May and has already cleared two crucial state Assembly committees in the legislature's lower chamber. A spokesperson for Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie said the legislation is 'being discussed.' The final bill would also need to be signed into law by Gov. Kathy Hochul. Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal (D-Manhattan), one of the bill's architects, called the PFAS-laced products 'cancer causing pollutants' harmful to a person's health and environment. Advertisement 3 Lawmakers in support of the bill claim the type of pots and pans are not safe. Octopus16 – 'By phasing out this whole class of dangerous 'forever chemicals' we can decrease the likelihood that New Yorkers are exposed to these toxins through the life-cycle of the product, including the manufacturing, use, and disposal,' Hoylman-Sigal, who is running for Manhattan borough president, said in a statement. The bill also has some broad support, with moderate Democrats and even a pair of Republican Senators co-sponsoring the proposal. Brooklyn Democratic Assembly Member Phara Souffrant Forres even wrote an op-ed for USA Today last month arguing the chemicals used to coat non-stick cookware pose health risks. 'As a nurse, this concerns me, and it's why I'm in support of getting these chemicals out of our cookware and other products, and ensuring safer alternatives are used,' said Souffrant Forres, a member of the Democratic Socialists of American. The FDA website notes that nonstick applications on pots and pans are an authorized use under federal guidelines. One Westchester Assemblyman against the measure noted the FDA's longstanding stance. 'I think consumer choice is crucial, there's no question,' Assemblyman Matt Slater (R-Yorktown) said. 'But you're running in conflict with what the [Food and Drug Administration] has out there.' 3 Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal is backing the legislation. Hans Pennink Advertisement The potential ban is one of several heavy-handed rules Empire State lawmakers have considered or put in place, including targeting wood and coal-fired stoves, single-use plastic bottles of soap in hotels and flavored nicotine pouches. While nonstick pans with PTFE are considered safe when used correctly, if the cookware is set to a temperature above 500 degrees, the coating can burn off and cause potentially harmful fumes, according to a 2024 Washington Post article. The fumes can lead to a polymer fume fever, also known as Teflon flu. Advertisement An FDA spokesperson told the publication that the agency is not aware of any research that shows PFAS in nonstick cookware could lead to a safety concern for customers – a point Burns from the cookware alliance points to. 'This dates all the way back to the JFK administration and has been true under both Democratic and Republican presidents alike,' he said.
