
‘Remembering': Spotlighting the healing voice in Arpita Singh's art
Many long-term friends and collaborators like Nilima Sheikh, Geeta Kapur, Gayatri Sinha and Deepak Ananth have contributed their perspectives on her practice through essays. Art historian and curator Kapur, for instance, in the essay titled Iconoclast, offers two theoretical frameworks for aesthetically examining Singh's works—feminist psychoanalysis and philosophy. 'Much of Arpita's work, world and ideology is history compressed into fables and allegories; what we witness are diverse imaginaries," she writes.
Singh was born in 1937 in Baranagar, Kolkata, just before World War II. The period of her early childhood was marked by famine, riots and the final thrust for independence. The artist believes that our memories transcend our lifetimes, and carry imprints of our ancestors. This retrospective brings alive those traces of memory in repetitive, frenetic bursts of expression, through repetitive motifs and symbols and questions the cycle of exploitation and erasure.
You enter the show with Searching Sita through Torn Papers, Paper Strips and Labels (2015). The large painting encapsulates Singh's focus on the impact of external sociopolitical events on women. The repetitive ticker that runs through the top of the canvas, Sita. You. I. Us is telling, as are the words 'Abducted, Abused, Slandered, Oppressed, Abandoned, Cursed, Lost", which occupy the edge of the painting towards the bottom right. The torn strips of paper, which traverse the painting like futile paths, reveal her anxiety and hopelessness, as she is tormented by her quagmire (of being forsaken).
Also read: Artistic encounters: How animals contemporary artists
Another work, My Lily Pond (2009) is far removed from the idyllic water lily ponds that would have dotted bucolic Bengal during her early childhood. Rather, it alludes to the toxic cesspool of power and geopolitics. Helpless figures in red with their arms raised are confronted by soldiers in army fatigues, and the word 'water" fills up the background like a deluge of helpless emotions. The American naval base Guantanamo Bay on the map of Cuba, painted prominently, points to the source of the oppression. 'Whatever I tell you three times is true" stencilled at the top right of the work speaks to the posttruth propaganda that normally accompanies such action.
Through both visual and written motifs, she speaks to the collective disenchantment. My Lollipop City: Gemini Rising (2005) is a testament to the city of Delhi. She moved there just before independence and has called it home since. At its heart, the painting is about the labyrinthine palimpsest of Delhi which takes a lifetime to navigate, but where millions of refugees and migrants have found a sense of belonging. It is teeming with figures and familiar motifs that pervade her oeuvre— like swarms of airplanes flying above, gerrymandering bureaucrats and politicians, historical monuments, and serpentine roads. At the very bottom of this large painting, she writes 'You are here", perhaps implying the uphill task migrants face when they aspire for a better life in the city.
In the show, the viewer can observe several inflection points in Singh's career. The period between 1974 and 1982 is referred to as the 'black-and-white" one in her practice. Singh, when queried about this phase by art curator and critic Hans Ulrich Obrist in an interview in August 2024, commented, 'At some point, I couldn't move easily across the canvas. I had to pause and think every time: 'What shall I do next? So, I gave up everything and made the basic elements of art—dot and line, dot and line. They became abstract works because nothing is recognisable in them. But it gave me a certain freedom."
It is this freedom of expression that is reflected in the larger oil paintings that she made subsequently— many of these are featured in the exhibition. The other significant shift is observed in works such as My Mother (1993), heavily influenced by communal riots in the aftermath of the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya in 1992. It heralds a sharper focus on the horrors of violence and their impact on society. Against this backdrop stands the solitary figure of her mother dressed in mournful white sari worn by widows. It is revealing of the tragedy and loss that families, and women in particular, are left to cope with in the aftermath of violence triggered by patriarchal, colonial or capitalist overreach.
Also read: 'Something like Truth': Staging four monologues around truth and justice
Works such as Woman with a Boat (2002) or For Fenugreek (2005), are testament to her sensitive portrayal of the ageing female body—thereby elevating both the fragility and the resilience of a woman, who has survived patriarchy, marriage, childbirth, body shaming, depression, and more.
Ultimately, her paintings are significant because they capture the precarious lived realities of post-independence India profoundly. Her repetitive motifs work despite their overwhelming presence, because they leave room for interpretation. Critically, the intergenerational traumas that women carry both from their collective pasts and uncertain futures, find a healing voice in her paintings—creating room for contemplation, support and empathy.
At Serpentine North Gallery, London until 27 July.
Anindo Sen is an independent art writer.
A spotlight on South-Asian artists
Aarti Lohia first discovered her passion for collecting art while living in Indonesia years ago. Today, she is a trustee of the South London Gallery and the Kochi Biennale Foundation, and serves on multiple councils such as at the Tate Modern. Through the S.P. Lohia Foundation—an international notfor-profit established in the UK in 2016—she backs South Asian artistic voices on the global stage. In 2022, she supported London's National Gallery's modern and contemporary programme, followed by a collaboration with the South London Gallery to bring Nairy Baghramian's Misfits series to London. Most recently, Lohia has supported Arpita Singh's major solo at the Serpentine. In an interview with Lounge, the Londonbased philanthropist reflects on the significance of Singh's practice and the broader role of philanthropy in strengthening South Asia's cultural ecosystem. Edited excerpts:
How significant is Arpita Singh's exhibition at the Serpentine?
Arpita Singh's works trigger emotions in the audience. Her works blend form and style with cartography, imagined and continued characters, and are done with a flourish in colour that is authentically Indian. We consider it a matter of pride to be able to bring Arpita Singh's solo works to one of the most impactful global art galleries. The fact that it is taking place during the London summer makes it a great opportunity to present her work to people from everywhere, and from across age groups and cultures free of cost. It is amazing that it has taken six decades to bring Arpita Singh's works to the world stage in a solo institutional exhibition. This has become a valuable opportunity to open doors for more artists from India and South Asia on globally relevant platforms
What role has philanthropy played in strengthening the art ecosystem in South Asia?
The Global South has emerged as a fluid and evolving concept, especially as colonial histories are being re-examined through contemporary voices. Artists from these regions offer alternative perspectives on recent history, young democracies, and social change. Philanthropy plays a key role in amplifying their work globally—but there's still much ground to cover. Arpita Singh, for instance, offers a deeply personal and powerful view of India's evolving society, especially through the experiences of its women. The S.P. Lohia Foundation is committed to supporting artists from or connected to the Global South, and Singh's work aligns closely with that mission.
Also read: Lounge Loves: Vodka sodas, a musical time machine and more
Are there intersections between your collecting and philanthropic journey?
My interest in collecting began in Indonesia, surrounded by its rich traditions of art and craft, and deepened in Singapore, where I engaged more closely with Indian contemporary artists. I noticed a clear philanthropic gap in supporting this space. While my collection is personal, my philanthropic work—through the foundation and engagement with institutions like Tate and the Museum of Modern Art—is focused on amplifying South Asian voices globally. I was among the early supporters of the Kochi-Muziris Biennale and continue to champion it internationally. For me, collecting is a hobby; philanthropy is a passion rooted in creating visibility and impact for Indian artists.
What leads to the decisions to support particular artists/ organisations/ museums?
Art institutions hold lasting value—they preserve cultural memory beyond shifting governments or politics. I'm drawn to organisations that share our foundation's values and aim to broaden representation. Personally, I connect with artists whose work is consistent and meaningful over time. At Serpentine, for instance, I appreciate how Hans Ulrich Obrist highlights underrepresented female voices. Supporting Nairy Baghramian's Jumbled Alphabet aligned with our belief in championing immigrant narratives. We're drawn to institutions that embrace diverse, progressive perspectives beyond the mainstream.
—Avantika Bhuyan
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
20 hours ago
- Time of India
Sana Raees Khan on the quashing of FIR against Tanu Weds Manu producer: This judgment protects countless others from malicious prosecution
Sana Raees Khan and Shailesh R Singh The Supreme Court recently quashed a cheating case filed against Bollywood producer Shailesh R Singh, known for films like Tanu Weds Manu . The court observed that monetary recovery cannot be sought through criminal proceedings or police intervention, stating that such disputes should be resolved through appropriate civil mechanisms. The bench also expressed displeasure at the manner in which the Allahabad High Court dealt with Singh's petition to quash the FIR lodged by complainant Kunal Jain. T he dispute arose after the film Lady Killer, produced by Singh, underperformed at the box office. The complainant, who had invested money in the project, allegedly failed to recover his investment with interest and subsequently filed a criminal case. Advocate Sana Raees Khan, representing Singh, argued that the FIR stemmed from a civil dispute that had been wrongly given a criminal colour. She pointed out that Singh is the co-founder and production head of a company engaged in the production of motion pictures, and that a commercial disagreement was being misrepresented as a criminal offence. Khan told the court that the FIR did not disclose any prima facie case of cheating or criminal intent. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Villas in Dubai | Search Ads Get Info Undo She argued, 'In order to constitute the offence of cheating, there must be evidence indicating that the accused intended to deceive the complainant right from the beginning. A plain reading of the FIR, which alleges that an amount of ₹9.56 crore is due from the petitioner, fails to establish any element of criminality. ' She further highlighted that the High Court had directed Singh to undergo mediation and deposit ₹25 lakh in advance with the complainant before mediation proceedings — a move she said prejudged the outcome and undermined the very purpose of the quashing petition. Commenting on the outcome, Sana told us, 'This landmark judgment not only protects my client Shailesh Singh but also offers relief to countless others facing malicious prosecutions. I am proud to have led this legal battle and secured a precedent that upholds the sanctity of criminal justice. It's a verdict that will resonate far beyond this case. I remain deeply respectful of the judiciary's wisdom.'


Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Badshah reignites feud with Honey Singh over 'Brown Rang' credits: 'I wrote it, not him'
Badshah has once again sparked the industry in India's hip-hop scene by claiming authorship of the 2011 hit 'Brown Rang,' a track widely associated with Yo Yo Honey Singh . The controversy resurfaced on July 22, when Badshah responded to a fan's post on social media with a pointed one-word jab: 'Credits.' 'He had the beat, but I wrote the song' The rapper elaborated that in 2011, Honey Singh had called him to mix a track. At the time, Badshah had already written 'Brown Rang,' while Singh had a beat paired with lyrics that Badshah described as 'weird.' He offered to rewrite the lyrics, and the final version, according to Badshah, was entirely his creation. He also claimed to have written the rap portion of 'Angrezi Beat,' another track often credited solely to Singh. Badshah said it in various 2024 interviews. Mafia Mundeer : From brotherhood to breakdown Both artists began their careers as part of the now-defunct hip-hop collective Mafia Mundeer, which also included Raftaar, Ikka, and Lil Golu. In the early 2010s, the group became well-known underground thanks to songs like 'Khol Botal,' 'Begani Naar Buri,' and 'Delhi Ke Deewane.' However, internal disputes over contracts, credit, and creative control led to a sour split. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Indonesia: New Container Houses (Prices May Surprise You) Container House | Search Ads Search Now Undo Badshah has previously accused Singh of being 'self-centred,' alleging that he made collaborators sign blank contracts and failed to acknowledge their contributions. Social media clash: 'Chomu, I'm not doing this for your support' The latest flare-up began when a fan posted a collage of Honey Singh's physical transformation and jokingly asked, 'What did he eat?' Badshah replied with 'Credits.' When another user tried to defend Singh and claimed he wrote Brown Rang, Badshah shot back: 'Chomu, tere support ke liye nahi kar raha main ye,' making it clear that he wasn't seeking validation but setting the record straight. A feud that refuses to die Badshah publicly expressed his desire to end the feud at a 2024 concert in Dehradun, calling Singh "a grudge he wanted to leave behind." His recent statements, however, suggest that tensions are still simmering beneath the surface. Fans continue to disagree, some of them support Honey Singh's heritage, while others support Badshah's claims.


India Today
a day ago
- India Today
Ratan Thiyam, Indian playwright and theatre icon, dies at 77
Legendary Indian playwright, theatre director, and cultural visionary Ratan Thiyam died in the early hours of Wednesday at the age of 77, leaving behind a towering legacy in Indian theatre. He breathed his last at around 1:30 am at the Regional Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS) in Imphal, where he had been undergoing treatment.A pioneering figure in the "Theatre of Roots" movement, Thiyam was best known for fusing traditional Manipuri performance styles with contemporary theatrical forms, crafting a distinctive stage language that earned him critical acclaim both in India and abroad. His decades-long career transformed the landscape of modern Indian theatre, making him one of its most revered and influential contributions were recognised with numerous national and international accolades. His honours included the Indo-Greek Friendship Award (1984), Sangeet Natak Akademi Award (1987), Fringe Firsts Award at the Edinburgh International Festival (1987), and the Padma Shri conferred by the Government of India in 1989. In 1990, he gained global recognition with the Diploma from the Cervantino International Festival in Mexico. His later awards included the Kalidas Samman (2005), John D. Rockefeller Award (2008), Bharat Muni Samman (2011), and the prestigious Sangeet Natak Akademi Fellowship (Akademi Ratna) in 2012, capping his legacy as a true cultural titan. He also received the Bhupen Hazarika Foundation Award in news of his demise spread, tributes and condolences poured in from across the country. Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma described Thiyam as 'a leading light of the Theatre of Roots movement' and 'a brilliant ambassador of the rich culture of Manipur and the Northeast.''He used art as a powerful vehicle to convey the emotions and aspirations of the people,' Sarma said in a heartfelt tribute on social Manipur Chief Minister N. Biren Singh also expressed deep sorrow over Thiyam's passing, calling him 'a true luminary of Indian theatre' and 'an esteemed son of Manipur.' Singh remembered Thiyam for his unwavering passion for theatre and his role in preserving and promoting Manipuri cultural heritage through the stage.'His work carried the soul of Manipur, echoing its stories, its struggles, and its beauty,' Singh a former chairperson of the National School of Drama (NSD), is credited with elevating Indian theatre to international standards. His innovative use of movement, music, and stagecraft brought alive themes of identity, morality, and human conflict, grounded in Indian philosophical and aesthetic for iconic productions such as Chakravyuh, Uttar Priyadarshi, and Andha Yug, Thiyam built a formidable reputation as a master storyteller, philosopher, and cultural guardian. His theatre company, Chorus Repertory Theatre, based in Imphal, became a training ground and home for aspiring artists from across the Thiyam's death marks the end of an era, but his artistic spirit will continue to resonate through generations of theatre practitioners, scholars, and contributions not only brought Manipuri theatre into the national spotlight but also made a lasting impact on the global stage.- Ends