Skullcandy just launched its most advanced headphones to date
Skullcandy has relaunched its Aviator headphone series after a 15-year hiatus
The new Aviator 900 ANC is its new flagship offering at $300 / £250. While not quite the brand's priciest headphones to date, they're being touted as the most premium and advanced, and are priciest in the current line-up.
While the original Aviator line made its debut in 2010, this revival attempts to blend the series' distinctive retro aesthetic with updated audio tech.
This includes THX Spatial Audio with head tracking – a Skullcandy first – which promises a more immersive listening experience.
Users will also be able to create a customised sound profile powered by Mimi – the same tech found in products from other brands, including Focal, Philips, and Nothing.
Beyond tailoring the sound, it will also reportedly restore detail, while letting you enjoy music at lower volumes.
As for noise cancellation, the Aviator 900 feature six microphones to help block out the outside world, while battery life can reach up to 60 hours with ANC turned off.
This drops to around 50 hours with it turned on, while a 10-minute quick charge provides four hours' worth of juice.
For context, this is pretty respectable, though it doesn't quite match the likes of the never-ending Cambridge Audio Melomania P100, which lasts up to 100 hours without ANC, and 50 hours with it turned on.
Still, Skullcandy's latest cans trounce more expensive handsets like the £400 five-star Sony WH-1000XM6 in terms of battery life, with Sony's offering only managing 30 hours with ANC on. The audio and ANC performance though, is likely a different story.
This is all, of course, without mentioning the design. It won't be to everyone's tastes, but we rather like the organic curves, coiled wires, and suede materials.
Physical controls like a knurled thumbwheel are a bonus too, and there's even a tiny multi-function LCD display with suitable retro orange digits for (presumably) displaying information like the current volume level. They fold flat as well, which is a bonus for compact travellers.
Connectivity includes Bluetooth 5.3 with LE Audio support, multipoint pairing for simultaneous device connections, and Google Fast Pair integration.
The accompanying Skullcandy app also provides customisation options, including five-band EQ adjustment, button remapping, and adjustable transparency modes.
You'll notice we haven't mentioned anything about the audio hardware – the press release is notably devoid of any actual physical specs like driver type, size, frequency response and the like, so we'll naturally have to reserve all judgement until we get to take them for a spin.
The Aviator 900 ANC are available now via Skullcandy's website and selected retailers globally for $300 / £250 (Australian pricing and availability have yet to be confirmed).
Whether or not it's worth forking out that much when excellent alternatives like the far cheaper Sony WH-CH720N exist, remains to be seen. The fact that you can also get the proven Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless for £199 in the UK at the time of writing is also tempting.
Still, we're looking forward to seeing how Skullcandy shapes up against the competition. Watch this space.
MORE:
Best over-ear headphones 2025: wired and wireless pairs tested by our in-house experts
Bag the five-star Sennheiser Momentum 4 headphones for only £199
Best headphones 2025: tested by our experts
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
39 minutes ago
- CBS News
USDOT pulls the plug on $26 million MagLev project citing poor planning, rising costs
Sean P. Duffy, the U.S. Department of Transportation Secretary, cancelled two grants that would've funded the proposed high speed MagLev train between Baltimore to Washington, D.C. The USDOT along with the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) made the announcement on Friday calling off two grants totaling over $26 million for the Super Magnetic Levitation Project (SCMAGLEV). The project was highly favored by Governor Moore, who traveled to Ogatayama, Japan in April during a trade mission to test ride the train. The press release cites the ending of the government's involvement due to, "a decade of poor planning, significant community oppositions, tremendous cost overruns, and nothing to show for it..." "We want big, beautiful projects worthy of taxpayer dollars – including high-speed rail. This project lacked everything needed to be a success from planning to execution. This project did not have the means to go the distance, and I can't in good conscience keep taxpayers on the hook for it," said U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy. "We'll continue to look for exciting opportunities to fund the future of transportation and encourage innovation." The FRA also claims the project would have major negative impacts to federal and national security agencies. Sincer 2016, when the FRA began working on the project, there have been many delays along with rising costs. The environmental review process for the project has also been stopped two times on the Federal Permitting Dashboard. It has been on hold since August 2021 until now. Overall, the estimated cost to complete the project would have been nearly $20 billion. The MagLev, short for magnetic levitation, is the world's fastest train. Some models are reportedly able to reach speeds of 370 miles per hour using magnetic fields to lift and propel trains without direct contact with train tracks. Without the friction caused when train wheels touch their tracks, the train can essentially levitate, creating a smoother, faster experience. The train had the potential to boost Maryland's economy, per Wayne Rogers, Northeast Maglev Chair. According to him, the project could have created over 160,000 jobs. However, many Marylanders whose homes were in the path of the proposed project were angry with the thought of a high speed train in their backyard.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Mark Zuckerberg's Meta pays ‘tens of millions of dollars' to poach top Apple AI exec — adding to murderers' row of new hires
Mark Zuckerberg's Meta has reportedly forked over 'tens of millions of dollars' to poach one of Apple's top artificial intelligence researchers as the tech giant continued to add to a murderers' row of high-paid talent. Ruoming Pang, who led the team responsible for developing Apple's AI models, will become the latest member to join Meta's new 'Superintelligence Lab,' Bloomberg reported, citing sources with knowledge of the matter. Meta reportedly lured Pang, who had worked at Apple since 2021, with a compensation package 'worth tens of millions of dollars per year,' the sources said. The company also recently hired away researchers Yuanzhi Li from OpenAI and Anton Bakhtin from Anthropic. In all, Meta has poached more than a dozen top AI researchers since last week, purportedly offering compensation packages worth $100 million or more to win the AI arms race – meaning the company's total spending on hires could soon surpass $1 billion, if it hasn't already. At least nine of the hires jumped ship from Sam Altman's OpenAI, with the others coming from Google DeepMind and Amazon-backed Anthropic. The new hires will be part of the the newly formed Meta Superintelligence Labs, headed by former Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang. Late last month, Zuckerberg announced that Wang came aboard after Meta invested nearly $15 billion for a 49% stake in the startup. Other key hires include former GitHub CEO Nat Friedman, ex-Safe Superintelligence CEO Daniel Gross and former OpenAI researcher Trapit Bansal, who played a key role in developing the ChatGPT maker's AI reasoning models. 'As the pace of AI progress accelerates, developing superintelligence is coming into sight,' Zuckerberg said in an internal message to employees on June 30. The announcement helped push Meta's stock to an all-time high. Meta confirmed the hire but declined further comment. Apple did not immediately respond. Meta's tactics have miffed Altman, who has publicly grumbled about his billionaire rival targeting OpenAI's employees with exorbitant packages. Top Meta executive Andrew Bosworth reportedly pushed back during a recent all-hands meeting, telling employees that Altman was being 'dishonest' about the extent of the offers. At the same time, Meta denied a report from the tech news site Wired that it had offered up to $300 million to some AI talent – numbers that, if true, would dwarf the annual pay of some of the world's top tech executives. 'Some people have chosen to greatly exaggerate what's happening for their own purposes,' Meta spokesperson Andy Stone said at the time. Meanwhile, the loss of Pang was another setback for Apple, which has struggled to integrate new AI features for its iPhones and other hardware. Pang oversaw roughly 100 employees at Apple. During Apple's Worldwide Developers Conference last month, the company confirmed that its long-teased AI overhaul of the Siri voice assistant still needed more work before it could be released to the public.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Meta dishes out $250M to lure 24-year-old AI whiz kid: ‘We have reached the climax of ‘Revenge of the Nerds'
Mark Zuckerberg's Meta gave a 24-year-old artificial intelligence whiz a staggering $250 million compensation package, raising the bar in the recruiting wars for top talent — while also raising questions about economic inequality in an AI-dominated future. Matt Deitke, who recently dropped out of a computer science doctoral program at the University of Washington, initially turned down Zuckerberg's 'low-ball' offer of approximately $125 million over four years, according to the New York Times. But when the Facebook founder, a former whiz kid himself, met with Deitke and doubled the offer to roughly $250 million — with potentially $100 million paid in the first year alone — the young researcher accepted what may be one of the largest employment packages in corporate history, the Times reported. 'When computer scientists are paid like professional athletes, we have reached the climax of the 'Revenge of the Nerds!'' Professor David Autor, an economist at MIT, told The Post on Friday. Deitke's journey illustrates how quickly fortunes can be made in AI's limited talent pool. After leaving his doctoral program, he worked at Seattle's Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence, where he led the development of Molmo, an AI chatbot capable of processing images, sounds, and text — exactly the type of multimodal system Meta is pursuing. In November, Deitke co-founded Vercept, a startup focused on AI agents that can autonomously perform tasks using internet-based software. With approximately 10 employees, Vercept raised $16.5 million from investors including former Google CEO Eric Schmidt. His groundbreaking work on 3D datasets, embodied AI environments and multimodal models earned him widespread acclaim, including an Outstanding Paper Award at NeurIPS 2022. The award, one of the highest accolades in the AI research community, is handed out to around a dozen researchers out of more than 10,000 submissions. The deal to lock up Deitke underscores Meta's aggressive push to compete in artificial intelligence. Meta has reportedly paid out more than $1 billion to build an all-star roster, including luring away Ruoming Pang, former head of Apple's AI models team, to join its Superintelligence Labs team with a compensation package reportedly worth more than $200 million. The company said capital expenditures will go up to $72 billion for 2025, an increase of approximately $30 billion year-over-year, in its earnings report Wednesday. While proponents argue that competition drives innovation, critics worry about the concentration of power among a few companies and individuals capable of shaping AI's development. Ramesh Srinivasan, a professor of Information Studies and Design/Media Arts at UCLA and founder of the university's Digital Cultures Lab, said the direction that companies like Meta are taking with artificial intelligence is 'foundational to why our economy is becoming more unequal by the day.' 'These firms are awarding hundreds of millions of dollars to a handful of elite researchers while simultaneously laying off thousands of workers—many of whom, like content moderators, are not even classified as full employees,' Srinivasan told the New York Post. 'These are the very jobs Meta and similar companies intend to replace with the AI systems they're aggressively developing.' Srinivasan, who advises US policymakers on technology policy and has written extensively on the societal impact of AI, said this model of development rewards those advancing large language models while 'displacing and disenfranchising the workers whose labor, ironically, generated the data powering those models in the first place.' 'This is cognitive task automation,' he said. 'It's HR, administrative work, paralegal work — even driving for Uber. If data can be collected on a job, it can be mimicked by a machine. All of those forms of income are on the chopping block.' Asked whether universal basic income might address mass displacement, Srinivasan, who hosts the Utopias podcast, called it 'highly insufficient.' 'Yes, UBI gives people money, but it doesn't address the fundamental issue: no one is being paid for the data that makes these AI systems possible,' he said. On Wednesday, Zuckerberg told investors on the company's earnings call: 'We're building an elite, talent-dense team. If you're going to be spending hundreds of billions of dollars on compute and building out multiple gigawatt of clusters, then it really does make sense to compete super hard and do whatever it takes to get that, you know, 50 or 70 or whatever it is, top researchers to build your team.' 'There's just an absolute premium for the best and most talented people.' A Meta spokesperson referred The Post to Zuckerberg's comments to investors. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
