Is a Summer Rally on the Horizon in the U.S. Natural Gas Futures Market?
The inventories, rig count, increased LNG demand, and price action during the slow shoulder season point to higher natural gas prices over the coming months. The peak demand season, when prices tend to reach annual highs, occurs in late Q3 and Q4. Given the bullish price trend, buying dips with tight stops could be optimal for natural gas over the coming weeks and months.
SoftBank's Masayoshi Son Unveils $1 Trillion AI Hub Proposal for U.S. to Rival China
Is a Summer Rally on the Horizon in the U.S. Natural Gas Futures Market?
Crude Prices Pressured on Reduced Concern About an Imminent US Strike on Iran
Stop Missing Market Moves: Get the FREE Barchart Brief – your midday dose of stock movers, trending sectors, and actionable trade ideas, delivered right to your inbox. Sign Up Now!
Nearby natural gas futures were at the $3.644 per MMBtu level on May 12, 2025. They were higher at near the $4 level on June 20.
U.S. natural gas futures are in a bullish trend in June 2025.
The daily chart of NYMEX natural gas futures for delivery in August at the Henry Hub shows the bullish price pattern since the April 24 low of $3.394 per MMBtu. The futures were trading at near the $4 level on June 20.
The longer-term chart displays a more significant bullish trend.
The monthly chart shows that natural gas futures have made higher lows and higher highs since trading at a $1.60 low in February 2024. The most recent continuous contract high was $4.908 per MMBtu in March 2025, which was less than half the level at the August 2024 high of $9.987, the highest price since July 2008.
A hot summer will increase natural gas demand
The 2024/2025 withdrawal season ended in March 2025. While natural gas prices tend to reach their highs during winter months, the spring tends to be a weak period for prices, as the shoulder season is when heating and cooling demand fall to annual lows.
As the natural gas market enters the peak cooling season during summer, demand should increase. U.S. natural gas inventories are higher than the five-year average but lower than the same time last year.
As the chart shows, natural gas stockpiles across the United States, at 2.802 trillion cubic feet, were 6.1% above the five-year average for the week ending June 13, 2025. However, they were 7.7% lower than last year's level. The stockpile levels support the price above $4 per MMBtu, but another factor could push prices even higher over the coming weeks and months.
The world's top ten natural gas-producing countries are:The chart indicates that the United States leads the world in natural gas production, followed by Russia in second place and Iran in third. Processing natural gas from a gaseous to a liquid form has increased its reach as LNG travels the world by ocean vessels.
The war between Iran and Israel is escalating in late June 2025, posing significant supply concerns for the LNG market from two perspectives. First, Iran is the third leading producing country, and war in the region has led to attacks on Iran's oil and gas infrastructure. Moreover, Iran's strategic position in the Persian Gulf, and most significantly in the Straits of Hormuz, a logistical chokepoint, could intensify the global LNG supply concerns, leading to higher demand for U.S. LNG and pushing domestic natural gas prices higher.
The most direct route for a risk position in the volatile U.S. natural gas market is the CME's NYMEX division futures and futures options contracts. The futures are highly volatile. Given the margin in the futures arena that increases leverage, the potential for price variance is exceptionally high.
The UNG ETF does an excellent job tracking U.S. natural gas futures on a short-term basis. The latest rally in August natural gas futures took the price 18.7% higher from $3.563 on June 11 to $4.230 per MMBtu on June 20.
Over the same period, UNG rose 15.4% from $15.70 to $18.12 per share. UNG underperformed natural gas futures because they reached their latest high on June 19 and early on June 20, a holiday in the U.S. when the stock market was closed.
Over the same period, the leveraged BOIL ETF product magnified UNG and the natural gas futures' price action.
The chart shows BOIL's 30.7% rally from $48.73 to $63.68 per share from June 11 through June 18.
At $60.90 per share, BOIL had nearly $280 million in assets under management. BOIL trades an average of over 2.86 million shares daily and charges a 0.95% management fee. As BOIL is a bullish, leveraged natural gas product, the KOLD ETF provides market participants with the opportunity for exposure on the short side of the U.S. natural gas market.
As natural gas futures move into the U.S.'s peak cooling season, supply concerns over worldwide LNG supplies have increased because of the ongoing war between Israel and Iran. Natural gas prices rallied to nearly $10 per MMBtu in August 2024. At near $4 in late June 2025, natural gas prices could have substantial upside potential over the coming days and weeks.
Meanwhile, leveraged products like the BOIL and KOLD ETFs require careful attention to risk-reward dynamics. Time and price stops will protect capital if natural gas prices move contrary to expectations or remain stable. Time decay tends to erode BOIL and KOLD prices as the ETF's employ swaps and options to create leverage. Another risk is that while natural gas futures trade around the clock, UNG, BOIL, and KOLD are only available during U.S. stock market hours. The ETF products can miss highs or lows occurring when the stock market is closed.
A summer rally could be on the horizon in the natural gas futures market, which has significant potential, as we saw in August 2024 when the price rose to nearly $10 per MMBtu.
On the date of publication, Andrew Hecht did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Barchart.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why United Natural Foods' (UNFI) Unusual Options Activity Points to a Potential Rebound
As a monitoring device, Barchart's screener for unusual stock options volume presents an important barometer for how the smart money may be positioning itself. By noting both the volume relative to longer-term averages and the overall flow of capital, retail investors can paint a sentiment picture and possibly determine where the market may head next. One idea to keep close tabs on is United Natural Foods (UNFI). Since the start of the year, UNFI stock dropped almost 15% of equity value. In the trailing month, sentiment has been particularly poor, with the security shedding more than 26%. However, in the past five sessions, UNFI gained 6.05%, potentially reflecting a behavioral shift. Is Apple Stock 'Dead Money' in July 2025? Watch This AAPL Options Indicator Now. BAC Earnings Play: Profiting from Volatility with a Naked Put Analysts Keep Raising Microsoft Stock Price Targets - Time to Buy? Stop Missing Market Moves: Get the FREE Barchart Brief – your midday dose of stock movers, trending sectors, and actionable trade ideas, delivered right to your inbox. Sign Up Now! On Monday, United Natural had a strong day, moving up 2.37%. Unsurprisingly, the company represented one of the highlights for unusual options activity. Specifically, total derivatives volume reached 6,709 contracts, representing a 73.85% lift over the trailing one-month average. Further, call volume clocked in at 6,319 contracts versus put volume of only 390, yielding a put/call ratio of 0.06. On paper, the low ratio indicates that more traders were engaging call options than puts, suggesting a bullish outlook. Barchart's options flow screener — which focuses exclusively on big block transactions likely placed by institutional investors — confirmed the intuitive reading of the ratio with a net trade sentiment of $124,800 above parity. What's intriguing is that the biggest transactions by dollar volume overwhelmingly stemmed from call options. Since Barchart's algorithm identified the sentiment as bullish, it would imply that the calls represented debit-based transactions, meaning that UNFI stock would have to reach established profitability thresholds for the underlying trades to be successful. That's 'directly' bullish in my book. To be fair, interpreting options flow — or any options-related info — is a tricky matter. Absent interviewing the traders involved, you're never 100% sure of the strategies and motivations behind the transactions. That said, the quantitative signal seems to back up the bullish case for UNFI stock. As insightful as reports on the derivatives market may be, they're still very much interpretive. While arguably better than the traditional methodologies of fundamental and technical analysis, these reports still lack specificity. For traders (especially options traders), a thesis cannot merely be centered on the magnitude component (y-axis); it must also consider the time element (x-axis). In other words, options traders live in a world of probabilities. To survive and thrive in this ecosystem, statistical analysis is necessary but the practice is difficult to conduct in the financial realm. Initially, you might think it's as easy as taking the frequency of the desired outcome divided by the total number of events in the dataset. However, this approach only calculates the derivative probability or outcome odds over the entire dataset's distribution. What we are looking for? We're seeking conditional probabilities — outcome odds over a specific subset of the data. It's a much more useful statistic, similar to a situational batting average (such as when there are runners in scoring position) rather than a simple batting average over last season. By understanding conditional odds, we can use math to determine when to swing and when to wait for our pitch. It's a beautiful concept that, once you see it, you'll never want to go back to the typical spray-and-pray approach. However, calculating conditional odds is a troubling practice in finance because share prices often fluctuate wildly over time. That's why a conversion process is necessary and market breadth — or sequences of accumulative and distributive sessions — offers an ideal solution. As a representation of demand, market breadth is effectively binary and that lends itself to the categorization of price action as distinct, discrete behavioral events. For example, in the last two months, the price action of UNFI stock can be converted as a 6-4-D sequence: six up weeks, four down weeks, with a negative trajectory across the 10-week period. Admittedly, this process compresses UNFI's magnitude dynamism into a simple binary code. But now, distinct demand profiles can be categorized across 10-week intervals, facilitating probabilistic analysis based on the statistical quantification of past analogs. As it turns out, since January 2019, the 6-4-D sequence has flashed 34 times. In 70.59% of cases, the following week's price action results in upside, with a median return of 3.62%. Should the bulls maintain control over the next three weeks, investors could potentially see an additional 4.4% of performance tacked on. Using Friday's closing price of UNFI stock of $22.76 as an anchor, $24.60 could be a legitimate target over the next three weeks. Given Monday's strong performance, a push toward the psychologically significant $25 level wouldn't be out of the question. Based on the market intelligence above, aggressive speculators may consider the 23/25 bull call spread expiring July 18. This transaction involves buying the $23 call and simultaneously selling the $25 call, for a net debit paid of $100. Should UNFI stock rise through the short strike price ($25) at expiration, the maximum reward is also $100, a payout of 100%. From a tactical perspective, what makes this trade attractive is the three weeks that traders have for the transaction to work out favorably. Further, the breakeven price for this trade is $24, which is reasonable given the current market price of $23.31. Another element to consider is the implied shift in sentiment regime of the 6-4-D sequence. As a baseline, the chance that a long position in UNFI stock will be profitable over any given week is 58.53%. While that's already robust, the 6-4-D adds 12 percentage points of 'free odds' in the bullish speculator's favor. On the date of publication, Josh Enomoto did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Errore nel recupero dei dati Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Analysts Keep Raising Microsoft Stock Price Targets - Time to Buy?
Sell-side stock analysts continue to raise their price targets on Microsoft Corp (MSFT) stock. One way to play this is to sell short out-of-the-money (OTM) MSFT puts. They provide a short-put yield of over 1.3% one month out for a 4% lower strike price. MSFT is trading at $492.50, just off its recent peak of $497.45 on June 26. It could have much further to go, based on our free cash flow (FCF) based price target and analysts' recent recommendations. Is Apple Stock 'Dead Money' in July 2025? Watch This AAPL Options Indicator Now. BAC Earnings Play: Profiting from Volatility with a Naked Put Analysts Keep Raising Microsoft Stock Price Targets - Time to Buy? Get exclusive insights with the FREE Barchart Brief newsletter. Subscribe now for quick, incisive midday market analysis you won't find anywhere else. My June 10 Barchart article ("Microsoft Stock is Up In the Last Month - Is MSFT Still a Buy? ") showed how MSFT could be worth $581.71 per share. That is still 18% over today's price, but at the time it was almost 24% than the price at the time of the article ($469.69). This price target was based on Microsoft's strong free cash flow (FCF) and FCF margins. However, there is reason to upgrade our price target, as analysts have done. For example, using a 29% FCF margin (the same as its latest quarter) and analysts' next 12-month (NTM) revenue average of $298 million, we forecast $86.42 billion in FCF. Then, using a 2.0% FCF yield (i.e., the same as a 50x FCF multiple), we forecast a market cap of over $4.32 trillion: $86.42b FCF x 50 = $4,321b market cap. However, it now makes sense to look one full year out to the fiscal year ending June 30, 2026, using revenue forecasts for the period. For example, Seeking Alpha shows that 57 analysts now project FY 2026 revenue (for the year ending June 30, 2026) will be $316.49 billion. That means our new FCF estimate, using a 29% FCF margin, is higher at almost $92 billion for FY 2026: 29% x $316.49 billion = $91.78 billion FCF That raises our market cap estimate, using a 2.0% FCF yield (i.e., a 50x multiple): 50 x $91.78 billion = $4,589 billion (i.e., almost $4.6 trillion) market cap Today's market cap, according to Yahoo! Finance, is $3,655 billion. As a result, MSFT's value could rise by +25.6% from here over the next year: $4,589 b/ $3,655b = 1.2555 -1 = +25.55% That means MSFT stock is worth 25.55% more, or $618 per share: $492.50 x 1.2555 = $618.09 new price target That is +6.2% from my prior price target. Moreover, since then, analysts have significantly raised their price targets. For example, Yahoo! Finance now shows that 60 analysts now have a $522.26 average price target. That is up from $512.04 as of June 10. In addition, Barchart's average survey price target is $522.81, up from $515.74 on June 10. So, on average, analysts have raised their price targets about +1.65% in the last 3 weeks. Moreover, which tracks recent analysts' stock price recommendations, shows that 37 analysts have an average price target of $556.11. That is +4.78% higher than the June 10 price target average of $530.74. This shows that analysts agree with my FCF-based analysis: MSFT is still deeply undervalued. However, there is no guarantee this will occur. The stock could fall from its peak. One way to play this is to set a lower buy-in target by shorting out-of-the-money (OTM) put options. This also provides existing shareholders with extra income. In my last Barchart article, I suggested selling short the $450 strike price put option that expires on July 18. This was slightly over 4% below the trading price of $469.36. The investor received $4.10 in midpoint premium, representing a yield of almost 1% (i.e., $4.10 / $450.00 = 0.00911 = 0.91%. However, now those puts have fallen in price to just 53 cents at the midpoint. So, most of the $4.10 premium has already been earned by the short-seller. It might make sense for a trader to cover this trade (i.e., enter an order to 'Buy to Close'), and roll it over into a new short-put trade. For example, the Aug. 8 MSFT put expiration period shows that the $470.00 strike put has a premium of $6.80 per put option contract shorted. That is slightly over 4% below today's price. So, the short-put yield is higher than before (for new investors), almost 1.5%: $6.80/$470 = 0.01447 = 1.447% (38 days to expiry) Moreover, for investors who rollover the prior trade, the new yield is still high: $(6.80 - $-0.53)/$470.00 = $6.27 / $470 = 0.1334 = 1.334% The point is that this is even higher than the original short-put yield, even though MSFT stock has risen. So, in total, the rollover trade provides a total yield of 1.334% and 0.91%, or 2.244% over the period from June 10 to July 18 (i.e., 38 days). In addition, less risk-averse investors can short the $475.00 put for $8.05, for a net gross yield of 1.69% (i.e., $8.05/$475.00), and a net (post-rollover) yield of 1.583% (i.e., $7.52/$475.00). That is just over the next 38 days, so the annualized expected return is very high. The result of these plays is that investors using a mix of these trades to make a 1.5% short-put yield over the next month. Moreover, the breakeven point is lower for an investor buying into MSFT if the account is assigned to buy at $470. For example, the breakeven buy-in point (if MSFT falls to $470 over the next month) is: $470 - $6.80 = $463.20, or 6.16% below today's price That provides huge upside, over one-third higher, given our $618.09 price target: $618.09/$463.20 = 1.334 = +33.4% upside The bottom line is that MSFT looks very cheap here. Our new FCF-based price target, as well as analysts' upgrades, shows it is at least 20% to 25% undervalued. So, it makes sense for new investors in MSFT to set a lower buy-in price target by shorting OTM puts. Existing shareholders can make extra income shorting these OTM puts as well. On the date of publication, Mark R. Hake, CFA did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Energy Demand Optimism Pushes Crude Prices Sharply Higher
August WTI crude oil (CLQ25) Wednesday closed up +2.00 (+3.06%), and August RBOB gasoline (RBQ25) closed up +2.26 (+1.08%). Crude oil and gasoline prices on Wednesday rallied to 1-week highs and settled sharply higher. Crude has support on concerns that Middle East tensions could flare up again after Iran moved to cut off communications with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Gains in crude oil accelerated on Wednesday afternoon after the S&P 500 climbed to a new all-time high, indicating confidence in the economic outlook and energy demand. Crude Oil Prices Supported by Middle East Tensions Nat-Gas Prices Rebound on the Outlook for a Smaller-Than-Average EIA Inventory Build Energy Demand Optimism Pushes Crude Prices Sharply Higher Stop Missing Market Moves: Get the FREE Barchart Brief – your midday dose of stock movers, trending sectors, and actionable trade ideas, delivered right to your inbox. Sign Up Now! Crude oil prices are supported after Iran moved to cut off communications with the IAEA, which could prompt the US and or Israel to launch additional attacks on Iran's nuclear sites. President Trump said the US will "be there" unless Iran backs away from its nuclear program. Weak global employment news on Wednesday was bearish for economic growth and prospects for energy demand. The US Jun ADP employment change unexpectedly fell -33,000, weaker than expectations of a +98,000 increase and the first decline in 2-1/4 years. Also, the Eurozone May unemployment rate unexpectedly rose +0.1 to 6.3%, showing a weaker labor market than expectations of no change at 6.2% Concern about a global oil glut is negative for crude prices. Last Wednesday, Russia stated that it is open to another output hike for OPEC+ crude production in August, when the group meets this Sunday. On May 31, OPEC+ agreed to a 411,000 bpd crude production hike for July after raising output by the same amount for June. Saudi Arabia has signaled that additional similar-sized increases in crude output could follow, which is viewed as a strategy to reduce oil prices and punish overproducing OPEC+ members, such as Kazakhstan and Iraq. OPEC+ is boosting output to reverse the 2-year-long production cut, gradually restoring a total of 2.2 million bpd of production. OPEC+ had previously planned to restore production between January and late 2025; however, production cuts won't be fully restored until September 2026. OPEC June crude production rose +360,000 bpd to a 1-1/2 year high of 28.10 million bpd. Gasoline prices have support from the American Automobile Association (AAA) projection that a record 61.6 million people will travel by car this Fourth of July holiday (June 28 to July 6), up +2.2% from last year and a sign of stronger gasoline demand. Oil prices continue to be undercut by tariff concerns, as President Trump recently stated that he intends to send letters to dozens of US trading partners within one to two weeks, setting unilateral tariffs ahead of the July 9 deadline that followed his 90-day pause. A decline in crude oil held worldwide on tankers is bullish for oil prices. Vortexa reported Monday that crude oil stored on tankers that have been stationary for at least seven days fell by -8.7% w/w to 80.22 million bbl in the week ended June 27. Wednesday's weekly EIA report was mixed for crude and products. On the bullish side, EIA distillate stockpiles fell by -1.7 million bbl, a larger draw than expectations of -1.2 million bbl. Also, crude supplies at Cushing, the delivery point for WTI futures, fell by -1.49 million bbl. On the bearish side, EIA crude inventories unexpectedly rose +3.85 million bbl versus expectations for a -2.7 million bbl draw. Also, EIA gasoline supplies rose by +4.19 million bbl, a larger build than expectations of +900,000 bbl. Wednesday's EIA report showed that (1) US crude oil inventories as of June 27 were -9.3% below the seasonal 5-year average, (2) gasoline inventories were -0.7% below the seasonal 5-year average, and (3) distillate inventories were -21.0% below the 5-year seasonal average. US crude oil production in the week ending June 27 was unchanged w/w at 13.433 million bpd, modestly below the record high of 13.631 million bpd from the week of December 6. Baker Hughes reported last Friday that active US oil rigs in the week ending June 27 fell by -6 to a 3-3/4 year low of 432 rigs. Over the past 2-1/2 years, the number of US oil rigs has fallen from the 5-1/4 year high of 627 rigs posted in December 2022. On the date of publication, Rich Asplund did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
