
Why your electricity bill is set to spike within WEEKS
The Australian Energy Regulator final determination report, released on Monday, had bad news for consumers, starting on July 1 as winter pushes up demand for heaters.
This is based on what retailers can charge customers in NSW, south-east Queensland and South Australia during the next financial year under a default market offer.
High demand and network outages were blamed for the steep wholesale prices feeding into higher retail prices, along with low levels of renewable energy as Australian governments try to phase out coal-fired power stations.
'These spot prices were partially driven by a greater frequency of high price events, which resulted from a range of factors including high demand, coal generator and network outages, and low renewable generation output,' the AER said.
In regional New South Wales, Essential Energy residential customers face the biggest increase of $228 or 9.1 per cent, with the AER citing 'improved network resilience to address climate change-related risks' along with 'the integration of consumer energy resources including rooftop solar, batteries and electric vehicles'.
This takes the average annual electricity bill for 2025-26 to $2,741 , which is even steeper than the $188 or 8.5 per cent increase for Endeavour Energy customers in Sydney, who will be paying $2,411.
The increases in NSW were up to 6.7 per cent above forecast inflation, with more homes having a smart meter monitoring when residents used electricity.
'Retail costs have risen for all customers in each region of NSW, primarily due to increases in retailers' operating costs,' the AER said.
'Increases in bad and doubtful debt costs and smart meter costs also contributed to the overall increases.'
In south-east Queensland, Energex's increases were more moderate at $77 or 3.7 per cent, or 1.3 per cent above forecast inflation to an average of $2,143.
South Australians were set to see a $71 or 3.2 per cent increase, which was 0.8 per cent above predicted inflation for SA Power Networks customers, for an average bill of $2,301.
Canstar data insights director Sally Tindall said the increases were bad news for customers.
'These electricity price hikes will knock the wind out of the sails for many families, just when they thought they'd turned a corner in the cost-of-living crisis,' she said.
'Price hikes of up to $228 for an average household will be too much for some families to bear, particularly as we enter one of the most energy-intensive periods of the year.'
The AER projected bigger increases for customers without a controlled load, where an electrical appliance like a dishwasher can be operated at a different time to the rest of the home to save money during an off-peak period.
The federal government's quarterly $75 rebates were extended until the end of December in the pre-election March Budget, where the price came off the bill without customers having to lodge an application for relief.
This has seen electricity bills fallen by 9.6 per cent in the year to March, helping to reduce headline inflation to just 2.4 per cent.
The AER argued its determination regarding existing customers struck a balance between 'protecting consumers from unjustifiably high prices, while also allowing retailers to recover costs'.
'Retail costs have seen larger increases in all regions,' it said.
'While this source of costs makes up a smaller portion of the total price, the rate of growth means it has contributed more than other elements to the price rises in some regions.'
Wholesale power prices make up 31 to 45 per cent of the AER's default market offer arrangement on electricity bill increases, compared with 11 to 16 per cent for retail costs.
Network costs made up 33 to 48 per cent of the approved price rise.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The one question about Australia's plans for China that Trump wants answered - as Anthony Albanese touches down in Shanghai
Anthony Albanese 's trip to China could be derailed by the Trump administration, who have issued a demand to know how he would respond to an invasion of Taiwan. Prime Minister Albanese and fiancé Jodie Haydon touched down in the Chinese financial hub of Shanghai on Saturday, ahead of a week-long visit that includes a meeting with Chinese Communist Party leader President Xi Jinping. While the Australian leader is set to discuss lighter topics, like trade and tourism campaigns, US President Donald Trump 's team on Saturday demanded answers on whether Australia would back America in a war against China. The US has been largely ambiguous about what its response would be to a Chinese invasion of Taiwan, which China has long claimed territorial rights over. Nevertheless, a report by the Financial Times on Saturday claimed US defence undersecretary Elbridge Colby had questioned Japan and Australia over its positions. The outlet cited five sources who all recalled the topic of the countries' response to a conflict in the Indo-Pacific being raised during meetings. Colby responded to the report on X, formerly Twitter, on Sunday, Australian time. 'As the department has made abundantly and consistently clear, we at Department of Defence are focused on implementing the President's 'America First', common sense agenda of restoring deterrence and achieving peace through strength,' he said. The senior defence official claimed the America First approach was already working. 'This has been a hallmark of President Trump's strategy - in Asia as in Europe where it has already been tremendously successful.' He also suggested several American allies were seeing the 'urgent need to step up' and 'are doing so'. 'President Trump has shown the approach and the formula - and we will not be deterred from advancing his agenda,' he said. In response to questions about Australia's hypothetical response to conflict in the Indo-Pacific, Albanese said 'we have our AUKUS arrangements in place'. 'We'll continue to work through all of these issues,' he said. 'Our alliance with the United States is a very important one for Australia so we'll continue to engage constructively in a coherent, stable, orderly way. 'That's the way I conduct this government.' As for his position on Taiwan, Albanese simply said Australia supports the 'status quo'. 'I think it's important that we have a consistent position, which Australia has had for a long period of time,' he said. 'We support the status quo when it comes to Taiwan. We don't support any unilateral action there. We have a clear position and we have been consistent about that.' Reports on Thursday claimed the US believed Australia should voice its direct support of the US by stating it would use American-made nuclear submarines should a conflict with China arise. However, the production of those submarines was called into question earlier this year by Colby himself, who is leading a review into the AUKUS pact under which the submarine deal was made. Albanese also addressed pressure to make a public statement on Sunday, noting tactical conversations between it and Australia would remain 'private'. 'You don't take private comments to a media conference. By definition, that's in private,' he said. 'We engage in a mature way. That's the way that we deal with our relationships.' Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy on Sunday was more blunt in telling the US it would not dictate Australia's military decisions. 'The sole power to commit Australia to war, or to allow our territory to be used for conflict, is the elected government of the day,' he told the ABC. 'That is our position. Sovereignty will always be prioritised and that will continue to be our position.' Albanese's upcoming sit-down with Xi will be the second time he's met with the Chinese leader, following his excursion to China in November 2023. He is yet to meet with Trump after the president left Canada's G7 summit early in June citing urgent developments in the Middle East. Albanese has faced criticism for meeting with Xi before the leader of one of Australia's biggest allies. However, it's not the first time an Australian leader has met with Xi before the US president. Tony Abbott pulled the same move by meeting with Xi in the weeks after taking office in 2013, before he met with Barack Obama. Tensions between Australia and China have grown since the Asian superpower began ramping up efforts to grow influence over the Indo-Pacific since the 2010s. That included the creation of armed artificial islands in the South China Sea. The Chinese Communist Party's intent to shift from a diplomatic player to a strategist became clear in 2019 with Kiribati and the Solomon Islands both switching its policies regarding Taiwan to side with China. Since then the Chinese People's Liberation Army has extended its presence in international waters, including an excursion down Australia's east coast by three Chinese People's Liberation Army Navy ships.


BBC News
6 hours ago
- BBC News
Community turbine group welcomes wind energy push
The government's push for more energy from wind has been welcomed by a group that operates a community wind turbine where residents pay lower prices for wind turbine at Salway Ash, near Bridport in Dorset, supplies electricity to about 50 households in the surrounding area at prices about 20% lower than the standard has been a de facto ban on new onshore wind turbines in the UK since 2015 but the government said it now wants to see wind at the centre of its "mission to make Britain a clean energy superpower".The government wants to see more benefit to communities who live in areas where wind turbines are installed - this is already happening in parts of Devon. Pete West, from Energy Local Bridport, said the Salway Ash scheme has been a success."We've got 50 householders that have been supplied for over five years now and none of them have left the scheme," said Mr West."There's a huge demand for local people to benefit from renewable energy and they are more likely to accept a wind turbine if they can be supplied with low-cost energy."The turbine was originally built by Peter Bailey on his farmland in said: "It makes more sense to generate locally - you have to find the right sort of places on the windy hillsides but it does work well and complements solar cells well."In the period before the de facto ban was introduced there was public opposition to some wind turbine plans such as the Church of England project to build six turbines in north and west Devon. In Devon, community schemes are in place in places such as Batsworthy Cross between Tiverton and South developer pays into a community benefit fund run by Devon Community Foundation (DCF) which helps residents decide how to best spend the Knott Kos, from DCF, said local residents "know their communities better than anyone".She said: "When they get to see where that money goes and they see tangible benefits from that money coming in - that can really change how they feel about a wind farm being in their community."


The Guardian
9 hours ago
- The Guardian
Australia won't commit in advance to joining hypothetical US-China conflict, Pat Conroy says
Australia will refuse any US request to join a 'hypothetical' conflict with China over Taiwan and won't make any advance commitment, the defence industry minister, Pat Conroy, has said, amid reports Washington is seeking such promises in discussions over the Aukus submarines. Conroy called on China to be more transparent about its military buildup, but said any commitment to war would be the sole power of the Australian government of the day. It came after multiple reports this week that the Pentagon was seeking guarantees from Australia and other allies about how they would respond in the event of a conflict in the Indo-Pacific. The Financial Times reported on Saturday that Elbridge Colby – the US under-secretary of defence for policy, who is also undertaking a review of the Aukus pact which would see America share nuclear-powered submarines with Australia – was asking Japan and Australia to reveal how they would act in a potential US-China war over Taiwan. The Sydney Morning Herald separately quoted a senior US defence official, who reportedly said Washington was seeking 'a clear sense of what we can expect from Australia'. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email The Pentagon was contacted for comment. Colby shared a post on X on Sunday (AEST) which referenced the FT article. In his post, he wrote that the US policy position included 'urging allies to step up their defense spending and other efforts related to our collective defense'. 'This has been a hallmark of President Trump's strategy - in Asia as in Europe where it has already been tremendously successful. 'Of course, some among our allies might not welcome frank conversations. But many, now led by NATO after the historic Hague Summit, are seeing the urgent need to step up and are doing so.' Conroy, a cabinet minister whose portfolio deals heavily with preparing to build the Aukus submarines, rebuked the idea Australia would commit in advance to any conflict. 'The sole power to commit Australia to war, or to allow our territory to be used for a conflict, is the elected government of the day. That is our position. Sovereignty will always be prioritised and that will continue to be our position,' Conroy told the ABC's Insiders program. Conroy said he would not comment on the nature of confidential discussions with the US over Aukus, but said the government would not 'discuss hypotheticals' around what Australia could do in the event of a potential future military engagement. 'The decision to commit Australian troops to a conflict will be made by the government of the day, not in advance but by the government of the day,' he stressed. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion The prime minister, Anthony Albanese, arrived in China on Saturday night for a six-day visit, which includes meetings with president Xi Jinping and premier Li Qiang, with the government saying the trip was about advancing Australia's security and economic interests. On Sky News on Sunday, the treasurer, Jim Chalmers, described the Australia-China relationship as 'full of opportunity but not short of complexity either'. It is unclear when the US may give any further public clarity on Colby's review of Aukus, which was initially described as a 30-day process. The start date of the review is unclear, but it is now 30 days since it was publicly announced. On Insiders, Conroy also declined to respond to reports that Trump may seek further costs from Canberra to fulfil the Aukus submarine deal, which would see the US sell several older ships to Canberra before new assets are constructed onshore in Australia. 'Let's see what the review finds. I'm confident it will support Aukus, just as our review of Aukus found, just as the UK review of Aukus found that. It's in the national interest of all three countries. It will contribute to deterrence as well as grow 20,000 jobs in Australia. Let's see what the US review comes forward with, then we'll react accordingly,' he said. Guardian Australia reported this week that Labor sources don't expect the review to be completed for months, while a Pentagon spokesperson said last week there was no public timeline for the work. Conroy said he didn't believe the report had been completed. The foreign affairs minister, Penny Wong, met her Chinese counterpart Wang Yi at the Asean summit in Malaysia on Friday. Government sources said she raised a number of Australian concerns with Beijing, including the circumnavigation of Australia by a Chinese naval taskforce and live-fire exercises, as well as unsafe actions in the South China Sea. Wong also raised concerns about the detention of Dr Yang Hengjun, Australia's opposition to the death penalty, and human rights in Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong.