North Korea says South Korea's overtures 'great miscalculation'
North Korea has no interest in any policy or proposals for reconciliation from South Korea, the powerful sister of its leader Kim Jong Un said on Monday in the first response to South Korean liberal President Lee Jae Myung's peace overtures.
Kim Yo Jong, who is a senior North Korean ruling party official and is believed to speak for the country's leader, said Lee's pledge of commitment to South Korea-U.S. security alliance shows he is no different from his hostile predecessor.
"If South Korea expects to reverse all the consequences of (its actions) with a few sentimental words, there could be no greater miscalculation than that," Kim said in comments carried by official KCNA news agency.
Lee, who took office on June 4 after winning a snap election called after the removal of hardline conservative Yoon Suk Yeol over a failed attempt at martial law, has vowed to improve ties with Pyongyang that had reached the worst level in years.
As gestures aimed at easing tensions, Lee suspended loudspeaker broadcasts blasting anti-North propaganda across the border and banned the flying of leaflets by activists that had angered Pyongyang.
Kim, the North Korean official, said those moves are merely a reversal of ill-intentioned activities by South Korea that should never have been initiated in the first place.
"In other words, it's not even something worth our assessment," she said.
"We again make clear the official position that whatever policy is established in Seoul or proposal is made, we are not interested, and we will not be sitting down with South Korea and there is nothing to discuss."
South Korea's Unification Ministry said Kim Yo Jong's comments "show the wall of distrust between the South and the North is very high as a result of hostile and confrontational policy over the past few years."
South Korea will continue to make efforts for reconciliation and cooperation with the North, ministry spokesperson Koo Byoung-sam told a briefing.
There has been cautious optimism in the South that the North may respond positively and may even show willingness to re-engage in dialogue, particularly after Pyongyang also shut off its loudspeakers, a move Lee said was quicker than expected.
Still, Lee, whose government is in the midst of tough negotiations with Washington to avert punishing tariffs that President Donald Trump has threatened against a string of major trading partners, has said U.S. alliance is the pillar of South Korea's diplomacy.
Lee said on the anniversary of the Korean War armistice on Sunday Seoul would make efforts in all areas to "strengthen the South Korea-U.S. alliance that was sealed in blood."
North Korea also marked the anniversary which it calls victory day with events including a parade in Pyongyang, although state media reports indicated it was at a relatively lesser scale compared to some previous years.
Columns of soldiers marched holding portraits of commanders including state founder Kim Il Sung with spectators and frail veterans in historic army uniforms in attendance in state media photos, which did not show major weapons as part of the parade.
A formation of military jets flew over the Pyongyang Gymnasium square in the night sky trailing streaks of flares and fireworks. State media made no mention of leader Kim Jong Un's attendance.
The two Koreas, the United States and China, which are the main belligerents in the 1950-53 Korean War, have not signed a peace treaty.
© (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Mainichi
8 hours ago
- The Mainichi
N. Korea's Kim orders freight station construction near China border
TOKYO (Kyodo) -- North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has ordered the construction of a freight station near the Chinese border to support a large-scale greenhouse farm project in the northwest, state-run media reported Saturday. Coming at a time when North Korea has been bolstering military and economic ties with Russia, particularly since Moscow's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, observers are watching whether the move could lead to an uptick in trade with its traditional ally China, which has recently been sluggish. Kim visited the region around Sinuiju on Friday, where severe flooding occurred in July 2024 after the Yalu River, which runs along the border with China, overflowed, according to the Korean Central News Agency. While inspecting embankment and farm construction, Kim called for the creation of a "comprehensive transport center" with a new vegetable storehouse and processing facilities built around it, the official news agency said. The area around the Yalu River has long been prone to flooding during heavy rains, with widespread damage reported last year. But with residential buildings reportedly swiftly rebuilt, Kim was quoted as saying such flood damage, once seen as inevitable, has "became a past story." Beijing is viewed as Pyongyang's closest and most influential ally in economic terms. But China's trade with North Korea in 2024 fell 5 percent from the previous year to about $2 billion, official data showed earlier this year, as bilateral trade lost momentum despite Beijing and Pyongyang marking the 75th anniversary of diplomatic relations.
Japan Times
11 hours ago
- Japan Times
Efforts set to resume to reach plastic pollution pact
Negotiators will take another stab at reaching a global pact on plastic pollution at talks opening Tuesday in Geneva but they face deep divisions over how to tackle the health and ecological hazard. The coming 10 days of talks involving delegates from nearly 180 nations follow a failure to reach a deal last December on how to stop millions of tons of plastic waste from entering the environment each year. Plastic pollution is so ubiquitous that microplastics have been found on the highest mountain peak, in the deepest ocean trench and scattered throughout almost every part of the human body. In 2022, countries agreed they would find a way to address the crisis by the end of 2024, but the talks in Busan, South Korea, failed to overcome fundamental differences. One group of countries sought an ambitious globally binding agreement to limit production and phase out harmful chemicals. However, a group of mostly oil-producing nations rejected production limits and wanted to focus on treating waste. The stakes are high. If nothing is done, global plastic consumption could triple by 2060, according to OECD projections. Meanwhile, plastic waste in soils and waterways is expected to surge 50% by 2040, according to the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), which is acting as the secretariat for the talks. Some 460 million tons of plastic are produced globally each year, half of which is single-use. And less than 10% of plastic waste is recycled. Plastics break down into bits so small that not only do they find their way throughout the ecosystem but into human blood and organs, recent studies show, with largely unknown consequences on the health of current and future generations. Despite the complexity of trying to reconcile the diverging interests the environment, human health, and industry "it's very possible to leave Geneva with a treaty," UNEP Executive Director Inger Andersen told the press in the run-up to the talks. The text published after the failed talks in South Korea contained 300 points that still needed to be resolved. "You have over 300 brackets in the text, which means you have over 300 disagreements," said Bjorn Beeler, executive director and international coordinator at IPEN, a global network aimed at limiting toxic chemicals. "So 300 disagreements have to be addressed." The most divisive issue is whether to restrict production of new plastic, with petroleum-producing nations like Saudi Arabia, Iran and Russia opposing limits. Another contentious point: establishing a list of chemicals considered dangerous, such as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), a family of synthetic chemicals often called forever chemicals as they take an extremely long time to break down. Bjorn Beeler, head of the IPEN network of activist groups working to eliminate pollutants said that no one wants the talks to go to a third round and the diplomats need to show progress. The "context is difficult," a diplomatic source acknowledged on condition of anonymity, saying they could not ignore the changed U.S. attitude toward multilateral initiatives under President Donald Trump. Meanwhile, developing nations are keenly interested in talks "either because they are plastic producers with a risk of a strong impact on their economies or because they suffer from plastic pollution and demand accountability," said the same source. In Nice in June, at the U.N. Oceans Conference, 96 countries, ranging from tiny island states to Zimbabwe, including the 27 members of the European Union, Mexico and Senegal, called for an ambitious treaty, including a target to reduce the production and consumption of plastics. Ilane Seid, chair of the Alliance of Small Island states (AOSIS), said "the treaty should cover the full life cycle of plastics and this includes production. It should not be a waste management treaty." "Governments must act in the interest of people, not polluters," said Graham Forbes, the head of Greenpeace's delegation at the talks, who denounced the presence of industry lobbyists. IPEN's Beeler said negotiators want to avoid another round of talks, but that does not assure an all-encompassing deal will be reached. "The escape hatch is most likely a skeleton that's going to be called a treaty, that needs to have finance, guts, and a soul to be actually something effective," he said.
The Diplomat
21 hours ago
- The Diplomat
The Evolution of ‘Made in China 2025'
The success of China's 'Made in China 2025' initiative cannot be judged simply by how effective the policy was in developing robotics, aerospace, advanced information technology, biopharma, new energy vehicles, and the five other key sectors that were meant to transform the country from a low-cost manufacturing hub into a global high-tech leader. It also needs to be evaluated in light of the priorities that fully emerged only after its launch in 2015: achieving technological self-reliance and bringing industrial supply chains within China's borders. Over the past decade, the Made in China 2025 strategy has successfully driven industrial development in many of its 10 focus sectors. But Beijing's shift toward economic security has broadened this approach, bringing a wider move toward cross-sectoral industrial dominance and more self-sufficient, high-tech supply chains. While localizing value chains inside China and self-sufficiency were part of the mix 10 years ago, the strategy was primarily designed to help China avoid the middle-income development trap, position its companies to become global leaders in their fields, and generate sustained economic growth through assertive industrial policy. China has made great strides in shifting its focus from low-cost production to tech innovation and manufacturing quality – yet supply chain dependencies persist. When Made in China 2025 was launched, it focused on 10 industries with a range of goals. The original policy and roadmap prioritized targets for market share and patent applications and the development of quality Chinese brands, while more broadly aiming to upgrade the economy to move China up global value chains. At the time, the country enjoyed access to international markets, foreign technology, and cross-border investment – and most of its policymakers, private sector, and scientific community did not support a push for more self-reliance. For instance, tech companies like Alibaba and Tencent focused their R&D efforts on the design side of the semiconductor value chain but relied on South Korean or Taiwanese technology for the actual production of chips. The onset of the China-U.S. trade war during Donald Trump's first presidency changed this equation. Washington's restrictions on Chinese tech giants Huawei and ZTE and the resulting broader tech war after 2018 galvanized Chinese society to embrace a whole-of-nation effort for technological advancement and self-reliance. Accordingly, the focus of Made in China 2025, as well as Beijing's metrics for assessing its results, shifted from avoiding the middle-income trap to achieving technological independence across its 10 focus sectors – with varying degrees of success.
