Democrats push to investigate Florida insurance companies
House Minority Leader Fentrice Driskell, D-Tampa, sent both Governor Ron DeSantis and House Speaker Daniel Perez letters asking to further investigate the recent news of property insurance companies claiming to be in distress, while at the same time, shifting billions in profits to companies they own.
Trump pauses aid to Ukraine amid clash with Zelensky
'We're pushing for that accountability, calling for an investigation, asking the Florida house to use its subpoena power. Let's put some folks under oath and let's get some questions,' Driskell said.
Democrats say the letters to DeSantis and Perez were sparked by the Tampa Bay Times' recent report on a secret study. The study found insurers have sent billions of dollars to affiliate companies, or to shareholders, instead of using those profits to benefit policy holders.'We know from the stories that we hear in districts that were ravished by hurricanes, were ravaged by flooding, that people are not getting what they need from their property insurance company,' Driskell said.
Driskell says the study conducted in 2022 confirms top insurance companies have been ripping off everyday Floridians and then lying to the legislature.
Aside from the news, Florida Insurance Commissioner Michael Yaworsky points to market stability emerging here in the state
'We are truly seeing good news emerge on every front,' Yaworsky said. 'We are seeing litigation rates decrease upwards of 30% throughout the state, so the reforms are working. It does take time for consumers to truly feel all those effects and the impacts, and to a degree, we are fighting against inflation and other economic factors that we cannot avoid, but we are seeing good news.'
News Channel 8 on your side reached out to both the governor and house speaker but have not heard back yet.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
7 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
‘Beautiful' or ‘Ugly,' Trump's big bill shapes the battle for House control in 2026 midterms
WASHINGTON — Debate over President Trump's sweeping budget-and-policy package is over on Capitol Hill. Now the argument goes national. From the Central Valley of California to Midwestern battlegrounds and suburban districts of the northeast, the new law already is shaping the 2026 midterm battle for control of the House of Representatives. The outcome will set the tone for Trump's final two years in the Oval Office. Democrats need a net gain of three House seats to break the GOP's chokehold on Washington and reestablish a power center to counter Trump. There's added pressure to flip the House given that midterm Senate contests are concentrated in Republican-leaning states, making it harder for Democrats to reclaim that chamber. As Republicans see it, they've now delivered broad tax cuts, an unprecedented investment in immigration enforcement and new restraints on social safety net programs. Democrats see a law that rolls back health insurance access and raises costs for middle-class Americans while cutting taxes mostly for the rich, curtailing green energy initiatives and restricting some workers' organizing rights. 'It represents the broken promise they made to the American people,' said Rep. Suzan DelBene, a Washington Democrat who chairs the party's House campaign arm. 'We're going to continue to hold Republicans accountable for this vote.' Whether voters see it that way will be determined on a district-by-district level, but the battle will be more intense in some places than others. Among the 435 House districts, only 69 contests were decided by less than 10 percentage points in the 2024 general election. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has so far identified 26 Democratic-held seats it must defend vigorously, along with 35 GOP-held seats it believes could be ripe to flip. Republicans' campaign arm, the National Republican Congressional Committee, has so far listed 18 GOP incumbents as priorities, plus two districts opened by retirements. There are a historically low number of so-called crossover districts: Only 13 Democrats represent districts Trump carried in 2024, while just three Republicans serve districts Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris carried. Both committees are busy recruiting challengers and open-seat candidates and more retirements could come, so the competitive map will evolve. Still, there are clusters of districts guaranteed to influence the national result. California, despite its clear lean to Democrats statewide, has at least nine House districts expected to be up for grabs: three in the Central Valley and six in southern California. Six are held by Democrats, three by the GOP. Pennsylvania features four districts that have been among the closest national House races for several consecutive cycles. They include a suburban Philadelphia seat represented by Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, one of just two House Republicans to vote against Trump's bill and one of the three GOP lawmakers from a district Harris won. Fitzpatrick cited the Medicaid cuts. Vice President JD Vance plans on Wednesday to be in Republican Rep. Rob Bresnahan's northwest Pennsylvania district to tout the GOP package. Bresnahan's seat is a top Democratic target. Iowa and Wisconsin, meanwhile, feature four contiguous GOP-held districts in farm-heavy regions where voters could be swayed by fallout from Trump's tariffs. Beyond bumper-sticker labels – Trump's preferred 'Big Beautiful Bill' versus Democrats' 'Big Ugly Bill' retort – the 900-page law is, in fact, an array of policies with varying impact. Democrats hammer Medicaid and food assistance cuts, some timed to take full effect only after the 2026 midterms, along with Republicans' refusal to extend tax credits to some people who obtained health insurance through the Affordable Care Act. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that 11.8 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2034 if the bill became law; 3 million more would not qualify for food stamps, also known as SNAP benefits. 'Folks will die here in Louisiana and in other parts of the country,' House Minority Leader Jeffries warned last week during a town hall in Republican Speaker Mike Johnson's home state of Louisiana. Jeffries singled out vulnerable Republicans like California Rep. David Valadao, who represents a heavily agricultural Central Valley district where more than half the population is eligible for the joint state-federal insurance program. California allows immigrants with legal status and those who are undocumented to qualify for Medicaid, so not all Medicaid recipients are voters. But the program helps finance the overall health care system, including nursing homes and hospitals. Republicans highlight the law's tightened work requirements for Medicaid enrollees. They argue it's a popular provision that will strengthen the program. 'I voted for this bill because it does preserve the Medicaid program for its intended recipients — children, pregnant women, the disabled, and elderly,' Valadao said. 'I know how important the program is for my constituents.' The law includes $4.5 trillion in tax cuts. It makes permanent existing rates and brackets approved during Trump's first term. Republicans and their allies have hammered vulnerable Democrats for 'raising costs' on American households by opposing the bill. GOP campaign aides point to the popularity of individual provisions: boosting the $2,000 child tax credit to $2,200 (some families at lower income levels would not get the full credit), new deductions on tip and overtime income and auto loans; and a new deduction for older adults earning less than $75,000 a year. 'Everyone will have more take home pay. They'll have more jobs and opportunity,' Johnson said in a Fox News Sunday interview. 'The economy will be doing better and we'll be able to point to that as the obvious result of what we did.' Democrats note that the biggest beneficiaries of Trump's tax code are wealthy Americans and corporations. Pairing that with safety net cuts, Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz concluded, 'The cruelty is the point.' Immigration, meanwhile, was Trump's strongest issue in 2024. NRCC aides say that will continue with the new law's investments in immigration enforcement. Democrats believe the Trump administration has overplayed its hand with its push for mass deportation. The president is a titanic variable. Democrats point to 2018, when they notched a 40-seat net gain in House seats to take control away from the GOP. This year, Democrats have enjoyed a double-digit swing in special elections around the country when compared to 2024 presidential results. Similar trends emerged in 2017 after Trump's 2016 victory. Democrats say that reflects voter discontent with Trump once he's actually in charge. Republicans answer that Trump's job approval remains higher at this point than in 2017. But the GOP's effort is further complicated by ongoing realignments: Since Trump's emergence, Democrats have gained affluent white voters -– like those in suburban swing districts -– while Trump has drawn more working-class voters across racial and ethnic groups. But Republicans face a stiffer challenge of replicating Trump's coalition in a midterm election without him on the ballot. Democrats, meanwhile, must corral voters who are not a threat to vote for Republicans but could stay home. Jeffries said he's determined not to let that happen: 'We're going to do everything we can until we end this national nightmare.' Barrow, Cooper and Brook write for the Associated Press. Cooper reported from Phoenix. Brook reported from New Orleans. AP reporters Michael Blood in Los Angeles and Marc Levy in Harrisburg, Pa., contributed to this report.
Miami Herald
7 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Miami Herald report on Alligator Alcatraz confirms what we suspected
When the Miami Herald/Tampa Bay Times published a list Sunday of more than 700 detainees held at the Alligator Alcatraz detention facility in South Florida, it confirmed what many have suspected all along: Despite political claims to the contrary, many of the migrants being detained have no U.S. criminal convictions or pending charges. According to the list, published by the Herald/Times in an urgently needed act of watchdog journalism, more than 250 of the detainees have immigration violations but no criminal convictions or charges in the U.S. Some are asylum seekers. Others arrived under humanitarian parole, or thought they were here with permission awaiting the result of ongoing legal cases. In other words, the portrayals by President Donald Trump, Gov. Ron DeSantis, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and others that this detention center in the Everglades is a necessary tool for detaining 'vicious' people and 'deranged psychopaths' is a gross overstatement, underscoring the reasons that due process is so important. No doubt there are some bad characters in the bunch. A third of the detainees on the list, which fluctuates as the population of the detention center changes, have various criminal convictions, the Herald/Times reported, with charges ranging from attempted murder and illegal re-entry to traffic violations. Hundreds of others only have pending charges. But overall, the idea that more than a third of those being held had no pending U.S. charges or convictions should be chilling to Americans. Just how indiscriminate has the U.S. immigration system become? Democratic and Republican members of Congress from Florida and state legislators were given a guided tour of the camp on Saturday, after several Democrats were initially turned away during an unannounced visit earlier in the week. Those on the tour came away with varying conclusions on the conditions, ranging from some Democrats characterizing it as an abomination while some Republicans said the air-conditioned facility meets all prison standards. Conditions aside, the list published by the Herald offers some concrete information on who is being held at the detention center that cuts through the rhetoric surrounding Alligator Alcatraz, which is being run by Florida — the president's home state — and paid for by taxpayers. As Walter Jara, the nephew of a 56-year-old Nicaraguan man taken to the facility following a traffic stop in Palm Beach County, told the Herald: 'That place is supposedly for the worst criminals in the U.S.' The list indicates that his uncle, Denis Alcides Solis Morales, has immigration violations but makes no mention of convictions or pending criminal charges. Jara said his uncle came to the U.S. legally in 2023 under a humanitarian parole program, and has a pending asylum case. Are those people so dangerous that they should be housed in a place called Alligator Alcatraz? DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin insisted to reporters that the absence of a criminal charge in the U.S. doesn't mean migrants have done nothing wrong. She said in a statement that some are 'actually terrorists, human rights abusers, gangsters and more' who 'just don't have a rap sheet in the U.S.' And, she added, 'every single one of these individuals committed a crime when they came into this country illegally.' Trump was elected promising to deport illegal immigrants who committed crimes. Once in office, he revoked Temporary Protected Status ( TPS) and humanitarian parole from thousands of people from places like Venezuela, Nicaragua and Haiti, effectively creating a whole new class of people without legal status. According to polls, Americans overwhelmingly support deporting immigrants with violent criminal records. But the Herald/Times findings reveal a broader dragnet at work — one that ensnares farm workers, people stopped for traffic violations and those who simply attend their immigration hearings. In our state, they are being rounded up with the same zeal used for violent offenders. If we are holding undocumented people in an isolated camp who have no charges or convictions in the U.S., that's a moral and legal failure. Click here to send the letter.
Newsweek
16 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump Gives Dems a Meatball Down the Middle
Opinion | Tap here to get this newsletter delivered to your inbox. The Insider's Track Good morning, The White House has really stepped in it with this Jeff Epstein mess, huh? I don't want to re-litigate the whole saga as we spoke about it at length last week, but since then this fracture within his base has only deepened and President Trump is looking increasingly vulnerable. To recap, on Friday a new feud erupted at the DOJ when Dan Bongino, the deputy director of the FBI, apparently threw a fit and didn't go to work, with his camp leaking items to the media about how the whole mess was the fault of AG Pam Bondi, and Bongino was considering resigning from the FBI unless Trump fired Bondi. Influential voices on the right like Megyn Kelly then came to Bongino's defense, saying Bondi needed to go—but of course failing to mention that Bongino and his boss, Kash Patel, both signed off on the release of the most recent Epstein memo as well as a CCTV video of Epstein's prison cell door that was released with a minute of material missing. Nothing says "this should quell the conspiracy theorists" like releasing security footage that's been manipulated! (Aside: This is all so predictable when you hire completely unqualified people for important jobs. They immediately fold under pressure. You think something like this could ever have happened under Obama? Or Clinton? No, because they didn't hire their top deputies off of cable news). Trump, seeing the political danger here, started the weekend off by playing the hits, starting with a random threat to take away Rosie O'Donnell's citizenship. Amazing. Hey, you! You're a dumb guy, right? Easily distracted? Look over here! Remember Rosie, from the 90s? Can we talk about her please instead of this messy Epstein thing? When that obviously didn't work, POTUS followed it up by going back to the well with an epic screed about how, actually, it was the Democrats who "created the Epstein files"—specifically, Hillary, Obama and Biden, who conveniently make up the Big 3 of Trump's political enemies. The thing about playing the hits is there's a very fine line between pleasing the crowd and just looking desperate. And Trump is not pleasing his crowd. The Dems, meanwhile, have an interesting decision to make here. Do you double down on Epstein, trying to tie Trump to this mess of his own making at every possible opportunity? The salient aspect of this, the reason why it has staying power over any number of other Trump-related scandals, is because it cuts to the heart of the entire Trump mythos: that this person was handpicked by God to pull back the curtain on all the nefarious operations of the rich and powerful that we were promised are actually to blame for all our problems. What brings out the schadenfreude we're seeing is that Trump and his folks were more than happy to help manifest that mythology when he was out of power. But now they're the dog that caught the car. There are some Democrats who are trying to keep this story in the news, like Rep. Marc Vesay of Texas who will introduce legislation today that calls for the release of the entire Epstein dossier. Ro Khanna, who's eyeing 2028, is also trying to force a vote. The political risks of this strategy are twofold, I think: 1) Right now, Trump's base is tearing itself apart over this. Why get in the middle of that? Once the Dems unite against Trump, the forces of negative polarization will go to work and MAGA will re-coalesce in Trump's corner, the way the T-1000 does after the Terminator blows it to bits. 2) Why focus on Epstein, who did cavort with plenty of high-profile Dems (including, inconveniently for them, the Clintons), when there is a buffet of other scandals or outrages to focus on, such as the growing national backlash to the ICE raids? Here's my thought bubble if I were a Dem strategist. This is a meatball right down the middle: an opportunity to mercilessly attack Trump as just another craven politician who, once in office, will always choose his rich and powerful friends over his base. It's a potent line of attack. If we can just keep everyone in line and focused on whatever Trump is trying to keep hidden with Epstein, we've got a great opportunity to rally our own ba--- wait, what's that? Joe Biden? The former president has apparently chosen this exact moment to give a rare interview from retirement, granting a sitdown with the NYT to discuss at length how he used an autopen to sign all his clemency decisions. Brilliant timing as always, Joe. Trump is facing the first real test of his legitimacy from his own base, so let's bring the convo back to you and your incompetent administration! I love politics! The Rundown The European Union has readied a set of retaliatory tariffs totaling 21 billion euros on U.S. goods, officials warned on Monday. Italy's Foreign Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Antonio Tajani said that the EU remains open to negotiations and is intent on avoiding a trade war with the U.S, but will respond with these substantial tariffs if a deal with the U.S. fails to materialize. The threat comes after President Donald Trump announced a new 30 percent tariff on Mexican and EU imports, set to take effect on August 1. Read more. Also happening: Russia-Ukraine war: The U.S. will send additional Patriot air defense batteries to Ukraine, President Donald Trump, as he repeated his criticism of Vladimir Putin's aggression. Trump said that the U.S. would be reimbursed partially by NATO for the cost of the batteries which Kyiv has said are required to defend against Moscow's missile and drone attacks. Read more. How Trump's near-assassination was downplayed: A year after the attempted assassination of Donald Trump at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, some political commentators are arguing the incident was minimized by the media, while marveling at how quickly the near-murder of the former and future American president has faded from public consciousness. Read the story. This is a preview of The 1600—Tap here to get this newsletter delivered straight to your inbox.
