
Bangladeshi nationals detained under Sosma for militant links in Malaysia
Inspector-General of Police Datuk Seri Mohd Khalid Ismail stated that while some detainees remain under investigation, others have been deported.
Khalid mentioned that a press conference will be held soon to provide further details.
'Insya Allah, tomorrow or the day after, I will hold a press conference to explain the actual situation,' he said during a media briefing today.
The arrests followed a three-phase operation in Selangor and Johor starting April 24.
Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail confirmed that no Malaysians were involved in the network, which was found to consist solely of Bangladeshi nationals.
The group reportedly aimed to spread extremist ideology based on IS beliefs.
Meanwhile, Khalid also attended the handover ceremony of Bukit Aman CID leadership, with DCP Datuk Fadil Marsus taking over as acting director.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Focus Malaysia
34 minutes ago
- Focus Malaysia
Ramasamy's gentle reminder to PMX: No automatic extension for Malaysian judges nor for its PMs
JUST as there is no automatic extension for the terms of judges, there is similarly no automatic process for extending the tenure of Datuk Seri Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim. Like the layered procedures required for judicial extensions, Anwar must also navigate a complex political path: he must win a parliamentary contest, secure a working majority, and obtain the consent of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong. In fact, extending the services of judges might be far simpler than Anwar securing a second term as PM. In his first term, Anwar only managed to convince the Agong to appoint him with the crucial support of parliamentarians from Sabah and Sarawak. Without their backing, his path to Putrajaya would have remained shut. Of course, Anwar aspires to serve a second term. But given the growing unpopularity of his government, such a scenario seems increasingly like wishful thinking. Thorny path ahead Anwar rose to power on the promise of institutional and structural reform. Today, those promises lie in tatters. Many Malaysians now believe that the reform agenda was less about genuine change and more about elevating Anwar to the premiership. His recent actions – particularly the perceived assault on the judiciary – have only deepened his unpopularity despite efforts to manufacture statistics suggesting otherwise. Respected judges may have left the bench with their dignity and integrity intact. In contrast, Anwar's potential exit from power may not be met with the same respect by a rakyat who had expected far better governance. While Anwar once spoke of institutional reform when he was in the opposition, governing has proven to be an entirely different matter. Twice former premier Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad might have wanted a judiciary that facilitated the smooth functioning of his administration but it wasn't motivated by personal legal concerns. Anwar's motives, however, appear more self-serving. His desire for a weakened judiciary seems closely tied to the civil suit filed by his former research assistant Yusoff Rawther over allegations of sexual misconduct. Anwar had reportedly sought immunity from the Federal Court to have the suit struck out. This goes far beyond Dr Mahathir's approach – Anwar appears to want a judiciary that not only doesn't obstruct governance but actively shields him from legal scrutiny. While Dr Mahathir may have weakened the judiciary; Anwar has rendered it impotent. The deliberate decision to not extend the terms of three seasoned and respected Federal Court judges represents a systematic attempt to hollow out the judiciary. In short, institutional reform is dead in Malaysia. And with it, the promise of a truly democratic, accountable and just system of governance. – July 2, 2025 Former DAP stalwart and Penang chief minister II Prof Ramasamy Palanisamy is chairman of the United Rights of Malaysian Party (Urimai) interim tourism packages The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia.


Daily Express
39 minutes ago
- Daily Express
PAS urges government to review Peaceful Assembly Act
Published on: Wednesday, July 02, 2025 Published on: Wed, Jul 02, 2025 By: FMT Reporters Text Size: Protesters making their way to Dataran Merdeka from the Sogo shopping complex during an anti-corruption rally in Kuala Lumpur on Jan 25. PETALING JAYA: PAS has called on the government to review the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 after the Federal Court's ruling yesterday that it is unconstitutional to criminalise the failure to notify the police five days in advance of holding a peaceful assembly. In a statement, PAS secretary-general Takiyuddin Hassan said the ruling by a five-member Federal Court panel chaired by outgoing Chief Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat would give Malaysians more confidence that their voices can be heard without the threat of prosecution. 'PAS also believes that this decision will further strengthen public confidence in the freedom of expression and assembly as key hallmarks of a mature and civilised democratic nation,' said Takiyuddin. 'PAS urges the government to comprehensively review the Peaceful Assembly Act so that it truly reflects the spirit of the Federal Constitution and the universal principles of human rights, especially in light of this historic decision.' Takiyuddin also urged the government to review or abolish legal provisions that could be misused to suppress freedom of expression, including the Sedition Act 1948, the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998, and the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984. The Kota Bharu MP said this was consistent with Pakatan Harapan's election promises outlined in its 15th general election manifesto. Yesterday, Tengku Maimun said Section 9(5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act imposes a punishment that exceeds the limits permitted under Article 10(1)(b) of the Federal Constitution, which guarantees the freedom of speech, assembly, and association. Tengku Maimun, who delivered the unanimous decision of the five-member Federal Court panel, also said the section was 'a disproportionate intervention'. The decision stemmed from a constitutional challenge brought by former Muda secretary-general Amir Hadi, who was charged in 2022 with failing to give the police five days' notice before organising a protest outside the Sogo shopping complex in Kuala Lumpur. Home minister Saifuddin Nasution Ismail said the government would table an amendment to Section 11 of the Peaceful Assembly Act in the upcoming parliamentary sitting following the Federal Court's ruling. Section 11 of the Peaceful Assembly Act requires organisers of assemblies to obtain the consent of the location's owner or occupier. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia


Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Singapore teen pleads guilty to punching police officer, sharing nudes on Snapchat
SINGAPORE, July 2 — A 19-year-old Singaporean man pleaded guilty to assaulting a police officer and circulating an intimate image without consent. The incident involving the police officer occurred after a dispute with his father in their Tampines flat, The Straits Times reported. The teenager and his father had both consumed alcohol before their fight escalated on June 5, 2024. His sister called the police, reporting that her brother and father were hitting each other with various objects. Two police officers arrived and attempted to de-escalate the situation, but the teenager remained aggressive. He then punched one officer in the face, fracturing his nose, as police tried to intervene in his scuffle with his father. The injured officer received seven days of medical leave after being examined at Changi General Hospital. In a separate case from July 2022, the teenager distributed a topless picture of a 15-year-old girl he met on Snapchat. The court has requested reports to assess his suitability for probation or reformative training, with sentencing expected in August. Due to his age at the time of the picture offence, the teenager cannot be identified under the Children and Young Persons Act.