logo
Homeowners at war with council over 45ft high 'Jack and the Beanstalk' oak tree as bosses refuse demands to cut it down despite fears it's a 'danger to life'

Homeowners at war with council over 45ft high 'Jack and the Beanstalk' oak tree as bosses refuse demands to cut it down despite fears it's a 'danger to life'

Daily Mail​06-06-2025
Homeowners living on a historic road are in a row with the council over a 'Jack and the Beanstalk' oak tree they say is a danger to them.
Residents living in the terraced properties in Winchester are surrounded by the 45 foot high tree and have branded the decision to issue a preservation order as 'grotesquely irresponsible'.
They claim the oak - which is still relatively young and grew six feet last year - was planted around 50 years ago by a previous resident who thought it was a 'good idea at the time'.
But it has continued to rapidly grow to the point that it is now 'out of proportion' to the surrounding properties and totally dominates the small garden it sits in.
The current homeowners Orla Williams, 40, and her partner moved into the terraced Grade II Listed home on Canon Street two years ago and applied to have the tree felled.
However, the Winchester County Council put a preliminary protection order on it and cited that it was 'appreciated' by the residents on a neighbouring street.
The decision has been slammed by neighbours - who live on one of Winchester's 'most prestigious roads' - who said that they are not the ones who will be forced to deal with the repercussions if it were to topple over.
The street, where the average house price is more than £600,000, is just yards from Kingsgate Street, and was where Admiral Nelson's mistress Lady Hamilton once lived.
The doctor said that after moving in, she was approached by several neighbours who raised concerns about the tree.
The mother-of-two said: 'They were concerned that it is getting very large and that it could cause damage to their properties and potentially harm to people if it gets any larger, so they wanted it to be taken down.
'We applied to the council to have it removed and someone came to look at it.
'[The tree officer] said that they want to put a tree protection order on it.'
The homeowner said that an 'awful lot of detritus' falls from the oak in the autumn and winter, and she is concerned about the droppings which fall down from wildlife like pigeons and squirrels.
She added: 'We appreciate that the tree is beautiful but it's the wrong tree in the wrong place.
'It is quite sad to remove something like that but it is only going to get bigger and potentially cause damage to lots of properties which is the main concern.
'The council said they were concerned about removing it because it's one of the only trees in the area.
'All of the local residents seem to be of the opinion that unfortunately, it's the wrong tree in the wrong place.'
According to a council report, the tree officer visited Ms Williams' address after receiving notice from the couple that it was due to be felled.
After visiting, he found that that tree met the criteria for a provisional protection order, which was issued in February of this year.
A Winchester County Council meeting will take place next week to confirm whether or not the order will remain in place.
In total nine residents objected to the order.
They all live in the centre of the cathedral city on roads which sit just yards away from Winchester College - the country's oldest public school and Rishi Sunak's alma mater.
Mark Pocock, a retired resident living on Canon Street, branded the council's decision to protect the tree as 'ludicrous'.
'As trees grow older they become more brittle,' he said.
'If it were to fall and damage properties or persons, I would say the responsibility would be entirely with the council - not the owners of those properties.
'I think putting a tree protection order on is grotesquely irresponsible of the council.
'It could be a danger to property and life.'
Nick Goff, 80, moved into his property on the road adjacent to Canon Street just over a year ago.
The retired British Airways pilot said he is worried that if the tree continues to go, the roots underneath will damage a medieval wall in his garden, which was built in the Tudor era.
Mr Goff said: 'The issue is that in 10 years' time, that will be double the height and double the width.
'It put on six feet last year it it's going to put on another six feet this year.'
The homeowner commissioned an independent report from a tree consultancy business who found the oak is still a 'teenager'.
The report found that while the tree is in 'good physiological condition', it is 'a large sized tree in a very small area' and so the tree protection order is 'unjustified'.
It also said that 'the possibility of longer term damage to the retaining walls and footings of the adjacent properties as entirely foreseeable'.
'Some guy planted this as something to do 40 years ago,' Mr Goff continued.
'Now, we have got Jack and the Beanstalk. It's not a historic tree, it's a silly mistake.'
The council report issued ahead of next week's meeting stated that the tree officer believed the concerns raised over the tree were 'speculative'.
It said that while it is 'not historic', the tree 'contributes meaningfully to local biodiversity and visual amenity'.
The report also stated that it is 'clearly visible' from residents living on a neighbouring private road, where it is 'appreciated'.
It added: 'It is also the last significant tree in an area of land between Canon Street and St Swithun's Street, enhancing the character of the conservation area.'
Retired resident Graham Rule, 62, said the decision by the local authority was 'irresponsible'.
He said: 'We all love trees but that shouldn't be there.
'The people who want the protection order, they don't live here - its totally irresponsible.'
Mr Rule said the tree was planted in the early 70s by a former resident.
He added: 'Like a lot of things, it seemed like a good idea at the time.
'I'm a huge fan of trees but at the end of the day that tree shouldn't be there.'
The conclusion of the tree officer's report stated that if the provisional TPO is not confirmed at the council meeting, it will be 'left vulnerable to being removed'.
The report added: 'The removal of this tree will have a detrimental impact on the biodiversity and also character of the conservation area.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NADINE DORRIES: Lucy Letby wants to see me. I filled in the paperwork six months ago. So who's blocking my prison visit - and why?
NADINE DORRIES: Lucy Letby wants to see me. I filled in the paperwork six months ago. So who's blocking my prison visit - and why?

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

NADINE DORRIES: Lucy Letby wants to see me. I filled in the paperwork six months ago. So who's blocking my prison visit - and why?

More than six months ago, Lucy Letby applied for me to be put on her 'approved visitor' list. I was sent a form in the post by Sodexo Justice Services which runs HMP Bronzefield where she is held. I dutifully did what was requested of me: filled in all the details, attached a photograph to the form, popped a signed spare in an envelope and returned it all, special delivery.

Emergency alarm to sound on all phones on anniversary of the Blitz
Emergency alarm to sound on all phones on anniversary of the Blitz

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Emergency alarm to sound on all phones on anniversary of the Blitz

An emergency alert will be sent to all mobile phones in the UK to test the country's preparedness for danger to life. At 3pm on Sunday Sept 7, the texts will be sent out to approximately 87 million mobile phones in the UK. The alert will coincide with the 85th anniversary of the start of the Blitz, which began on Sept 7 1940. During the test, phones will vibrate and make a loud siren sound for about 10 seconds, even if they are set to silent. A message will also appear on phone screens, making it clear the alert is only a test. The Emergency Alerts system is used to warn if there is a danger to life nearby, including extreme weather, and will allow vital information and advice to be sent to people rapidly in an emergency. It will be the second time such a test has taken place. The first was in April 2023 as part of a government commitment to familiarise the public with the alerts. Countries such as Japan and the USA also test similar systems. Since April 2023, five alerts have been sent, including during major storms when lives were at risk. The largest use of the system happened in Scotland and Northern Ireland when approximately 4.5 million people received an alert during Storm Éowyn in January 2025, when a red weather warning over risk to life was issued. In December 2024, 3.5 million people across Wales and the South West of England received an alert during Storm Darragh, which killed two people. Other activations have included when an unexploded Second World War bomb was discovered in Plymouth and during flash flooding in Cumbria and Leicestershire. Potential to save lives Before the test, the Government will run a public information campaign to notify people that it is taking place. Pat McFadden, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, said the alerts had the potential to save lives. 'Just like the fire alarm in your house, it's important we test the system so that we know it will work if we need it,' he said. A new Resilience Action Plan, published on Tuesday, will improve the way the Government prepares for and responds to emergencies. A website will provide information on 'simple and effective steps' people can take to be more prepared. These include working out the best escape route from home in the event of a fire or flood and keeping a hard copy of important phone numbers in the event of a power cut. The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology is investing £370 million to better secure the UK's telecommunications networks through research and investment in new technology and infrastructure. The National Situation Centre and the Devolved Governments are also going to sign a data-sharing Memorandum of Understanding to ensure that every nation in the UK has the best available information to prepare and respond to crises.

Chicken tray bake, feta tart and spicy tofu: three delicious and speedy student recipes
Chicken tray bake, feta tart and spicy tofu: three delicious and speedy student recipes

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Chicken tray bake, feta tart and spicy tofu: three delicious and speedy student recipes

A student meal should be quick, nutritious and delicious. These recipes tick those boxes. There's a puff pastry spinach and feta tart that will impress your housemates, a garlicky chicken tray bake that saves on washing up, and a nutritious, filling peanut butter tofu perfect for getting you through evenings of revision. Give them a go! This tart uses a nifty roll of readymade puff pastry as well as frozen spinach, creamy ricotta and lots of tangy feta cheese. Serve with a big crunchy salad. Prep 20 minCook 30 min Serves 6 Cost per portion £1.04 (without optional and to-serve ingredients) 400g frozen chopped spinach 250g ricotta 200g feta cheese, crumbled 2 large eggs, lightly whisked with a fork ½ tsp dried chilli (optional)½ lemon, zested 1 x 320g pack ready roll puff pastry 2 tbsp sesame seeds, optional Salad – cucumber, tomato, lots of green leaves, to serve Defrost the spinach then tip it into a clean kitchen cloth and squeeze out all the liquid you can. Tip it into a mixing bowl. Add the ricotta, two-thirds of the feta, about half the beaten egg, the dried chilli, lemon zest and some seasoning. Heat the oven to 200C (180 fan)/390F/gas 6. Line a flat baking tray with baking paper. Unravel the pastry carefully on to the paper. Score a border around the edge of the pastry, about 1cm wide. Fill the middle with the spinach mix, leaving the border empty. Smooth it down with a spoon and crumble over the rest of the feta. Brush the border with the remaining egg then sprinkle with the sesame seeds. Bake for 30 minutes until golden and puffed up. Serve with the salad. You'll be the envy of your fellow housemates with this moreish garlic butter chicken and wedges – all cooked in the oven for ease. If you don't like spice, simply leave out the cajun seasoning. Prep 30 minCook 35 min Serves 4 Cost per portion £1.38 (without to-serve ingredients) 2 large baking potatoes (850g), each cut into 10 wedges 3 tbsp vegetable oil 2 large skinless and boneless chicken breasts 2 eggs, whisked with a fork50g plain flour 70g dried panko breadcrumbs 1½ tbsp cajun spice 70g unsalted butter 1 garlic clove, finely grated ½ small bunch parsley, finely choppedPeas or broccoli, to serve Bring a pan of salted water to the boil. Add the wedges and boil for 10 minutes then drain through a colander and set aside for 10 minutes in the colander. Heat the oven to 220C (200C fan)/425F/gas 7. Heat the oil in a large-lipped oven tray or two smaller trays for 10 minutes. Once hot, toss the wedges in the oil on the tray/s. Toss through 1 tbsp cajun spice and some salt. Bake for 12 minutes. Meanwhile, cut the chicken into strips. Toss each one in flour, followed by the egg then coat it in the breadcrumbs. Place the chicken in the tray/s, sprinkle with remaining cajun spice and return to the oven for 20 minutes. Heat the butter in a saucepan, add the garlic and cook over a low heat for 3 minutes then stir in the parsley and a pinch of salt. Once the chicken and wedges are cooked and golden brown, pour the garlic butter over everything. Serve with peas or broccoli, if you like. This vegan bowl is packed with creamy nut butter, red peppers and chunks of tofu. Make a batch, eat half for dinner then reheat the rest for lunch the next day. Prep 20 min Cook 15 min Serves 2 Cost per portion £2.06 (without to-serve ingredients), or £2.25 (with rice and broccoli) 2 tbsp vegetable, sesame or olive oil 1 block extra-firm tofu, cut into big chunks 2 garlic cloves, thinly sliced 1 red pepper, deseeded and roughly chopped 1-2 tsp mild chilli (depending on how spicy you like it!)1 tbsp tomato puree 100g peanut butter 1 tbsp soy sauce 1 tbsp agave or honey 1 tbsp rice or white wine vinegar 300ml water 30g salted peanuts, chopped2 spring onions, chopped To serve Cooked rice Cucumber or broccoli Heat 2 tbsp of oil in a large frying pan. Add the tofu and fry over a high heat for 6 minutes, turning regularly until golden brown. Remove with a pair of tongs or a fork and set aside on a plate. Add the garlic and chopped pepper to the pan and fry for 2 minutes over a high heat then stir in the chilli and tomato puree and fry for a further 2 minutes. In a bowl, mix together the peanut butter, soy, vinegar and agave or honey. Add the peanut mixture to the pan then slowly stir in the water. Bring to a simmer and stir in the tofu. Cook for 5 minutes. Serve with rice and finish with chopped peanuts and spring onion. This is delicious with some cucumber or broccoli on the side. For more guidance on the right course for you, check out the Guardian university league tables for 2025. The Guardian league tables for 2026 will be out on 13 September in print and online

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store