Tide Now Supports Over 1.5 Million Small Businesses Globally
Tide, the UK's leading business management platform, today announces it has surpassed 1.5 million members globally. Tide has added over 500,000 members since September 2024, with the UK now at 750,000 and India at more than 750,000. Tide's share of the UK market has grown to 13%. Tide continues to expand its presence in Germany.
Oliver Prill, CEO of Tide, commented: 'Reaching 1.5 million members globally and lending more than £1 billion to UK SMEs are major milestones for Tide. These achievements reflect our commitment to helping small businesses save time and money by giving them business critical tools across finance, admin and related commercial services that they need, to grow. We are enriching and expanding our range of highly connected products at pace. We will continue to explore markets to boost the geographic footprint of our business management platform.'
Highlights:
View source version on businesswire.com:https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250729705088/en/
CONTACT: Lloyd Purnell
PR and Communications Lead, UK, Tide.
Email:[email protected]
KEYWORD: EUROPE IRELAND UNITED KINGDOM
INDUSTRY KEYWORD: DATA MANAGEMENT SUSTAINABILITY TECHNOLOGY FINANCE SMALL BUSINESS FINTECH BANKING APPS/APPLICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ENVIRONMENT ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE PAYMENTS SOFTWARE DATA ANALYTICS
SOURCE: Tide
Copyright Business Wire 2025.
PUB: 07/29/2025 03:00 AM/DISC: 07/29/2025 03:01 AM
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250729705088/en
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
IPO market heats up: These 4 names prepare to go public next
EquityZen head of market insight Brianne Lynch joins Market Domination with Josh Lipton to discuss the initial public offering (IPO) market in light of Figma's (FIG) recent public debut and whether companies need to have an artificial intelligence (AI) story to succeed. She also shares which private companies are likely to go public next. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination. Which are the possible candidates in your opinion, that would be on your radar, who might be willing to test the public markets this year? Sure. So, you know, several of the names on our IPO outlook for the year have already gone public. But there are a few that we're still waiting on. One of the big ones being Klarna. This is a company that was planning to go public in the spring, tabled those plans given the volatility in the market post deliberation day. Uh but they're reportedly now looking at a September IPO. So that'll be, um, the next of several Fintech IPOs we've seen. You had Circle, um, Chime, eToro. So certainly, uh, Fintech is an area where we're seeing more activity and given Klarna's brand recognition, um, and you know, value in the market, that's one we have our eyes on. Right now if you're going to go public, Brian, do you have to have an AI story? Do you have to be able to just sprinkle some of that AI magic on your S-1? Yeah. I would say at a minimum you have to try. And Figma, you know, that's something that played into their story as well. They had so many case studies of their large enterprise clients saving, you know, lots of time and money because of the AI tools that they've built into their products. So, I think that's a table stake for any company that is looking to go public. And that might be the best option for public market investors at the time because you have to remember a lot of these pure play AI companies are still very young in their life cycle. They're less likely to be going public in the next few years. So yes, that's bringing more investors into the private markets to invest. Uh but to kind of capitalize on that interest, public companies or contenders to go public will also need to have that as part of their story. Do you think there there are certain kinds of private companies, Brian, that would be more likely to receive a warm welcome to the public markets in in this environment against this backdrop? Sure. I mean, we've seen a few examples of what has worked. You know, I talked about a little bit about the need for growth, the need for profitability, but when we look at the companies that may be coming next or even the IPOs we've seen in the first half of the year, it hasn't been just one sector or one industry. You've seen Fintech, um, you've seen crypto, which is obviously growing a lot and given, you know, the regulatory tailwinds, uh, we expect that to continue to be a hot market. Um, but then, you know, Netskope, another name on our outlook, that's a cybersecurity company. Um, StubHub, another one. That's an e-commerce player. So, it's definitely not a, you know, one sector narrative that's driving the market. It's more are you growing? Are you profitable? Do you have the brand name? Um, and do you have a a story that's exciting to investors, uh, especially, uh, given the lack of public companies relative to private companies now. Related Videos Berkshire Hathaway earnings: 'Perfect' stock to own when 'worried' Tesla must pay $240M+ for deadly 2019 car crash: What to know Fed Governor Adriana Kugler to resign Dow falls more than 500 points on jobs report, tariffs Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
24 minutes ago
- Forbes
I Tried ChatGPT's AI Agent To Make Money Online. Here's What Happened
Everyone's talking about AI agents. But why all the hype? 'They're the new future of work,' IBM's executive Justina Nixon-Saintil told me back in February when I visited IBM's headquarters in London. Nixon-Saintil predicted that very soon, AI agents would be so powerfully effective that they would be our new teammates at work. One day, you could be logging into your desktop and be greeted with hybrid team members: not an actual hybrid team in the working-from-home sense, but the kind that is half human, half robot, like something of an eery sci-fi movie. 'These agents can actually execute the work for you," Nixon-Saintil said. "Now, managers will need to know how to lead humans and how to lead a team of AI agents.' (*From Upwork's survey of 3,000 knowledge workers in May 2025) I was already curious about AI agents and just how useful they could be in this new world of work. But now that OpenAI released its new ChatGPT Agent mode, I decided to put it to the test and see if it could actually help me build a business and make money online as a freelancer. In this article, I share what I discovered. What Is An AI Agent? An AI agent is an AI tool (still in early stages) that can perform complex tasks and acts much like an assistant or even as an employee. 'AI agents are the tools we use to interact with AI. They can automate and perform complex tasks, such as natural language processing, that would normally require humans,' says McKinsey & Company. What Can Agentic AI Do? McKinsey further explains that you can organize agents into systems that can: What Are The Best AI Agents? There are different types of AI agents, some of which you may already use for work, like Copilot and ChatGPT. Then there are more advanced models and software, fantastic for entrepreneurs, freelancers, and professionals launching side hustles (especially when you have limited time because you're working 9-5), such as: Can ChatGPT's AI Agent Really Help You Make Money Online? The short answer is yes. As a well-experienced freelancer with six years under my belt, I decided to give ChatGPT's new agent mode a go, and see if it could transform my business or be just another hype. What I did: The results were astounding. I was able to watch the agent work in real time as it: "Emphasize measurable results in experience entries. For roles at CreatiSphere and Rachel Wells Coaching, spell out metrics that matter to high‑net‑worth clients: revenue growth, client portfolio size, geographies served and notable partnerships. Incorporate achievements such as 'grew coaching business to $300K+ revenue in 2024,' 'helped 10,000 professionals across eight countries increase income,' or 'secured Fortune‑500 clients for corporate training programmes.' Now that was something to think about. I tell my clients all the time to use quantifiable metrics wherever possible, and I did this in my about summary section on LinkedIn, but had never considered including metrics like my coaching business revenue in my experience section. The AI agent gave me tons of actionable steps which I'm currently implementing to take my business to the next level, and even though I already have partnerships and clients, I know for sure that when I apply these tips to my business I'll be able to secure even more six-figure deals using the leverage I have. This is just one example of how you can use AI agents like ChatGPT's agent mode to help you make more money, especially as a freelancer. Here's another powerful example of how to make as much as $10,000 from this simple AI agent trick with ChatGPT. See this screenshot below: My prompt: I want you to identify 10 key decision-makers for me to land speaking engagements, who are already in my LinkedIn network, and draft a message to them by way of introduction to build a relationship with them. Slight caveat: If you're using ChatGPT's agent mode to log into some websites and perform tasks for you, it may not be able to bypass the 'I'm not a robot' human verification, even if you take over and control its desktop and perform the verification yourself. How Do You Use AI Agents To Make Money? AI agents like ChatGPT certainly can transform your ability to make money online through your skills and start/boost your freelance business, if used for tasks like: Here's how, step-by-step: Will I use ChatGPT Agent mode again? Absolutely. I'm looking forward to reporting back on how my income and business revenue doubles after using this fantastic tool for the next few months. In the meantime, give agentic AI a try and see what it can do for your career, your money, and your business.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Car finance payouts have been limited, but lenders aren't off the hook
There may well be a few sighs of relief from senior finance company and banking executives following the Supreme Court's ruling, but it is unlikely you will hear the champagne corks popping. The verdict does almost certainly reduce the potential compensation bill significantly. Lenders no longer face the prospect of having to pay £30bn to £40bn to aggrieved car buyers. The likelihood of the government stepping in also appears to have receded dramatically. Nevertheless, the industry is not off the hook. The Financial Conduct Authority may still open a redress scheme for cases where dealers had a financial incentive from lenders to ramp up interest rates on loans as much as possible. The Supreme Court's ruling also upheld one consumer claim, in which the commission payments were deemed unfair – and that could provide a template for others to follow. All of this means the compensation bill could still be in the billions. The Supreme Court's intervention has been eagerly awaited since October, when the Appeal Court issued a verdict in three test cases which could have triggered an avalanche of compensation claims. In each case, people who had bought cars on finance claimed they were partially or wholly unaware that the deal had involved a commission payment being made by the lender to the car dealer. They claimed that in law the commissions amounted to bribes, or secret payments. The Appeal Court judges agreed, essentially saying that commission payments made by a finance company to a dealer for arranging a car loan were illegal if the car buyer had not given his or her "informed consent". They also concluded that a car dealer had a "fiduciary duty" towards the car buyer when it came to arranging a car loan. In other words, the dealer should set his or her own interests aside, and act purely on the customer's behalf. This meant that millions of car buyers could potentially claim compensation – if they could show that the dealer had not specified what commission payments they were receiving for lining up a finance deal. It was not enough for the details to be buried in small print. Lenders had feared that this would lead to an avalanche of claims against them – and that the same arguments could be used to challenge other kinds of consumer finance agreements as well, potentially increasing the compensation bill still further. But the Supreme Court threw very cold water over those arguments. The President of the Court, Lord Reed, dismissed the idea that car dealers had a "single minded duty of loyalty" to their customers, and insisted they "plainly and properly" had personal interests in the finance agreements they were involved in. The ruling clearly blocks off what could have been a very wide avenue for compensation claims. However, the court did side with one of the claimants. In the case of Marcus Johnson, a factory worker, it decided that the finance agreement was "unfair" under the terms of the Consumer Credit Act. This was because the size of the commission payment was very large, and because Mr Johnson had been misled about the relationship between the dealer and the lender. He was, they said, entitled to compensation. Analysts say this could open the doors for other cases in which the commission payments are seen to be egregious. There is also a key question the Supreme Court ruling does not answer. This is what should happen in cases involving so-called Discretionary Commission Agreements (DCAs). These were finance deals in which the car dealer could set the interest rate of a loan, within a set scale. The higher the rate, the more commission they would be paid – and the customer would be unaware of the fact. The Financial Conduct Authority banned such deals in 2021. It is now considering whether to launch a redress scheme for consumers who were affected by them. If it goes ahead, millions of car buyers could still have a claim, though it is not clear how much compensation they would get. According to Richard Barnwell, a financial services advisory partner at accountancy firm BDO, the bill could still be substantial. "We believe there is still a potential for redress, for example, if discretionary commission arrangements are deemed to be an unfair relationship, redress could still be from to £5bn to £13bn or more," he said. Other analysts agree. According to Martin Lewis, who runs the MoneySavingExpert website, "the Supreme Court has certainly narrowed the number of people who will be able to reclaim car finance. I think you're probably talking the lower end of £10bn, as opposed to £40bn." That £10bn would still be a significant figure. But the finance industry appears to have avoided the potential free-for-all rush to claim compensation the earlier verdict had threatened to spark off. And while the Treasury says it will "work with regulators and industry to understand the impact for both firms and consumers", the BBC understands that the likelihood of the government intervening with retrospective legislation to protect financial firms has now diminished significantly. Sign in to access your portfolio
