logo
1978 Dodge Omni and Plymouth Horizon Test: Borrowing from the Best

1978 Dodge Omni and Plymouth Horizon Test: Borrowing from the Best

Car and Driver05-06-2025

From the January 1978 issue of Car and Driver.
What you see here is not a VW Rabbit. It may look like a Rabbit and contain some genuine Volkswagen parts, but this car is in fact a Plymouth. The new Horizon and its Dodge twin, the Omni, represent the small-car plunge Chrysler has waited seven years to take.
In many ways, the end result justifies the delay. Chrysler has been roundly criticized for not going after Pinto, Vega, and Grem­lin business even though corporate officials claim they "went to the brink" year after year to justify a Chrysler subcompact. Each year hard-nosed analysts told them to pass. Americans have never demonstrat­ed a strong taste for chopped or miniatur­ized big cars, which is really all we've been offered in a domestic label so far. The al­ternative is an import, and "buying for­eign" has been such an attractive proposi­tion that even Ford, Chrysler, and GM stock their small-car shelves from across the water. The Omni and Horizon will scramble this system because they are nei­ther imported nor shrunken big cars. With a transverse-mounted, front-wheel-drive powertrain and highly efficient body, these cars are the state of the small-car art.
View Photos
Aaron Kiley
|
Car and Driver
You're probably as surprised as we are to see Chrysler leap frog the competition like this. Just when its highly touted image of engineering superiority was starting to tarnish, it jumped GM by a full year and Ford by two years in the race to front-­wheel-drive sedans. In truth it wasn't engi­neering progress, but rather anti-crisis ac­tion that boosted Chrysler over the front.
Like all the revolutionary engineering programs for 1978, this one was born of Detroit's Doomsday, the winter of 1974. In the grip of an energy crisis and decimat­ed big-car sales, Chrysler had to stretch Christmas holidays to weeks for every em­ployee, and to months for many. Plants were shut down to deflate swelling inven­tories, whole engineering groups were sent on mandatory leave and operating costs were slashed to the bone. The lights were all but shut out.
View Photos
Aaron Kiley
|
Car and Driver
As the cataclysm passed and the compa­ny recovered from shock, the message was clear. Chrysler's Commandment Number One for future survival had to be a funda­mental shift to more efficient automobiles. And without the usual waffling or waiting, here it is. The Omni and Horizon are this company's commitment to the future.
Richard Halatek, Chrysler's chief of small-car planning has suggested the name "Phoenix" for the Omni/Horizon pro­gram, because it really has risen from the ashes of Chrysler's old cheap-energy atti­tudes. We can all applaud Rabbit-like cars built in America by a company now pre­pared to take efficiency seriously, but the Omni and Horizon will begin their lives bearing a strong Wolfsburg imprint. No other car has trespassed so far beyond po­lite limits of plagiarism. Chrysler's ride and drive engineers have in fact mistaken VW Rabbits for their own prototypes on early test trips. And under the hood, the VW-Audi engine and transaxle casting marks are present for all to see.
View Photos
Aaron Kiley
|
Car and Driver
The inevitable "not guiltys" that come in reply to these charges are weak. Chrys­ler planners credit the Rabbit's shape and layout as the one best suited to maximum efficiency in a four-passenger car. They feel that Omni and Horizon styling has been determined by function—four sitting comfortably erect with plenty of room for themselves and their luggage behind—rather than by artistic whim. Giugiaro, who created the Rabbit's crisp lines, must be a little piqued by such a Xerox of his ideas, but it is inevitable that cars of this type from every manufacturer will soon be moving our families.
While Chrysler doesn't seem to mind a short ride on the Rabbit's reputation for initial impressions, that is where the simi­larity ends. The Omni and Horizon are American cars, and even though they're the smallest thing Chrysler has ever built, they are meant to deliver a full measure of what this company believes Americans prize most: ride and comfort. This means adjustments of the Rabbit blueprint amounting to a 4.7-inch longer wheelbase, 9.5 inches more length, 2.8 inches more width and roughly 200 pounds more weight. (Just to complete the longer, lower, wider triad, the roof is lower than a Rab­bit's by 2.1 inches.) The longer wheelbase and heavier weight smooth out ride mo­tions and the bigger exterior dimensions pay off in more interior room. However, the roominess advantages over a Rabbit are modest (about an inch in most impor­tant dimensions) when compared to the ex­terior's swelling.
View Photos
Aaron Kiley
|
Car and Driver
At least the EPA is convinced. Its index of interior roominess measurements have classified the Omni and Horizon as "com­pacts," while VW Rabbits, Honda Accords, and Ford Fiestas are one size down as "subcompacts."
The prototype cars we have driven did not offer a satisfactory basis for final ride judgments, but they did demonstrate ex­actly what Chrysler engineers are after. Extra-long wheel travel (6.6 inches in front, 7.7 inches in back, compared to 6.1 and 7.9 inches respectively in a Rabbit) is this car's claim to fame, even though such an attribute is rare in American cars. The long travel theory of suspension design al­lows soft spring rates for absorbing little bumps, with less likelihood of bottoming out over big bumps. Body roll is managed by front and rear anti-sway bars. This is a typically European approach, but while VW or Fiat would finish the job with tight damping, Chrysler has chosen very low shock-absorber control. This lessens the in­fluence of small bumps on comfort but also makes the car slow to settle after wavy pavement. On fast steering maneuvers, the Omni and Horizon react in a lazy fash­ion—they're still zigging when you're ready to zag. The idea here is not to make former VW owners feel at home, but rather former big-car owners, who might be ready for more efficient transportation.
View Photos
Aaron Kiley
|
Car and Driver
They will be asked to bear few sacrifices. The options sheet is fat with goodies new to this size car. In spite of the engineers' best recommendations, power steering is at the top of the extra-cost list. It's not at all necessary from a functional standpoint, but the marketing types had no desire to cold turkey their power-assist addicts.
Inside, there has been no skimping—no exposed heaters, no bare metal panels, no rubber floor mats—and this should tell you the Omni and Horizon start out at im­port-deluxe levels of trim. How far you take them in the luxo-garnish-molding di­rection is limited primarily by your imagi­nation. You can pick from two upgrades of interior and exterior trim, outside wood­grain, or even premium outside woodgrain. Vinyl bucket seats are standard, but you may choose from five other vinyl, or cloth and vinyl combinations in two different backrest designs. Cut-pile carpeting is standard with all interiors.
View Photos
Aaron Kiley
|
Car and Driver
The overall impression is plenty of com­fort but less quality than most imports have built their reputations on. Again, we'd rather wait for real cars for final as­sessments, but daily contact items like door handles and controls seems a little rough around the edges. The outside door latch looks like a pull will open it, but in­stead it takes a squeeze. The parcel shelf requires an awkward two-handed maneu­ver to release. And rear lift-over is the highest of any car in this class. It is weak detail execution that reveals Chrysler as a newcomer to little-car business.
Four-cylinder engines are also new to Chrysler (the last domestic-built one came in 1932 Plymouths), but even so, the new four-banger seems right at home in the Omni and Horizon. Very little vibration shakes through, and in normal cruising, the 40-pound blanket of sound insulation is worth its weight in quietness. We mea­sured a noise level of 75.0 decibels at 70 mph, exactly what we've found in both the VW Rabbit and Honda Accord. At full throttle, the Omni/Horizon does blast through a loud, resonant voice at 85.0 dec­ibels, compared with the Honda's 84.0 dec­ibels and 77.0 decibels in the Rabbit.
Everything you feel, see or hear while driving reflects the Chrysler touch, so ev­ery sensation after the first glance reinforc­es the Omni/Horizon's made-in-America label. Everything, that is, but a close in­spection of the parts. The big bought-out item is the powertrain. Volkswagenwerk AG will ship assembled short block, cylin­der head, and four-speed transaxle assem­blies to Chrysler's Trenton, Michigan en­gine plant. There, the American labor force will take over to "dress" engines with external components such as carburetors, ignition, and emissions controls and pre­pare them for cars that will be screwed to­gether in Chrysler's Belvedere, Illinois as­sembly plant.
View Photos
Aaron Kiley
|
Car and Driver
The basic design of the engine is shared with the Rabbit—an in-line four with a belt-driven overhead camshaft and an alu­minum non-crossflow cylinder head. While VWs and Audis sharing this engine have shifted to a smaller 1457 cc displacement for 1978, Chrysler has opted for a larger 1710 cc long-stroke version for more torque. (1976–77 Rabbits used a 1588 cc en­gine.) The larger displacement also helps offset the power lost moving from VW's Bosch fuel injection to the Omni/Hori­zon's Holley two-barrel carburetor. Power output is a healthy 75 hp at 5600 rpm, making this the highest specific output en­gine of any car made in America. Chrysler has added one key refinement of its own, a Lean Burn electronic ignition system.
While VW supplies Rabbit four-speed manual-shift transaxles for the Omni and Horizon, the optional three-speed auto­matic is a variation of the ever-popular Chrysler TorqueFlite.
Even though Chrysler buys nothing but powertrains from VW, they have "bor­rowed" a number of chassis design con­cepts. The front suspension is MacPherson strut with coil springs—just like the Rab­bit's—and also features a negative scrub radius layout. (The steering axis intersects the ground outboard of the tire contact patch center. This produces automatic steering forces to maintain straightline sta­bility when traction differs on left and right sides of the car.) The coil spring is purposely not concentric with the strut tube, so bending-induced friction is partial­ly cancelled. Minute VW details such as ball-joint attachments and control-arm pivot connections have also been religious­ly duplicated by Chrysler. At least when the engineers decided to copy someone else's paper, they picked the brightest kid in the class.
View Photos
Aaron Kiley
|
Car and Driver
The Omni and Horizon's rear suspen­sion is familiar, although it is neither the Rabbit's "torsion-crank" design nor the Dasher's beam axle/trailing arm configu­ration. Like the VW Polo (a Honda Civic­-sized car not exported to America), Chrys­ler has chosen a pair of trailing arms linked by a transverse member midway between the suspension's pivot axis and the axle centerline. Really, this layout was chosen more for fuel-tank packaging than any sus­pension function. Chrysler has dubbed the design "semi-independent," since the transverse member does partially tie to­gether left and right wheel movements. Rear coil springs and shock absorbers are concentric, a common design practice for lightweight rear suspensions.
All of this adds up to a driving feel that is clearly aimed more at family use than hard charging. The steering is numb and slow, so you're not likely to provoke a ma­neuver you can't manage. However, when forced to prove itself, this car does know how to sink its tires into the pavement. We measured a cornering grip of 0.71 g. As long as you keep the power on, understeer limits cornering speed. To make things a little more interesting, you need only lift off the throttle and the car promptly tight­ens its line. This might help aggressive drivers find their apexes, but it's bound to be a source of surprise to the 55-mph set.
Braking is the Omni/Horizon's forte, and here the new little kid on the block can beat every other car Chrysler builds. Stop­ping distance from 70 is a very short 206 feet. The system is disc-front and drum­-rear, with an optional power booster. We found the power assist unnecessary. With­out it, pedal effort is 32 pounds at 0.5 g deceleration, about optimum for good control. Part of the excellent braking feel and linearity is a result of Chrysler's choice of leading-and-trailing-shoe (rather than duo-­servo) rear brakes.
View Photos
Aaron Kiley
|
Car and Driver
All sporting intentions have been pur­posely muted in the Omni and Horizon. But just for now. In time, the five-door body style will be teamed up with a more aggressive three-door. (Just hope it's not a Scirocco duplicate.) An American-built 2200 cc four-cylinder engine is under devel­opment and turbocharger rumors have been circulating for months.
Chrysler hereby joins the world-car scheme of manufacturing, with a new twist on this increasingly popular approach. Rather than design one car for local con­struction in many markets, the engineers have shopped around the world for the best parts to bring back home for their new small car. They may be mostly VW under­neath, but the Omni and Horizon are un­deniably Chrysler's ride to the future.
Specifications
Specifications
1978 Dodge Omni/Plymouth Horizon
Vehicle Type: front-engine, front-wheel-drive, 4-passenger, 4-door hatchback
PRICE
As Tested: N/A
ENGINE
SOHC inline-4, iron block and aluminum head, port fuel injection
Displacement: 105 in3, 1710 cm3
Power: 75 hp @ 5600 rpm
Torque: 90 lb-ft @ 3200 rpm
TRANSMISSION
4-speed manual
CHASSIS
Suspension, F/R: struts/multilink
Brakes, F/R: 9.1-in disc/7.9-in drum
Tires: FIrestone Deluxe Champion Radial
P155/80R-13
DIMENSIONS
Wheelbase: 99.2 in
Length: 164.8 in
Width: 66.2 in
Height: 53.4 in
Curb Weight: 2170 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 11.7 sec
1/4-Mile: 18.8 sec @ 74 mph
90 mph: 41.9 sec
Top Speed (observed): 92 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 206 ft
Roadholding: 0.80 g
C/D TESTING EXPLAINED

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

San Francisco's Crane Cove Park playgrounds back on track after nonprofit scandal
San Francisco's Crane Cove Park playgrounds back on track after nonprofit scandal

CBS News

time15 minutes ago

  • CBS News

San Francisco's Crane Cove Park playgrounds back on track after nonprofit scandal

After weeks of uncertainty and disappointment, there's finally good news for families in the Dogpatch neighborhood. The long-promised playgrounds and a dog park at Crane Cove Park are finally moving forward, despite a financial scandal that nearly derailed the project. Located at 18th and Illinois Streets near the Chase Center, Crane Cove Park opened in 2020 with plans for two children's play areas and a dedicated dog park. But last month, residents were stunned to learn that most of the private donations meant to fund those amenities had been mismanaged by the San Francisco Parks Alliance, a prominent nonprofit that works closely with the city on public space initiatives. The revelation left many neighbors frustrated and skeptical, including RJ Andrews, a nearby resident and father of two young children. "Initially, it was a reaction of suspicion because it's taken so long to develop," Andrews said. "We were concerned that the fences would go up and nothing would happen." The Parks Alliance had received a $3 million donation from the Baker Street Foundation, a philanthropic group led by board member Nicola Miner and her family, specifically earmarked for the Crane Cove improvements. While nearly $1 million of that was transferred to the Port of San Francisco, the nonprofit admitted that it spent the remainder on its own operating expenses. The disclosure and other concerning financial revelations triggered investigations by both the San Francisco City Attorney and District Attorney. The Parks Alliance has since ceased operations. Despite the setback, the Port of San Francisco has confirmed that construction on the promised amenities is now officially underway. Two playgrounds — one for toddlers, the other for older children — are in progress, along with a fenced dog park. According to Port Communications Director Eric Young, the project is now expected to cost $2.51 million, less than originally projected. With $975,000 already received from the Parks Alliance, the Port plans to fund the remaining $1.54 million internally. "The project is underway," Young said in a written statement. "The Port is reviewing capital budgets to identify where we can reprogram funds to complete the kids and dogs play areas at the park. We are working closely with the City Attorney's Office and city partners to assess our legal and financial options. Staff will return in July to the Port Commission to discuss tradeoffs and next steps as we ensure the park improvements are delivered." Port staff are expected to present the funding source to the commissioners at their July 8 meeting. Miner expressed relief at the update. "I think it's fantastic. I can't believe it. It's amazing that the Port still held strong to its mission," she said. "I am really happy in how San Francisco responded. It was actually better than I expected." For Andrews and his family, including a newborn daughter, the timing couldn't be better. "She'll be maybe one of the first and youngest patrons of the new playgrounds," he said. "Sometimes, dreams do come true." Other residents shared in the optimism. "The fact that there's some more things that are geared toward little ones like Mason is just extremely exciting to us," said local resident Gerry Mudjer, referring to his eight-month-old son. "I think we'll be here a lot more often because of it." "I don't think there's a lot of dog parks in this area generally. There's a beach. They have public access, but [the dogs] don't really have their own specific place to play. So it'll be nice to have a contained area where you know you can let them off leash," added Savannah Schulze, a dog owner. Construction fencing and groundwork are already visible at the site, a promising sign for neighbors who feared the project might be abandoned. The Port hopes to complete the playgrounds and dog park by February 2026, with a possibility of opening as soon as the end of this year.

Paula Oyibo Exits Ulta Beauty Chief Financial Officer Role After One Year
Paula Oyibo Exits Ulta Beauty Chief Financial Officer Role After One Year

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Paula Oyibo Exits Ulta Beauty Chief Financial Officer Role After One Year

Ulta Beauty's Chief Financial Officer Paula Oyibo is exiting her post a little over a year after taking on the role. The beauty giant announced on June 25 that Chris Lialios, senior vice president and controller since 2018, will step in as interim CFO, the Wall Street Journal reports. The company has not disclosed the reason behind Oyibo's departure, which comes just months after she was promoted to chief financial officer in April 2024, following her 2019 arrival. 'It has been my honor to serve as CFO for Ulta Beauty,' said Oyibo. 'I am extremely proud of our team's accomplishments and believe Ulta Beauty is well-positioned to execute the Ulta Beauty Unleashed plan.' At the time of her promotion to the C-Suite, Oyibo succeeded longtime CFO Scott Settersten. The company has launched an external search for a permanent CFO, working with a top executive search firm to identify potential candidates. Lialios, Oyibo's interim replacement, has served as Ulta Beauty's Senior Vice President – Controller since 2018, overseeing financial reporting, internal controls, and accounting policy. He first joined the company in 1999 as an assistant controller and has since played a key role in leading finance transformation efforts and rising through the ranks. A Certified Public Accountant, Lialios holds a B.S. in Accounting from the University of Illinois, Chicago, and an M.B.A. from Webster University. 'Chris has been a respected leader on Ulta Beauty's finance team for more than 25 years, and we are thankful to him for stepping into this important interim role as we conduct a search for our next CFO,' said Kecia Steelman, president and chief executive officer. 'We're confident that his deep familiarity with our business, coupled with his financial expertise and leadership style, will ensure a smooth transition as we continue to execute our Ulta Beauty Unleashed plan.' RELATED CONTENT: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Home-state favorite Chase Elliott passes Brad Keselowski on final lap to win NASCAR Atlanta race
Home-state favorite Chase Elliott passes Brad Keselowski on final lap to win NASCAR Atlanta race

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Home-state favorite Chase Elliott passes Brad Keselowski on final lap to win NASCAR Atlanta race

Home-state favorite Chase Elliott passed Brad Keselowski on the final lap and won the the crash-filled NASCAR Cup Series at Atlanta on Saturday night for his 20th career victory. Elliott, the popular driver from Dawsonville, Georgia, earned a spot in the NASCAR playoffs with his first victory since April 2024 at Texas. It was his first win in Atlanta since 2022. Advertisement 'I've never in my whole life, this is unbelievable,' Elliott said. 'This is something I'll remember the rest of my life.' [DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks] The race's second crash early in Stage 2 took out many of the sport's biggest names and left others with damaged cars. Pole-winner Joey Logano, who led the first 36 laps before light rain forced the first caution, was among the many drivers caught up in the big crash. Among others knocked out of the race: William Byron, Austin Cindric, Ross Chastain, Josh Berry, Corey LaJoie and Daniel Suarez. 'It wrecked the whole field,' Logano said. 'I still don't know exactly how it started ... but it was total chaos. Cars were sideways and on the brakes. I got hit from every corner possible.' Advertisement Added Denny Hamlin, who suffered damage to his Toyota in the crash: 'Some zigged. Some zagged. Most crashed.' The Atlanta race at EchoPark Speedway, formerly known as Atlanta Motor Speedway, was the debut of the 32-driver In-Season Challenge, a five-race, bracket-style tournament. The parade of highly regarded drivers to be knocked out so early in the race showed the perils of trying to pick NASCAR winners on a March Madness-style bracket sheet. The top two seeds were among the early casualties. Hamlin, the No. 1 seed in the tournament, finished 31st and lost to Ty Dillon, who finished eighth. Chase Briscoe, who held off Hamlin for his first win for Joe Gibbs Racing last week at Pocono Raceway, was the No. 2 seed before being knocked out in a crash and losing to Noah Gragson in the tournament. Advertisement A $1 million prize awaits the winner as part of a new media rights deal that includes TNT. Elliott and Keselowski were on the front row when a caution with 33 laps to go forced a decision on whether to pit for fresh tires. Both stayed on the track and Elliott faded following the restart until making his decisive charge at the very end. [SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter] Bracket busters Ryan Blaney, the race favorite according to BetMGM Sportsbook, was knocked out on a wreck late in the first stage. Christopher Bell hit the wall, triggering the crash that ended the stage with Cindric in the lead. Advertisement Cindric was involved in the bigger crash early in Stage 2. Kyle Busch, Denny Hamlin and Bubba Wallace were among others involved in the crash. Photo finish Tyler Reddick beat Elliott to the finish line by .001 seconds to win Stage 2 in a battle between drivers looking for both their first stage win and overall win of the season. Weather woes Lightning and rain delayed qualifying Friday and the Xfinity race won by Nick Sanchez late Friday night. More lightning and rain threatened Saturday night's race. Fans were encouraged to leave the stands about 90 minutes before the race due to severe weather in the area but were allowed to return as pre-race were conducted as planned. Up next The Cup Series moves to Chicago for the Chicago Street Race on Sunday, July 6. ___ AP auto racing:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store