House appropriators OK rebukes to recent DOD scandals in budget bill
But the spending plan still drew significant criticism from Democratic lawmakers who objected to restrictions on abortion care for troops, insufficient funds to support Ukraine and missing budget justifications from the administration on how hundreds of billions of dollars will be spent.
The funding bill — which heads to the full chamber for consideration later this summer — includes a 3.8% pay raise for troops in 2026 and plans to trim 45,000 civilian employees from the department's workforce in a cost-cutting move.
Administration officials have billed it as the first $1 trillion defense budget, pairing the appropriations request with an expected $150 billion funding boost for military programs in the Republican-backed reconciliation package winding through Congress. Without that money, the defense budget would see no increase from fiscal 2025 levels.
House panel pushes ahead $453 billion funding plan for VA next year
In a statement Thursday, Rep. Ken Calvert, R-Calif., chairman of the appropriations committee's defense panel, praised the funding plan as 'investing significantly in modernization of the force, maintaining U.S. maritime and air dominance, fostering both innovation and the production capacity it relies upon, air and missile defense, and support for service members and their families.'
But he also acknowledged Democratic complaints about incomplete funding requests from the administration, and said he hopes those information gaps will be filled in coming weeks.
The committee approved the bill largely along party lines (only one Democrat, Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez of Washington, voted for it) after more than eight hours of debate and delays, with numerous Democratic amendments rejected by the GOP majority.
But Republicans did go along with several provisions touching on recent department controversies.
Language offered by Rep. Mike Levin, D-Calif., and approved by the committee would block the use of funds to skirt the Posse Comitatus Act, which prohibits the use of military personnel for civilian law enforcement.
The provision came in response to the Trump administration's recent decision to deploy National Guard troops and active-duty Marines to Los Angeles to help with immigration enforcement efforts, over the objections of city and state officials.
Calvert and other Republicans backed the measure without offering any direct criticism of President Donald Trump's decision.
The committee also approved a Democratic-led amendment to block defense officials from sharing classified information on unsecured networks, a measure aimed at Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's use of the privately-owned Signal app earlier this year to discuss overseas airstrikes with senior administration leaders.
And the legislation calls for a full accounting of money spent on the Army' 250th anniversary celebrations, scheduled for this weekend. The event — which coincides with Trump's 79th birthday — has seen its size and scope balloon by tens of millions of dollars as White House officials have mandated a larger and larger celebration.
Other Democratic-led proposals on restricting Trump's use of a Qatari plane as the new Air Force One, blocking the renaming of Navy ships and returning to previous policies allowing travel stipends to help pay for abortion-related care were all rejected.
Republicans also included language in the final bill which would block any diversity and inclusion programming at the Defense Department and severely limit health care options for transgender troops or family members, both priorities of the administration.
Earlier this week, Senate Republicans expressed stronger concerns about the missing budget information, but said they hope to move soon on their own version of the defense spending package. Both chambers will have to adopt their own drafts of the appropriations measures before negotiating a final budget compromise to be sent to the president to become law.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
42 minutes ago
- CNN
Live updates: Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill' awaits House vote
Update: Date: 4 min ago Title: Speaker Johnson says he expects final passage of Trump agenda bill later this morning Content: Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters that he expects final passage of the president's sweeping domestic policy bill around 8 a.m. ET, noting that President Donald Trump has been speaking with members throughout the night. Timing for passage of the bill is fluid, however, and it's not yet clear exactly when a final vote will take place. 'He was directly engaged, as he always is, and that was very important. He — members wanted to hear certain assurances from him about what's ahead, what the future will entail, and what we're going to do next, and all of that. And he was very, very helpful in that process,' said Johnson. 'I talked to him multiple times today, tonight, this morning. I mean, he was up, engaged as late as 1am. He may still be up for all I know. He doesn't really sleep a lot, so, you know, directly engaged wanting to know, play by play, what was happening and how he could help and all that.' Johnson also laid out his estimate for the timeline going forward for the morning. 'The group will go down, get the votes necessary to pass the rule. We'll proceed to debate, probably two to three hours for that. There's an hour allotted, but Leader Jeffries gets a Magic Minute. I think he goes about an hour. Mine will be much shorter than that, and we'll proceed a final vote, and we'll be passing this bill, I expect, maybe around 8, 8:30 this morning, maybe sooner, maybe sooner,' he told reporters. 'We'll be gathering on the floor shortly. I'm going to collect — somebody's driving in, they're about to arrive and we'll be moving forward here shortly,' he added. Update: Date: 16 min ago Title: House GOP holdouts fall in line and agree to bring Trump agenda to floor Content: A group of House Republican holdouts fell in line behind President Donald Trump and agreed to allow his agenda to come to the floor — reversing course after days of threatening to block the bill from a final vote. That includes some House hardliners who have complained that the package would add $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the next decade, as well as moderate-leaning members who have concerns about Medicaid cuts. The tally was 219 to 213 with only one GOP no vote: Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick. The House cleared a key procedural hurdle and voted to advance the bill in the early hours of Thursday morning – after House GOP leaders held open the vote on the rule to govern debate for a lengthy period of time as they worked to flip 'no' votes and win over key holdouts. GOP leaders believe they will now have the votes to actually pass Trump's giant tax and spending cuts package when it does come to a full floor vote, but it is not yet certain. Final passage is expected later Thursday morning, after debate, though timing remains fluid. Update: Date: 1 min ago Title: GOP Rep. Ralph Norman flips, says he will back bill after assurances from Trump Content: Rep. Ralph Norman, a conservative who has previously said he was opposed to the Senate-passed version of President Donald Trump's sweeping domestic policy bill, said late last night he will back the bill in the procedural vote and final passage, after receiving assurances from Trump that his concerns will be addressed. 'It's the right thing to do at the right time,' Norman told reporters. Norman said that the president had given conservative holdouts assurances that the green energy tax credits, as well as other conservative priorities, would be 'dealt with' — though Norman refused to say if that would happen by executive order or by future legislative action — during their meeting at the White House yesterday. Some Republicans have been vocal in their opposition to the Senate's slower timeline to phase out some energy tax credits, and Norman said it was important for them to get assurances on that from the White House. 'We got clarification on what's going to be enforced. We got clarification on how the IRAs were going to be dealt with. We got clarification on the tax cuts — and still we'll be meeting tomorrow on the specifics of it. But no, I feel comfortable with this,' Norman said. Pressed on how they can trust leadership will continue to take them seriously, if they still fold, Norman said, 'We get the best we can get, and we go as far as we can go to get for the American people, what we need. That's not bluffing. The reason we have credibility, they know we'll vote no.' He added, 'Now look, this is a game of — and it is a game — of getting the most you can for your consistency. And we're doing that, I'll do that. As long as I'm up here, I'll do that.'
USA Today
43 minutes ago
- USA Today
Iranian nuclear program degraded by up to two years, Pentagon says
WASHINGTON, July 2 (Reuters) - The Pentagon said on Wednesday that U.S. strikes 10 days ago had degraded Iran's nuclear program by up to two years, suggesting the U.S. military operation likely achieved its goals despite a far more cautious initial assessment that leaked to the public. Sean Parnell, a Pentagon spokesman, offered the figure at a briefing to reporters, adding that the official estimate was "probably closer to two years." Parnell did not provide evidence to back up his assessment. "We have degraded their program by one to two years, at least intel assessments inside the Department (of Defense) assess that," Parnell told a news briefing. U.S. military bombers carried out strikes against three Iranian nuclear facilities on June 22 using more than a dozen 30,000-pound (13,600-kg) bunker-buster bombs and more than two dozen Tomahawk land attack cruise missiles. More: Iran enacts law suspending cooperation with UN nuclear watchdog The evolving U.S. intelligence about the impact of the strikes is being closely watched, after President Donald Trump said almost immediately after they took place that Iran's program had been obliterated, language echoed by Parnell at Wednesday's briefing. Such conclusions often take the U.S. intelligence community weeks or more to determine. "All of the intelligence that we've seen (has) led us to believe that Iran's -- those facilities especially, have been completely obliterated," Parnell said. Over the weekend, the head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog, Rafael Grossi, said that Iran could be producing enriched uranium in a few months, raising doubts about how effective U.S. strikes to destroy Tehran's nuclear program have been. Several experts have also cautioned that Iran likely moved a stockpile of near weapons-grade highly enriched uranium out of the deeply buried Fordow site before the strikes and could be hiding it. But U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said last week he was unaware of intelligence suggesting Iran had moved its highly enriched uranium to shield it from U.S. strikes. A preliminary assessment last week from the Defense Intelligence Agency suggested that the strikes may have only set back Iran's nuclear program by months. But Trump administration officials said that assessment was low confidence and had been overtaken by intelligence showing Iran's nuclear program was severely damaged. According to Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi, the strikes on the Fordow nuclear site caused severe damage. "No one exactly knows what has transpired in Fordow. That being said, what we know so far is that the facilities have been seriously and heavily damaged," Araqchi said in the interview broadcast by CBS News on Tuesday. (Reporting by Phil Stewart and Idrees Ali; Editing by Lisa Shumaker)
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Some oil patch execs say "drill baby drill" isn't happening
President Trump wants to " drill baby drill." But many producers in the heart of the oil patch have other plans — and some say Trump's trade policies are discouraging drilling. Why it matters: Many things affect gasoline prices. But producers' caution about growing output could limit how much prices at the pump might fall by helping avoid a large market glut of oil. Driving the news: The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas on Wednesday released its latest quarterly survey of execs in its region that includes the prolific Permian Basin. These anonymous surveys are hot commodities for anyone seeking the industry pulse. Threat level: " The Liberation Day chaos and tariff antics have harmed the domestic energy industry," one executive told the Fed. "Drill, baby, drill will not happen with this level of volatility. Companies will continue to lay down rigs and frack spreads," said the exec, one of several who criticized the tariffs. State of play: The poll of exploration and production (E&P) firms and drilling contractors showed overall activity contracting slightly in Q2, and production dipping slightly. Looking ahead, the poll's average of price forecasts is $68 per barrel over the next year for WTI, the benchmark U.S. grade, roughly where it's at now. "Almost half of executives surveyed expect to drill fewer wells in 2025 than they planned at the start of the year," it states. Large producers (10,000+ barrels per day) were more likely to see drilling "significantly" fall. What we're watching: Prices and input costs. If they drop to $60 per barrel and stay there, 61% expect their production to fall slightly over the next 12 months, while 9% see a big drop (see above). Twenty-seven percent of execs say the recent steel tariff hike will mean slightly fewer wells drilled, and 5% expect significantly fewer. Flashback: The Q1 survey showed that on average, firms say they need oil at $65 to profitably drill new wells. The latest outlook from the Energy Department's independent stats arm projects a slight drop in the second half of this year, and a slight annual decline in 2026. Yes, but: A White House spokeswoman said Trump is making drilling easier by rolling back "stifling" Biden-era regulations. "The One, Big, Beautiful Bill's tax cuts and full equipment expensing will further turbocharge growth and investment by oil and gas companies — another reason Republicans need to get this bill across the finish line and onto the President's desk," Taylor Rogers said in a statement. The big picture: U.S. output is already at record levels and the country is by far the world's largest producer. Trump's "dominance" agenda includes more drilling access in offshore areas and Alaska. But those are very long-term projects. Today's economic picture, combined with shale producers' focus on capital discipline and shareholder payouts, is working against near-term growth.
