OSCE is calling on the Georgian Dream to release political prisoners and hold new elections
The OSCE Parliamentary Assembly adopted the Portuguese Declaration, expressing concern over developments in Georgia following the parliamentary elections held on October 26, 2024. The declaration calls on the country's authorities to fulfill their commitments and support a transparent and inclusive political process that reflects the will of the people.
Among other points, the report includes a call for the ruling Georgian Dream party to release all political prisoners and hold new, fair elections, as the 2024 vote was marked by a number of irregularities.
The OSCE Parliamentary Assembly also calls on the new government of Syria to withdraw its recognition of the independence of Georgia's uncontrolled territories and to recognize Georgia's territorial integrity.
Key points of the declaration:
The OSCE Parliamentary Assembly expresses deep concern over the parliamentary elections held in Georgia on October 26, 2024, during which the OSCE/ODIHR election observation mission reported numerous violations in the electoral process; It raises concern about breaches of electoral procedures and the unprecedented use of administrative resources, which undermines the principles of freedom and equality in the electoral process and casts doubt on the results themselves; It condemns the disproportionate use of force against peaceful protesters who are firmly advocating for Georgia's European and democratic future; It expresses concern over arrests and politically motivated persecution of journalists, activists, and opposition politicians; It voices disappointment that the Georgian authorities are using all possible means to consolidate power by adopting new laws on foreign agent registration, broadcasting, and grant regulation; It notes that the situation in Georgia continues to deteriorate, with the government moving further away from the path of European integration; It expresses deep concern over the growing anti-EU rhetoric and deems it completely unacceptable; It is extremely concerned that deepening ties with the Russian Federation and China raise alarm in the context of Georgia's declared European aspirations.
The OSCE Parliamentary Assembly urges the Georgian Dream party to de-escalate the situation and launch a national dialogue with all stakeholders in order to resolve the crisis and restore public trust in Georgian democracy.
It calls on the government to respect the rights to freedom of assembly and freedom of expression and to refrain from using force against peaceful demonstrators, politicians, and journalists.
The Assembly also urges the Georgian Dream party to return to the path of EU integration. It reaffirms its support for the pro-European aspirations of Georgian society.
The Assembly reiterates its support for the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Georgia within its internationally recognized borders and calls on the Russian Federation to withdraw its recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia as independent states, to comply with the EU-mediated 2008 ceasefire agreement, and to end the militarization of these regions and efforts to forcibly separate them from the rest of Georgia.
News in Georgia
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
an hour ago
- Powys County Times
King to highlight vital bond with France over threats that ‘know no borders'
The King will stress the vital partnership between France and the UK in the face of a 'multitude of complex threats' at the state banquet in honour of French President Emmanuel Macron, declaring 'as friends and as allies, we face them together'. Charles and the Queen are set to welcome the French leader and his wife Brigitte to Windsor Castle on Tuesday as Mr Macron begins his three-day state visit to the UK. At a glittering banquet in the historic Berkshire landmark in the evening, the monarch will deliver a speech, highlighting how 'these challenges know no borders: no fortress can protect us against them this time'. But he will tell Mr Macron that Britain and France can help lead the way in confronting threats relating to defence, technology and climate change, saying: 'Our two nations share not only values, but also the tireless determination to act on them in the world.' Charles and Camilla are hosting Mr Macron and the first lady at the historic royal residence. They will be feted with a carriage ride through the town, a ceremonial welcome and the opulent state dinner. The King, in his toast, will reflect on 1,000 years of 'shared history and culture between our two peoples', including many of the royal family's personal connections to France. 'For centuries our citizens have admired each other, amused each other, and imitated each other', he will say, and reveal how he remains 'in awe of France's extraordinary attributes and achievements'. Charles will also hail the Anglo-French partnership as vital amid the many challenges of today, saying: 'Our two countries face a multitude of complex threats, emanating from multiple directions. 'As friends and as allies, we face them together.' It marks the first state visit to the UK by an EU head of state since Brexit, and will see Mr Macron address parliamentarians in the Palace of Westminster's Royal Gallery and, on Thursday, join a UK-France Summit at Downing Street. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has signalled a 'reset' in relations between the UK and Europe as he looks to heal the wounds caused by the Brexit years. Defence, growth, security, migration and French tactics on tackling small boats will be discussed, with the two leaders expected to dial in to speak to other allied nations who are looking to support any future peace deal in Ukraine. Downing Street said on Monday that the UK's relationship with France was 'key' to dealing with boat crossings, following reports French police officers had used knives to puncture a boat off the coast. The Prince and Princess of Wales will also play a role by meeting the president and the French first lady at RAF Northolt on Tuesday morning on behalf of the King and travelling with them to Windsor. Charles and Camilla will formally greet their guests on a Royal Dais constructed on Datchet Road in Windsor town centre, with the castle in the backdrop as gun salutes sound in nearby Home Park. The King, the Queen, the Waleses and Mr and Mrs Macron will then take a carriage procession through Windsor and along part of the Long Walk which leads to the castle, just as former French president Nicolas Sarkozy did in 2008. Mr Macron's state visit to the UK, from July 8-10, is the first to be hosted at Windsor Castle, rather than Buckingham Palace, in a more than a decade since that of the Irish president Michael D Higgins in 2014. State visits, which capitalise on the royals' soft power to strengthen diplomatic ties overseas, will be hosted at Windsor for the next few years while reservicing work continues at the London Palace and starts to affect the state rooms. The last state visit to the UK from France was in March 2008 when the now-disgraced Mr Sarkozy, since convicted of corruption and influence peddling, and his wife Carla Bruni, were the guests of Elizabeth II at Windsor. The arrangements are likely to form the template for US President Donald Trump's high-profile state visit in September, but much will depend on security considerations for the US leader, who survived an assassination attempt last year. A ceremonial welcome will be staged in the castle's quadrangle with Camilla, William, Kate and Mrs Macron watching as the King and Mr Macron inspect the Guard of Honour. Lunch will be hosted in the State Dining Room, after which the president and his wife, the King and Queen and members of the royal family will view a special exhibition of items relating to France from the Royal Collection in the Green Drawing and Mrs Macron will also travel to London on Tuesday afternoon to see the Grave of the Unknown Warrior at Westminster Abbey and visit the Palace of Westminster where the French leader will address parliamentarians before meeting opposition leaders at Lancaster House. The King and president will both deliver speeches at the banquet in the medieval St George's Hall, where some 160 guests will be seated at the elaborately decorated 50 metre table, which will run the full length of the vast room. Kensington Palace has yet to confirm whether Kate will attend the banquet. The princess opened up about her 'rollercoaster' cancer recovery, its life-changing impact and putting on a 'brave face' last week. The King and Queen paid a state visit to France in September 2023 and enjoy a warm rapport with Mr and Mrs Macron, who will stay in the castle during their trip. Mrs Macron, 72, sparked a storm in May when she was seen pushing her husband's face away with both hands before they disembarked a plane in Vietnam. The 47-year-old president dismissed the gesture – caught on camera – as horseplay, but it caused a stir in France, with daily Le Parisien newspaper asking: 'Slap or 'squabble'?' The couple, married since 2007, met at the high school where Mr Macron was a student and Brigitte was a married teacher. The visit comes a year after the UK and France celebrated 120 years since the signing of the Entente Cordiale. The Anglo-French agreements in 1904 ushered in improved relations between the two countries which had fought against each other during the Napoleonic Wars.
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
BRICS nations meaning explained: Donald Trump's latest tariff threat
Trump has teased negotiations over the tariff rates since, and late on July 6, said letters and deals on tariffs would start being communicated to various countries the following day. In another July 6 post on Truth Social, Trump threatened an additional 10% tariff on imports from another subset of countries. "Any Country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% Tariff," Trump's post stated. "There will be no exceptions to this policy." What countries might he be talking about? More: US close to several trade deals ahead of tariff deadline this week, Trump officials say What does BRICS stand for? BRIC is an acronym coined in 2001 to describe rapidly developing countries that could impact the global economy. Those originally included: Brazil Russia India China South Africa joined the group in 2010, changing the acronym to BRICS, according to the Library of Congress. Over time, foreign leaders from each country began meeting and collaborating in formal summits. BRICS countries expanded in 2024 The BRICS countries make up approximately 45% of the world's population. Reuters reported in 2023 that the group of developing countries has sought to challenge the world order of Western dominance. In 2024, five more countries joined the bloc, according to Reuters. The newly admitted BRICS countries are: Iran Ethiopia Egypt Indonesia United Arab Emirates The BRICS countries issued a joint statement from their summit that started in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil on July 6, warning that tariffs could hurt global trade, according to Reuters. Trump's Truth Social threat came hours later. What were the original tariff rates slated for BRICS countries? Trump has previously threatened tariffs on the BRICS countries, apparently in response to efforts to undermine the dollar. In November 2024, he posted on Truth Social a threat to issue a 100% tariff against BRICS countries. So far, the only country to receive a 100% or higher tariff rate under this Trump administration was China. After weeks of the escalating trade war between the world's second-largest economy and the U.S., the two reached an agreement to lower the triple-digit tariff rates while they discussed a trade deal. Here are the tariff rates the other BRICS countries faced as of early April. However, rates above 10% were delayed for 90 days, and the Trump administration has teased that several deals could be announced the week of July 7. Brazil - 10% Russia - 0% (The White House said there are previously imposed sanctions on exempt countries that "preclude any meaningful trade with these nations." India - 26% South Africa - 30% Iran - 10% Ethiopia - 10% Egypt - 10% Indonesia - 32% United Arab Emirates - 10% Another tariff acronym: What does TACO stand for? Financial Times columnist Robert Armstrong coined "TACO trade" in May, describing how some investors anticipate market rebounds amid Trump's on-again, off-again tariff policies. The acronym stands for "Trump always chickens out." Armstrong describes TACO trade as many investors' strategy to buy into the market that dips when Trump announces steep tariffs on the assumption that he will back off his tariff order, and the market will rebound. Trump hit back at a reporter who asked about the term on May 28, saying, "you ask a nasty question like that. It's called negotiation." Contributing: Joey Garrison, Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy, Carlie Procell, Josh Meyer, Cybele Mayes-Osterman, USA TODAY; Reuters Kinsey Crowley is the Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at kcrowley@ Follow her on X and TikTok @kinseycrowley or Bluesky at @
Spectator
2 hours ago
- Spectator
Europe must prepare to support Ukraine without America
It is unquestionably the case that people who should have known better were blinded by the Capri-Sun King's glare when they reassured us that Donald Trump would not abandon Ukraine, that a second Trump administration would not really cut off military aid to Kyiv or effectively offer a free pass to Vladimir Putin. Yet that is what is happening. Last week the US Department of Defense halted a planned delivery of air defence missiles and precision munitions to Ukraine, the third time this year that such a stoppage has been put in place. The weaponry was part of a supply programme agreed under President Biden, but was halted as the Pentagon undertakes a 'capability review' to assess stockpiles currently held by the United States. A spokesman explained: We can't give weapons to everybody all around the world. Part of our job is to give the President a framework that he can use to evaluate how many munitions we have and where we're sending them. And that review process is happening right now and is ongoing. However, the motivation behind the sudden decision, reportedly taken personally by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and without coordination or consultation either within the administration or with Congress, is suspect. Democrat Adam Smith, ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee, said his staff had 'seen the numbers' and 'we are not at any lower point, stockpile-wise, than we've been in the three-and-a-half years of the Ukraine conflict'. President Trump has made no secret of his attitude towards Ukraine and President Volodymyr Zelensky or his scepticism of their cause. It is no surprise that a partisan as zealously loyal and conceptually unfit for office as Hegseth should mirror the commander-in-chief's instincts. For Ukraine, and for European security, this is serious. It is no coincidence that at the end of last week Russia launched its biggest air strikes on Kyiv since the beginning of the full-scale invasion in 2022, using more than 500 drones. Ukraine is believed to be running dangerously low on stocks of interceptor missiles for its US-supplied MIM-104 Patriot air defence systems, which made up part of the anticipated deliveries, as did FIM-92 Stinger man-portable surface-to-air missiles. There are reports that Ukrainian forces were reduced to using machine guns to try to bring down drones in the recent air strikes. It must now be clear to any observer – as it is certainly clear to a gleeful Kremlin – that the United States is not a reliable ally to Ukraine, unpredictable even in its reliability (some of the munitions to be transferred last week had already been loaded onto lorries in Poland before their delivery was stopped by the Pentagon). What is the solution? How do Ukraine's allies in Europe respond? Germany has already sent three of its own Patriot batteries to Ukraine, but last week it emerged that Chancellor Friedrich Merz has also discussed purchasing further missiles from the United States and sending them on to Ukraine. Merz and his SPD defence minister, Boris Pistorius, are keen for Germany to take a stronger leadership role on Ukraine. Major General Christian Freuding, who oversees the Special Staff for Ukraine at the Federal Defence Ministry in Berlin, noted that Nato's European members plus Canada had exceeded the estimated $20 billion (£14.7 billion) of military assistance from Washington last year. 'If the political will is there, then the means will also be there to largely compensate for the American support,' Freuding added. There are two parts to assistance to Ukraine. The first is the obvious support for defensive measures like Patriot missiles to protect the country from Russian air strikes. Germany's apparent intentions are welcome in that regard, and will make a real difference so long as President Trump does not also prove reluctant to countenance even the sale of weapons to third parties for shipment to Ukraine. The second part has to be assisting Ukraine in more active measures against Russia. If Ukrainian forces can take the fight to Russian bases and installations, and particularly if they can force Russia to pull forces further back from the border for safety, they will make themselves all the safer. We saw last November the effect that long-range strikes could have when the United States finally agreed to remove restrictions on the use of MGM-140 ATACMS tactical ballistic missiles and the UK followed suit on Storm Shadow cruise missiles. Olaf Scholz had vetoed the supply of Taurus long-range missiles when chancellor of Germany. Merz has shifted Berlin's position, saying such a supply is 'within the realms of possibility' and agreeing a deal to help manufacture new precision strike weapons in Ukraine. America has been the biggest bilateral donor to Ukraine but it is not irreplaceable. If supplies from the United States are beginning to falter, however, European nations need to act quickly and decisively. Germany is doing so, and the UK, especially after lifting restrictions on Storm Shadow, has been generally reliable. We should not see assistance to Ukraine as separate from each country's national security: the threat from Russia is here, now, and it is being unleashed on the cities and armies of Ukraine. The West cannot and should not wait to respond.
