
A smarter life? Meet the Gen-Zers who are switching off their smartphones
Trinity
graduate sticks to it: no changing. 'My mam laughs at me,' he says. 'It's like back in the day when there was only a phone box. Once I have a plan, I am committed. It's like, 'Call me once. Make the plan and I'll show up. If you're not there, I'm not going to get your text.''
Like a growing number of people his age, Brocklebank is making an active choice to downgrade his use of phones and
social media
. He took the decision following
Covid
when his screen time rocketed. 'I was on screens 14-16 hours a day,' he says. 'I would have been on Zooms until three o'clock every morning. I used to have 100-and-something Snapchat streaks, of people I would text every day. I wasn't going for walks. I wasn't sleeping. I'm only now readjusting.'
Did his phone use feel like an addiction? 'It's entirely addictive,' he says. 'There can be withdrawals. Like, I would get very irritable, very snappy, very short-tempered ... Say I were to go off my phone for four hours, and then if I went back on and I didn't have a text or a notification, I'd do something like post on Instagram, so I'd be like, 'Oh people are liking that, they still care.' And if that wasn't getting as many likes, you'd have to delete it, and then stop on your phone for a few days. I was caught in this vicious cycle.'
These days, things are very different. 'I'm on my phone less and I'm happier,' he says. 'I'm not going, 'Oh, do people think I'm good-looking on
?' Or, 'Do my friends care about me?' I'm also spending more time with them in person. Even my mam is on the phone more than me. My phone did have a lot of power over me, but at this point it could just go missing.'
READ MORE
Back in the early days of smartphones, there was a sense of excitement about the possibilities the technology could bring: that the internet could democratise opportunity and offer access to information almost instantaneously. Now in its place has come a widespread unease. Educators report that young people, used to gamified social media, struggle to focus at school. Phones have a zombifying effect where people scroll but can't remember, once they put the phone down, what they've been watching. There is a greater understanding that algorithms are driving the content people see.
'Your attention is a currency,' says Garret Nugent, an 18-year-old secondary school student from Dublin, who has also decided to restrict his use of social media. 'I realised if my attention was valuable to companies, I should pay more attention to where I was putting it.'
Now coming into his Leaving Cert year, Nugent has deleted
TikTok
and keeps a tight rein on his screen time. 'I got rid of a lot of apps,' he says. 'TikTok is marketed as a way of relaxing, but it's not relaxing. You feel hollow.'
Nugent first got a smartphone at 13, having been given a flip-phone around the age of 10. A keen musician, it wasn't long after he started using social media that he realised his piano and harp playing was suffering owing to the time he was spending scrolling. He decided to wrest back control after he'd been home sick from school and spent the whole day on TikTok.
'It was outrageous,' he says. 'I spent 11 hours on TikTok. I would have been 14 or 15.' What was he watching? 'The worst part is you don't really remember. There was a lot of Minecraft. I got a lot of 'fun fact' ones, like about 'Oh, this guy invented penicillin.' Comedy sketches were very common.'
Garret Nugent: 'It was outrageous. I spent 11 hours on TikTok'
Nugent's smartphone usage these days is considered. 'It's about deciding what you're using your phone for,' he says. 'I'd rather watch videos I choose of something I'm interested in than spending hours scrolling things, barely deciding to watch them.' Factoring in the use of pragmatic apps such as Google Maps, Nugent's screen time is around three hours a day. 'For the moment, I feel like I have things in a solid place,' he says. 'I'm comfortable with how I'm using my phone.'
[
Social media is destroying young people's mental health. Why do we keep tiptoeing around this reality?
Opens in new window
]
It takes a certain maturity to be able to zoom out and look at your life online with such critical appraisal. It's also indicative of a new generation of young people who are feeling the burn from their phones, and want to control their smartphone usage to improve their mental health and deepen their attention spans.
According to a recent report by GWI, a research institute which surveyed the views of 20,000 young people and their parents across 18 countries, the number of 12- to 15-year-olds who take breaks from their smart screens rose by 18 per cent to 40 per cent since 2022. Another survey conducted by the British Standards Institution found that
almost half of young people said they would rather live in a world
where the internet did not exist.
Are young people scared of their smartphones? That might be a stretch, but there is certainly a growing degree of caution among some.
Nuala Whittle, a 26-year-old masters student from Co Wicklow now living in Berlin, is still on Instagram, but has a timer set to go off after 30 minutes to remind her of how long she's using it every day. She's wary about the messaging that comes to her via social media apps, particularly in relation to body image. 'My main source of weight questioning came from a really early age from Instagram and Tumblr,' she says. 'At the time, I was too young to realise how damaging that would be.'
What did she see? Whittle reels off the video and picture messaging that would flash up on her feed. 'Tips for 'here's how you can go your whole day without fainting'. And, 'here's how you can keep it under 100 calories per day'. Or 'here's how you should make up for the green apple you ate'. That was mostly Instagram. At the time they had a caveat saying, 'you might see some harmful images'. Of course when you're 16, you're like, 'I want to see the harmful images. I'm big and mature.' You look at it with a morbid fascination, but there's a part of you that's like, should I be paying attention to this?'
Nuala Whittle: 'When you're 16, you're like, I want to see the harmful images – I'm big and mature'
Whittle didn't talk to her friends and family about what she was witnessing. 'You just kept it to yourself,' she says. 'You never spoke to friends about whether they were going down the same rabbit holes, or acting on the things they saw.'
A private unease built up in Whittle. 'I saw a lot of very graphic self-harm content. I was like, 'Should I be seeing this?' And you never say it. Because when I was growing up, we didn't have the same awareness of the fact that images are marketed to people. And depending on what demographic you are, you get a certain type of content. Your age is dictating a lot.'
Whittle now tries hard to restrict her Instagram use, but still regularly hits two hours a day on the app. She feels the marketing targeted at her has changed as she has grown older. 'When I was young, it was weight-based. Now it's this trend towards anti-ageing. My current marketing is a lot of Botox and filler and tweakments and 'here's these tiny things that you can do to not age any more than this'. I'm also seeing a lot of celebrities, and 'here's a breakdown of what they have had done'. When I was in New York, I saw girls of 10 or 12 in Sephora looking at anti-ageing products. Because now the marketing is 'prevention is the best cure, you have to start early'. They were in these brightly lit make-up chairs, dissecting their faces.'
Young girls can be seriously impacted by social media use. In a
2025 survey by social enterprise the Shona Project
, 52 per cent of teenage girls said filters and editing apps negatively affect their self-esteem.
But teenage boys face profound challenges too. 'I had stealthily censored pornographic images pop up on my Instagram when I was in my early teens,' says Tadhg McLoughlin, a 23-year-old from Clondalkin in Dublin. 'It would be accounts run by OnlyFans models where they'd post themselves dancing and then you'd go to a profile, and it would be like, 'Click my link'. Two years ago, I had really explicit, pornographic images pop up on my 'For you' page on TikTok. I reported it. With kids and teens, there's a lot of preying on morbid curiosity.'
A student of screenwriting in Dún Laoghaire Institute of Art, Design and Technology, McLoughlin has spent years trying to restrict his social media use, with some successes and failures. 'I've been trying to get off the phone, particularly social media,' he says. 'I deleted TikTok for three months and then my girlfriend was giving out that she couldn't send my TikToks so I redownloaded it, but I think I'm going to delete it again. The content is horrible. I don't remember half the stuff I see.'
Tadhg McLoughlin: 'I think I'm going to delete Tiktok again. The content is horrible.' Photograph: Dara Mac Dónaill
Even when young people try to get off their smartphones, invariably they wind up back on them again, their hand forced by the demands of the modern world. Ita Mac Carthy is mother to 13-year-old Sandy. 'Sandy got rid of his smartphone for a flip-phone for a good six months,' she explains. 'We reintroduced the smartphone when he went on a school trip abroad so we could contact him by
, and now he's on Instagram. I'm not sure how long he'll keep Instagram or his smartphone: they don't make him happy and he knows it.'
[
Smartphones are an easy scapegoat for a more profound unhappiness
Opens in new window
]
Trying to reduce screen time is like playing a game of Whac-a-Mole: once you put the phone away, a compelling reason pops up to use it – you might need WhatsApp for a video call with family abroad, Revolut to pay someone for gig tickets or to split a restaurant bill, the camera to scan a QR code, or even email just to keep up with homework. 'My school uses Teams, Microsoft Word, the whole Microsoft package,' Nugent says. 'I also need my smartphone for navigation: I use Google Maps a lot.'
Two-factor identification messages ping in while you're already using a screen: a laptop. 'I was applying for my driving licence and it kept sending me text verifications,' Brocklebank says. 'Banking is one of the main things. You have to run after your phone to send confirmations.'
Can so-called dumbphones – the app-less, old-fashioned mobile phones – help? Not really, the young people interviewed for this article report. Smartphones are designed to be central to our lives and inseparable from our person. We need them to function in the modern world.
According to research firm Data Insights Analysis, sales of dumbphones will decline by 1.3 per cent in 2025. 'I wish I could live comfortably with a 2007 flip-phone,' McLoughlin says. 'Ideally I would just have calls and texts and maybe a camera for pictures, or email. But I just don't see things going that way, where that's even a possible choice, because of the culture we live in.'
FOMO, or the fear of missing out
, is a large part of what forces people back on to smartphones and social media: WhatsApp and
groups can be vital for our social or work lives. There's a secondary aspect too: the craving most of us have for the warm, fuzzy feeling of validation that comes with social media usage – with the likes, reposts and thumbs up – and the pinpricks of insecurity if we aren't online.
Brocklebank would get upset sometimes if he went offline for a time, only to find a low number of unread messages waiting for him when he logged back on to social media. 'It was, 'Am I still friends with that person?'' he says. 'I was so sure they didn't like me.'
Jack Brocklebank: 'My phone did have a lot of power over me.' Photograph: Tom Honan
In The Anxious Generation: How the Great Rewiring of Childhood is Causing an Epidemic of Mental Illness, American social psychologist
Jonathan Haidt explores
how smartphones fuel insecurity and encourage constant social comparison among young people. Haidt believes great structural strides must be taken – by placing responsibility on governments and technology companies – to protect young people from their smartphones. Many Irish professionals working in education and mental health agree.
'It's causing mayhem in our school and I'm sure in lots of other schools that are not discussing it because we're caught between a rock and a hard place because of confidentiality,' says Mary*, a primary schoolteacher in Munster. 'We've seen first-hand the impact it's having on very young children after Holy Communion when they're being given access to mobile phones. It's impacting their mental health, their social interactions. We were saying in school it should be a Department of Health not a Department of Education topic because of the impact it's having.'
Countries including France, the Netherlands, Italy and Luxembourg have introduced school-wide bans on phones during the day. Earlier this summer, the Department of Education stopped short of banning smartphone use for post-primary students, but issued a new directive for primary schools to bring in new policies that ban the use of smartphones during the school day.
Rachel Harper, principal at St Patrick's National School in Greystones, is the founder of It Takes A Village, which signed up eight primary schools in the catchment area in 2023 to a no smartphone voluntary code until the children reached secondary school.
'Going back two years ago, nobody was talking about this,' she says. 'Parents were quietly worrying about it, but were afraid to speak too much because they didn't want to come across as judgmental to other parents.'
Rachel Harper, principal of St Patrick's National School in Greystones, Co Wicklow. Photograph: Alan Betson
For Harper, who is on the HSE Therapeutic Wellbeing Pilot project steering group, it's vital to normalise such conversations. 'All of us working together, that's how we're going to get change. There have to be a lot more restrictions with the tech companies themselves.'
For now, the change has to come from within. Eighteen-year-old Nugent has a variety of tools to ensure he doesn't idle away his days on social media. 'I had Minimalist Phone from the start of third year,' he says. 'I deleted it and re-downloaded it. I've had it now without deleting it for maybe a year and a half.'
Minimalist Phone is an app that helps users to navigate social media in a mindful way. 'It changes your phone screen so you have to search for apps if you want to go into them,' he says. 'Before opening certain apps, you can get a timer and you have to wait for a bit before opening the app. I also got an app called NoScroll – you can block certain websites. You can block YouTube shorts in YouTube – that solved that issue for me: a lot of the things posted there are just TikToks, posted in YouTube.'
[
Excessive use of social media creating generation of 'broken people', psychiatrist says
Opens in new window
]
McLoughlin has a Gameboy for his long bus journeys to college. 'If I want to entertain myself, I have a specific game, a piece of media, that I'm going to engage in, and I'm controlling the environment,' he says. And he has a notepad, not a Notes app. 'I'll write things down physically on paper. I'll keep my notepad with me all the time.'
Brocklebank has spent a lot of time reflecting on the hold his phone once had on him, and what it means to him to have freedom from it. Letting his phone run out of battery helps him appreciate the magnitude of the spell that was once cast on him. 'One day I was standing in the rain and my phone died and I was like, 'Oh, I'm holding a brick now,'' he relates. 'It took away a lot of the phone's power.'
As for Nuala Whittle in Berlin? She has a sharper, more brutal tactic to reduce her smartphone use. 'Throw it,' she says, with a laugh. 'When you want to stop using your phone, launch it as far away from you as you can towards a surface that won't break it. If you're on the bed, throw it on to the couch. If you're on the couch, throw it on to the carpet. And then, if you're really comfortable in the chair, just rely on the fact that you're so comfortable that you don't want to get up.'
'Sometimes you have to do silly things,' Whittle concludes. 'Literally: just throw it away.'
*Mary's name has been changed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Irish Sun
11 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
UK-wide emergency alert to OVERRIDE millions of phones & trigger loud siren – exact date you'll be hit
A UK wide emergency alert is set to override millions of phones and trigger a siren on your device. A message that will be sent to phones across the country in a national test of the UK's emergency alert system has been published in advance as the Government seeks to ready the public for the drill. Advertisement 1 A UK-wide emergency alert is set to override millions of phones in September Credit: Alamy Millions of devices will vibrate and make a siren sound for around 10 seconds as they receive the text of fewer than 100 words at around 3pm on September 7. It will assure the public that they "do not need to take any action" and include a message in both English and Welsh. The Government has been carrying out a public awareness campaign to ensure people know when the test is taking place, including those facing domestic abuse who may have hidden phones. On Monday, the Cabinet Office said the text message will include both English and Welsh and be sent to mobile phones on 4G and 5G networks in the UK. Advertisement Read more News It will read: "This is a test of Emergency Alerts, a UK government service that will warn you if there's a life-threatening emergency nearby. "You do not need to take any action. In a real emergency, follow the instructions in the alert to keep yourself and others safe. "Find simple and effective advice on how to prepare for emergencies at . "Visit for more information or to view this message in Welsh. " Advertisement Most read in The Sun Live Blog Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden said: "Just like the fire alarm in your house, it's important we test this system so that we know it will work if we need it. New Emergency Alerts system will inform people who are in immediate danger by sending alerts direct to mobile phones "The alerts have the potential to save lives." Since the first national test of the system in April 2023, five alerts have been sent, including during major storms such as Storm Eowyn in January when lives were at risk. Other activations have took place when an unexploded Second World War bomb was discovered in Plymouth, as well as during flash floods in Cumbria and Leicestershire. Advertisement Some MPs have called on ministers to use different modes of communication for the alert in order to ensure it reaches people who do not have access to a phone. Liberal Democrat Cabinet Office spokeswoman Sarah Olney has suggested the Government follows Scandinavian examples where the public have been handed pamphlets about preparing for emergencies.


Irish Times
13 hours ago
- Irish Times
How to save water: The average Irish person uses 133 litres a day
How long do you spend in the shower? If it's more than eight minutes, that's above average. Reduce your time washing by just 60 seconds and you could save 15 litres of water with every shower. But why be bothered with saving water anyway? There's hardly a shortage in rainy Ireland, and isn't water free? Yes, water covers 71 per cent of the planet , but only 1 per cent is available to us as drinking water. We share this with animals and plants, as well as using it in our homes and businesses. Water isn't an unlimited resource, and getting clean, safe water to our taps is not without cost. READ MORE Uisce Éireann treats 1.7 billion litres of water for homes and businesses every day. The water comes from rivers, lakes, springs, wells and groundwater, but getting it to your sink or shower is harder than it looks. There are money and resources involved in sourcing, treating, storing and distributing water all the way to your home. Drinking water needs to meet European Drinking Water standards so that it's safe to drink. There's the cost of collecting and treating your wastewater, and to its return to the environment too. Yes, Ireland experiences high levels of annual rainfall, but much of the water is lost due to old water infrastructure, says Uisce Éireann. Summer is putting extra pressure on the system, it says. Water supplies in 12 counties officially entered 'drought status' earlier this month. Reduce your laundry by one cycle a week and you can save up to 13 litres of water. Photograph: Getty Images 'Really consider' your water usage, Uisce Éireann asks all of us. The average person in Ireland drinks, cooks, launders, showers, waters and flushes their way through 133 litres of water a day. If you think you're pretty careful about your usage, a handy online calculator from Uisce Éireann will tell you how much you are saving compared to others, and what you can do to save more. First, the kitchen. By only using your dishwasher or washing machine when fully loaded, you'll save 23 litres of water a week, says Uisce Éireann. Go a step further and reduce your laundry by one cycle a week and you can save up to 13 litres of water. Drop one dishwasher cycle a week and you can save up to 10 litres of water. How many of us run the tap to get colder drinking water? Chill your water in a jug in the fridge instead and you'll save a whopping six litres a day, that's 42 litres a week. There are savings to be made on water usage in the bathroom. Photograph: Getty Images Running the tap to wash fruit and vegetables wastes a lot of water too. Use a bowl of water instead, and you'll save 91 litres of water. When you're finished, you can use it to water your plants. There are savings to be made in the bathroom too. Reduce your shower time by 60 seconds and you can save over 100 litres in a week. You can also brush up on savings at the sink. Leave a tap running and it uses six litres of water a minute. Turn off the tap while you brush your teeth, for example, and you could save a whopping 84 litres of water a week. Fix a dripping tap and you'll save 150 litres of water. If you haven't got a dual full flush, half flush loo, think about installing a toilet cistern bag. Sitting in the cistern, this reduces the amount of available space there. When you flush, less water can travel back to the cistern. This could save up to 105 litres of water every week. A garden, if you have one, can get pretty parched this time of year. Use a watering can to douse your plants instead of a garden hose and you'll save an average of 25 litres of water a week. Running a hose for just one hour uses as much water as a family would typically need in an entire day, says Uisce Éireann. Better still, if you've got space, install a water butt to collect rainwater from your gutters. Using this to water your garden can save an average of 25 litres of water a week. By using only what we need, we can all play our part in conserving Ireland's resources.

Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Why do we hoard? My mother's death made me think again about possessions
When my mother died last year, it fell to me to clear out her home in Co Laois . Sorting through her cherished hats and costume jewellery, I came to question why we hold on to so much stuff. At some point in most of our lives, we will be faced with the job of arranging what to do with the belongings of a deceased family member. It's an unenviable task, both emotionally and physically exhausting. When you speak to those who have already been through the process, they will offer sympathetic words and advise you to be ruthless. Yet, as you sort through the loved one's things, it's hard not to be drawn into what's left behind as part of an archival search for meaning. In the early months following my mother's death, I had dealt with drawers and wardrobes full of clothes, dutifully doling out special items to those who wanted them and giving rails full of clothing to a local charity sale. But soon I came across match boxes full of carefully collected sets of buttons and biscuit tins filled with old keys, tiny locks, nails, screws and, yes, more buttons, belt buckles and clasps of all sorts. It felt like I was back in the 1950s. READ MORE The generation of people born in the 1920s and 1930s grew up at a time of scarcity, in the aftermath of Ireland's revolutionary period. They went on to live with severe rationing during the second World War and after it. I remember reading once how in the early 1940s, many of the iron railings in England were removed and melted down for scrap metal to produce munitions. These more ornate outdoor railings were often replaced with old metal bed frames. Such reuse was the modus operandi of people living through wars – who learned never to throw anything out that might have another use. In more recent times of plenty, this strong sense of frugality has been replaced by an overzealous consumer culture, which has little concern for where things end up once they are discarded. As a result, when you are sorting out things from the past, you quickly realise that there are very few channels through which to pass on items meticulously stored away for some possible future use. And yet, I find myself carefully going through all this stuff in my mother's home out of respect for those who kept it. And I am unwilling to pile it all into black domestic waste bags – or, worse again, throw everything into a skip. It's a bit like panning for gold – most of what I find doesn't seem to have much value at all. So where should it all go? For example, keeping so many pens – even those once cherished Parker pens with replaceable ink cartridges – seems anachronistic in an era where branded pens are chucked out once their ink runs out. Costume jewellery belonging to Sylvia Thompson's late mother. Photograph: Nick Bradshaw A carved wooden plate belonging to Sylvia Thompson's late mother. Photograph: Nick Bradshaw On a brighter note, I have found a home for those hundreds of buttons of all shapes and sizes. They have gone to a dressmaker/designer who, hopefully, will create some new costumes where lots of buttons will become a feature rather than a functional part of a garment. I also found a local amateur dramatic society willing to take a selection of hats that my mother wore with pride. Anyone born in the early part of the last century will also remember the fashion for costume jewellery – beautiful delicate broaches with sprays of flowers, or abstract patterns with semi-precious stones embedded into their design. Or long necklaces with coloured beads of every hue you could consider. These flamboyant and inexpensive jewellery items added a touch of elegance to a dress worn to a dance. But, nowadays, few bother with such accessories. So, some of these boxes will again be stored away as they await an event to share them with the next generation, some of whom may be interested in vintage jewellery. I will also store away selected chinaware, Waterford crystal glasses and collections of brass ornaments in the hope that someone will be charmed by them in the future. In addition, I will personally cherish a carved wooden plate with an embedded musical box that played a tune as it turned on its pedestal. This was used for home-made birthday cakes when we were children. But, back to the question at the heart of this redistribution. Why do people hoard such an amount of things in the first place? Is it to remember a time when they were more energised by life? Is it for fear of losing some of their identity as they age? Or, more prosaically, is a reluctance to clear the clutter from the past and live more fully in the present just a form of laziness? Some mental health experts say that stressful experiences are often the reason for holding on to things that are no longer of use. That stress might be following a death, a divorce or another loss. Those who are socially isolated sometimes hoard more things too. The Buddhist philosophy – and, indeed, the Christian message – of not putting excess value on material possessions encourages us to live with what we need and no more. If our society functioned in a way that everything had a reuse value – that one person's trash was another person's treasure – would this help those to let go of the things they have kept but no longer need? When war or climate catastrophe forces people to leave home abruptly, they have no choice but to separate themselves from their belongings. Would your life be any different without them? Would you feel lighter and more able to focus on the present moment instead? Or would you just start collecting all over again?