
Europe reacts with mix of relief and concern to US trade deal
The agreement, announced on Sunday between two economies that account for almost a third of global trade, will see the US impose a 15 per cent import tariff on most EU goods - half the threatened rate but much more than what Europeans hoped for.
Many of the specifics of the deal were not immediately known, however.
"As we await full details of the new EU–U.S. trade agreement, one thing is clear: this is a moment of relief but not of celebration," Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever wrote on X. "Tariffs will increase in several areas and some key questions remain unresolved."
Trump said the deal, including an investment pledge topping the US$550 billion deal signed with Japan last week, would expand ties between the trans-Atlantic powers after years of what he called unfair treatment of US exporters.
It will bring clarity for European makers of cars, planes and chemicals.
But the EU had initially hoped for a zero-for-zero tariff deal. And the 15 per cent baseline tariff, while an improvement on the threatened rate of 30 per cent, compares to an average US import tariff rate of around 2.5 per cent last year before Trump's return to the White House.
European Commission chief Von der Leyen, describing Trump as a tough negotiator, told reporters on Sunday that it was "the best we could get."
European stocks opened up on Monday, with the STOXX 600 at a four-month high and all other major bourses also in the green. Tech and healthcare stocks led the way.
"The 15 per cent rate is better than the market was fearing," said Jefferies economist Mohit Kumar.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz welcomed the deal, saying it averted a trade conflict that would have hit Germany's export-driven economy and its large auto sector hard.
French government ministers said on Monday that the deal had some merits - such as exemptions they hoped to see for some key French business sectors such as spirits - but was nevertheless not balanced.
Industry minister Marc Ferracci stressed more talks - potentially lasting weeks or months - would be needed before the deal could be formally concluded.
"This is not the end of the story," he told RTL radio.
European companies, meanwhile, were left wondering whether to cheer or lament the accord.
"Those who expect a hurricane are grateful for a storm," said Wolfgang Große Entrup, head of the German Chemical Industry Association VCI.
"Further escalation has been avoided. Nevertheless, the price is high for both sides. European exports are losing competitiveness. US customers are paying the tariffs," he said.
Stellantis shares were up 3.5 per cent and car parts maker Valeo jumped 4.7 per cent while German pharma group Merck KGaA rose 2.9 per cent, in a sign of relief for those sectors.
Among the many questions that remain to be answered, however, is how the EU's promise to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in the US and steeply increase energy purchases can be turned into reality.
It was not immediately clear if specific pledges of increased investments were made or whether the details still must be hammered out.
And while the EU pledged to make US$750 billion in strategic purchases over the next three years, including oil, liquefied natural gas (LNG) and nuclear fuel, the US will struggle to produce enough to meet that demand.
While US LNG production capacity is due to almost double over the next four years it will still not be enough to ramp up supplies to Europe, and oil production is expected to be lower than previously forecast this year.
Despite the lingering unknowns, analysts stressed the deal still helped decrease uncertainty. Oil prices rose on Monday, as did the euro.
"Now that there is more clarity, you would think that not only in the United States, but around the globe, there will be a little bit more willingness to look at investment, to look at expansions, and to look at where the opportunities are," said Rodrigo Catril, senior currency strategist at National Australia Bank.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
30 minutes ago
- The Star
How the US became the apex predator on trade
For a region often hailed as the future of the global economy, it's been an unedifying experience. One by one, Asian leaders swallowed trade accords with the United States that are slightly better than envisaged months ago, but more punitive than when they bet on access to the American market as a development strategy decades ago. The glory days of supply chains must seem like a prehistoric time to the countries that lined up to concede to White House demands for levies. Certainly a throw-back to an earlier, less prosperous, age: The overall level of US tariffs is now the highest since 1930s, according to Bloomberg Economics. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba was once adamant he would never accept duties, especially on autos, but concluded he could live with a 15% penalty. The European Union's top official, Ursula von der Leyen, said last Sunday the 15% rate the bloc settled on with President Donald Trump was the best she could manage. Key economies yet to strike a deal, such as South Korea and India, risk more adverse terms than those that already went along to get along. Trump is demanding a demonstration of obeisance and, in important ways, is receiving it. At the top of the commercial food chain is the United States, still the premier economy by a healthy margin. Tariffs may not revive the working-class communities that he claims to champion, but Trump can put on an emotionally satisfying show. Fingers crossed And the nations that have yielded get Trump off their back – and cross their fingers that they will fare better under the next president. In this sense, it's useful to think in terms of apex predators, those at the pinnacle of the natural food chain that are able to devour smaller players, according to Dmitry Grozoubinski, a former Australian trade negotiator. 'They are to a large extent paying protection money,' he told me. Tariffs of around 20% seem to be the benchmark for South-East Asia, based on deals announced with the Philippines, Indonesia and Vietnam. In the case of the latter two, they negotiated the US down from higher levels than foreshadowed in April. They will still hurt. Vietnam, which has become an export dynamo, may see its shipments to America drop by one third. Efforts to squeeze China are a feature of the pacts; Washington wants to curb the ability of Chinese firms to re-route products through third countries. The Philippines appeared to suffer a humiliation; the levy on goods from the archipelago was just a hair lower than what was announced by Trump a few weeks ago. Many details are still to be resolved and countries haven't given up on getting better terms. The common element, aside from just getting what passes as a deal done, is allowing Trump some of the theatre he craves. Praise the agreements and the White House's occupant. Counting on ties And, perhaps, when the attention is elsewhere, you can get a slightly better deal. Philippines President Ferdinand Marcos Jr made it clear he hasn't given up. Ahead of his recent meeting with Trump at the White House, his team put great store in the close historical ties between the two nations; the Philippines was once a US colony and it regularly brushes up against Chinese ships in the South China Sea. On the face of it, Manila got little from the arrangement. Marcos' best shot is to work with negotiators while Trump has moved on. Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth hinted at this by saying there may be a military component to the accord. 'The wolf is now at other doors,' said Grozoubinski, author of the book Why Politicians Lie About Trade. 'The indignity hurts less than the fight would. In return, counterparts get a semblance of certainty about the cost of entry to the United States, a vital component in the competition for foreign direct investment,' Grozoubinski added. The escape can be a form of victory. In the case of Vietnam, for example, the country is still fairly competitive with a 20% tariff. It stings, but probably isn't enough to warrant a producer packing up and going somewhere else. It may all be worth it to keep access to US customers. The administration foreshadowed this calculous before 'Liberation Day'. Stephen Miran, chair of Trump's Council of Economic Advisers, told Bloomberg Television in March that nations have little choice other than to sell to the United States. They will pay up to retain that privilege. Seoul, you are next. South Korean officials have dangled a shipbuilding partnership as part of a potential compact. Talks with China, underway in Sweden, will be something else. Hopefully, the world economy won't be too damaged. The question Chinese President Xi Jinping will ask is whether the fight is worth it and how much resistance his own economy can stand. — Bloomberg Daniel Moss is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asian economies. The views expressed here are the writer's own.


The Star
30 minutes ago
- The Star
Trade tariff risks likely to affect Westports
TA Research said it is keeping its financial year 2025 (FY25) to FY27 earnings forecast unchanged. PETALING JAYA: Westports Holdings Bhd is likely to report a profit of between RM420mil and RM475mil for the first half of financial year 2025 (1H25). In a note, TA Research said the projected amount accounted for 45% to 50% of its full-year forecast. Westports will be releasing its results for the second quarter of financial year 2025 (2Q25) tomorrow. 'In general, we expect 2Q25 key operating metrics to track the trade performance of Malaysia and China during the period. 'As such, we project Westports' 2Q25 gateway and transhipment volume to be around 1.2 million to 1.25 million and 1.53 million to 1.58 million twenty-foot equivalent units, respectively, by referring to Malaysia and China's respective trade growth of 6.1% and 4.5% year-on-year in 2Q25. 'We keep our financial year 2025 (FY25) to FY27 earnings unchanged at this juncture and maintain Westports' FY25 transhipment and gateway volume growth assumptions of 3% and 2%, respectively, pending the tariff outcome soon,' it said. TA Research was hopeful that the government would secure a favourable deal with the United States on the tariffs, although the odds appeared slim. Should negotiations fall through, the research house said the looming 25% export tariff would significantly undermine Malaysia's trade competitiveness, putting the country at a distinct disadvantage. 'More critically, we expect tariff-inflated US imports would dampen consumer spending in the fourth quarter of this year, particularly given that many consumers likely stocked up during the 90-day tariff reprieve.' US President Trump had indicated that all countries would face tariffs ranging from 15% to 50%. 'As such, Malaysia would be able to minimise the impact from the structural change only if the tariff is set at the 20% levels or near its peers namely Vietnam (20%), the Philippines (19%), Indonesia (19%), Japan (15%) and the European Union (15%). 'As the access to United States' high-tech chips and China's rare earth minerals and magnets would remain the key concerns of both countries and subject to export restrictions, we believe the rule of origin would also be applied to Malaysian exports as the country is one of the important transhipment hubs in the Strait of Malacca. 'In other words, higher tariffs could be imposed on goods transhipped through Malaysia like the trade deal between the United States and Vietnam, which includes a 40% tariff on transhipment.' TA Research has downgraded its rating on Westports to a 'sell', ahead of the looming risk from the trade tariff. However, it maintained Westports' target price at RM5.57 per share. 'As the share price has appreciated by 22% since the port tariff hike announcement, we believe the market has fully priced in the positive impact from port tariff adjustment,' according to the research house.


The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Trump signs order implementing additional 40% tariff on Brazil, White House says
U.S. President Donald Trump speaks after signing the VA Home Loan Program Reform Act at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 30, 2025. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein