Kamala Harris announces she will not run for governor of California
, the former vice-president and 2024 Democratic presidential nominee, announced on Wednesday that she will not run for governor of
California
– a highly anticipated decision that leaves the contest to lead the country's largest blue state wide open.
'For now, my leadership – and public service – will not be in elected office,' Harris said in a statement, ending months of speculation about her political future after losing the
2024 US presidential election
to
Donald Trump
.
'I look forward to getting back out and listening to the American people, helping elect Democrats across the nation who will fight fearlessly, and sharing more details in the months ahead about my own plans,' she added.
Harris (60) who previously served as California's attorney general and US senator, had been exploring a run for the state's top job since leaving the White House in January.
[
Tariffs: as new regime kicks in, what does it mean for Europe and for Ireland?
Opens in new window
]
But, she said in the statement, 'after deep reflection, I've decided that I will not run for governor in this election'. The decision does not rule out a future run for public office, including a third bid for the White House, after unsuccessful campaigns in 2020 and 2024.
Her looming decision had in effect paralyzed the race to replace the term-limited Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, with early polling suggesting she was Californians' top choice.
The Harris-less race to lead California will now take place in a political landscape dramatically reshaped by her loss to Trump in November, which plunged the party into a period of paralysis and soul-searching.
In the months since, the Democratic base has grown increasingly furious with its old guard, demanding fresh leadership and a more combative approach to what they view as Trump's increasingly authoritarian agenda.
In a nod to the discontent roiling her party, and the country, Harris said: 'We must recognize that our politics, our government, and our institutions have too often failed the American people, culminating in this moment of crisis. As we look ahead, we must be willing to pursue change through new methods and fresh thinking – committed to our same values and principles, but not bound by the same playbook.'
While the decision was disappointing to supporters eager to see Harris square off again with Trump during the final years of his term, Harris had given few signals that she was deeply excited by the prospect of leading the state from the governor's perch in Sacramento. The months-long slog to next year's contest would have forced Harris to grapple with her role in Democrats' losses in November, which has already drawn criticism from corners of the party eager for leaders to step aside and make space for a new generation of candidates.
The crowded field of Democrats running for governor in California is so far made up of long-serving or well-known political leaders, including Xavier Becerra, the former attorney general of California who served with Harris in Biden's cabinet as the secretary of health and human services; Antonio Villaraigosa, the former Democratic mayor of Los Angeles; the state's lieutenant governor, Eleni Kounalakis, who is close friends with Harris; and the former representative Katie Porter.
The most prominent Republicans in the race are Chad Bianco, the sheriff of Riverside county, and Steve Hilton, the former Fox host and former adviser to then UK prime minister David Cameron. Ric Grenell, a longtime Trump ally, has also toyed with the idea of running.
In a statement, Villaraigosa commended Harris's leadership and said her decision 'reflects her continued commitment to serving at the highest levels of government'.
'We face critical challenges in California – and we need a proven problem solver to tackle our affordability crisis,' he said.
Republicans – some of whom had been eager to elevate Harris as the face of the Democratic party – nevertheless touted her decision as a political victory for the president.
'Kamala Harris's political career is over thanks to President Trump,' said Kollin Crompton, a spokesperson for the Republican Governors Association, adding, perhaps prematurely: 'Americans across the country can sigh in relief that they won't have to see or hear from Kamala Harris any longer.'
Harris had maintained a relatively low profile since she returned home to Los Angeles, offering few clues about her political future. She remained most out of view as protests erupted in response to the Trump administration's immigration raids in Los Angeles earlier this summer. In a statement issued after Trump ordered national guard troops deployed Los Angeles, she said that protest was 'a powerful tool' and said she supported the 'millions of Americans who are standing up to protect our most fundamental rights and freedoms'.
She has been selective about when to weigh in against the Trump administration's actions. Earlier this year, Harris delivered a sharp speech in which she warned that the US was witnessing a 'wholesale abandonment of America's highest ideals' by the US president.
On Wednesday, Harris vowed to remain politically engaged.
'We, the People must use our power to fight for freedom, opportunity, fairness, and the dignity of all,' she said. 'I will remain in that fight.' - The Guardian
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
4 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
The Irish Independent's View: Prudence, rather than largesse, makes most economic sense for Ireland right now
As August begins, we have already seen so many budgetary kites take flight to tell us the making of the next year's budget starts earlier each year. Right now, Ireland is a rich nation and its people have expectations that accord with that. But in a Trumpian discordant world, that situation could change rapidly, as we found to our cost in 2008 when we entered what former finance minister Michael Noonan later called 'a lost decade'. Ireland's small, open economic model leaves us susceptible to swift boom-and-bust switches. In early October, we will learn the 2026 financial plans of 'Mr Prudence' himself, Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe. Many of us believe we deserve more goodies, but this is more a time for caution. If tough global economic times hit soon, we will be in a better position than we were in 2008, but the atypical budget surplus, which contrasts with our European neighbours, can only cushion so much. Ireland cannot be an economic outlier forever. We are reminded that the days of the early 2000s, when taoiseach Bertie Ahern declaimed that the 'boom just got boomier', presaged tough economic times. The impact of Donald Trump's tariffs may diminish the resources available for such largesse Mr Donohoe and his colleagues insist that one-off budget payments, like electricity bill grants, are not going to happen next year, but closer analysis suggests the Government's dilemma is that voters will notice the difference if they do not happen again. This is particularly true for households with children, who benefited from two double welfare payments. For a single worker on €50,000 last year, the budget measures delivered about €860 extra per year. When you add the two energy credits amounting to €250, you find it was a nice bonus that will be missed. The impact of Donald Trump's tariffs may diminish the resources available for such largesse, which should at all events be targeted, rather than blanket, measures. It may also provide some political cover for a more prudent approach to public spending. Last month's Summer Economic Statement indicated that there would be scope for a tax package of about €1.5bn, but a substantial part of that would be taken up by the pledged hospitality Vat rate cut to 9pc. Put this alongside keeping the lower Vat rate on household energy bills and you are suddenly over €1bn for a full year. Yet voters want income tax cuts, which are key to politicians' re-election, assuming there is available cash. Then there is the demand for welfare increases averaging €12 a week last year. All things considered, the Budget 2026 will prove more challenging than in the years of austerity when cutbacks virtually wrote themselves.
Irish Times
33 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Kamala Harris and Stephen Colbert symbols not so much of a vanished time as a lost US future
Time moves differently in Donald Trump 's presidency, so the effect of seeing Kamala Harris back on television screens was like the shock return of a once prominent but long vanished character from Dynasty or Falcon Crest, or any of the stars from the classic era of US soap operas that outlasted the rise and fall of several presidencies. The defeated Democratic candidate is in the public eye again to publicise 107 Days, her account of her belated, doomed attempt to resuscitate her party's hopes in the 2024 presidential race after Joe Biden 's candidacy became untenable. She was appearing on the The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, a flagship talkshow that CBS has decided to cancel once the season ends in May. The decision to end Colbert's run generated delight on the Republican right, not least from Trump, who is frequently in the firing line of Colbert's brand of slick, savagely funny satire. That CBS needed approval from the Trump administration for its sale to Skydance to go through, and that its parent company, Paramount, recently settled a spurious $16 million lawsuit with the president, was lost on nobody. David Letterman, the original host of the show, from 1993-2015, described the CBS decision as 'gutless' and 'pure cowardice'. READ MORE Ironically, the Trump lawsuit was framed around a charge that an interview Harris had given to 60 Minutes during last year's election campaign had been edited to her advantage. Cancelling Colbert was just the icing on the cake for Trump. And it was also a reflection of the fast-changing broadcast news and talkshow landscape. Letterman had the undivided attention of late-night America but the culture, and options, have changed enormously since then. CBS issued a bland statement thanking Colbert and leaked remarks to the effect that a staff of 100 and a bill of a $100 million for a dwindling audience had become impossible to maintain. The Ed Sullivan Theater, where The Late Show with Stephen Colbert is recorded live, in midtown Manhattan. Photograph: Spencer Platt/Getty So when Harris and Colbert sat down, a desk between them, both seemed like symbols not so much of a vanished time as a lost future. It will be impossible for Americans to ever see Harris and wonder what the road not taken in 2024 might have looked like. The stark numbers of the election are worth repeating. Although Harris and the Democrats were trounced on the big blue and red electoral college board, in actual human votes, Trump won 77,303,568 (49.8 per cent) and Harris 75,019,230 (48.3 per cent). Some 2,284,338 votes separated them: a significant number of people but not so much that Harris and her supporters won't always imagine a different outcome. As Colbert mentioned, she looked rested. She revealed that she spent much of the past six months in restorative mode – 'lots of cooking shows'- and that, no, she had not watched much current affairs. 'I'm not into self-mutilation,' she said in a rare moment of sharpness. [ From the archive: It's a do-or-die moment for Kamala Harris. She needs to assert herself Opens in new window ] That acidic edge was a reminder of what Harris often seemed to lack during those 107 days when she sought to persuade Americans that she was a better alternative to Trump. She had the extraordinary rise from modest west coast immigrant home, a natural telegenic appeal and, when she permitted herself, came across as warm and authoritative. There was no menace. But there was too often a blurriness about what she might do. And even in Thursday night's harmless and friendly theatre in New York, her fatal conservatism remained intact. She brought no gossip or intrigue or fresh revelation, nothing to excite the hopes of the millions of lost Democrats out there. For six months, Trump has talked and talked and talked, as though the Oval Office is his psychologist's couch and the people of the United States his listener. It may be bewildering and contradictory and frightening. But it has the world's attention. [ US AI policy risks disaster because of Trump Opens in new window ] Harris teased an anecdote featuring Doug, her husband, and a missed birthday of hers in the days before the election but when Colbert teed her up, she broke into laughter and said, 'you have to read the book'. A mildly exasperated Colbert mimicked flicking through the pages. It's the golden rule of these shows followed by any celebrities there to sell a film or a biography: the host says lovely things about you and in turn, you tell a few self-deprecating yarns and everyone is happy. Even now, Harris held back. Six months in, Trump's second term has, for now, confounded the doom sayers. The markets continue to thrive despite the tariff upheaval. However, Friday's August deadline was accompanied by reports of a weakening labour market and a dip in markets. He has, as promised ended border immigration but the Ice deportation campaign continues to horrify many Americans. His vow to end the Russia-Ukraine conflict has not been fulfilled. The situation in Gaza has become even more horrifying that it was under Biden. [ Justine McCarthy: Keir Starmer and Donald Trump looked ready to put a ring on it. No wonder Melania stayed at home Opens in new window ] Already, the Democrats are nearing the point where potential challengers to the next Republican candidate will have to step into the bright lights. Many have interpreted Harris's decision not to run for governor of California next year as an intention to put herself forward as a presidential candidate in 2028. To Colbert's army of night-watchers who flicked off the TV for the night, it will take a lot of convincing by Harris if she is to catapult from her place as the face of calamitous disappointment for Democrat voters to their best future hope.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
The Mission. The CIA in the 21st Century by Tim Weiner: Tale of an evolving agency
The Mission: The CIA in the 21st Century Author : Tim Weiner ISBN-13 : 978-0008606596 Publisher : William Collins Guideline Price : £25 In a world increasingly controlled by the secret services, this recent history of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is probably a better indicator of future events than the words of politicians. Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Tim Weiner illuminates the moral and legal grey zone of the United States's most famous clandestine organisation through his lifelong specialism in intelligence. The effectiveness of the CIA has yo-yoed over the last 25 years, falling under George Bush jnr and 9/11, and peaking under former president Barack Obama, whose decisiveness and perception surprised the 22,000 staff. Unfortunately, the hallmarks that made George W's eight years so fraught – the policy vacuum, blame culture and estrangement from reality – are all present again, as described in the prologue, Autocracy in America, written two months into the start of the current presidency. Newly appointed CIA director John Ratcliffe, from Texas, has 'promised to align the CIA with Trump's view of the world'. Loyalty tests ('Wasn't the 2020 election stolen?', for instance) filter candidates for top appointments; and the new posse seems willing to effectuate Donald J's dreams for Greenland, Canada and elsewhere. READ MORE As well as charting the 80-year old agency's highs (under 'beloved' Bush snr) and lows (with Richard Nixon, seeking rescue from Watergate), The Mission traces the expansion from the core work of espionage to political warfare, paramilitarism, training other agencies (Jordan and Iraq), and, most controversially, into running 'black sites' such as Guantánamo, 'enhanced interrogation techniques' (torture) and assassination without the justification of self-defence. In 2022, former presidentJoe Biden even outsourced negotiations with Russia 'to prevent a nuclear war' to his CIA director Bill Burns. A fascinating account informed by scores of interviews, The Mission traces the CIA's loss of direction after the cold war. 'How could it be great without its great enemy?' Espiocrats and the bizarre – the 'rampant' sex in desperate situations such as the Baghdad outstation – pervade the tale. Weiner and his wife, Kate Doyle (descended from Robert Emmett's brother Thomas) were in Galway in June, and although the country is not mentioned, Irish intelligence chiefs will, no doubt, read The Mission to help frame reactions if, as Weiner hypothesises, Trump makes the CIA go rogue again and carry out plans to 'rebuild the secret prisons, overthrow a sovereign nation, or assassinate his political enemies'. Neasa MacErlean is the author of Telling the Truth is Dangerous: A history of Robert Dudley Edwards
