logo
How Maria Kim and REDF Are Building Career Pathways Across the United States

How Maria Kim and REDF Are Building Career Pathways Across the United States

Newsweek2 days ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Maria Kim started her career in insurance, moving up the ranks but finding herself unfulfilled despite her success. She mentioned the September 11, 2001, attacks as a moment when her philosophy around work and career changed. She noted a similar shock occurring in the workforce since the COVID-19 pandemic.
"If this is how fragile our world is, am I really walking in my vocation?" Kim told Newsweek about her feelings at the time she made a career pivot. "Obviously, we all were mourning what was happening in our country. It was also professional shock ... so I did a little soul searching."
She started working for Cara Collective, an organization that supported career opportunities for people who have served time in the justice system.
"We had a couple businesses that helped folks build their skills, their confidence, their moxie and ultimately get placed in private sector jobs where they continued their economic mobility," she explained.
Kim attended business school at the University of Chicago, saying she was one of two people in her class interested in nonprofit work at the time. Her first contact with REDF (Roberts Enterprise Development Fund) was with Cara Collective as a grantee of its investment program. Today, she's the CEO of REDF, a social enterprise accelerator founded by George Roberts, the finance-industry veteran who co-founded the well-known investment firm KKR.
"Social enterprises are businesses that exist not just to offer some type of good or service, but to create jobs and something we call economic power for folks overcoming tough barriers to employment," Kim said. "Those barriers could include homelessness, impact of the justice system, or often a combination of the two."
In addition to financial support, social enterprises benefit from the business acumen within REDF, including leaders like Kim, access to strategic templates and advice on how to scale operations to make the biggest impact.
"We want to help all of these businesses have double-bottom-line impact, not just produce a profit that they can reinvest in their mission, but produce social impact that can scale," Kim said. She added that she's seen a rise in business students interested in working at places with a social mission, an assertion backed by survey data over the last year. REDF has started an MBA fellowship program to help business students familiarize themselves with nonprofit operations.
"We're not just coaches for these enterprises. We're consultants, too, and that consultancy is targeted towards the attributes of the business that make it more financially sustainable, but also the attributes of the organization that help them to provide the support of services for the employees so that they can continue to grow their impact," Kim said.
Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Canva
From her post, Kim detests the notion that, as a nonprofit CEO, she's not running her company with strong business principles, or with an eye for growth.
"Nonprofit is merely a tax status. It is not a state of being, so screw all y'all that think that the nonprofit industry is not a business industry," Kim said. "It certainly is. We just happen to reinvest our dividends in a different way."
In the interest of considering job candidates whose personal experiences present barriers to employment, Kim points to a few details around "why barriers happen in the first place," including the higher rate of crime convictions for racial minorities, particularly for non-violent offenses, or the fact that some people choose homelessness over abusive living situations, and may lose their hourly job in the process.
"Our argument is you all are missing out. There is a large talent pool that is crushing it in these businesses that could use another opportunity at an increasingly more economically mobile job in the future," Kim said. REDF and their partners are working to "redefine how this country thinks about what talent looks and feels like, or who or what is worthy of investment."
She pointed to some of the organizations currently partnered with REDF, which are receiving financial and strategic support and continuing their mission of helping people find jobs, such as the Center for Employment Opportunities, which is serving 8,000 people coming out of incarceration per year and hiring them into maintenance and neighborhood beautification roles. Rise Up Industries in San Diego is another, which teaches computer numerical control (CNC) skills to individuals who were formerly incarcerated or gang-involved so they can pursue careers as CNC machine operators in manufacturing. Coalfield Development is helping people experiencing barriers to employment in the Appalachian region to train for modern jobs, while The Challenge Program in Delaware is providing job opportunities for young people through furniture building.
"The REDF portfolio has generated over $3.1 billion dollars in earned revenue," Kim said. "But the more important metric is that collectively, they've employed over 157,000 people all around the country."
The employment figures imply that 157,000 families are impacted, either by improved living conditions or better future prospects as a result of their parents' or spouses' employment. But Kim notes that it's not just a job that people are worthy of; it is a job with upward opportunity. So REDF tracks mobility as well.
"We can track the economic mobility [by] their reduction in reliance on government benefits, which is around 66 percent," Kim said. "And we can track their transition from insecurity to housing stability, which has risen 253 percent."
Sometimes companies don't even know they have embedded a social aspect to their business, Kim said, which can open them up to more resources, either through government support or organizations like REDF. She pointed to the example of a sneaker company that was actively hiring formerly incarcerated individuals, but did not even know that it could qualify for tax benefits and other opportunities.
With instability hitting businesses of all kinds due to global political instability, Kim also shared that REDF has identified a few core areas of focus so that it doesn't feel a need to cover the world with social employment enterprise solutions. As of now, the organization is focused on Los Angeles, where it is headquartered, the Chicago area, and Appalachia, three parts of the United States with diverse communities and significant need for innovation in social enterprise.
"We want to help the businesses here who've been around for a minute really level up, such that they can be contract ready for these types of opportunities," Kim said, of the growth and attention coming to LA and Chicago with a World Cup, Olympics and other major events on the way. "We don't want to let those big positive demand shocks pass us by, so, that's kind of a micro experiment. We want to do the work of codifying employment social enterprise into state law."
In Appalachia, REDF is working to build financial incentives for existing employers to develop more inclusive hiring and promotion practices or reshape business models to adapt to modern times.
"We want to incentivize a certain amount of capacity among large companies, small businesses, traditional employers to go employment social enterprise," Kim said. "To convert their practices increasingly towards inclusive employment."
Newsweek is set to host its inaugural Women's Global Impact forum. The August 5 event, hosted at Newsweek's headquarters in New York City, will bring together some of the world's top female executives and connect them with rising stars across industries and job functions.
For more information on the event and entry guidelines, please visit the Women's Global Impact homepage.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Olmsted Is Closing in Prospect Heights
Olmsted Is Closing in Prospect Heights

Eater

time5 hours ago

  • Eater

Olmsted Is Closing in Prospect Heights

is the lead editor of the Northeast region with more than 20 years of experience as a reporter, critic, editor, and cookbook author. Chef Greg Baxtrom's standout Prospect Heights restaurant Olmsted will close August 17 after nearly a decade, he announced on Instagram. Olmsted, named for the famous landscape architect Fredrick Law Olmsted, who shaped the design of public spaces such as Prospect Park and Central Park in New York, opened to much fanfare in 2016. It was in the process of being saved, he said in his post, but efforts fell through. The announcement comes weeks after Baxtrom shuttered nearby Patti Ann's, the midwestern-leaning restaurant and bakery named after his mother. His remaining restaurant, 5 Acres, continues to run at Rockefeller Center. When it debuted, Olmsted 'was originally focused on steak-and-potatoes accessibility. But that isn't quite how it played out,' Eater wrote in sizing up how it became 'the hottest restaurant in Brooklyn' by 2017. A native of Chicago, Baxtrom opened his first restaurant in New York after working at acclaimed restaurants like Mugaritz in Spain, Atera and Per Se in New York, and Blue Hill at Stone Barns in Tarrytown. He once described himself as the '18-year-old with braces' working in the kitchen at Chicago's Alinea — and his Prospect Heights restaurant recently hosted the Alinea pop-up in honor of its 20th anniversary. Olmsted reflects Baxtrom's experiences, incorporating a working garden where diners could enjoy cocktails a stone's throw from live quail. His early menus featured dishes like watermelon sushi, the famous carrot crepe with clams, guinea hen two ways, and desserts like the frozen yogurt with whipped lavender honey. And while prices were more expensive than what had been in the neighborhood, he opened with prices that were 'low' compared to similar caliber restaurants, Pete Wells said in a two-star New York Times review. Baxtrom outlines some of his reasons to close in his Instagram post. 'Deciding to close a restaurant is never based on a single decision, but rather on many factors.' First, he cites his decision to get sober five years ago, when 'it became clear that I needed to prioritize my mental health over the restaurants if I was going to continue living. However, I find it challenging to practice this in real life.' In addition, the funding that would have kept the restaurant afloat fell through. 'If you are someone who appreciated what we created and would be interested in partnering with me to save Olmsted,' Baxtrom says on Instagram, 'please reach out.' Baxtrom told Eater that their pre-COVID expansion had become 'a bit of dead weight,' he says. The plan was to revert the restaurant to its original size. 'It just required investment. Beyond my means.' He also spoke of his hopes that Vanderbilt Avenue would have become more of a destination street, with Akhtar Nawab opening Alta Calidad in 2017, along with Joe Campanale and Erin Shambura opening nearby Fausto in the old Franny's space that same year. 'I hoped more big restaurateurs were going to follow.' Today, 'Vanderbilt is surprisingly a very difficult neighborhood to navigate,' he says. On his Instagram post, he says he has 'no desire to leave the industry I love; it brings me so much joy.' And over DM with Eater, Baxtrom says that perhaps he'd like to eventually open something in Chicago. 'My folks are getting older and I'd like to be there more.' Baxtrom demonstrated through his businesses that he is close with his parents. Patti Ann's that shuttered in July wasn't just an homage in name. It referenced the food he grew up on in his family's suburban Illinois household and featured an interior that nodded to his mother's career as a teacher — complete with a map on the wall as decor, cubbies that his father helped him build, and a report card on the table's performance that came with the check. Eater NY All your essential food and restaurant intel delivered to you Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Elon Musk Spent Millions to Get Back in Donald Trump's Good Graces
Elon Musk Spent Millions to Get Back in Donald Trump's Good Graces

Newsweek

time5 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Elon Musk Spent Millions to Get Back in Donald Trump's Good Graces

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Elon Musk made donations totaling $15 million to three super PACs supporting Donald Trump and the Republicans after his very public falling out with the president, but all before he announced his plans for the new "America Party." Newsweek reached out to the White House and Musk via X, SpaceX, and Tesla for comment by email outside of normal business hours on Saturday morning. Why It Matters Musk and Trump formed a fast and mutually beneficial friendship in the runup to the 2024 presidential election, with Musk bankrolling Trump's campaign to the tune of at least $250 million and helping him secure victory against then-Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic nominee. Trump then positioned Musk as the point person for the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), giving him free rein to look into the federal government to cut back on "waste, fraud, and abuse" and bring down spending across all departments. However, their relationship took a turn as pressure mounted against Musk, with Tesla suffering significantly due to his role in the Trump administration, and ultimately Musk left his post to return to the private sector. Musk, who called himself Trump's "first buddy," also publicly criticized the administration-backed "One Big Beautiful Bill," which aims to extend tax cuts, increase immigration enforcement, and end consumer incentives for electric vehicles. Trump and Musk then started to taking shots at each other—through the press and via their respective social media platforms—culminating in a very public falling out in June. Musk accused Trump of withholding the release of the Epstein files because he was allegedly named in them, and Trump threatened to cut Musk's contracts with the federal government. Tesla CEO Elon Musk speaks is seen in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30 in Washington, D.C. Tesla CEO Elon Musk speaks is seen in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30 in Washington, To Know Following their public feud, which occurred in the first week of June, Musk appeared to try and make amends with the president by donating $5 million to each of three super PACs related to Trump and the Republicans. The Daily Mail first noted the donations in a report on Friday, but Newsweek verified through Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings that Musk donated $5 million each to MAGA Inc., the Senate Leadership Fund, and the House Leadership Fund. All three donations were made on June 27, which is about a week before he then declared he would create his own political party—the America Party. Musk's last donations were made to the AMERICA PAC, which included a roughly $27 million donation on June 30, according to the filings. He has also donated to the reelection campaign for Republican Representatives Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Barry Moore of Alabama, although those were only a few thousand dollars each. This was also around the time that Musk heavily criticized the "One Big Beautiful Bill," which he said was "political suicide" to pass and warned it would add trillions to the national debt. Musk decided to create the America Party after holding a poll on X on July 4, in which he asked users: "Should we create the America Party?" as a way of creating "independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system." The poll received 1.25 million votes, with 65.4 percent saying "Yes," which Musk greeted with enthusiasm, writing: "By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it! When it comes to bankrupting our country with waster & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy." As a foreign-born U.S. citizen, Musk cannot run for president, but he could bankroll other candidates, which he could do with a third party. He wrote in a separate X post that if he did make a new party, he would focus on capturing two or three Senate seats and eight to 10 seats in the House of Representatives in order to have impact on legislation. Trump criticized Musk's decision to start a third party, writing on Truth Social at the time, in part: "I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks. He even wants to start a Third Political Party, despite the fact that they have never succeeded in the United States - The System seems not designed for them. The one thing Third Parties are good for is the creation of Complete and Total DISRUPTION & CHAOS." What People Are Saying President Donald Trump in his last Truth Social post to mention Elon Musk, which was on July 24, wrote: "Everyone is stating that I will destroy Elon's companies by taking away some, if not all, of the large scale subsidies he receives from the U.S. Government. This is not so! I want Elon, and all businesses within our Country, to THRIVE, in fact, THRIVE like never before! The better they do, the better the USA does, and that's good for all of us. We are setting records every day, and I want to keep it that way!" Elon Musk in his last X post to mention Donald Trump, which was on July 8, wrote: "How can people be expected to have faith in Trump if he won't release the Epstein files?" What Happens Next? It remains unclear if Trump and Musk have had any direct communication following their war-of-words in June. This article includes reporting by The Associated Press.

Trump's Decision to Fire BLS Chief Echoes Putin's Strategies
Trump's Decision to Fire BLS Chief Echoes Putin's Strategies

Time​ Magazine

time6 hours ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Trump's Decision to Fire BLS Chief Echoes Putin's Strategies

President Donald Trump's firing of the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) on Friday afternoon just after she delivered a negative jobs report echoes the impulse of many leaders to shoot the messenger. Trump declared, 'I've had issues with the numbers for a long time. We're doing so well. I believe the numbers were phony like they were before the election and there were other times. So I fired her, and I did the right thing.' While Trump may or may not be friends with Vladimir Putin, he is clearly following the Russian President's HR staffing guidelines to eliminate lieutenants who bring bad news. As we've documented before, the Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat) has a long history of manipulating official economic statistics to please Putin, 'bending over backward to correct bad numbers and burying unflattering statistics' under the pressure the Kremlin has exerted to corrupt statistical integrity, especially since Putin's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. The reliability of official statistics from China has also been brought into question, leading analysts to rely on a wide range of unofficial or proxy indicators to gauge the true state of the Chinese economy. Even China's former Premier, the late Li Keqiang, reportedly confided that he didn't trust official GDP numbers. Read More: What to Know About the Jobs Report That Led Trump to Fire the Labor Statistics Chief Like other strongmen, Trump has repeatedly shown a pattern of manipulating data to suit his preferred narrative. Trump's surprise firing of BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer has quickly caught the attention of technical market analysts and economists on both sides of the political spectrum. One side cheers the push to disrupt a slow, bureaucratic federal agency. The other side shouts in dismay over concerns about yet another example of Trump politicizing an apolitical institution. Both responses are warranted. The accuracy of BLS data has long been questioned as major revisions only come in months later. To their credit, the BLS, in addition to other statistical agencies, has publicly recognized a need to modernize its methodology. Unfortunately, though, the severity of job revisions has worsened since the COVID-19 era, with no successful program to address the issue. The downward revision on Friday of more than 250,000 jobs marked the most significant adjustment since the depths of the pandemic. However, Trump's accusations against the BLS of rigging the job numbers to make him and the Republican base look bad, and his subsequent firing of McEntarfer based on a belief that BLS revisions were politically motivated, are yet another step closer to authoritarianism. Introducing his latest conspiracy theory, the President went even further by suggesting McEntarfer, whose career spans two decades across Republican and Democratic Administrations, rigged the numbers 'around the 2024 presidential election' in then-Vice President Kamala Harris' favor. Trump conveniently fails to mention that his definition of 'around' was back in August 2024. Recall, the 2024 presidential election was a full three months later in November. Revisions are not unusual behavior by the BLS. They are a critical part of the natural process for developing an accurate picture of the largest, most dynamic economy in the world. The average size of job revisions since 2003 is not insignificant at 51,000 jobs. And, despite what Trump may want Americans to believe, his tariff policies have created an unprecedented level of uncertainty in the U.S. economy, comparable only to that of 2020, with many economists expecting a recession to follow as a result. Bloomberg reporting has pointed to a possible connection between the severity of negative job revisions and recessionary economic environments. The BLS has also been subjected to DOGE-led hiring constraints and other resource rescissions. In addition, the Trump Administration's disbanding of the Federal Statistics Advisory Committee in March both eliminated one of the main engines for enhancing agency performance and, perhaps, in what should have been a concerning harbinger, abolished the canary in the data integrity coal mine. Complaints about BLS methods are legitimate, like the reliance on enumerators over scanner data, and deserve attention, but this is not how to fix it. Read More: What Trump's Win Means for the Economy This is far from the first time Trump has subordinated statistical integrity to political theater. From crowd sizes to weather forecasts, vote counts to tariff formulas, Trump has discarded facts for fictions that play to his political favor. Trump doesn't just bend the truth—he twists the numbers until they resemble propaganda and then silences those who disagree. As CBS News titan Edward R. Murrow warned 65 years ago: 'To be persuasive, we must be believable. To be believable, we must be credible. To be credible, we must be truthful.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store