OpenAI launches Study Mode in ChatGPT: What is it, how it works, and more
rolled out
Study Mode
in ChatGPT, a new feature designed to help students develop critical thinking skills rather than simply spoon-feeding them answers. Available to logged-in users across Free, Plus, Pro, and Team plans, the feature transforms the AI chatbot into an interactive tutor that guides students through problems step-by-step instead of delivering instant solutions.
Study Mode represents OpenAI's response to widespread concerns about AI's impact on education. When enabled, ChatGPT asks probing questions to assess skill levels, breaks down complex concepts into digestible sections, and provides personalised feedback based on previous conversations. The system refuses to offer direct answers unless students actively engage with the material, encouraging deeper understanding over quick completion.
No more instant answers: How ChatGPT's new mode forces students to think
The feature employs Socratic questioning techniques developed in collaboration with teachers and pedagogy experts. Students can upload course materials, images, or PDFs for contextualized help, while the system adapts responses based on individual learning goals and past study sessions when memory is enabled.
"It's like a live, 24/7, all-knowing office hours," said Noah Campbell, a college student who tested the feature early. The tool works across all ChatGPT platforms, iOS, Android, web, and desktop, and integrates with voice dictation and advanced voice mode for hands-free learning.
Unlike traditional ChatGPT interactions where users get immediate responses, Study Mode deliberately slows down the process. The AI might ask "What do you think happens next?" or "Can you explain why this step is important?" before revealing solutions.
Students can toggle Study Mode on and off through ChatGPT's tools menu, and it works with uploaded materials like class notes or problem photos. The system remembers past interactions when memory is enabled, creating increasingly personalized learning experiences.
Study Mode is available in 11 Indian languages with comprehensive multimodal support combining voice, image, and text capabilities.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
17 minutes ago
- Indian Express
ChatGPT is second most-used tool for learning new skills for students at IIT Bombay
ChatGPT, the popular generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) chatbot, has emerged as the second most-used tool for learning new skills among students at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Bombay—after online platforms like Coursera. This was revealed as Insight – the institute's official student media body, released its Senior Survey 2025 report on Friday. The findings are based on responses from 282 students. Of the 272 students who answered the question, 'How did you generally study/learn new skills in the institute?', 118 cited online platforms, while 65 mentioned ChatGPT. Only 9 students said they used library books—the traditional method of learning new things in university settings. Despite AI tools becoming prevalent in university settings, ChatGPT remains underutilized in certain areas. Out of 138 respondents to the question on – in which situations have you not used ChatGPT ever – 89 said that they have not used it for resume-making. Whereas only 46 said that they have not used it for assignments and projects. As respondents of the Senior Survey are soon to enter the workforce, it is important to note that 'work-life balance' and 'a career aligned with one's skill set' have emerged as top priorities—ranking higher than financial compensation. Factors like location of posting and work culture were deemed less important. Among 269 respondents for a question on important factors to consider when choosing career – 29.4 percent ranked work-life balance highest. Separately, over 40 percent of 262 respondents said a career aligned with their skill set was most important. Contrary to the perception that IIT Bombay students often move away from core engineering, the survey shows that out of the 282 students who responded to the question on their immediate plans after graduation – 67 said they would continue in core engineering, while 66 planned to stay in technology. When asked about interest in their core branch, 135 of 277 respondents said they were and still are inclined to pursue it. However, 58 said they had lost interest, while 65 admitted they were never inclined in their field of study. Whereas 19 students said that they were not interested in their core branch before but are now keen to pursue.
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Bad news for Sundar Pichai's Google, loses appeal in…, major victory for video game maker…
Home Business Bad news for Sundar Pichai's Google, loses appeal in…, major victory for video game maker… Bad news for Sundar Pichai's Google, loses appeal in…, major victory for video game maker… Google is also facing a proposed breakup of its advertising technology as part of the countermeasures to its monopoly in that business. A trial on that proposal is scheduled to begin in September. Sundar Pichai- File image A federal appeals court has upheld a jury verdict declaring Google's Android app store an illegal monopoly, due to which a federal judge can implement changes at increasing consumer choice. The unanimous decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is a legal setback for Google. It is the third major antitrust ruling against the tech giant since late 2023, with various aspects of its digital empire being found in violation of monopoly laws. How Will Verdict Benefit Google's Competitors? It is considered a major victory for video game maker Epic Games, which launched a legal battle against Google's Play Store for Android apps and Apple's iPhone app store nearly five years ago in an attempt to bypass payment processing systems that charged 15% to 30% commissions on in-app transactions. What Jury Found About Google? Following a month-long trial, a nine-person jury determined that Google had rigged its system to thwart alternative app stores from offering better deals to consumers and software developers. That verdict resulted in US District Judge James Donato ordering Google to tear down digital walls shielding the Play Store from competition, triggering the company's appeal to overturn the jury's finding and void the judge's mandated shakeup. But a three-judge panel that heard Google's appeal in February rejected its lawyers' contention that Donato erred by allowing the case to be determined by a jury that deviated from the market definition outlined by another federal judge who mostly sided with Apple in Epic's case against the iPhone maker's app store. What Was Google's Stand In Case? Google has argued that the required revisions will raise privacy and security risks by exposing consumers to scam artists and hackers masquerading as legitimate app stores. But Epic's lawyers have ridiculed Google's warnings about the changes as scare tactics in a desperate attempt to protect the fortunes of its corporate parent Alphabet Inc. Although Epic fell short in its attempt to have the iPhone's app store declared a monopoly, that case resulted in a judge issuing an order that required Apple to surrender exclusive control over the payment processing of in-app transactions and allow links to alternative systems without collecting a commission. (With Inputs From Agencies) For breaking news and live news updates, like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter and Instagram. Read more on Latest Business News on
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Anthropic CEO rejects Nvidia CEO Jensen Haung's AI remarks: ‘That's the most outrageous lie I've ever….'
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has responded to Jensen Huang 's previous remarks, stating his words are 'outrageous'. "I've said nothing that anywhere near resembles the idea that this company should be the only one to build the technology," Amodei said, adding "'[=It's just an incredible and bad faith distortion." Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The feud started in June when the Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said he disagreed with "almost everything" Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei said. Speaking at the Viva Tech conference earlier this year, Huang accused Amodei of believing AI is so dangerous that only his company should be allowed to build it — an idea Huang described as unrealistic and monopolistic. "AI is so incredibly powerful that everyone will lose their jobs, which explains why they should be the only company building it," Huang then said of Amodei's thinking. In a latest episode of the "Big Technology" podcast hosted by Alex Kantrowitz, Anthropic CEO said 'I've never said anything like that', adding 'That's the most outrageous lie I've ever heard.' Dario Amodei said that he didn't know where "anyone could ever derive that from anything that I've said." Amodei insisted that in a "race to the bottom," AI companies rush to launch new features without enough safety checks, which puts everyone at risk. In contrast, his approach is a "race to the top," where the most responsible and ethical AI companies lead the way, setting higher standards for the entire industry. "I've said multiple times, and I think Anthropic's actions have shown it, that we're aiming for something we call a race to the top," he added. In a related news, Dario Amodei warned employees against massive salary increases from competitors like Meta, stating it could "destroy" the company's culture. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Speaking on the Big Technology Podcast, Amodei revealed that when Meta and other tech giants began targeting Anthropic engineers with lucrative offers, he sent a clear message to staff: the company would not compromise its compensation principles. "What they are doing is trying to buy something that cannot be bought," Amodei said, explaining that many employees rejected external offers and some "wouldn't even talk to ." The CEO emphasized that Anthropic maintains a level-based compensation system where negotiations aren't permitted, calling it a matter of fairness.
