Farmers seek compensation for loss of land to power transmission lines
In a memorandum submitted to the Minister, association's oganisational secretary Attahalli Devaraj said high voltage 66/11 KV and 220 KV power transmission lines of KPTCL passed over agricultural lands, resulting in loss of cultivable area for many farmers.
The transmission lines from KPTCL Mini Station in Gejjeyanavaddaragudi in Hunsur sub division passed through several villages, including Dharmapura, Karimuddanahalli, Aspatre Kaval, Basti Maranahalli, Hallada Koppalu, Udduru Kaval, Tarikal and other areas in Hunsur. These power transmission lines and towers built on the land have not been accompanied by any clear steps regarding compensation to the affected farmers, the association said.
'In response to an RTI application, the officials have claimed that land rates were fixed during a meeting held with farmers in March 2024. But, when asked which specific farmers or land owners attended the meeting, the officials said no farmers had agreed to be present at the meeting. This clearly indicates that the farmers were not part of the decision-making exercise and fair land rate had not been determined', Mr. Devaraj alleged, while contending that the authorities had held meetings on the issue without bringing it to the notice of the land-owning farmers or seeking their consent.
The association sought to bring to the Minister's notice that the market rate of the land in the region was ₹2 lakh per gunta. Hence, a fair rate should be determined for the land and an appropriate compensation amount should be fixed. The farmers' body also contended that the transmission lines had already been electrified without the farmers' consent.
The association pointed out that farmers in villages such as Koodanahalli, Devalapura, Marasettihalli, Joranahalli, Varuna and Vajamangala too had not been adequately compensated while drawing the 220 KV line from Kadakola to Vajamangala in Mysuru taluk. 'Their lands lie near layouts where land prices range between ₹6 lakh and ₹10 lakh per gunta, while the department quotes only ₹50,000 to ₹60,000', Mr. Devaraj said in the memorandum.
Irrigation pumpsets
The association urged the government to discontinue the policy of Aadhaar-linked registration and meter installation for irrigation pumpsets. The irrigation pumpsets of farmers should be regularised upon payment of ₹5,000, the association said.
For lands that had been affected by power transmission lines, the government should provide free electricity connections for irrigation pumpsets, it added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Bihar voter drive bid to exclude migrants, attack on Constitution: Opposition to ECI brass
A delegation of Opposition leaders on Wednesday told Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and other EC officials that the proposed Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar's electoral roll was aimed at excluding voters-particularly migrant workers-from the upcoming assembly polls. Calling the timeline and conditions impractical, they alleged the move undermined electoral fairness and amounted to an "attack on the Constitution's basic structure." The EC's response, they said, was unsatisfactory, setting the stage for possible agitation and legal action. After the meeting, Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi questioned the timing of the SIR, noting that the last such revision in Bihar was in 2003-well ahead of elections. "In 22 years and multiple polls since, was every election flawed? Now you want to rush this massive exercise in just two months in a state with nearly 8 crore voters?" he said. Escalating his attack, Singhvi called the SIR "the worst assault on the Constitution's basic structure," warning that wrongful deletion or addition of even one voter distorts the democratic process . He questioned the EC's move to drop Aadhaar and ration cards as valid documents and mandate birth certificates for post-2003 voters and their parents. The Opposition could have cooperated had the exercise begun earlier with practical requirements, he said, adding that the EC's justification citing Maharashtra and increased BLA deployment was "not satisfactory." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like [Click Here] 2025 Top Trending local enterprise accounting software Esseps Learn More Undo Manoj Jha of the RJD said: "This (SIR) is a conspiracy to evict people. The purpose of any exercise is exclusion instead of inclusion." He added that the EC had no answer when asked why such an exercise, not undertaken in 22 years, was being carried out now, using documents most people don't possess. Dipankar Bhattacharya (CPI-ML) claimed the SIR aimed to exclude Bihar's migrant workers , who account for 20% of the state's voters, from the assembly polls. "Like note-bandi, this is vote-bandi," he quipped. Live Events
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Two crore Bihar voters will be disenfranchised because of SIR, INDIA bloc claims
The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls currently underway in Bihar could disenfranchise at least two crore voters in the State, especially the migrant population, a delegation of INDIA bloc leaders said on Wednesday after a nearly three-hour-long meeting with the Election Commission of India (ECI). Twenty leaders from 11 parties of the Opposition bloc met the Commission to convey their objections regarding the SIR exercise ahead of the Bihar Assembly elections scheduled for October–November this year. Drawing a parallel with the 2016 demonetisation exercise, which was colloquially referred to as notebandi, the Opposition termed the electoral revision 'votebandi'. Citing the ECI's own estimate that at least 20% of Bihar's population comprises migrant workers, the leaders expressed fears that such individuals could be arbitrarily removed from the rolls. Speaking at a press conference after the meeting, Congress leader and senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi said the delegation raised three primary concerns: the necessity, timing, and feasibility of the revision exercise. 'Firstly, we asked if the last revision was in 2003, for 22 years, four or five Bihar Assembly polls have happened - were all those elections faulty and imperfect?' Mr. Singhvi asked. He pointed out that the 2003 revision was held well in advance of national and State elections. 'In contrast, this revision, which affects the second largest electorate in the country with over eight crore voters, is being carried out in just two months,' he said. 'We believe that migratory persons, who travel to work, cannot be at the beck and call of the enumerator.' Mr. Singhvi further stated that 'disenfranchisement' is the gravest attack on the Constitution's basic structure. 'We have said that upwards of 2.5 or three crore persons - let us assume the minimum two crore - may be disenfranchised by this exercise. Why choose to do this at the cusp of the elections?' he asked. Mr. Singhvi also questioned why the ECI had 'jettisoned and abandoned' the Aadhaar card, which has previously been used to confirm voter identities. He raised concerns over the lack of transparency, noting that political parties were not informed in advance about the planned revision. 'EC seems completely disinclined to consider our submissions,' he said. Rashtriya Janata Dal leader Manoj Jha described the meeting as 'less than amicable'. '20% of the population, who migrate in search of livelihood, are in danger of losing their voting rights. The purpose of this exercise is exclusion rather than inclusion,' Mr. Jha said. Communist Party of India (Marxist–Leninist) Liberation General Secretary Dipankar Bhattacharya said the Opposition came away from the meeting even more concerned. 'The EC clarified that only those who are ordinary residents will find their names on the electoral roll. Those who are forced to leave the State looking for livelihood, in EC's view, will not be considered 'ordinary residents',' he said. Mr. Bhattacharya also questioned the logistics of reaching eight crore voters during the monsoon season. Responding to the Opposition's concerns, the Commission said that the SIR was being conducted in accordance with Article 326 of the Constitution, the Representation of the People Act, 1950, and the instructions issued on June 24. The Commission maintained that each concern raised during the meeting was addressed in full. The ECI also thanked political parties for appointing over 1.5 lakh Booth Level Agents (BLAs) for ground-level participation in the SIR. The meeting saw tensions rise over the issue of representation, with the ECI having earlier informed parties that only the heads would be allowed in. 'It will render dialogue between political parties and the Election Commission absolutely impossible,' Mr. Singhvi said, criticising the move. However, ECI sources later clarified that some participants were pre-appointed while others were allowed entry on the Commission's own discretion. The Commission said it allowed two representatives from each party to ensure all views were heard.
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
'Votebandi': INDIA Bloc vs Poll Body On Electoral Roll Revision In Bihar
New Delhi: Putting up a united front, a delegation of 11 parties from the opposition INDIA bloc met the Election Commission on Wednesday to share their concerns over the large-scale revision of the electoral rolls in Bihar, but came out more unhappy than they were when they went in. "After meeting the Election Commission, our concerns have increased further because the Commission did not give a satisfactory reply to any of our questions," CPI(ML) Liberation General Secretary Dipankar Bhattacharya, who went on to call the process 'votebandi', said. Trouble began when the delegation - which included leaders from the Congress, Rashtriya Janata Dal, CPI(M), CPI, CPI(ML) Liberation, NCP (Sharadchandra Pawar) and Samajwadi Party - reached Nirvachan Sadan, the office of the Election Commission in New Delhi, on Wednesday and were told only two members from each party would be allowed in. "For the first time, we were given rules to enter the Election Commission (EC). For the first time, we were told only party chiefs can go. Such restrictions mean that necessary dialogue between political parties and the EC can't happen... Today, only two people per party were allowed, which left leaders like Jairam Ramesh, Pawan Khera and Akhilesh Singh standing outside," Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi said. The delegation then went in and had a three-hour meeting with Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and other election commissioners. The leaders told the Commission that the special intensive revision - a targeted voter verification and list-updating process that includes physical verification of voters, document scrutiny, and deletion of ineligible entries - being conducted so close to the assembly elections in Bihar risked leaving voters out and adding ineligible people to the rolls. "If the last intensive revision was conducted in 2003 and elections happened a year later, why is this being pushed now, with only 2-3 months left before the polls? You didn't even mention the intensive revision until January, and now suddenly it has been implemented. Why now? We are not against the revision, but it can be done with great care after this election," Mr Singhvi said, pointing out that there are nearly eight crore voters in Bihar, increasing the risk of errors if the exercise is carried out in such a short timeframe. Criticising the lack of Aadhaar validation using Aadhaar cards, Mr Singhvi said the EC demands Aadhaar for everything else "but not here - why?" 'Exclusion' RJD leader Manoj Jha expressed deep concern over the documentation criteria laid out by the Commission. "If this exercise leads to exclusion rather than inclusion, what is its purpose?" he asked. Mr Jha warned that most people do not possess the 11 types of documents required for voters not listed in the 2003 electoral rolls and said, "If the intent is to exclude crores of people, you will see a flood of protests on the streets." The RJD leader also raised doubts about the Election Commission's intent and transparency, saying the rationale provided to them was not convincing. 'Democracy Under Threat' Perhaps the sharpest criticism came from CPI(ML) Liberation General Secretary Bhattacharya, who called the Election Commission's explanations "unsatisfactory" and said democracy in the state is under threat. Mr Bhattacharya said the Commission admitted that 20% of Bihar's voters reside outside the state, which effectively means they could lose their right to vote. "This is nothing less than 'votebandi' for Bihar," he said, comparing the exercise to the demonetisation, or 'notebandi', carried out in 2016. "There seems to be a failure on our part to convince the Election Commission that one month is not enough for lakhs of voters to submit identification documents. Democracy in Bihar is under threat. A major people's movement is now necessary," he said. To a question by NDTV about the possibility of going to court to challenge the exercise, Mr Singhvi, who is a senior advocate in the Supreme Court, said the delegation would decide on legal options "at a later stage". Replying to the same question, Mr Jha said, "This is not the place to say these things. We will decide and inform the media." Poll Panel Response In a statement after the meeting, the Election Commission said the special intensive revision (SIR) is being done following the proper provisions and all concerns brought up by the leaders of the parties were addressed. "The SIR is being conducted in accordance with the provisions of Article 326, Representation of the People Act 1950 and instructions issued on 24.06.2025. The party representatives raised various concerns related to SIR. Each concern which was raised by any member of the political party was fully addressed by the Commission," the poll body said. On the issue of two members being allowed in, the panel said it was to ensure a plurality of viewpoints. "Some of the participants were given an appointment and others were allowed to join in without any prior appointment, as the Commission decided to meet two representatives from every party so as to listen to all views... The Commission also thanked all political parties for actively participating in the SIR process so that no eligible voter is left out," the statement said.
