logo
Cultural resistance in times of conflict

Cultural resistance in times of conflict

Observer3 days ago

Cultural resistance is one of the essential forms of struggle that societies adopt when faced with escalating conflicts, particularly in times when foreign dominance threatens to erase or distort national cultures. It is a conscious and creative act rooted in the defence of identity and heritage.
This form of resistance manifests through literary and artistic means that protect national identity and stand against intrusive forces — whether through direct or indirect colonial influence. These forces often operate on ideological and intellectual levels and present themselves in the guise of technological, economic, or political transformations. The objective is not just cultural modification, but also an attempt to destabilise the moral and ethical frameworks that hold societies together.
Nations have employed a variety of methods to resist such forms of soft dominance, which often seep into daily life in subtle ways. Cultural resistance can be seen in literary texts — narratives, poetry and drama — as well as in the visual and performing arts. These works have emerged in new forms of visual and auditory expression, while traditional cultural heritage continues to demonstrate its relevance in confronting modern challenges and defending identity.
The world in general, and the Middle East in particular, has long suffered from ideological pressures on political, economic and technological fronts. In response, our societies have shown remarkable capacity to preserve their cultural identity and to craft cultural narratives that reflect the richness of their civilisational roots. This resistance reflects a deep awareness of the intellectual danger that looms when a society becomes disconnected from its cultural identity and historical lineage.
This danger becomes more pressing amid intensifying geopolitical conflicts and ideological agendas that exploit economic and technological rivalries. In areas of conflict plagued by violence, displacement and destruction, the need to protect cultural identity on both national and regional levels becomes ever more urgent. Cultural resistance, in this context, is not a luxury — it is an imperative. It is about affirming shared values and a commitment to history, ethics and human dignity.
Recent years have seen ideological struggles expand across Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, and, most recently, Iran. This reflects a deeper transformation in the nature of conflict in the Middle East. Cultural resistance today is not confined to the Arab world but resonates globally. Edward Said described this phenomenon as 'the replicative nature of Zionist discourse,' a concept that captures the cultural erasure efforts now underway. In contrast, cultural resistance challenges such erasure, not only through institutional means, but also at the level of popular and global consciousness.
Attempts to reshape identities through manipulated narratives and ideologically driven agendas — ones that often align with unrestrained capitalist motives — now seek to dominate collective memory and history. This poses a threat not just to national identity, but to the individual's very sense of self. The aim is to strip people of their cultural and civilisational affiliations, thereby weakening their ability to defend their nations and their values. Societies then risk falling under forms of political, economic and social colonisation.
Writers, artists and cultural practitioners now carry a significant responsibility. Their output shapes the public consciousness and must reflect a commitment to peace, heritage and creativity. They are key players in forming national awareness, especially for younger generations. Their strength lies in rejecting division and holding firm to values and ethics in times of turmoil.
In sum, conscious participation and creative production through cultural resistance are vital tools for intellectual development and for confronting the ideological and cultural challenges facing the region. By protecting national identity and enriching creative traditions, cultural resistance remains a cornerstone of societal resilience.
Aisha al Darmaki
The writer is a member of the State Council and a researcher specialising in semiotics
Translated by Badr al Dhafri
The original version of this article was published in Arabic in the print edition of the Oman Arabic on June 22, 2025.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Israel must not be allowed to triumph?
Why Israel must not be allowed to triumph?

Observer

time2 days ago

  • Observer

Why Israel must not be allowed to triumph?

Could we imagine a Middle East without Iran — not merely without its current government, but stripped of its strategic presence, historical depth and deterrent capacity? And who would fill such a void? This question invites a cascade of potential chaos were Israel (or the West supporting it) to emerge victorious in the ongoing conflict with Iran. The reality is that Arab states cannot escape their responsibility for what follows if Israel achieves its aims. Regret by then would be too late, meaningless in a region fully dominated and unquestioningly obedient to Israel. The heart of the matter isn't Israel's military might — it has Western backing and near-global silence bordering on complicity — but whether the Middle East could survive the consequences of an Israeli victory. The answer is unambiguous: it cannot. Such a defeat would usher in the greatest danger the Arab world has faced in recent times. Arab perceptions of Iran have long been flawed, often narrowed to sectarian tropes. Yet Iran — both under the Shah and after 1979 — is an ancient civilisation, a state with deep historical roots, a regional vision and jurisdictional sway that cannot simply be erased. The 1979 revolution was not just a religious export — it was a profound internal upheaval, rooted in political, social and economic transformation. Arab states would have done better to engage Iran as a regional partner rather than heed Western calls to isolate and dismantle it. Many policymakers in the Middle East have persisted in the belief that a weakened Iran would bring stability. This notion, fuelled by Western think‑tanks, treats the revolution as an ideological aberration and fails to grasp that dismantling Iran would leave a tremendous geopolitical vacuum. It risks turning Gulf states into mere satellites of a new regime — and could even fracture the Arab world, repeating patterns seen after Baghdad fell in 2003. Israel isn't just aiming to disarm Iran; its Western backers envision full dominance — military, ideological and economic. This would enable Israel to reshape regional dynamics to serve its own long-held interests. In this scenario, normalisation agreements become superficial at best. Israel would define the cultural and geopolitical order. Those who resist would find themselves in the grip of widespread chaos. Alarmingly, current Middle East dynamics could perfectly set this scenario in motion. It is among the darkest moments in Arab history — marked by disunity, ideological extremism and a lack of political coherence. A victorious Israel would also have global consequences. It would convey that diplomacy is obsolete and that military dominance is the only arbiter of power. What may appear as a strategic void — an emerging Israeli hegemony — would instead become a regional vacuum filled by Israeli influence across security, economics and technology. Such dominance cannot yield lasting stability. History shows that it breeds violent resistance — from Lebanon to Gaza to Iraq. The collapse of central authority could ignite decentralised extremist movements, unleashing violence that cannot be contained. This would be worsened by a profound sense of injustice as Iran is punished for its support of Gaza and Palestine. Preventing an Israeli win is not about endorsing Iran's military ambitions but about preserving regional diversity. The Middle East has always balanced on a knife-edge; allowing one power to dominate entirely would undermine that balance. Arab and Gulf states must deploy all their influence to block an Israeli victory — publicly and privately — and forge new regional equations based on partnership, deterrence and dialogue instead of military supremacy. Otherwise, the Arab world will deeply regret dismantling Iran, just as it has regretted Iraq's downfall — and this time, the consequences could be far more catastrophic. At this historic crossroads, the region needs clear-sighted leadership, wisdom and balanced thinking to maintain equilibrium and stability. Allowing Israel to win this war would imperil the Middle East's collective identity, culture and security. Translated by Badr al Dhafri. The original version of this article was published in Oman Arabic newspaper on June 23.

HM exchanges new Hijri year greetings with leaders of Arab countries
HM exchanges new Hijri year greetings with leaders of Arab countries

Observer

time3 days ago

  • Observer

HM exchanges new Hijri year greetings with leaders of Arab countries

Muscat: On the occasion of the New Hijri Year 1447 AH and the anniversary of the Prophet Mohammed's Hijra, His Majesty Sultan Haitham bin Tarik has exchanged cables of greetings with leaders of Arab and Muslim countries. In his cables, His Majesty the Sultan expressed his sincere sentiments and best wishes for them, praying to Allah the Almighty for the return of this blessed occasion on them and their peoples, and to bestow upon the entire Islamic nation abundant blessings. In their cables to the country's Monarch, the leaders of the Arab and Muslim countries expressed their sincere greetings and best wishes to His Majesty the Sultan. They prayed to Almighty Allah to bestow divine blessings and bounties upon His Majesty and his noble people, and to make the new Hijri year, a year in which Muslims and the entire world enjoy stability, peace and harmony.

Iran one step closer to cutting cooperation with IAEA
Iran one step closer to cutting cooperation with IAEA

Observer

time3 days ago

  • Observer

Iran one step closer to cutting cooperation with IAEA

TEHRAN: Iran has taken one further step towards cutting off its cooperation with the United Nations' atomic watchdog, as Tehran takes stock in the aftermath of its brief war with Israel. The Guardian Council, a key supervisory body, on Thursday approved the temporary suspension of cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), state news agency IRNA reported, a day after the measure was passed in parliament. According to the resolution, Iran will not allow IAEA inspectors into the country until the "safety" of its nuclear facilities is guaranteed. Tehran is also asking the IAEA to condemn the attacks by the US and Israel on Iran's nuclear facilities. Without ongoing cooperation with the IAEA, which is mandated to monitor nuclear facilities in countries around the world, there is little prospect of negotiations with the US resuming. US President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that there would be new talks with Iran next week - a comment that has not brought any official response from Tehran so far. Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Thursday that Israel was hit hard by the conflict, in his first public comments since a ceasefire came into force earlier this week. "Despite all the fanfares and claims, the Zionist regime was nearly destroyed and crushed under the blows of the Islamic Republic," Khamenei said in a video message cited by IRNA. An excavator is used to clear the rubble in front of a building recently hit in Israeli strikes in Tehran following a ceasefire with Israel that ended 12 days of fighting. - AFP Iran had also achieved "victory over the American regime," he said, arguing that the US had failed to achieve its objectives. He praised "the extraordinary unity and solidarity of the Iranian people." Iran suffered major attacks on its nuclear and military facilities during the war which began on June 13, as well as losing many top scientists and military leaders in Israeli strikes. The US also intervened on Israel's behalf with a strike on Iranian nuclear sites at the weekend. Some two dozen people were killed in Israel. The Iranian authorities say over 600 people were killed in Iran. The status of Iran's nuclear programme is uncertain after the US strikes. Despite the ceasefire with Israel, Iranian airspace remains largely closed. The closure will be extended until 2 pm (1030 GMT) on Friday, IRNA reported, citing a ministry spokesman. Some exceptions were allowed for the eastern part of the country, but the country's main international hub in the capital remains closed. Authorities warn of continued Israeli activity Iran's intelligence services remain on high alert, despite the ceasefire with Israel, according to official reports. "The cessation of hostile military operations does not mean the end of (Israel's) malicious and hostile actions," the state news agency Tasnim reported. The actions include gathering intelligence about the country, spreading misinformation and weakening national unity, the report said. Suspicious cases must therefore be reported under all circumstances, it added. - dpa

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store