BJP reaffirms support to de-notified nomadic tribes in Andhra
Addressing tribal leaders, Madhav said only the Narendra Modi-led government has allocated a dedicated budget for these communities, which have been historically marginalised due to colonial-era policies.
He recalled that these tribes, despite participating in India's freedom struggle, were branded as criminals by the British in 1871, resulting in decades of persecution. Their liberation began on August 31, 1952, and gained momentum under former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, whose commission highlighted the cultural significance of these communities.
'The commission clearly stated that India's rich cultural heritage owes much to these nomadic tribes,' Madhav said. Since 2014, the Modi government has prioritised their recognition and welfare, he added.
Highlighting local challenges, Madhav noted that many de-notified tribes in Andhra Pradesh still lack voting rights, contributing to their continued socio-economic struggles. He said the BJP has conducted studies to address this issue and is formulating plans to protect identity and dignity.
As part of the 75th Vimukti Diwas celebrations, Madhav announced a month-long series of 'Spoorthi' programmes across all districts, culminating in a grand event on August 30. BJP MLA Dr Parthasarathi, former IAS officer Dasari Srinivas Rao, State General Secretary Bitra Shivannarayana, and OBC Morcha State President Rongala Gopi Srinivas were also present.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
28 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Ludhiana: Jakhar joins BJP protest against mayor, demands audit of funds
The ongoing protest by BJP councillors against mayor Inderjit Kaur entered its fourth day on Wednesday, with BJP state president Sunil Jakhar lending his support by joining the demonstration outside the Municipal Corporation Zone D office. Jakhar slammed the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government for allegedly suppressing democratic voices and demanded immediate withdrawal of the FIR lodged against five BJP councillors. All the senior leadership from the district was present during the protest and raised slogans against the mayor and AAP government. BJP state president Sunil Jakhar sitting on protest along with local party leaders at MC Zone D office in Ludhiana on Monday. (Gurpreet Singh/HT) Addressing the protesting councillors and supporters, Jakhar said, 'The mayor and the AAP-led administration must stop misusing power. Lodging an FIR against elected representatives who were raising public issues is an attack on democracy. If the FIR is not revoked, BJP will intensify its protests and gather all MC zonal offices across Ludhiana in the coming days.' Jakhar also questioned the utilisation of funds under the Smart City Project, stating that over ₹900 crore has been received from the Centre, but the on-ground progress is negligible. He demanded a third-party audit of all the projects undertaken under the scheme. 'We want a complete audit report to be made public. The people of Ludhiana have the right to know where this money has gone,' he added. Jakhar also pointed out the recent arrest of the superintendent engineer by the Vigilance Bureau under the charges of corruption regarding the development project of the city. Senior BJP leader and advocate Bikram Singh Sidhu said, 'MC is miserably failed to maintain the city as roads are in deplorable condition, potable water is still distant dream, solid waste management is not maintained, sewerage system is also failed and MC is becoming a house of corruption and due to which we are requesting the union government of India through urban development ministry to constitute the special team to conduct a proper audit of smart funds.' 'The mayor has registered a false FIR and BJP workers will continue an indefinite strike against the mayor until the case will be revoked,' he added. The protest began after a confrontation took place between BJP councillors and the mayor during a meeting last week. The BJP leaders alleged that the Mayor misbehaved with them when they tried to raise civic issues. The Municipal Corporation later filed an FIR against five BJP councillors and 20 others, which further escalated the tension. The protest had seen participation from councillors and leaders of other parties, including the Shiromani Akali Dal and Congress in the past days, who have expressed concern over the growing intolerance in local governance.
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
Action on Kaleshwaram report after House debate: Revanth
Hyderabad: The state govt has decided to act on the Justice PC Ghose Commission report, which squarely blamed former chief minister K Chandrasekhar Rao and his administration for corruption, irregularities and engineering failures in the Kaleshwaram project, particularly sinking of piers in Medigadda, and damages to Annaram and Sundilla barrages. Chief minister A Revanth Reddy on Monday said concrete action would be taken "strictly on the basis of the report," but only after a detailed debate in, both the assembly and council. "This will not be political vendetta. The report is the outcome of an independent judicial inquiry led by Justice Ghose, one of the country's most distinguished jurists," he asserted. The 665-page report was tabled before the cabinet four days after it was submitted to the govt. The cabinet cleared it along with a brief summary prepared by a three-member officials' committee. The CM said opinion of all political parties and independents would be sought before finalising the next course of action. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad The assembly and council sessions are expected to be convened shortly to debate the report, after which legal and administrative action will begin against all those held accountable by the Ghose panel. The Ghose commission has held a range of decision-makers — former ministers, senior IAS officers, irrigation engineers, contractors and project agencies — accountable for the massive procedural, technical and financial mess. It traced the project's decline to KCR's 'unilateral decision' to abandon the original Pranahita-Chevella project and redesign it as the Kaleshwaram Lift Irrigation Scheme. "Every crucial decision — from site changes to cost escalation to contract awards — was taken personally by the then chief minister," the report states. Even senior BRS leaders such as former irrigation minister T Harish Rao and former finance minister Eatala Rajender were found culpable. "The commission stated that corruption took place on a massive scale and wrong decisions made for selfish gains caused the present collapse of the barrages," Revanth said. Irrigation minister N Uttam Kumar Reddy, with deputy CM Mallu Bhatti Vikramarka by his side, quoted the report to say that the cabinet approval shown for the Rs 2,591-crore Medigadda barrage was illegal. "The commission conclusively stated that KCR took all decisions on Medigadda, Annaram and Sundilla barrages without placing them before the cabinet," he said. According to the report, the entire project was characterised by "rampant and brazen procedural and financial irregularities." The commission listed the faults: Lack of proper planning, inflated estimates, illegal approvals, switch from lumpsum to turnkey contracts, revised estimates with mala fide intent, undue favours to agencies, defective designs (barrages constructed as dams), poor quality control, faulty construction, absence of operation and maintenance systems, missing manuals, illegal completion certificates, premature release of bank guarantees and complete financial mismanagement. The report goes on to say that the Kaleshwaram scheme, once projected as the lifeline of Telangana, has turned into a "colossal waste of public money due to profound failure of governance, technical oversight and financial discipline, driven by individual decisions and undue influence of political leadership."
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Javed Akhtar recommends these books to rethink India's past and politics
In an interview, Javed Akhtar, one of India's most influential lyricists and public intellectuals, revealed he is simultaneously engrossed in two books. Far from light reading, Akhtar's selections are a testament to his ongoing engagement with the country's political and historical tensions. At a time when public memory is fiercely contested, Akhtar, in an interview with Lallantop, revealed that he has turned to two works: Muslims Against Partition of India by Shamsul Islam and The New Icon: Savarkar and the Facts by Arun Shourie. One excavates the erased history of Muslim leaders who resisted Partition; the other critically reexamines the contested legacy of VD Savarkar, the Hindu ideologue. This account that brings to light the largely forgotten Muslim individuals and organisations who opposed the creation of Pakistan before 1947. Drawing on archival records, Urdu poetry, and political speeches, the book challenges the dominant narrative that portrays the Partition as a unanimously Muslim demand. It documents the efforts of leaders and groups who actively fought for a united India. It also revisits significant events like the 1857 War of Independence and the Azad Muslim Conference of 1940, offering evidence of a secular, inclusive Muslim nationalism that was ultimately sidelined by both colonial policies and dominant communal politics. The second edition of the book includes rare photos and newly unearthed material from the National Archives of India, offering a nuanced counter-history of the independence movement. The books is a critical investigation into the life and legacy of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, one of the most controversial figures in India's nationalist history. Shourie examines Savarkar's writings, statements, and actions, as well as British government archives, to question the mythology that has built up around him. The book looks into claims such as Savarkar's escape attempt in Marseilles, his alleged friendship with Mahatma Gandhi, and the controversial mercy petitions he submitted during his incarceration in the Andamans. It also explores his ideological stances on Hindutva, Hinduism, and the kind of state he envisioned. With sharp analysis and a historian's skepticism, Shourie raises pressing questions about Savarkar's role in the freedom struggle, his cooperation with the British, and his influence on current political narratives. The book seeks to separate fact from fiction at a time when Savarkar's image is being revived and rebranded in Indian politics.
