logo
The Fragrance Market's Squeezed Middle

The Fragrance Market's Squeezed Middle

Just a year ago, Nest was all about accessible luxury. The premium fragrance brand, best known for its home candles and diffusers, expanded its line into body sprays that launched at Ulta Beauty for $39 – a category that's been booming thanks to younger shoppers.
But in May, the 17-year-old brand decided that upmarket was the way to move, wiping its Instagram feed clean and replacing it with its new Voyages collection of fine perfumes sold for $250 at Harrods and Bergdorf Goodman. The accompanying campaign, shot by photographer Nick Knight, lends it a higher-fashion positioning than past products. Knight told The Business of Beauty he spent four weeks photographing the fragrances with the goal 'to create images that live in your memory and your emotions.'
Nest CEO Edgar Huber, who joined the brand in March 2023, said, 'One of the key elements we have identified for us is really to elevate the brand, make the brand more sophisticated, modernize it, [and make] it more attractive on a global basis.' Still, the body sprays are staying put at Ulta Beauty, and its core sub-$200 range of fragrances is remaining in retailers like Sephora.
At first glance, this low-to-high oscillation might seem chaotic, especially in context: Nest's beloved founder Laura Slatkin announced her departure from day-to-day activities earlier in the month in the midst of its rebranding. But consumer desire for affordable scents you can layer and ultra-luxury fragrances that are cult-worthy reflect the current state of the fragrance market: price points low and high are booming, while prestige sales are lagging.
ADVERTISEMENT
According to data from Circana, sales of fragrances with an average price under $50 grew by 11 percent in the first quarter of this year, while those over $150 increased by 14 percent. The accessible spray categories continue to skyrocket, with body spray sales doubling their sales and hair perfumes up 70 percent. The $50 to $150 range, however – where the smaller sizes of classic icons like Chanel No. 5 and Miss Dior sit — has seen sales decline 3 percent.
'After Covid, niche kind of exploded,' said fragrance consultant Robert Sorce, a former president of Byredo who has also worked at Creed and Amouage. 'A lot of prestige brands are thinking, 'How do I really upscale to compete with those niche brands?''
Brands with products in the mid-price range — which is where Nest's core fragrances land, at $102 — have several challenges when expanding to both the high and the accessible ends of the spectrum. Both require a calibration of brand equity, whether that means elevation to support fine fragrance launches or preservation when going downmarket.
Nest's revamp strategy has gone beyond an Instagram reset and high-end campaign. Behind the scenes, it has meant 'closing distribution we didn't want to have,' including combating third-party marketplace sellers on Amazon, as well as reducing discounts and promotions, said Huber. In addition, the brand has pursued more 'consistent and coherent brand expression' with packaging redesign.
Stretching the Limits
With the continuous popularization of niche fragrances well above the $250 price range, the price of what qualifies as 'luxury' fragrance has shifted far upward. The sub-$200 fragrances, typically designer in nature, feel inexpensive compared to niche labels pushing the boundaries of what fragrance collectors are willing to pay.
'The prices just keep going up,' said Sorce. Kering-owned Creed's 100 mL signature Aventus fragrance has climbed above $500, while Maison Francis Kurkdjian's Baccarat Rouge retails at $335 for 50 mL. Brands such as Roja can sell bottles over $3,300.
The number of luxury fashion brands with upmarket fragrance offerings has steadily risen in recent years. Following Dior's La Collection Privée ($220 for the smallest size) and Chanel's Les Exclusifs de Chanel ($350), which debuted in the 2000s, Gucci came out with its Alchemist's Garden line ($280 to $415) in 2019 and Louis Vuitton launched its Les Extraits in 2021 ($585). Luxury fashion brands entering or restarting fragrance have skipped over the prestige category entirely and gone straight to luxury, such as Puig-owned Dries Van Noten with its collection ranging from $310 to $365 and Kering-owned Bottega Veneta's Colpo di Sole fragrance at $450. Even premium brands have climbed up, with Diptyque launching Les Essences de Diptyque ($330) last year.
'They saw this surge in niche and that people were paying for $500 for a bottle of Creed,' said Sorce. 'They were like, 'There's no price resistance, so we're going to cut out the bottom. It makes more sense to just invest more in the top.''
ADVERTISEMENT
For Nest, the reasons to go upmarket were numerous, said Huber. He noted that luxury is the 'fastest growing sub-category of fine fragrances,' and has global appeal – while body sprays are a very North America-centred phenomenon. The new line will help the brand's goal of moving further into luxury retailers in Europe and the Middle East, he said.
Margins are also better on fine fragrances, even with the higher cost of luxury ingredients, said Sorce.
The High-Low Shopper
While a highly concentrated eau de parfum with an expensive campaign is one of the only ways perfumiers can go upmarket, there are nearly infinite ways to go more accessible. In addition to less concentrated options like body sprays and hair perfumes, minis, rollerballs, and 'ancillaries' like lotions are all seeing high demand. These launches are still coming in rapid succession, with Boy Smells and By Rosie Jane both being the latest to join the body spray craze last week.
'I'm a prestige value shopper. I love beautiful products, but I also want to have an attainable price point that doesn't feel like a luxury,' said By Rosie Jane founder Rosie Jane Johnston, who launched a fragrance-forward body care collection in May.
The most obvious customer for these launches is the entry-level shopper, which is as young as Gen Alpha, thanks to Sol de Janeiro. According to Huber, 64 percent of Nest's body mist customers are new to the brand, creating a ladder for shoppers who might upgrade to the core fragrances and Voyages eventually.
More than ever, it appears masstige, premium and luxury brands are finding common ground, creating cheaper formats or ultra-luxe options. Few, however, are revitalizing their core segments.
But the premium price range slump isn't affecting all brands equally, as popular designer perfume franchises remain resilient: LVMH listed Dior's J'adore as one of its scents with 'enduring appeal' in its first-quarter 2025 earnings report. Buzzy scents like Glossier You have won over TikTok and brought newness to the classic category.
As more luxury brands like Balenciaga plan their entries and re-entries into fragrance, it's unlikely that new launches will be in the $100 price range, according to Sorce. 'They'll look at more of the $200-and-above range,' he predicted.
Sign up to The Business of Beauty newsletter, your complimentary, must-read source for the day's most important beauty and wellness news and analysis.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Indigenous leaders push for meeting with first ministers as Ford takes softer tone on development
Indigenous leaders push for meeting with first ministers as Ford takes softer tone on development

Hamilton Spectator

time21 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Indigenous leaders push for meeting with first ministers as Ford takes softer tone on development

HUNTSVILLE, Ont. — Frustrated at being blocked from Tuesday's first ministers' meeting with Prime Minister Mark Carney, Indigenous leaders are pushing for one including them amid deepening concerns about legislation fast-tracking mining and infrastructure projects in the fight against U.S. tariffs. The request came as Premier Doug Ford struck a softer tone over Ontario's Bill 5, which empowers the province to bypass environmental and other laws to create 'special economic zones' to speed development and offset an expected economic slowdown because of U.S. President Donald Trump's levies. 'It's time now, in 2025, that First Nations are at the table and that we have a bigger seat in this country,' Assembly of First Nations Chief Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak said after a two-hour confab with premiers gathered Monday at Deerhurst Resort for their annual Council of the Federation meeting. 'We do have to have tough discussions with each other,' she added, criticizing Ford's Bill 5 and the similar federal Bill C-5, which passed quickly in recent weeks, for measures that 'bulldoze' treaty rights and other protections. 'We're all trying to make a better country. Rushing bills through is not a good way to start.' Ford, this year's chair of the council, pledged to pitch such a meeting to Carney over a barbecue dinner with premiers Monday night at his lakefront cottage south of Huntsville. 'We'll really push it as quickly as possible to make that happen,' he said. British Columbia Premier David Eby said the request from Nepinak was 'well received' by the premiers. 'Without question, Indigenous leadership need to be at the table with premiers and with the prime minister on issues,' he added. 'We know if we want to get projects done quickly … the projects have to have strong Indigenous partnerships.' The premiers' meeting with the Assembly of First Nations, the Métis National Council, Congress of Aboriginal Peoples and others centred on the fight many Indigenous leaders are waging against Ford's Protect Ontario by Unleashing Our Economy Act, and Carney's One Canadian Economy Act, which also has a less contentious element — removing most federal barriers to interprovincial trade. Both laws are aimed at speeding development of pipelines, rail corridors, mines and other major infrastructure projects — in Ottawa's case, projects deemed of 'national interest' and which the premiers and Carney are still discussing. Their passage left First Nations leaders furious at a lack of advance consultation. Ford and Carney have been attempting to smooth the resulting tensions ever since. Following their warnings that the controversial laws will end up slowing development, nine Ontario First Nations have launched legal challenges of both bills, insisting they are unconstitutional, and are seeking court injunctions to prevent Ottawa and Queen's Park from moving quickly on projects. 'Our rights cannot be implemented or respected without us, in substance and in process,' Nepinak warned last week. While still carrying a big stick in terms of his legislation, Ford said he'll work with First Nations that are in agreement on projects and keep talking to others that are not. 'The ones that want to be progressive, more quick, we'll move quick. The ones that want a little more conversation, that's fine,' Ford told reporters. 'For the most part, I can't do something if they don't want to do it,' he added. 'You can't move forward without their collaboration and buy-in.' That is hardly a guarantee, noted Chief Alvin Fiddler of Nishnawbe Aski Nation. 'That's not what the bills say,' said Fiddler, who sat in on the meeting and in May pledged 'fierce resistance' from native communities that are worried about being trampled in the rush to development. 'We don't believe you,' he added in a shot at Ford. Earlier in the day, Ford urged First Nations leaders to take advantage of billions of dollars in financial supports. 'This door is only open so long,' Ford said as he and his fellow premiers arrived at Deerhurst in a motorcade from Toronto, escorted by an Ontario Provincial Police motorcycle unit. 'There's never been a better opportunity for Indigenous communities — I'll speak for Ontario — than right now,' added Ford. 'There's $3 billion of equity sitting in the window that they can draw from. There's $70 million of training, $10 million of scholarships.' Ford is eager to accelerate projects in northwestern Ontario's Ring of Fire to extract critical minerals needed for electric vehicles, defence and other industries. 'We're gonna work with them,' he pledged in regard to First Nations. 'We want everyone to have an opportunity.' Carney, who met with hundreds of Indigenous representatives last Thursday in Gatineau over their concerns about the federal legislation, will provide premiers with an update Tuesday on trade negotiations with the Americans. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said she's eager to hear more details from Carney on Bill C-5 and echoed Ford's concerns that major projects need to get rolling sooner rather than later. 'The problem has been, historically, that they haven't moved at all, that projects have 10 year or more time horizons,' she told reporters. 'This new world we're in, we have to figure out a way to get to 'yes' faster. It doesn't mean there isn't a robust conversation that has to happen, but it has to happen in a time frame when a proponent is going to know that the answer is 'yes' and how we get there,' Smith added. 'I'm supportive of an abridged time frame but I think we also have to figure out how that's going to work.'

Jerry Jones' worst NFL enemy remains Jerry Jones
Jerry Jones' worst NFL enemy remains Jerry Jones

USA Today

time3 hours ago

  • USA Today

Jerry Jones' worst NFL enemy remains Jerry Jones

Jerry Jones, owner of the Dallas Cowboys, has an NFL nemesis hell bent on keeping him from reclaiming the glory of the 1990s. That man is Jerry Jones, de facto general manager of the Dallas Cowboys. To be clear, Jones' talent evaluation and trust in his scouts remain top notch. The Cowboys continue to generate elite homegrown talent on a semi-regular basis. Draft-n-Play Jerry Jones? That guy is an asset. But once those guys get near the end of those rookie contracts, Contract Extension Jerry Jones comes out. And while Contract Extension Jerry is great for his stars' checking accounts, it's actively hindering the roster around them. None of that is new. Jones' propensity to drag his feet early in negotiations has often led to more expensive deals down the line for players Dallas cannot afford to see leave. What could have been a five year, $262.5 million extension for Dak Prescott in 2023 (using Justin Herbert's deal as a comparison) eventually became a four year, $240 million deal in 2024, paying him $5 million more annually than any other NFL player ($231 million of that is guaranteed). CeeDee Lamb was always set to reset the wide receiver market. Doing so at the eve of the 2024 season lined him up for $34 million per year instead of around $30 million had he signed the offseason prior ($100 million of that is guaranteed). That creates salary cap bottlenecks down the line for a team that's perpetually high on star power and often low on depth. Jones' hesitation has logic behind it; he's waiting to see if a young player's production wanes before making a massive commitment. At the same time, that keeps said young player on a less expensive salary, which allows some breathing room to pay off the other massive extensions looming around the corner. However, that strategy keeps costing him money while antagonizing the players on which he relies. And Monday's comments about Micah Parsons, whose upcoming extension gets pricier each month? Fairly antagonistic! "Even if" is a bold way to address your team's desire to keep a 26-year-old with 52.5 sacks and four Pro Bowl honors in four seasons as a pro. Yet, here is Jones, quietly negging a player who has only missed four games due to injury in his career to date (a fifth game, in Week 18 vs. the Eagles in 2021, was due to COVID-19). Jones also added 'I am not the least concerned about having any dangling participles out here on a contract,' which is a folksy, homespun way of suggesting that, yep, this approach will once again cost Dallas extra money as a luxury tax for an owner/manager who lives for the escalation of contract negotiations but still seems to lose the big ones more often than he wins. Parsons, by the way, took notice. How could he not? So why is Jones waiting? He offered a couple rationalizations. The first, naturally, was the fleeting nature of mortality and rising tide of reckless drivers. The second, more sensible option was that he'd been burned before and had some regrets. And Jerry Jones, because he is Jerry Jones and you do not have to speak diplomatically when you own a superyacht, named names beyond Prescott and his nine missed games in 2024. Trevon Diggs was an All-Pro his second season in the league and a Pro Bowler the third. He signed a five year, $97 million contract to become one of the league's five highest paid cornerbacks, then missed 15 games due to injury in 2023 and six games in 2024 while providing good-not-great coverage. Steele signed a five-year, $82.5 million contract in 2023 after ascending to a starting role at right tackle, which made him the ninth-highest paid offensive tackle in the NFL. He hasn't missed a game since then, but his play hasn't lived up to the salary even though he'll only be the league's 25th-highest paid tackle in 2025. Jones paid market value for a boom-or-bust cornerback and a rising young tackle. One of them was derailed by injury and the other has struggled, but there's room for both players to revert to form (Steele is the oldest of the two and only 28 years old). Jones isn't in the hope business, however, he's looking for results. And these results align more closely with his wait-and-see philosophy than the fact Lamb was an All-Pro for the third straight season last fall. Thus, the Cowboys will likely be stuck with the privilege of paying Parsons a record-setting amount in the late stages of the 2025 preseason. A deal to beat out the $41 million in annual salary to TJ Watt -- resetting the market last offseason probably would have clocked in closer to $36 million per year -- could leave the franchise committed to something like $137 million in annual average salary to three players. That's not unmanageable, but it's a problem. Dallas has been so strapped for cap space in recent years that its top free agent additions the last few seasons have been: All the while, players like Connor McGovern, Dalton Schultz, Dorance Armstrong, Tyler Biadasz, Jourdan Lewis and Demarcus Lawrence left for cash elsewhere. That's not why the Cowboys have one playoff win since 2019, but it certainly doesn't help. Monday's comments were a refreshing display of honesty. Not about Micah Parsons, of course, but about how Jones views his roster management. The sunk cost of paying a player who might get injured or fall off far outweighs the opportunity savings of paying young, proven players what they're worth before it gets damagingly expensive. Jones is content to lose leverage and give up more in guarantees than he would have years earlier if he can find data that rewards his wait-and-see approach. That's not anything we didn't already know, but it's something else to hear Jones go out and effectively admit it. It's an approach that keeps the Cowboys from turning its stars into a constellation. And while it means guys like Prescott, Lamb and, eventually, Parsons all get truly lucrative contracts down the line, it also means they won't have the support to maximize the talent for which Jones is paying so much.

Tracee Ellis Ross Is All About This Subtle Netted Accessory
Tracee Ellis Ross Is All About This Subtle Netted Accessory

Elle

time4 hours ago

  • Elle

Tracee Ellis Ross Is All About This Subtle Netted Accessory

THE RUNDOWN Tracee Ellis Ross is one of the undefeated street-style champions of our time. In just one week, the High Note actress has turned out a series of impeccable looks, including an A-line tent dress from Givenchy made entirely of leather and a more sculptural look from independent designer LII. This morning, Ross was spotted on the streets of New York City, headed to an appearance on The Today Show in fresh-off-the-runway Jacquemus, styled by her longtime collaborator Karla Welch. The sweeping blue-and-white-striped look effortlessly embodied the oceanside breeze you'd enjoy while summering in the south of France—exactly as the spring 2026 collection intended to do. (The pieces were inspired by designer Simon Porte Jacquemus's peasant-farmer heritage in the region.) To add a further pop of color, Ross enlisted her longtime and legendary hairstylist Chuck Amos for a cobalt fishnet-covered slicked-back bun. The duo has recently been obsessed with the neon-netted chignon cover, pairing teal with a recent Khaite look, and for the LII dress, cherry red that matched the soles of her white Louboutins. On Instagram, the actress joked that it was the theme of the week, even captioning one photo dump: 'I did a lot of fish-netting around the apple.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store