California stabbing suspect allegedly planned to kill several of his radio station coworkers, police say
Investigators say an attempted murder suspect arrested earlier in June allegedly had plans to kill several coworkers at his Northern California radio station.
Chico police say officers responded to Results Radio along Manzanita Court on the morning of June 18 after getting reports that an employee at the station, later identified as 30-year-old Chico resident Kevin Leeson, had allegedly stabbed a coworker.
At the scene, officers say the stabbing victim was trapped in a back patio with the suspect still inside the building -- blocking the person from getting out. The rest of the staff had evacuated.
Police soon breached a fence at the back of the building and got to the stabbing victim, who was evaluated for minor injuries.
With Leeson still inside the station and not coming out, crisis negotiators were called to the scene.
Eventually, police say Leeson surrendered peacefully.
Detectives allege that Leeson intended to kill several of his coworkers, but the plan was thwarted by how quickly the other employees and Chico police responded to the situation. Police did not detail how they learned of Leeson's alleged plans.
Leeson has been arrested and booked into Butte County Jail. He's facing charges of attempted murder and assault with a deadly weapon.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Deceit, dishonesty, betrayal': The wrongful conviction that haunted Johnnie Cochran
He was an uncommonly dangerous man, in the FBI's eyes, a combat-toughened killer who had returned from Vietnam to wage war on the Establishment. "We are going to drive the pigs out of the community,' Elmer "Geronimo" Pratt, the 21-year-old leader of the Black Panther Party in Los Angeles, told a reporter in 1970. Pratt was stout, compact and level-eyed, with a raspy drawl bespeaking his childhood on the Louisiana bayou. He envisioned a violent end at the hands of police, whom he cast as an occupying army in African American neighborhoods. "The next time you see me, I might be dead.' When he went on trial in 1972 — on charges he murdered a white schoolteacher, execution-style, during a robbery — he insisted he was being framed. His defense attorney, a young Johnnie Cochran Jr., initially dismissed Pratt's talk as paranoia. But Cochran would later describe the case as 'a twilight zone of deceit, dishonesty, betrayal and official corruption.' Pratt's conviction kept him behind bars for 27 years, and the case haunted Cochran, who believed Pratt was innocent and who had made a mistake at trial that prosecutors skillfully exploited. In the authorities' war against perceived subversives, it would be years before it became clear how brazenly they had cheated. 'It looked on the surface like a really straightforward murder case,' said Stuart Hanlon, now 76, the radical San Francisco defense attorney who took up Pratt's appeal as a law student and pursued it doggedly for decades. The victim was Caroline Olsen, 27, who was with her husband on a Santa Monica tennis court in December 1968 when a pair of gunmen approached demanding money. The men ordered the couple to lie face down, then began opening fire. She was fatally wounded; her husband was struck but survived. The robbers got $18. The investigation stalled, and Pratt was not a suspect until 1970, when Julius "Julio' Butler, a beautician and former police officer, implicated him. Butler had been a Panther himself, and had resented Pratt's elevation as Los Angeles leader. The state's star witness, Butler testified that Pratt had dropped by his beauty shop and announced he was going on a 'mission' and later pointed to an article about the Santa Monica shooting to confirm it was his doing. Cochran asked Butler if he had ever been a police informant. Butler flatly denied it. Devastatingly for the defense, Olsen's widower pointed to the defendant and said: "That's the man who murdered my wife.' Cochran argued against the reliability of cross-racial witness identification, particularly under conditions of stress, and put on the stand a witness who had seen Pratt in the Bay Area around the time of the killing. He also put on Pratt, who had been decorated for heroism during two tours in Vietnam with the Army, and who showed what Cochran called a 'soldier's contempt' for whomever shot the helpless Olsen in the back. Cochran thought it was a winnable case, but he introduced an exhibit that backfired terribly. It was a Polaroid, given to him by Pratt's brother, who insisted it had been taken a week after the shooting. It showed Pratt with a beard, which contradicted the widower's initial description of the shooter as "a clean-shaven black man.' Prosecutors countered with a Polaroid employee who said the film had not even been manufactured until five months after the crime, a blow to the defense's credibility that left jurors doubting Pratt's other claims. It took jurors 10 days to find him guilty of first-degree murder. The sentence was 25 years to life. "You're wrong. I didn't kill that woman,' Pratt erupted. "You racist dogs.' Pratt spent the next eight years in solitary confinement. He was shuttled among prisons, and eventually allowed conjugal visits; his wife gave birth to two children. At a series of unsuccessful parole hearings, the panel waited for him to say he was sorry. He insisted he hadn't done it. 'The last person I killed,' he would say, 'was in Vietnam.' There was much the authorities had not shared with Pratt's defense team. They did not reveal that Olsen's widower had previously identified another man as the shooter. (The man had been in jail at the time and could not have done it.) Nor did they reveal the scope of the star witness' work as an informant for law enforcement officials. Based on FBI documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, Pratt's lawyers pieced together a picture of Butler's intimate involvement with the FBI, the Los Angeles Police Department and the L.A. County district attorney's office in dozens of cases. To FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, the Panthers had been the most dangerous group in the country, homegrown terrorists with stockpiles of weapons and alarming Maoist rhetoric. His secret COINTELPRO program was a campaign of spying, wiretaps and sabotage aimed at crushing perceived subversives and thwarting 'the coalition of militant black nationalist groups.' 'Geronimo was targeted by the FBI because he was a natural leader,' Hanlon said. As Hanlon pieced together documents, it became clear that Butler had been helping. Rejecting appeal after appeal, however, courts ruled that Butler had not been an informant — he had been 'a contact and nothing more,' according to one judge — and that Pratt did not deserve a new trial. He was still considered dangerous. 'If he chooses to set up a revolutionary organization upon his release from prison, it would certainly be easy for him to do so,' a prosecutor said at one parole hearing. 'He does have this network out there.' When defense lawyers brought their evidence to then-L.A. County Dist. Atty. Gil Garcetti in 1993, they presented it as a chance to undo the injustice his predecessors had sanctioned two decades earlier. But Garcetti's review dragged on for years, and the attorneys turned again to the courts. This time, the courts granted a hearing. Because the L.A. County Superior Court bench was recused — the original prosecutor was now an L.A. County judge and a probable witness — the case was transferred to Orange County Superior Court. For Pratt's supporters, this provoked a chill. What hope did they have in a staunchly conservative county? But Judge Everett Dickey surprised them. "It's clear that this is not a typical case," Dickey said. "It cries out for resolution.' This time, Pratt's team was armed with evidence never heard at the original trial. They had the testimony of a retired FBI agent who supported Pratt's claim that he had been in Oakland during the killing. They knew that the D.A.'s office had allowed Butler to plead no contest to four felonies in exchange for probation, around the time he testified against Pratt. And they had an index card, recently discovered by one of Garcetti's investigators in the office files, that listed Butler as a D.A. informant. It was filed under B; it had been there all along. "It had never been turned over to the defense. How could they have not turned this over?' Garcetti said in a recent interview. 'I couldn't find anyone who would fess up to the fact that, 'Yeah, we had that document in the files.'' Still, Garcetti's prosecutors downplayed the card's importance. Butler was not an informant, they argued vehemently, but merely a 'source.' In late 1996, Cochran finally got a chance to confront Butler. He had waited years. Butler had become an attorney and an official at a prominent Los Angeles church. He insisted he had been merely a 'liaison' between law enforcement and the Panthers. Cochran asked him his definition of informant. He admitted he had told the FBI that Pratt had a submachine gun. He said his definition of an informant was someone who supplied accurate information. "So under your own definition, you were informing to the FBI?" Cochran asked. "You could say that," Butler said. Dickey threw out Pratt's conviction, concluding that Butler had lied and that prosecutors had hidden evidence that could have led to Pratt's acquittal. Pratt was released on bail in June 1997, to the cheers of his supporters. "The greatest moment of my legal career,' Cochran called it. Pratt flew home to Morgan City, La., 'to see my mama and my homefolks,' he said. "It wasn't easy getting here.' He said he wanted to hear rain on the tin roof of his childhood home. Pratt's legal ordeal was not over, however. Garcetti appealed, saying he had found no evidence pointing to Pratt's innocence. He did not drop the case until an appeals court sided with Pratt in February 1999. The following year, Pratt won $4.5 million in a false-imprisonment lawsuit against the city of L.A. and the FBI. He bought a farmhouse in Imbaseni, Tanzania, where he enjoyed the companionship of Pete O'Neal, a former Black Panther who had fled the U.S. in 1970. O'Neal found him dead at home in May 2011. Pratt had been hospitalized with high blood pressure, a condition that had plagued him for years, but had torn out his IVs and gone home. He hated confinement. He was 63. "We always say, 'The system works,' but no, the system only produced the right result because Geronimo and the community and a band of lawyers fought the system. The system doesn't work by itself,' said Mark Rosenbaum, one of the lawyers who helped with Pratt's appeal. "They took away half of his life. And they couldn't break him.' So, who killed Caroline Olsen? Hanlon believes the killers were other Black Panthers — a pair of heroin addicts known to feed their habit with armed robbery. They died violently in the 1970s, one by gunfire, the other impaled on a fence during a burglary. In a recent interview, Garcetti, one of the defense team's primary antagonists for years, said that his views on the case have evolved. In retrospect, he regrets fighting to keep it alive. "He was more likely framed than he was the person who actually committed the crime,' Garcetti said. Since leaving office, he said, he has learned more about the U.S. government's tactics against disfavored groups in the 1960s and '70s. 'I have read enough to know the FBI, from the top down, were working to isolate any quote-unquote leader in the Black Panther movement, and it wouldn't shock me to learn that they went after people who really hadn't committed a crime that they were bent on removing from the scene." Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Knife crime expert's key advice to parents as kids 'terrified everyone is carrying a weapon'
Birmingham kids are terrified of other young people and carry knives in a misguided fear 'everyone their age is armed', a knife crime expert explained. Fuelling this idea, in part, is the social media content and music videos these children can be exposed to, desensitising them to violence and stabbings regularly posted online. Other youths, particularly in deprived areas, may be turning to robberies in a bid to secure money, or a lifestyle they otherwise feel is out of reach, says Natasha Pope. Read more: Reality of Birmingham knife crime as 'kids kill kids' and children groomed into life of crime with 'trainers and fast cash' And these problems come amid trust issues with police too, with some youths reluctant to seek help in the event of a confrontation - falsely believing it's better to defend themselves. For parents, understanding these key issues impacting young people here in 2025 is vital, suggests expert Natasha Pope. She spoke to BirminghamLive as part of our Deep Cuts project - a wider look at the problem of knife crime which you can read in full here. A mum to two teenage boys herself, she's currently heading-up research into knife crime and serious youth violence - which will later help inform the police approach of the best way forward. "Young people are very, very scared of other young people, a lot of that's to do with this anticipation that they're going to come to harm directly," says Natasha, who has previously worked with West Midlands Police. "They do believe that all people their age are carrying knives. So it's fuelling this misconception that: 'Everybody else is carrying so I need to do something to protect and defend myself.'" Music videos online and social media posts - such as stabbings or youths posing with knives - also fuel the fears everyone is armed. But in reality, research suggests it's more like four per cent of young people carrying weapons. "If young people are consistently exposed to social media inputs, it can also increase the fear or perception that young people are carrying a knife," she says, "or that there's a very strong likelihood of this perhaps befalling them. "Again it's a desensitisation as well, not only it's a risk it could be normalising it, but also potentially desensitising them to this. They see what happens online and it almost becomes a script - seeing someone has a knife and thinking 'they could use it against me'. "It's what they're exposed to, seeing things online, all the discussions they're privy to, all this kind of reinforces that it is a problem, For young people, if we look at music videos, it's what they're involved in and exposed to in their environments." Research shows young people between the ages of 10-14 are more influenced by peers than their own parents. "If they're involved or affiliated with anti social friends then there is that increased risk as well," she went on. A lack of strong relationships, or trust with police is also perpetuating the problem. She continued: "They don't trust the police to actually be there to support them, first of all if an incident is happening as it's going to take the police time to respond and get to that event. "Secondly, they have this mindset or thought that if they carry a knife, they're able to defend themselves in the immediate moment." For under 25s in particular, it's argued they lack this "consequential or long term thought", she adds. Anti-police narratives too, especially during the pandemic, have only exacerbated negativity towards officers. "They are very reluctant to seek help and when you link that in with youth services, they don't have a youth worker as a middle person to really go to," she says. For youths in Birmingham the outlook is particularly bleak, with council spending far less per head than the national average. Kids here have just £11 per person, compared with the healthier sum of £34pp across England. - where else has £34? To top it off, the bankrupt council's spending on young people's services has fallen by 57 per cent in real terms since 2019/20 - dropping from £7.5 million (adjusted for inflation) to £3.2 million in 2024/25. Our investigation found there were 3,450 knife crime offences in Birmingham last year, the largest proportion of these were Robbery of Personal Property, 35.8% of offences. "If young people are living in very deprived communities, they may not feel they have another way out," says Natasha, offering a possible explanation for the increase in robberies. "Or there may not be another way for them to actually obtain these resources or money for example. They will perhaps use these means as a way of achieving that." Ensure young people have a safe space to share fears Open up a 'two-way' conversation Be empathetic Understand the pressures and challenges for young people Asked her advice, for speaking to our children around knife crime, she suggests: "It's about having a more empathetic conversation, understanding the pressures and challenges their young person is facing or what they're engaging in, their friendship groups. "Making sure that young person feels it's a safe space to confide in and share their feelings and concerns. "It's about opening up the conversation and not making them so overly concerned and worried about how their parents are going to react, as that could deter them from coming forward." This piece forms part of our Deep Cuts investigation, a three-month investigation into knife crime in the West Midlands, which can be read in full here. BirminghamLive has contacted Birmingham city council for a response on the youth cuts data.
News24
an hour ago
- News24
Police task team rescues kidnapped man in Germiston, two arrested
A 30-year-old kidnapping victim was rescued in Germiston during a police operation on Friday Sharon Seretlo/Gallo Images Be among those who shape the future with knowledge. Uncover exclusive stories that captivate your mind and heart with our FREE 14-day subscription trial. Dive into a world of inspiration, learning, and empowerment. You can only trial once. Start your FREE trial now Show Comments ()
