Uganda targeting LGBTQ community with hatred and violence: HRW
In a report released on Monday, Human Rights Watch (HRW) said Ugandan authorities have 'perpetrated widespread discrimination and violence' and 'spread misinformation and hatred against LGBT people' since the 2023 law was enacted.
The 2023 Anti-Homosexuality Act made consensual same-sex relations punishable by up to life imprisonment and 'aggravated homosexuality' punishable by death.
As the legislation took effect, rights groups and international partners condemned the law and withdrew funding.
The HRW report says the government has followed up the legislation with a campaign of persecution, detailing widespread police abuse, including harassment, extortion, and arbitrary arrests based on perceived or actual sexual orientation or gender identity.
HRW found that the law has ramped up already existing abuse and discrimination against LGBTQ people to unprecedented heights. The report also detailed the rights violations enabled by the law and the devastating effect it has had on the lives of LGBTQ people, activists, allies, and their families in Uganda.
During the months leading up to and following the law being passed, the Ugandan authorities, including high-profile political and government figures, used traditional and social media to spread misinformation and hatred against LGBTQ people, the report notes, leading to an uptick in attacks and harassment against them and LGBTQ rights groups.
'For the last two years, LGBT Ugandans have suffered a range of abuses because of the government's willful decision to legislate hate against them,' said Oryem Nyeko, senior Africa researcher at HRW.
'The Ugandan authorities need to urgently improve this environment, which enables a wide range of human rights violations and puts countless Ugandans at serious risk of abuse.'
The interviewees reported a surge in threatening messages.
'People would keep on calling you [saying]: 'We know where you stay. We know what you do,'' one told HRW.
Another activist described how online threats escalated until three men broke into her home in 2023, attacking her and sexually assaulting her friend.
She told HRW that one assailant said: 'You make me ashamed to be Ankole. If we want, we can kill you and no one will look for you.'' Ankole is one of Uganda's main ethnic groups.
Other Ugandan rights groups have reported similar patterns since the law's passage.
Within 24 hours of its enactment, eight cases of physical and sexual violence, including corrective rape, were identified, according to Kampala-based DefendDefenders.
'The number of requests [for assistance] is overwhelming,' a staff member told HRW.
Prominent LGBTQ organisations were also targeted, according to the report, including through group bans, staff arrests, and harassment of lawyers representing queer clients.
HRW contacted government, legal, and police authorities but received no response.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
8 minutes ago
- New York Times
Jewel Thais-Williams, Whose Nightclub Celebrated ‘Queer Black Joy,' Dies at 86
Jewel Thais-Williams, who turned her Los Angeles night club, Jewel's Catch One, into a glittering sanctuary for the city's Black L.G.B.T.Q. community, persevering through police raids, pushback from local bigots and a devastating fire, died on July 7. She was 86. Her death, in a hospital, was confirmed by her friend Jasmyne Cannick, who organizes the annual South L.A. Pride celebration. She did not specify where Ms. Thais-Williams died or state the cause. Ms. Thais-Williams opened Jewel's Catch One in 1973 as an antidote to West Hollywood gay clubs that had denied entry to Black clientele or demanded that they provide multiple forms of identification, a discriminating practice that was common at the time. As her disco's profile rose, it became a cornerstone of Black gay nightlife and joined the ranks of the country's most revered clubs. By some accounts it made Ms. Thais-Williams the first Black lesbian to own a bar in the United States. Everyone was welcome at The Catch, as it was known to locals. Revelers of all skin colors and sexualities, decked out in sequins, leather and even jockstraps, streamed in nightly. Megastars like Donna Summer, Sylvester and Chaka Khan performed under shimmering lights, and celebrities like Sharon Stone and Janet Jackson blended with the crowd, knowing that the 'paparazzi wasn't coming,' as Ms. Thais-Williams told The Los Angeles Times in 2018. (In fact, the club had a no-camera policy for many years.) Madonna, too, became an evangelist, throwing an album release party at Catch One in 2000 that featured male exotic dancers in Swarovski crystal-encrusted codpieces. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
The Hill
37 minutes ago
- The Hill
As Congo moves toward peace, US aid vanishes
After decades of brutal conflict, I was encouraged by President Trump's recent announcement of a new peace agreement in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Joined in the Oval Office by the foreign ministers of Rwanda and Congo, he outlined a plan to end a war that had killed 7,000 people in just the first two months of this year, with hundreds of thousands more displaced. It was a welcome surprise — and a necessary start. I have seen the cost of this conflict up close. In 2016, I boarded a United Nations helicopter headed to a rural village along the Rwanda-Congo border. The only thing standing between the villagers and a looming militia attack was a ring of U.N. peacekeepers. As we prepared to depart, a woman approached and begged me to take her with us. She was terrified that the peacekeepers would leave. That moment has never left me. Today, the U.N. peacekeeping mission in Congo is still the only line of defense for thousands of civilians caught in the crossfire. With more than 13,500 total personnel on the ground, the mission is being pushed to the brink as the Rwandan-backed M23 rebel movement sweeps across eastern Congo, seizing major cities like Goma. But between the combatants and the civilians, U.N. peacekeepers remain in place, still doing their job. That job just got harder — and more important. The peace agreement announced in Washington sets a 30-day deadline for a regional security framework and a 90-day deadline for economic integration. In theory, the Congolese government will demobilize the Rwandan-aligned Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda militia, while Rwandan troops withdraw from Congolese territory. But diplomacy is only one piece of the puzzle. That's where the U.N. peacekeeping mission comes in. Peace on paper means little without implementation. The U.N.'s top diplomat in the region, Bintou Keita of Guinea, is well positioned to pressure all sides to follow through. And the peacekeeping mission — with its deep local presence and relationships — will be critical to brokering trust, verifying compliance and responding quickly to any resurgence of violence. In fact, it already is. In June, the U.N. helped facilitate a cease-fire in Ituri Province, signed by six armed groups — a quiet but meaningful victory. This was an important step in quelling violence from other rebel factions operating in eastern Congo, including the Ugandan Allied Democratic Force, with ties to both regional and international Islamic terrorist networks. Still, critics have long called for the U.N. peacekeeping mission's closure. At nearly $1 billion annually, it is one of the U.N.'s most expensive missions. Its mandate is sprawling. The Congolese government has also called for a drawdown of forces. That process is already underway, with South Kivu formally returning to Congolese control in April 2024. But a joint U.N.-Congolese review last fall showed that key security benchmarks remain unmet. Military units lack readiness. Courts are understaffed. Demobilization efforts are lagging. Pulling funding now would be like taking the parachute off a skydiver mid-descent. Yet that's exactly what's happening. On Capitol Hill, lawmakers passed a White House rescissions package that slashed funds for U.N peacekeeping, including efforts in the Congo. The cuts bypassed the normal appropriations process, raising alarm on both sides of the aisle. Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) called it 'an illegal end-run around Congress.' Others warned it sets a dangerous precedent — gutting foreign policy programs without legislative oversight. The strategic stakes are enormous. China has steadily increased its funding and troop contributions to U.N. peacekeeping, positioning itself as a global security stakeholder. If the U.S. walks away from missions like the U.N. peacekeeping mission in Congo — especially in a resource-rich region where rare earth minerals are shaping the geopolitics of the future — it risks ceding both influence and credibility. Moreover, withdrawing now would all but guarantee a wider humanitarian disaster as refugees flood into Congo's nine bordering nations. Armed factions, as history shows, are rarely far behind — exporting conflict across Central Africa. Peacekeeping isn't just about boots on the ground. It is about presence. In remote villages and war-torn cities, blue helmets are often the only sign that the international community is still watching — that someone will step in when the government cannot, when the militias return and when peace starts to fray. Earlier this year, Office of Management and Budget officials defended rescissions as a cost-saving measure. But what's the cost of failure in Congo? What's the cost of walking away from a peace process the U.S. helped broker? The woman at the border that day didn't know the name of the mission. She didn't care about budgets or congressional procedures. She just knew that those in blue offered safety. Peacekeeping isn't charity, it's strategy. It offers unparalleled legitimacy, shares the burden with allies and costs far less than war. And at $1.50 per American per year, it remains one of the most cost-effective investments in global stability the U.S. can make. The president is understandably proud of the peace agreement the U.S. brokered. Support of U.N. peacekeeping is one way to help it succeed.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
LGBTQ+ mental health hotline shuts down
WASHINGTON (NEXSTAR) — The LGBTQ-specific part of the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline shut down Thursday following a directive from the Trump administration, drawing bipartisan criticism from lawmakers and mental health advocates who warn the move endangers lives. The specialized LGBTQ+ line, launched in 2022, offered targeted support for individuals in crisis and had fielded more than 1.2 million calls, texts, and chats since its debut. 'There's more than a million of those moments where someone thought it would be better if they weren't here, and they had someone to call,' said Rep. Sharice Davids (D-Kan.). The Trump administration eliminated resources for diversity, equity and inclusion programs, including this crisis line. 'It's been very successful,' said Rep. Paul Tonko (D-N.Y.). 'And President Trump has determined to put politics ahead of care, ahead of saving lives.' According to the Trevor Project, about 40 percent of LGBTQ youth seriously considered suicide in the past year. Those with access to affirming mental health services like the 988 line were significantly less likely to attempt it. Even some Republicans, such as Rep. Mike Lawler (N.Y.), are urging the Department of Health and Human Services to restore the LGBTQ+ line. 'To me, this is about saving lives,' said Lawler. 'It is about preventing suicide. And it's something all of us as Americans should be unified on.' Lawmakers say the shutdown not only strips away critical mental health support but also sends a harmful message to vulnerable communities. 'Whether you are part of the LGBTQ community, whether someone in your family is or you have friends that are, every single one of us should be concerned about that,' Davids said. Lawmakers have sent a letter urging HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to immediately reverse the shutdown. As of now, the agency has not announced any changes.
