
Bombshell report suggests ‘Chinese spies' infiltrated Stanford University
The report, published by the Stanford Review , tells the story of a Stanford student working on sensitive research at the school – and given the name 'Anna' to protect her identity – receiving unexpected messages from a man with the alias Charles Chen asking about seemingly harmless topics like networking opportunities.
Those messages soon took a 'strange turn,' according to the outlet when Chen's questions became more personal, asking Anna if she spoke Mandarin, encouraging her to visit Beijing on a trip he would pay for, and referencing details she had never disclosed to him.
Charles advised Anna on how to enter China briefly enough to avoid visa scrutiny from authorities, told her to only communicate through the CCP-monitored WeChat and told her to delete screenshots.
'Under the guidance of experts familiar with espionage tactics, Anna contacted authorities,' the article explains.
7 A report from the Stanford Review, a student newspaper at Stanford University, claims spies from the Chinese Communist Party have infiltrated the school.
Getty Images
'Their investigation revealed that Charles Chen had no affiliation with Stanford. Instead, he had posed as a Stanford student for years, slightly altering his name and persona online, targeting multiple students, nearly all of them women researching China-related topics. According to the experts on China who assisted Anna, Charles Chen was likely an agent of the Chinese Ministry of State Security (MSS), tasked with identifying sympathetic Stanford students and gathering intelligence.'
Fox News Digital spoke to students involved in the article who explained that there are three major takeaways from the findings of the report.
7 'He had posed as a Stanford student for years, slightly altering his name and persona online, targeting multiple students, nearly all of them women researching China-related topics,' the article said.
Getty Images
'Number one, what we saw was a full apparatus for extracting information so they would hit the students they wanted, then two, they would administer loyalty tests and three they would demand the information be sent back,' one of the students said.
In some cases, if the students refuse to provide information to the CCP, their parents are threatened back home and sometimes interrogated by police, according to the students who spoke to some Chinese international students.
'To be very clear, what they said is that every Chinese international student at any time can be asked by the CCP to disclose their research information,' Fox News Digital was told.
7 According to the students who spoke to some Chinese international students, their parents were threatened back home if the students did not provide information.
REUTERS
'So what that looks like is, potentially weekly calls with the Chinese ambassador back in China, where they will explain what research they're doing and if it is particularly sensitive technologies like AI and robotics. This is where the majority of the CCP targeting is happening. They'll ask them to send back not just public information, they'll also send back internal lab reports, future directions of the research, recorded conversations with the professor, the methodologies, the other participants in the research, particularly if they're Chinese international students so they can look for other ones.'
The Stanford Review story points out that the House Select Committee on China sent a letter to Stanford last year warning of the risks that China poses to STEM research.
The article also explained how concerns about a Chinese spy presence in China have 'quietly persisted' for 'years' and claimed that several people who were contacted were too afraid to speak publicly.
7 The story acknowledges that the House Select Committee on China sent a letter to the school last year warning of the risks that China poses to STEM research.
AP
'One student who experienced espionage firsthand was too fearful to recount their story, even via encrypted messaging,' the article states.
''The risk is too high,' they explained. 'Transnational repression, $64 million in Chinese funding , and allegations of racial profiling have contributed to a pervasive culture of silence at Stanford and beyond.'
The authors of the article, after interviewing dozens of people in and around the university, summed up their findings by saying, 'The CCP is orchestrating a widespread intelligence-gathering campaign at Stanford.'
'In short, 'there are Chinese spies at Stanford.''
Fox News Digital spoke to former California GOP Congressman Michelle Steel about the report, and she explained that hundreds of millions of dollars are pouring in from China to prestigious universities. She called the situation 'very dangerous.'
'President Trump is totally right,' Steel said. 'China is the biggest threat to all other industries, but especially universities.'
7 'President Trump is totally right,' Congressman Michelle Steel said. 'China is the biggest threat to all other industries, but especially universities.'
via REUTERS
Hudson Institute senior fellow Michael Sobolik, who recently published an article urging the U.S. to 'stop giving Beijing an advantage through TikTok,' told Fox News Digital that 'sunlight is the best disinfectant' in this situation.
'If Stanford is worried about foreign espionage and coercion on its campus – and it should be – then its leadership will need to call it out publicly,' Sobolik said.
'Thus far, woke politics have deterred Stanford from speaking out. That's insane, and it rebounds to Beijing's benefit. The CCP is one of the most racist political organizations in the world, and it hides behind the Chinese people as a shield,' he continued. 'If Americans are afraid to call the party out, we implicitly advance the CCP's narrative that there's no difference between the Chinese people and the CCP.'
7 'If Stanford is worried about foreign espionage and coercion on its campus – and it should be – then its leadership will need to call it out publicly,' Hudson Institute senior fellow Michael Sobolik said.
Getty Images
In a statement, Stanford University said it 'takes its commitment to national security with the utmost seriousness, and we are acutely aware of the threats posed by the Chinese Communist Party to all research universities.'
'Stanford has rigorous policies and processes in place to ensure that research by its faculty and students is conducted in a manner that safeguards America's interests. Stanford does not conduct classified or secret research,' the statement continued. 'Stanford has a university-wide process for reporting threats to research security, and carefully assesses all reports. Stanford consults with federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies to ensure our policies and procedures are rigorous and protect national security.'
The university added that it is 'looking into' the Stanford Review report and has reached out to federal law enforcement, adding that it is 'very important to distinguish between threats posed by the Chinese Communist Party, and Chinese and Chinese-American faculty and students who are at Stanford to learn and contribute to the generation of knowledge, and are valued members of our community.'
7 The university said it is 'looking into' the report and has reached out to federal law enforcement.
Getty Images
Steel and the Stanford students told Fox News Digital that while it is important not to generalize and make assumptions about all Chinese students, it is the students from China who are ultimately the victims in this situation as they are coerced and sometimes punished by the CCP.
'We really have to protect these innocent students, innocent Chinese Americans, but at the same time we really have to vet those students coming in or anybody, even diplomats, they're coming in, we really have to vet them,' Steel said.
Fox News Digital reached out to the Chinese embassy in Washington, D.C., for comment on the report and received a statement denying the allegations.
'The above reports are full of false information, delusional speculation, political lies and ideological prejudice,' spokesperson Liu Pengyu said. 'China is strongly dissatisfied with and firmly opposes this.'
'China-US educational cooperation has not only expanded the channels for students of the two countries and enhanced the understanding between the two peoples, but also promoted the economic prosperity and scientific and technological innovation of the United States, which is in the interests of both sides,' the statement continued.
'We urge the US to stop generalizing national security, stop slandering Chinese students, and stop stigmatizing, politicizing and instrumentalizing normal educational exchanges. Effectively protect the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese students studying abroad, and do not take discriminatory and restrictive measures against Chinese students.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
ComEd CEO seeks rules to prevent AI from boosting energy bills
The head of Chicago's biggest energy supplier has called for new rules to curb the impact of the artificial intelligence boom on consumers' electricity bills. Commonwealth Edison Co. has proposed modifications to tariffs that include higher deposits for data centers, according to Chief Executive Officer Gil Quiniones. He also wants data centers to post collateral in case 'loads and revenues do not materialize as planned.' 'What really needs to happen is to make sure that we're not shifting costs due to data centers powered by AI to all the other customers,' Quiniones said in the interview Wednesday. Concerns are growing about the impact on ordinary consumers from the massive build-out of AI-related infrastructure. The boom is spurring the largest increase in US electricity demand in decades, but power suppliers struggling to keep pace. Quiniones spoke at the Global Quantum Forum in Chicago, where utility executives including ComEd's owner, Exelon Corp., and Southern Co. also addressed the issue. Southern's CEO Chris Womack said Americans will revolt if they end up on the hook for soaring power costs associated with AI. Earlier this week, the operator of the largest US grid offered more evidence of how power prices are being bid higher. The outcome of an electricity auction Tuesday meant businesses and households served by PJM Interconnection LLC will spend a record $16.1 billion to ensure power supplies in the year starting June 2026. The region supplied by PJM includes Chicago. Prices would have been even higher if Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro hadn't sued to place a cap on increases, Exelon CEO Calvin Butler said during a panel discussion. 'When you look at the prices that came out yesterday, they're only going to continue to increase,' Butler said. 'Policy is very important, because we have to get this right. And I wish I could tell you today that we have an answer for the short term.' The growth of quantum computing in Illinois alongside the AI and data centers boom needs to be closely watched, Quiniones also said. While quantum computing is less energy-intensive than AI, Chicago's quantum and microelectronics park, a project spearheaded by Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, has already attracted more than $1 billion in investment from companies including PsiQuantum Corp., International Business Machines Corp. and Infleqtion. 'For now, we are a state that exports power,' Quiniones said. 'We need to be very, very closely monitoring this, working with PJM and our regulators in the state to make sure that we make appropriate additions in the future, not only in generation capacity, but investment on the transmission system.'

Wall Street Journal
2 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
The Pentagon Gets Serious About Drones
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently put out a video unveiling drone deregulation for the U.S. military, and the Trump crowd loves a good show. But the Pentagon's play is welcome and crucial for preparing American forces for a future fight. 'Drones are the biggest battlefield innovation in a generation, accounting for most of this year's casualties in Ukraine,' Mr. Hegseth's memo this month says. 'Our adversaries produce millions of cheap drones each year.' Anyone awake to the Ukraine war knows drones dominate the front lines, and Russia is churning out copies with a heavy assist from Chinese parts.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tariffs will drive up U.S. prices even with Trump trade deals, experts say
The new normal for U.S. tariffs on foreign goods starts at 15%. Even as President Trump seeks to forge new terms of trade with Japan, the European Union and other global economic partners, he is raising the floor for tariffs to their highest level in decades. Speaking at an AI summit on Wednesday, Mr. Trump said "we'll have a straight, simple tariff of anywhere between 15% and 50%," conditioning the lower rate on countries opening their economies to the U.S. The White House has said sharply higher tariffs could take effect on dozens of countries as soon as Aug. 1 unless they ink new trade deals. The Trump administration has a separate negotiating timeline with China, which faces an Aug. 12 deadline for an agreement. As these new rules of international commerce take shape, companies across a range of industries are emphasizing that higher tariffs translate into higher operational costs — and higher prices for consumers. For example, Nestlé on Thursday said it was considering hiking prices for candy bars and other products as tariffs threaten to eat into the food company's profit margins. The same day, Italian fashion brand Moncler said it has already hiked prices for its apparel to offset additional tariff-related costs. And General Electric said this week that proposed U.S. tariffs, should they take effect, would cost the company around $500 million in 2025, noting that it would move to offset those taxes through "cost controls and pricing actions." Orange juice importer Johanna Foods has gone a step further, this week filing a lawsuit against the Trump administration over its proposed 50% tariff on Brazil, which the New Jersey company said would seriously hurt its business and force it to hike product prices by up to 25%. The White House disputes that higher U.S. tariffs will drive up costs for businesses and consumers. "The administration has consistently maintained that the cost of tariffs will be borne by foreign exporters who rely on access to the American economy, the world's biggest and best consumer market," White House spokesman Kush Desai told CBS MoneyWatch in a statement. Desai also pointed to a recent analysis by the White House's Council of Economic Advisers that he said shows import prices falling this year. Price hikes not "instantaneous" Economists warn that consumers should brace for higher prices on a range of goods, from leather products and clothing to electronics and automobiles, later this year. "Up to now there has been only limited passthrough from tariffs into final consumer prices, but we still expect the impact to gradually mount in the second half of this year," Paul Ashworth, chief North America economist with Capital Economics, told investors in a research note. "Now that the Trump administration is concluding deals that would see the tariff rate facing most trading partners settling at between 15% and 20%, with even higher rates levied on Chinese imports, we suspect retailers will be forced to finally raise the prices paid by consumers." Inflation in the early part of 2025 remained fairly contained. That's because many companies and consumers accelerated their purchases of imported goods to avoid the risk of paying more if, or when, steep new tariffs take effect. Meanwhile, in the short-term, sharply higher prices are unlikely across the board, according to trade experts. "When you open up the hood of that, it's not going to be even across all categories of spending," Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Budget Lab at Yale, told CBS MoneyWatch. "It's categories of spending where we import more that are going to be more sensitive to tariffs." But over the longer term, an increased baseline tariff, coupled wtih higher levies on individual countries, is projected to drive up U.S. prices by 2% over the next two years, according to an analysis from the Yale Budget Lab. "This isn't an instantaneous, 'We wake up the next morning and the world is different,'" Tedeschi added. But as the new U.S. tariff regime becomes embedded in global supply chains, some import-heavy product categories could see especially sharp price increases, he said. Specifically, foreign-made leather shoes and handbags, along with apparel, could see prices spike by at least 40%, while the cost of electronics could jump more than 20%, according to the Yale Budget Lab. Johnson says Jeffrey Epstein files controversy is not a hoax Idaho murders documents released after Bryan Kohberger is sentenced to life in prison The Sentencing of Bryan Kohberger | "48 Hours" Podcast