‘Fairness': Major change outlaws ticketless parking fines in NSW
The Minns Labor government has announced a return to ticketed parking fines, ending what it refers to as 'years of an unfair system', where drivers could be issued a parking fine but not be notified until weeks after the offence.
The ticketless system was implemented by the Coalition in 2020, and quickly saw a significant rise in the number of fines issued.
The reforms will reinstate the old-school on-the-spot ticketing system which will require parking officers to physically attach a parking fine or notification to the vehicle.
There will also be a requirement for the driver of the vehicle to be notified of the fine no longer than seven days after the offence takes place.
NSW Finance Minister Courtney Houssos said the new system would ensure people would no longer be 'caught by a surprise parking ticket weeks later'.
'Our commonsense changes bring fairness and transparency back to the system' she said.
'Motorists will once again benefit from on-the-spot notifications. New requirements that motorists are provided with photos of the offence will assist them if they wish to object to a fine.'
NRMA Spokesperson Peter Khoury said the organisation welcomed the removal of ticketless parking fines in NSW, and commended the state government 'for listening to motorists and making this commonsense reform'.
'Transparency matters. People deserve to know when and why they're being fined – and to have a fair chance to challenge if needed,' he said.
'The Government has worked through the issues, consulted widely, and come to an appropriate solution. Today is a great day for NSW motorists.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
31 minutes ago
- ABC News
Here's what the Qantas cyber attack may mean for your data and what to do to protect yourself
Cybersecurity experts are warning Qantas customers to remain vigilant to scams and hacking attempts in coming days, after as many as 6 million Australians were caught up in a data breach. Qantas has revealed it came under attack by cybercriminals on Monday and is continuing to investigate exactly how many customer records were stolen, of the millions on the platform that was breached. Here's what we know about the data accessed, how it could be used by cybercriminals and what you can do to protect yourself in the wake of the incident. Qantas says a cybercriminal targeted a call centre and then gained access to a third-party customer servicing platform. The airline has outlined the data stolen: it includes some customers' names, email addresses, phone numbers, birth dates and frequent flyer numbers. "Importantly, credit card details, personal financial information and passport details are not held in this system," the airline's statement reads. Qantas said the system that was accessed contains the records of 6 million customers. It said it would contact all of those who were potentially affected. On Wednesday, a message was sent to Qantas Frequent Flyer members, noting: "For those customers whose information has been potentially compromised, you will receive further communication from us shortly." So, essentially, watch this space if you are a Qantas customer. Tony Jarvis, the chief information security officer at cybersecurity firm Darktrace, told The Business that personal data had different values when sold on the dark web, depending on the nature of the data. As of Wednesday evening, Mr Jarvis couldn't detect any data from the Qantas breach for sale on the dark web but said he would continue to monitor the situation. He advises Qantas customers to stay across updates from the airline in case further details of the type of data compromised are released. Qantas has established customer support lines and says it will also maintain a dedicated page on its website to keep customers updated. The biggest risk for people now is that their data is used to attempt fraud, target scams or, in the worst-case scenario, steal their identity. Personal details can be used to add weight to impersonation scams — for example, pretending to be a company or agency someone has an account with. He therefore warns Qantas customers to be vigilant about handing over extra details, like credit card information or bank details, to people claiming to be from government agencies or companies. "Then it becomes a financial loss," he added. Cybercrime specialist Richard Buckland agrees that further scam attempts remain one of the biggest concerns from the Qantas breach. The data could also be used to try and hack into accounts on other services. If you use the same email address across many online profiles, stolen information such as your date of birth, address or phone number could be used to try and gain access to other accounts and even financial records. "The information that's been stolen is used by lots of companies to identify them," Professor Buckland, from UNSW, said. In previous cybersecurity incidents involving major Australian companies including Medibank and Optus, there were also concerns that people's personal information could be sold on the dark web to carry out further identity theft. In Medibank's case, the data hacked was so sensitive in nature — with personal healthcare records accessed — that it also led to grave concerns for people's individual wellbeing and ransom demands against Medibank. Both Professor Buckland and Professor De Silva note that such sensitive information hasn't been reported as accessed in the Qantas hack. If you're a member of the Qantas loyalty program, you might be wondering if your points are at risk. Qantas has listed frequent flyer numbers as among the data compromised, but says "no frequent flyer accounts were compromised". However, Professor Buckland warns those accounts could be targeted in subsequent hacking attempts, given membership numbers are among the data breached. "It's quite possible this could be used to log into the frequent flyer system by claiming you've lost a password and trying to do some sort of password reset," he said. Airline loyalty commentator Adele Eliseo notes that loyalty balances are extremely valuable, describing them as a financial asset. "Frequent flyer numbers are more than membership references. They are the gateway to accessing points with tangible financial value, and when linked with personal information, they expose account holders to significant vulnerability," she said. She encourages people to log in to their accounts often in coming weeks and months and check for any unusual activity, and consider two-factor authentication. The consensus among the cyber experts we spoke to? An oldie but a goodie — change your passwords. "Then just watching it closely. Presumably, if someone does go in and steal those points or it uses them for things, Qantas is able to reimburse that, so I think it's just a matter of noticing that that's happened." Professor De Silva says people should think about resetting passwords and make them as secure as possible, including by using password generation software that encrypts codes. "This is something we should be doing regularly," he said. Darktrace's Mr Jarvis warns people to avoid clicking on links in emails purporting to be from Qantas, as companies that have experienced cyber attacks are often impersonated in their wake. Professor De Silva also says there is a risk that people's credit card details have been stored along with their frequent flyer accounts, and that this information could now be accessed too. In this instance, he thinks people should take the "extreme measure" to cancel their credit card, "to be on the safe side".
The Australian
31 minutes ago
- The Australian
Editorial. Yoorrook justice report will fail for same reason as Voice to parliament
It will fail for the reason the voice to parliament was rejected by the Australian people at the 2023 referendum. A decisive majority demonstrated no appetite for denying, as the national anthem puts it, that 'we are one and free'. As prime minister Kevin Rudd put it in the 2008 apology to the Stolen Generations, 'profound grief, suffering and loss (were inflicted) on these our fellow Australians'. There is also a sleight of hand in the report, making the case that the memory of the destruction of cultures weighs so hard on Indigenous Australians now that a parallel government is needed to lift their burden. The commission presents 100 recommendations, many focused on symbolism that will do nothing to reduce Indigenous imprisonment or improve health and housing, employment and education. Despite this, Rueben Berg, co-chairman of the First Peoples' Assembly of Victoria, said on Tuesday: 'When it comes to issues facing First Peoples, we need a different approach, one that draws on the expertise of First Peoples to design and deliver practical solutions to local challenges. That's what treaty is all about.' It is also exactly what the Coalition of Peaks is doing without a political assembly. The 80 or so grassroots community organisations that make up the Peaks work on the federal government's Closing the Gap program and are 'accountable to our communities, not governments … we know how to best advance our lives'. Ideologues who cannot accept the voice result may not like it, but the Peaks approach is politically practical while the Yoorrook commission's call for 'the transition to genuine nation-to-nation relationships' is not. As for those of its recommendations that call for specific improvements to the lives of Indigenous Australians, they are all matters for government now. Indigenous Australians in Victoria working to build careers and set their children up for long and happy lives are entitled to all the assistance government provides. They have a right to see their cultures respected and their histories acknowledged. And Premier Jacinta Allan knows it, responding with a back-covering 'we share the Yoorrook Justice Commission's goals of truth and justice and will carefully consider the commission's final findings and recommendations'. The history of settler society is far more nuanced than appears in the commission report; British governments were not indifferent to the rights of Indigenous Australians. It is incontestable that the arrival of 19th-century settlers was a calamity for millennia-old Australian economies and cultures. But the Yoorrook Justice Commission's recommendations must be judged on how enacting them would improve the circumstances of disadvantaged Indigenous Australians now and in the future. Awareness, indeed anger, among Indigenous Australians today at what occurred in the past should be recognised – it was the point of Mr Rudd's apology, which is still recognised in Sorry Day. But history cannot be undone; guilt is not hereditary. 'Let the dead Past bury its dead,' as poet Henry Wadsworth Longfellow put it.
ABC News
32 minutes ago
- ABC News
Victoria's Yoorrook Justice Commission a 'blueprint' for the rest of Australia, First Nations leaders say
In 1834, life for people living in what's now known as Victoria was about to drastically change. Within 17 years, a new British colony had been founded and those who had lived there for millennia were dwindling in numbers. It was not from natural sickness or old age "but by the quiet, bureaucratic sanctioning of violence. A poisoned meal, a raid at dawn, a report filed away whose careful phrasing obfuscated the reality". In those 17 years from the arrival of the Henty brothers, Aboriginal people from Gunditjmara and Kulin lands dropped from a population of 15,000 to just 2,000 people. For those whose ancestors were killed, this is a history well known. More than 170 years later, it has never been forgotten. These were the findings released on Tuesday from Australia's first formal truth-telling commission, the Yoorrook Justice Commission, which investigated Victoria's colonial roots and the impact they continue to have on First Nations people today. The commission's 'Truth be Told' report documented the massacres and frontier violence that occurred and the government policies that forced Aboriginal peoples onto missions and reserves where traditional practices were banned. It examined the legislation that allowed children to be forcibly removed from their families and their culture. The report called it a "genocide". But it also highlighted the resistance of Aboriginal people: "They held on to one another, to their languages, to Country. In a time when the world around them insisted on their disappearance, survival became the ultimate resistance." For Senator Lidia Thorpe, reading those words was validating and one step closer to justice. "As long as I've been alive my uncle Robbie Thorpe has taken on many politicians for genocide against our people," the Gunnai, Gunditjmara and Djab Wurrung woman said. "I think it's a bit of healing, acknowledgement and justice that my uncle and others have been fighting for all of their lives." In the years that followed — the founding of what we now know as Victoria — government action ramped up. "The colony's preoccupation shifted from Aboriginal land to Aboriginal blood," the report stated. "Once the land had been fenced, surveyed and renamed, attention turned inwards to the bodies and lineages of those who remained." In 1886, the Aborigines Protection Act (Vic) was imposed "as a mechanism for the disappearance of Aboriginal people under the ongoing pretence of a regime of 'protection'". "The colony had decided that First Peoples would need to be made to vanish." Yorta Yorta man Ian Hamm was separated from his family when he was three weeks old under these government policies and gave testimony to the commission. "It can only be classed as the deliberate actions of trying to completely destabilise the presence of a people from the place they have always been," he told ABC Radio Melbourne. "Not just destabilise them but effectively proactively wipe them out." He said there is a 'maturity' in acknowledging genocide. "It tells me what I already knew. It's written in a single word that everybody understood but nobody would utter those words. Now it's written down." CEO of Reconciliation Australia Karen Mundine said now the findings were laid bare, many will be watching to see if the Victorian government will "do things differently" and continue to "show leadership" as the first state embarking on truth-telling and treaty-making in the country. "I think there is power in words," she said. "When we know history, when we understand the injustices that happened and existed, it's really for us to do something with that knowledge. "The reports are not done as a kind of exercise in report writing, but they're actually done with care and consideration to see better outcomes for First Nations peoples." The Yoorrook Justice Commission released 100 recommendations as part of its final report. Among them is a call for the First Peoples Assembly — a democratically elected body of First Nations people tasked with treaty-making with the state government — to be made permanent and their powers extended to shared decision-making. On Monday, Victorian Premier Jacinta Allen expressed her support for treaty making. However, the opposition stated if it wins power at next year's election, it will not support a new role for the First Peoples' Assembly or a treaty. But Ian Hamm remains confident a treaty will be established. "We can't allow this opportunity to slip, what would that say about us as Victorians, about us as a people, all of us who are resident in this state that we had the opportunity to grasp this moment in time and history, we're going to throw this opportunity under the bus?" "That would reflect poorly on us as people. How could we look ourselves in the mirror with any pride, with any respect for who we are?" Indigenous writer and former Yes campaign leader and Thomas Mayo wants to see all Australians support Victoria in the next stage of treaty negotiations. "There will be concerted efforts from the creators of culture wars that try and keep Indigenous people down in this country and often for their own political ambitions," he said. Mr Mayo wants the public to 'fight against the disinformation' that plagued the Voice Referendum. "The truth-telling report is important because it's there in black and white. It's been a very extensive process, there's been a lot of emotional labour put into it," he said. "Undoubtedly the result is something that is truthful, that people can rely on." States and territories have taken varying approaches and are at different stages of truth-telling and treaty processes across the country. South Australia has established a legislated Voice to Parliament. New South Wales is expected to begin treaty conversations in the coming months. Last year Queensland's Crisafulli government scrapped the state's Truth-Telling and Healing Inquiry, and earlier this year the NT government did the same with its treaty process, which had been underway for seven years. Senator Lidia Thorpe said she hoped the outcomes of the Yoorrook commission would set a road map for other states to follow. "Those recommendations are not only a pathway to treaty, they're a pathway to peace for Aboriginal people in this country, and ways the government can close the gap they continually talk about," she said. "That's why we need federal leadership in this space, so that there's a mandate and a template for the rest of the states and territories to get on board. Don't be left behind." Karen Mundine said she hoped the commission's findings will demonstrate the importance of truth-telling. "As some of our older people begin to age and pass, there's an urgency to record those stories right across the country," she said. "While some formal processes may be winding back, we urge governments and other jurisdictions to think carefully about that.
