Public media braces for the worst
Welcome to POLITICO's West Wing Playbook: Remaking Government, your guide to Donald Trump's unprecedented overhaul of the federal government — the key decisions, the critical characters and the power dynamics that are upending Washington and beyond.
Send tips | Subscribe | Email Sophia | Email Irie | Email Ben
Staffers at local NPR and PBS stations around the country were devastated by the news last week that Congress approved $1.1 billion in federal funding cuts to public media, a move that could jeopardize the futures of dozens of stations.
Small, as well as rural, public media stations that heavily rely on federal funding to operate are now bracing for the unknown after Congress approved a package on Thursday that will claw back Corporation for Public Broadcasting funding.
Some stations say they're being punished over a fight between President DONALD TRUMP and the national public broadcasting organizations that have little relationship to the service smaller outlets offer their communities.
'I think [lawmakers'] decisions were not informed,' said DON DUNLAP, president and general manager of KEDT-TV/FM, a public radio and TV station in Corpus Christi, Texas. 'We're there to help people. There are 10 public TV stations in Texas, and we're thinking probably six of them will close down within a year.'
In April, Trump asked Congress to roll back funding for NPR and PBS, which he has long accused of bias against him and other Republicans — a claim both outlets have denied. The public media cuts are one aspect of the Trump administration's aggressive campaign against media outlets it deems as partisan. Trump has taken legal action against several news organizations, including CBS, ABC and The Wall Street Journal, over unfavorable coverage.
Several station heads told POLITICO they've been preparing for potential cuts since the Trump administration first floated the idea earlier this year.
For hundreds of stations, federal money makes up a significant portion of their total funding. According to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, about 45 percent of all public media stations that received their grants are in rural areas, and nearly half of those rely on CPB for 25 percent or more of their annual budget.
Without federal funding, those stations may be forced into layoffs and programming cuts, if they're able to survive at all.
According to data obtained by POLITICO, 34 public radio and TV stations receive at least 50 percent of their funding from federal grants. Twelve of those stations are in Alaska.
'We can't fundraise our way out of this. We have to make other decisions,' said MOLLIE KABLER, executive director of CoastAlaska, which oversees six public radio stations in southern Alaska. 'We have to consider, 'What services are we going to give up? What people are we going to let go of? And how can we find a way to collaborate and retain service for Alaskans?''
Public media staffers from local affiliates to the national networks have been lobbying Republicans in Congress for weeks in hopes of staving off the cuts. In the end, only four Republicans in both chambers voted against the final version of the package, which also included cuts to foreign aid: Sens. LISA MURKOWSKI of Alaska and SUSAN COLLINS of Maine, and Reps. MIKE TURNER of Ohio and BRIAN FITZPATRICK of Pennsylvania.
'NPR and PBS decide how to allocate their budgets, so any potential effects to news stations will stem from their own budget choices – not federal spending reductions,' a House leadership aide said in a statement. 'It's up to the networks to manage funds wisely and root out waste so rural stations can succeed.'
Representatives for Senate Majority Leader JOHN THUNE did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
An Office of Management and Budget spokesperson refuted claims that local NPR and PBS affiliates had remained nonpartisan, saying in a statement they had 'politicized their own coverage by relying on syndicated programming from their national org.'
'Democratic paper-pushers masquerading as reporters don't deserve taxpayer subsidies, and NPR and PBS will have to learn to survive on their own,' said White House principal deputy press secretary HARRISON FIELDS. 'Unfortunately for them, their only lifeline was taxpayer dollars, and that ended when President Trump was sworn in.'
Read the full story here.
MESSAGE US — West Wing Playbook is obsessively covering the Trump administration's reshaping of the federal government. Are you a federal worker? A DOGE staffer? Have you picked up on any upcoming DOGE moves? We want to hear from you on how this is playing out. Email us at westwingtips@politico.com.
Did someone forward this email to you? Subscribe!
POTUS PUZZLER
Which former president served for 18 years in Congress after his presidency?
(Answer at bottom.)
Agenda Setting
NEW GSA HEAD: Trump today appointed MIKE RIGAS as acting administrator of the General Services Administration, Sophia reports, effectively layering DOGE-aligned STEPHEN EHIKIAN and JOSH GRUENBAUM atop the agency.
GSA staffers and people close to DOGE view the appointment as a strategic move by the White House to rein in Ehikian, the former acting administrator, and Gruenbaum, the commissioner of the Federal Acquisition Service within GSA. They were chosen by DOGE's former operational lead, STEVE DAVIS, to lead DOGE after Davis and ELON MUSK left government, according to three people familiar with the internal workings of DOGE and GSA, granted anonymity to speak candidly.
The change in leadership is a notable shift for GSA, one of two federal agencies that Musk came closest to controlling earlier this year. It's also the most significant public step the White House has taken to diminish the role of Musk loyalists following his exit.
'The GSA has been a pillar of this success, and the President has full confidence in their ongoing work to advance this transformative agenda,' Fields, the White House spokesperson, said in a statement.
WSJ BOOTED: The White House is removing The Wall Street Journal from the pool of reporters covering the president's weekend trip to Scotland, White House press secretary KAROLINE LEAVITT told POLITICO, our ELI STOKOLS and Irie report.
The move follows the Journal's report last week alleging that Trump sent a sexually suggestive message to JEFFREY EPSTEIN in 2003. Trump has denied the existence of the letter and POLITICO has not verified it.
TARINI PARTI, a White House reporter for the Journal who did not have a byline on the Epstein story, had been scheduled to serve as the print pooler for the final two days of Trump's four-day trip to his golf courses in Scotland. But the White House, which earlier this year took over control of pool rotations from the White House Correspondents' Association, removed her from the trip manifest, Leavitt said.
'Due to the Wall Street Journal's fake and defamatory conduct, they will not be one of the thirteen outlets on board' Air Force One, Leavitt said in a statement.
A Journal spokesperson declined to comment. A White House spokesperson declined to comment on whether the Journal would be included in the pool in the future, either on the White House campus or on subsequent trips.
FINAL CBO SCORE: The Congressional Budget Office today released its final prediction for how the GOP megalaw will grow the national debt and impact American households over the next decade, our JENNIFER SCHOLTES, ROBERT KING and BENJAMIN GUGGENHEIM report.
Over the next decade, Trump's signature legislation would increase the federal deficit by $3.4 trillion and cause 10 million people to lose health insurance, the CBO forecasts. While the law would save more than $1 trillion by cutting federal spending on health care — with the majority coming from Medicaid — CBO predicts that the package's costs will far outweigh its savings.
Following the report's release, Leavitt told reporters outside the White House the legislation was 'a fiscally responsible bill, one of the most fiscally conservative pieces of legislation for its size that has ever crossed through Capitol Hill.' She emphasized that Trump 'wants to cut our deficit' and said he would do so with tariff revenue.
In the Courts
SHOW ME THE MONEY: A federal judge ruled today that the Trump administration is violating the law by concealing how it spends congressionally appropriated funds by taking down a public website that displayed that information, our ERICA ORDEN writes in.
In a 60-page decision, U.S. District Judge EMMET SULLIVAN wrote that 'there is nothing unconstitutional about Congress requiring the Executive Branch to inform the public of how it is apportioning the public's money.' Sullivan, an appointee of BILL CLINTON, added: 'Defendants are therefore required to stop violating the law!'
Sullivan ordered the Trump administration to reinstate the database, but paused his order until Thursday to allow time for an appeal. The ruling is a win for the nonprofits Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and Protect Democracy Project, both of which sued the OMB and its director, RUSS VOUGHT. A White House spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the ruling.
ACCESS TO COUNSEL: A federal judge today ordered the administration to reinstate a policy to provide legal counsel to immigrants in deportation proceedings who are deemed mentally incompetent, our KYLE CHENEY writes in. U.S. District Judge AMIR ALI concluded that the administration had failed to justify eliminating the policy, leaving vulnerable people at risk during complex proceedings.
Ali, an appointee of JOE BIDEN, noted that the program had helped thousands of immigrants with mental disabilities access counsel during immigration cases, and when it was cut from DOJ's books earlier this year, the only explanation was that it was for 'convenience.' A White House spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the ruling.
DEFYING THE COURTS, BY THE NUMBERS: Trump administration officials have been accused of defying the courts in a third of lawsuits in which a judge has delivered a substantive ruling against the administration, WaPo's JUSTIN JOUVENAL reports.
A Post analysis of more than 337 lawsuits brought against the administration found that judges had ruled against the Trump administration in 165 lawsuits, as of mid-July. The administration has been 'accused of defying or frustrating court oversight in 57 of those cases — almost 35 percent,' the analysis found. Trump officials, who accuse the courts of 'judicial tyranny,' have denied defying the orders.
Fields in a statement called judges who have ruled against the president 'leftist' and said the president's attorneys 'are working tirelessly to comply' with rulings. 'If not for the leadership of the Supreme Court, the Judicial Branch would collapse into a kangaroo court,' he said.
What We're Reading
How the 2017 Trump tax cuts ballooned the 'big, beautiful bill' (POLITICO's Taylor Miller Thomas, Paula Friedrich and Jonathan Lai)
6 months after DOGE upended their lives, 6 former federal workers reveal their advice for others (Business Insider's Ayelet Sheffey, Jack Newsham, Juliana Kaplan, and Alice Tecotzky)
When Getting Fired Is Only the Beginning for Federal Workers (NYT's Eileen Sullivan)
Donald Trump's Tariff Dealmaker-in-Chief (The New Yorker's Antonia Hitchens)
As Trump's raids ramp up, a Texas region's residents stay inside — even when they need medical care (AP's Amanda Seitz and Jacquelyn Martin)
POTUS PUZZLER ANSWER
That would be former President JOHN QUINCY ADAMS, who served nearly two decades in Congress after concluding his term as sixth president of the United States in 1829. Adams suffered a stroke at his desk in the House chamber and ultimately died in the speaker's office. (Source: The Library of Congress)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why the market is shrugging off Trump's firing of the BLS chief
Trump fired the head of the BLS on Friday, but so far, markets have looked past the shock decision. Sources say there are a variety of other sources investors can use to assess the employment picture. Strong earnings and higher rate-cut odds are powering stocks higher on Monday. August kicked off with a shocker, with Donald Trump firing the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics after a less-than-rosy July employment report. The move sparked prognostications about untrustworthy government data going forward and comparisons to China, which some believe is uninvestable due to issues with data quality. Then why is the market unfazed as trading kicks off on Monday? Stocks rallied to start the week, with the Dow up almost 500 points at midday and the Nasdaq Composite jumping as much as 2%. For now, markets are focused on other things, like the higher odds of a September rate cut after the employment picture suddenly soured. "Obviously, the firing was unconventional. That's pretty much everything with this administration compared to previous administrations, but at this point, there is so much private data that the market can look at other sources," Paul Hickey, cofounder of Bespoke Investment Group, told Business Insider. Apart from the BLS statistics that investors already parse, there's a patchwork of private and public data, including ADP data, hiring and firing data from a range of consulting firms, and labor market sentiment indicators from sources like the Conference Board. "There are private sources of data, and if they are moving in the opposite direction from the government data, then it becomes an indicator that something is off with the statistics,"Aleksandar Tomic, Associate Dean, Strategy, Innovation, & Technology at Boston College, told Business Insider. Trump said Erika McEntarfer's firing was justified and that the July data had been manipulated to make the administration look bad. He did not offer evidence for this claim, though White House economic advisor Kevin Hassett said the revisions in the data are "hard evidence." The July revisions were substantial, showing that the US added nearly 260,000 fewer jobs in May and June than had been initially reported. Trump and Republicans have also criticized earlier revisions, including last year's that showed over 800,000 fewer jobs added in the 12 months leading up to March 2024. The irony of Trump's anger over the July jobs numbers is that the weak report has pushed up the odds of the September rate cut to nearly 90%, getting the president closer to seeing the Fed loosen monetary policy as he's been demanding all year. But for investors, things like the robust GDP report for the second quarter and solid corporate earnings, particularly among mega-cap tech giants, are boosting the outlook for the market even as Trump's move stirs some uncertainty. For Sergio Altomare, a former senior enterprise architect at the Fed, the next big question is who will replace McEntarfer at the helm of the BLS. "I think the ultimate impact is going to take time to sort itself out, but I think really the immediate thing is, who gets appointed? What is their background? What does the data show? Is it dramatically different from what we're seeing?" Altomare said that it will be difficult to properly assess the impact of Trump's decision on financial markets until these questions have clear answers. Luckily for markets, some answers could come soon. Trump has said that in the coming days, he'll nominate a new BLS chief, as well as a replacement for Fed Gov. Adriana Kugler, who resigned on Friday. Both positions require confirmation by the Senate. It is also worth noting that some agree with the president's decision. For his part, investing legend Ray Dalio said on Monday that he, too, would probably fire the BLS chief. In a post on X, he described the agency's process for making key economic estimates as "obsolete and error-prone," with no plan to fix it. "The revisions brought the numbers toward private estimates that were in fact much better," Dalio said. Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Japan trade negotiator to visit US to press for swift implementation of auto tariff deal
TOKYO (Reuters) -Japan's top tariff negotiator Ryosei Akazawa said he planned to visit Washington from Tuesday to press the United States to have President Donald Trump sign an executive order to bring an agreed 15% tariff rate on automobiles into effect. The U.S. last month agreed in a trade deal with Japan to lower existing tariffs on Japanese automobile imports to 15% from levies totaling 27.5% previously. Duties that were due to come into effect on other Japanese goods will also be cut to 15% from 25%. "We will push the United States to make sure that an executive order be signed on the agreed tariff on automobiles and automotive components as soon as possible," Akazawa told parliament. Referring to the problem of "stacking" where goods can be affected by multiple tariffs, Akazawa also said Japan wants to make sure that goods that are already levied at more than 15% would be exempt from the additional 15% rate.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Alaska Sen. Murkowski toys with bid for governor, defends vote supporting Trump's tax breaks package
JUNEAU, Alaska (AP) — Republican U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, speaking with Alaska reporters Monday, toyed with the idea of running for governor and defended her recent high-profile decision to vote in support of President Donald Trump's tax breaks and spending cuts bill. Murkowski, speaking from Anchorage, said 'sure' when asked if she has considered or is considering a run for governor. She later said her response was 'a little bit flippant' because she gets asked that question so often. 'Would I love to come home? I have to tell you, of course I would love to come home,' she said. 'I am not making any decisions about anything, because my responsibility to Alaskans is my job in the Senate right now.' Several Republicans already have announced plans to run in next year's governor's race, including Lt. Gov. Nancy Dahlstrom. Republican Gov. Mike Dunleavy is not eligible to seek a third consecutive term. Alaska has an open primary system and ranked choice voting in general elections. Murkowski is not up for reelection until 2028. A centrist, Murkowski has become a closely watched figure in a sharply divided Congress. She has at times been at odds with her party in her criticism of Trump and blasted by some GOP voters as a 'Republican in name only.' But her decision to support Trump's signature bill last month also frustrated others in a state where independents comprise the largest number of registered voters. She previously described her decision-making process around the bill as 'agonizing.' On Monday, she said it was clear to her the bill was not only a priority of Trump's but also that it was going to pass, so it became important to her to help make it as advantageous to the state as she could. 'So I did everything within my power — as one lawmaker from Alaska — to try to make sure that the most vulnerable in our state would not be negatively impacted,' she said. 'And I had a hard choice to make, and I think I made the right choice for Alaskans.'