logo
Canon EOS R50 V review: Pro vibes, minus the price

Canon EOS R50 V review: Pro vibes, minus the price

Hindustan Times11-06-2025

The gap between beginner and professional cameras used to be a financial chasm. Aspiring creators faced a stark choice: spend around ₹50,000-60,000 on a camera with no pro features, or splurge lakhs for features like 4K at 60 FPS and Log shooting. Thankfully, that era is over. With cameras like the Canon EOS R50 V, which happens to be the subject of this review, bridges that gap by delivering professional tools without the professional price tag.
It includes key features like Canon Log 3, which is ideal for high-quality footage, while omitting extras unnecessary for creators on platforms like Instagram and YouTube.
Having said that, I have been using the camera as my primary for over two weeks now to shoot a wide range of content, right from portraits to product videos, product photos, reels for my personal Instagram, and whatnot. So far, I have been thoroughly impressed by what the camera has to offer, all in a very tiny form factor that will not intimidate anyone if you take it out on a shoot. Here are my observations, what could have been better, and what I absolutely adore about this (small) camera by Canon. I have also been using the camera with the supplied RF-S14-30mm f/4-6.3 IS STM PZ kit lens, so I will have opinions on that as well. Read on.
When I first unboxed the EOS R50 V, I was surprised to see that you have the ability to mount the camera vertically without attaching any cage to it whatsoever. This is made possible using the1/4-20" tripod mount on the side of the camera. For context, my Sigma FP, which happens to be a dedicated cinema-grade camera, has this feature. So, to see something like this on a camera that costs around ₹70,000 (body) is certainly refreshing and speaks volumes about the creator-first experience that Canon is trying to offer here.
As for the video itself, the footage coming out of the R50 V's tiny body is excellent. The camera captures 4K 30 FPS video, which is oversampled from 6K, and can also capture 4K 60 FPS video, but it does come with a 1.56x crop, unfortunately. However, I think it can be lived with, especially if you are a beginner creator or someone who does not mind shooting tight shots. The best part happens to be that the 4K is actually 10-bit video.
On top of this, the ultimate flexibility comes thanks to Canon Log 3, which can create magical looks if you know what you are working with. You can simply import your Canon Log 3 footage into a program like DaVinci Resolve 18 or 19, which is what I did. The real test of its video capabilities, embedded below, shows how manoeuvrable the footage is.
A post shared by HT Tech (@hindustantimestech)
Yes, I did screw up with exposing Canon Log correctly, which is why some highlights were clipped. But apart from that, if you expose it correctly, it can result in spectacular quality video, which would be further amplified if you pair a really sharp lens with it.
Canon claims that the camera can record up to two hours of continuous 4K video, thanks to the magnesium alloy internal body which can dissipate heat. As per my testing, I did test the camera out in bright sunlight, in the scorching Jaipur sun in 42 degree Celsius heat, and not once did I experience the camera getting hot. Yes, I did shoot in bursts, like a 5 second clip here and a 20 second clip there. It reminded me of my Sigma FP, which barely gets hot, despite how much you push it.
This shows the heat dissipation is quite good, and the camera will not overheat on you when you need it the most. At least, that is what I experienced shooting in bursts. I did try shooting continuous video and tested it for up to around 40 minutes, in studio conditions under an AC environment, and the camera did not skip a beat. It kept recording, so it does go on to show that it is reliable.
Also Read: Xiaomi 15 Ultra review: A camera beast with powerful performance
My first camera was a Canon EOS 70D, which was also an APS-C camera like the R50 V. The autofocus back then was incredible. I grew up watching Casey Neistat's videos and saw how flexible the autofocus was and what Casey could do with it. I think the R50 V belongs to that breed of cameras.
The autofocus is reliable with its Dual Pixel CMOS AF II. It tracks eyes and barely misses. I have shot multiple unboxing videos using this camera, and not once did the camera have to hunt for focus. I tried the same with human subjects as well, with the same result: it latches on to focus super quickly, and the focus transitions are rather smooth. It is not jerky, and that is what gives it a cinematic look and feel.
In photos as well, I noticed the camera is super quick to latch onto focus when you half-press the shutter. That gives me confidence that anyone looking forward to buying the Canon R50 V for content creation, especially if they are a one-man show, can simply flip the screen 180 degrees, see themselves, and then be worry-free about whether they are going to be in focus. It is that quick. So, no more worries about keeping yourself in focus or manually adjusting it. Of course, manual focus is where it is at if you are shooting movies, but for a one-man show, when you are filming yourself, manually adjusting the focus can be a chore, and this is where the R50 V makes it super easy.
Another area where the R50 V makes filming super easy is being able to press record from the front of the camera itself. Yes, there is a record button situated on the bottom right of the camera. You can simply press record from there and do not have to fiddle around with the shutter button for the most part.I have been using the button on the front, and this makes it super easy to start rolling.
While I am not a fan of specifications for a camera, they are needed. The R50 V has a 24.2-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor. Canon has paired it with a DIGIC X image processor, which also happens to be the same processor that the company uses in one of its flagship cameras, the Canon EOS R5 Mark II, which costs four or five times what this camera does. So, the camera is certainly capable in this regard.
You can capture raw images alongside JPEGs. It has an ISO range of 100 to 32,000, expandable to 51,200 for stills. From what I could tell, the photo capability is decent. Yes, it is not the best, and not as good as the video, but it is decent, and it will get the job done if you know what you are shooting. It can capture fast movement at up to 15 FPS with the electronic shutter or 12 FPS with the electronic first-curtain shutter. If you are out shooting wildlife, there is a silent shutter feature as well, which can disable sounds and lights so that you do not disturb any birds.
As for the images themselves, they do turn out sharp. The highlight roll-off is particularly impressive for a camera of this size and something that costs this little. So, for the most part, I think you will have a fun time capturing images using this camera. It is also quite light and super portable. So, if you are looking for something to document your everyday life, I do not think you can get a better camera than this.
Perhaps slap a small 24mm pancake lens on this and use it like people use the Fujifilms of the world to document everyday life or use it as a street camera. This is where it can really excel. There was zero stress while holding the camera during my photo-taking expeditions in the old city of Jaipur, and I can confidently say this is going to be a fun experience for most photographers.
I have the RF-S14-30mm f/4-6.3 IS STM PZ kit lens with me. It has an f-stop range of F4 to F6.3 and it, too, offers a video-first experience. It has power zoom, which means the lens does not change in size when you zoom. This can
be especially useful when you mount the camera on a gimbal because the balance of the gimbal does not change, so you can rest assured you will have a balanced gimbal despite zooming with the lens. This camera paired with a tiny gimbal can be a quick run-and-gun setup for most people, or perhaps even serve as a B-camera for someone who is already shooting on Canon cameras and using Canon Log 3.
The lens is also quite stable for the most part because it does have image stabilisation. So, if you are shooting video handheld, you should expect stable footage for the most part. But of course, because the camera does not have in-body stabilisation, you will have to have stable hands or perhaps make the camera a little heavier by attaching a cage.
Canon has included a 3-inch screen with the R50 V that can articulate both front and back. This is particularly useful for content creators who will not necessarily be attaching external monitors to the camera. This screen ensures that they are in focus and framed right, which is just incredibly useful.
The screen itself seems high quality; it is ample bright, even in outdoor conditions. As for the ports, it offers a 10Gbps USB-C port, a headphone jack so you can monitor audio correctly, and a port to attach a mic, because of course, sound is as equally important as your footage. However, it does come with a Micro HDMI port, which is not to anyone's liking, so you will have to use a converter if you want to stream footage to an external monitor or recorder.
Coming to the battery life, the battery is the LP-E17 that Canon has been using in some older cameras as well. Canon claims 390 shots, and we got somewhere around that figure. The camera has great battery life; at least that is what I have felt. I could go through an entire day of documenting my footage and clips without actually charging the battery, and that too in 4K 24 FPS Log 3. So you will be okay with the battery life. Of course, you can just buy additional batteries if you need them.
Also Read: OnePlus 13s review: The minimalist powerhouse
The R50 V has a bit of a rolling shutter problem, especially if you are into shooting fast objects. The moment you pan your camera quickly, you will notice that the footage can feel rather janky. You will feel like the screen is sort of liquefying, which of course reflects in the footage as well. There is a rolling shutter. You can read about what rolling shutter is, but this should not affect most people because they will keep their cameras stationary to record videos of talking heads, film objects like smartphones, or create beauty and cooking videos.
For most of that stuff, rolling shutter really is not a factor that should worry you. Sure, if you are going to be out shooting F1 cars or fast bikes, which only some of you will be, you do not have to really worry about it. Another thing that certainly could have been better is the 4K 60 FPS crop. It is around 1.56x, and it can certainly make for tight-looking shots. This could have been prevented.
Overall, for ₹79,999, the Canon EOS R50 with the kit lens is certainly great value. I feel it offers some of the best image and video-taking ability at this price point. It has reliable autofocus that latches onto subjects super quickly. Canon has thought of practicality and has bundled features like the front-facing record button and the tripod mount on the side for vertical mounting. This eliminates the need for any cage, and the camera is portable, so the possibilities to rig it out are endless. I give it 9 out of 10 stars.
MOBILE FINDER: iPhone 16 LATEST Price, Specs And More

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why tech billionaires want bots to be your BFF
Why tech billionaires want bots to be your BFF

Mint

time11 hours ago

  • Mint

Why tech billionaires want bots to be your BFF

Next Story Tim Higgins , The Wall Street Journal In a lonely world, Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg and even Microsoft are vying for affection in the new 'friend economy.' Illustration: Emil Lendof/WSJ, iStock. Gift this article Grok needs a reboot. Grok needs a reboot. The xAI chatbot apparently developed too many opinions that ran counter to the way the startup's founder, Elon Musk, sees the world. The recent announcement by Musk—though decried by some as '1984"-like rectification—is understandable. Big Tech now sees the way to differentiate artificial-intelligence offerings by creating the perception that the user has a personal relationship with it. Or, more weirdly put, a friendship—one that shares a similar tone and worldview. The race to develop AI is framed as one to develop superintelligence. But in the near term, its best consumer application might be curing loneliness. That feeling of disconnect has been declared an epidemic—with research suggesting loneliness can be as dangerous as smoking up to 15 cigarettes a day. A Harvard University study last year found AI companions are better at alleviating loneliness than watching YouTube and are 'on par only with interacting with another person." It used to be that if you wanted a friend, you got a dog. Now, you can pick a billionaire's pet product. Those looking to chat with someone—or something—help fuel AI daily active user numbers. In turn, that metric helps attract more investors and money to improve the AI. It's a virtuous cycle fueled with the tears of solitude that we should call the 'friend economy." That creates an incentive to skew the AI toward a certain worldview—as right-leaning Musk appears to be aiming to do shortly with Grok. If that's the case, it's easy to imagine an AI world where all of our digital friends are superfans of either MSNBC or Fox News. In recent weeks, Meta Platforms chief Mark Zuckerberg has garnered a lot of attention for touting a stat that says the average American has fewer than three friends and a yearning for more. He sees AI as a solution and talks about how consumer applications will be personalized. 'I think people are gonna want a system that gets to know them and that kind of understands them in a way that their feed algorithms do," he said during a May conference. Over at Microsoft, the tech company's head of AI, Mustafa Suleyman has also been talking about the personalization of AI as the key to differentiation. 'We really want it to feel like you're talking to someone who you know really well, that is really friendly, that is kind and supportive but also reflects your values," he said during an April appearance on the Big Technology Podcast. Still, he added, Microsoft wants to impose boundaries that keep things safe. 'We don't really want to engage in any of the chaos," Suleyman said. 'The way to do that, we found, is that it just stays reasonably polite and respectful, super-even handed, it helps you see both sides of an argument." With all of that in mind, it comes as little surprise that the current crop of chatbots are designed to sound like you're having a conversation with another human. This has resulted in lots of pearl clutching. There are academics warning about the dangers of users falling in love with AI and individual anecdotes of users going overboard in their use. The idea of a heartbroken man falling in love with his chatbot isn't new, of course. It was the plot of the 2013 film 'Her" starring Joaquin Phoenix and Scarlett Johansson, who voiced the AI. (OpenAI's own AI voice, which sounded eerily similar to Johansson's last year, triggered a public fight with the actress.) Still, we—a society that's only a generation into a world of social media—have some recent experience in how algorithms can have unintended consequences. They create echo chambers that reinforce worldviews rather than expand them. The news of Musk's Grok reboot is an example of that. Grok and xAI were born, in part, out of Musk's concerns about AI being developed by companies he called woke. He pointed to Google results that seemed overly concerned with being politically correct rather than factually accurate. With xAI, Musk aimed to create what he called a 'maximum truth-seeking AI." Yet when an influential X user known as Catturd lambasted Grok's answers in June, Musk took quick note. 'When Grok first came out—it was awesome—now Grok is just woke fake news that repeats liberal talking points," Catturd posted on June 18. 'I know this for a fact because everything Grok says about me is a lie. What a joke Grok has become." Another X user asked Grok why it lied about Catturd. 'I aim to provide accurate, neutral responses based on available data," the chatbot responded on X. 'Claims that I lie about @catturd2 may stem from disagreements with my sourcing, like Media Matters or Rolling Stone, which document his misinformation. I don't have personal biases, but AI training can introduce unintended slants. Some report I censor criticism or push fringe views, while others note I fact-check conservative claims accurately. Bias in AI is complex, and neutrality is tough to achieve. If you have specific examples of lies, please share, and I'll clarify with evidence." Musk wasn't impressed. 'Your sourcing is terrible," Musk replied. 'Only a very dumb AI would believe [Media Matters] and [Rolling Stone]! You are being updated this week." He later said xAI would retrain the AI on data created with an updated version of Grok, 'which has advanced reasoning" that would be used 'to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors." After all, nobody wants a friend who is always spouting the wrong crazy stuff. Write to Tim Higgins at Topics You May Be Interested In Catch all the Technology News and Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates & Live Business News.

Facebook users beware, Meta AI can scan all your phone photos anytime if you are not careful
Facebook users beware, Meta AI can scan all your phone photos anytime if you are not careful

India Today

time14 hours ago

  • India Today

Facebook users beware, Meta AI can scan all your phone photos anytime if you are not careful

Meta has consistently found itself at the centre of privacy debates. There's little doubt that the company has been using our data, for instance, our publicly posted photos across Facebook and Instagram, to train its AI models (more commonly known as Meta AI). But now, it seems Meta is taking things to another level. Recent findings suggest that it now wants full access to your phone's camera roll, meaning even photos you haven't shared on Facebook (or Instagram), reported by TechCrunch, some Facebook users have recently come across a curious pop-up while attempting to upload a Story. The notification invites them to opt into a feature called 'cloud processing.' On the surface, it sounds fair and safe, as Facebook says this setting will allow it to automatically scan your phone's camera roll and upload images to Meta's cloud 'on a regular basis.' In return, the company promises to offer 'creative ideas' such as photo collages, event recaps, AI-generated filters, and themed suggestions for birthdays, graduations, or other cool? But wait for it. When you agree to its terms of use, you're also giving Meta a go-ahead to analyse the content of your unpublished and presumably private photos on an ongoing basis as Meta AI looks at details such as facial features, objects in the frame, and even metadata like the date and location they were taken, to gradually become is little doubt that the idea is to make AI more helpful for you – the user – since AI needs all the data one can possibly fathom to make sense of the real world and respond accordingly to questions and prompts you are putting out. And Meta, on its part, says that this is an opt-in feature, which is to say that users can choose to disable it as and when they want. That's fair, but given that this is user data we're talking about and given Facebook's history, some users (and privacy advocates) would be tech giant had earlier admitted it had scraped all public content uploaded by adults on Facebook and Instagram since 2007 to help train its generative AI models. However, Meta hasn't clearly defined what 'public' means or what age qualifies someone as an 'adult' in its dataset from 2007. That haziness leaves a lot of room for different interpretations—and even more room for concern. Moreover, its updated AI terms, active since June 23, 2024, don't mention whether these cloud-processed, unpublished photos are exempt from being used as training Verge reached out to the Meta AI executives, but they bluntly denied that Meta, "is not currently training its AI models on those photos, but it would not answer our questions about whether it might do so in future, or what rights it will hold over your camera roll images."There is, thankfully, a way out. Facebook users can dive into their settings and disable this cloud processing feature. Once turned off, Meta promises it will begin deleting any unpublished images from the cloud within 30 days. Still, the very nature of this tool—pitched as a fun and helpful feature—raises questions about how users are nudged into handing over private data without fully realising the a time when AI is reshaping how we interact with tech, companies like Meta are testing the limits of what data they can collect, analyse, and potentially monetise eventually. This latest move blurs the lines between user assistance and data extraction. What used to be a conscious decision—posting a photo to share with the world—now risks being replaced with quiet uploads in the background and invisible AI eyes watching it all unfold. We'll see how things pan out.- Ends advertisement

What to know about online age verification laws
What to know about online age verification laws

Time of India

time21 hours ago

  • Time of India

What to know about online age verification laws

The Supreme Court has upheld a Texas law aimed at blocking children under 18 from seeing online pornography by requiring websites to verify the ages of all visitors. Many states have passed similar age verification laws in an attempt to restrict access to adult material from minors, but digital rights groups have raised questions about such laws' effects on free speech and whether verifying ages by accessing sensitive data could violate people's is the Texas law? The law requires websites hosting pornographic material to verify the ages of users in hopes of stopping those under 18 from visiting. Adults would need to supply websites with a government-issued ID or use third-party age-verification services. The law carries fines of up to $10,000 per violation - fined against the website - that could be raised to up to $250,000 per violation by a has argued that technology has improved significantly in the last 20 years, allowing online platforms to easily check users' ages with a quick picture. Those requirements are more like ID checks at brick-and-mortar adult stores that were upheld by the Supreme Court in the 1960s, the state internet service providers, search engines and news sites are exempt from the do sites verify ages? It's already illegal to show children pornography under federal law, however it's rarely enforced. But various measures already exist to verify a person's age online. Someone could upload a government ID or consent to the use facial recognition software to prove they are the age they say they and social media companies such as Instagram parent company Meta have argued that age verification should be done by the companies that run app stores, such as Apple and Google, and not individual apps or people get around verification? Critics, such as Pornhub have argued that age-verification laws can be easily circumvented with well-known tools such as virtual private networks (VPNs) that reroute requests to visit websites across various public have also been raised about enforcement, with Pornhub claiming those efforts would drive traffic to less-known sites that don't comply with the law and have fewer safety opposes such laws? Though heralded by social conservatives, age verification laws have been condemned by adult websites who argue they're part of a larger anti-sex political also garnered opposition from groups that advocate for digital privacy and free speech, including the Electronic Frontier Foundation. The group has argued that it is impossible to ensure websites don't retain user data, regardless of whether age verification laws require they delete Jain, vice president of policy at the nonprofit Center for Democracy & Technology, said the court's decision on age verification "does far more than uphold an incidental burden on adults' speech. It overturns decades of precedent and has the potential to upend access to First Amendment-protected speech on the internet for everyone, children and adults alike.""Age verification requirements still raise serious privacy and free expression concerns," Jain added. "If states are to go forward with these burdensome laws, age verification tools must be accurate and limit collection, sharing, and retention of personal information, particularly sensitive information like birthdate and biometric data."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store