Expert calls for interagency, intergovernmental cooperation to regulate crypto industry
PETALING JAYA : A cryptocurrency expert is urging collaboration between government agencies and international bodies to strengthen regulatory oversight of the digital asset industry.
The call comes amid a surge in financial fraud and cybercrime linked to cryptocurrencies.
Vincent Fong.
Vincent Fong, chief editor of Fintech News Malaysia, acknowledged that Malaysia was among the early movers in developing regulatory frameworks for cryptocurrency but said the country was now lagging behind its counterparts in several key areas.
He said markets like Singapore and Hong Kong have already issued clear guidelines on stablecoin – a type of cryptocurrency.
'Like any financial crime, crypto crimes are something that require interagency and intergovernmental cooperation to tackle,' he told FMT.
Regulations on cryptocurrency in Malaysia currently fall under the Securities Commission, particularly the Capital Markets and Services (Prescription of Securities) Order 2019.
As it stands, cryptocurrency is not recognised as legal tender in Malaysia. Instead, it is treated as a form of security, akin to stocks. Issuers of digital assets must first obtain authorisation from the Securities Commission by meeting the conditions outlined in the Digital Asset Guidelines.
Last year, Bernama quoted the Malaysia Cyber Consumer Association as saying that more than 4,000 fraud cases tied to cryptocurrency were reported in Malaysia within the past five years, with total losses exceeding RM200 million.
It also quoted Nadisah Zakaria, an assistant professor at the finance department at Prince Sultan University in Saudi Arabia, as saying that while Bank Negara Malaysia has issued guidelines on cryptocurrency usage, the lack of comprehensive regulations may lead to misuse, fraud or instability in the market.
Earlier this week, it was reported that Singapore ramped up crypto exchange regulations in a bid to curb money laundering and boost market confidence after a series of high-profile scandals rattled the sector.
Fong called for joint educational efforts to protect consumers from investment scams, citing initiatives like the #JanganKenaScam campaign jointly organised by several local banks as a model for effective public awareness.
Similarly, Redza Arbee, the former head of digital adoption at Khazanah Nasional Bhd, suggested modelling regulations after existing international frameworks.
One such example is the Genius Act – recently passed by the US Senate – that regulates stablecoin, which has in the last two years overtaken bitcoin as the preferred cryptocurrency of cybercriminals.
'With clear regulation, we can help the public understand all the nuances of cryptocurrency.
'Otherwise, it'd be like opening up a casino without helping people understand what's at stake,' said Redza, author of a book titled 'The Digital Transformation of Money'.
Agalya J Munusamy.
Lawyer Agalya J Munusamy called for the authorities to cooperate with cryptocurrency issuers on improvements to existing regulations, instead of banning digital assets outright.
In 2022, then deputy finance minister I Shahar Abdullah said the country had no intention of recognising cryptocurrencies as legal tender, due to the volatility of digital currencies and the risks from hackers, among others.
However, Agalya said the government should recognise the fact that 'you can't stop someone from going into cryptocurrency'.
'Just because they're banned, it doesn't mean that people can't find other ways to use them anymore.
'I think what's more important is to have round table discussions between both parties, and see how you can improve regulations. Meet in the middle,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
10 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Pekan Nanas school hall brawl: 18 men arrested for rioting with weapons (VIDEO)
KUALA LUMPUR, July 7 — Police have arrested 18 men after a brawl broke out at a school hall in Pekan Nanas, Pontian late Friday night. The incident, which occurred around 11.30pm on July 4, was reported by a member of the public who called the Pontian police headquarters. Responding swiftly, officers from the district's Criminal Investigation Division were dispatched to the scene. The suspects, all local men aged between 17 and 48, were apprehended on the spot. They are being investigated under Section 148 of the Penal Code for rioting with weapons, and Section 427 for causing mischief. If found guilty, they face up to five years in prison, a fine, or both under Section 148, and up to two years' jail or a fine under Section 427. The police have stressed they will not compromise when it comes to crimes that threaten public peace and safety. The statement comes as videos of the fight continue to circulate on social media, prompting concern from the public. Authorities have urged the public not to share unverified footage or information related to the case. Anyone with information has been asked to contact the Pontian police hotline at 07-6869999.
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Trading ideas: Edelteq, WCT, Green Packet, MAG, Capital A, Mudajaya, Mesiniage, MN, Kretam, Kim Hin, TeamStar, ISF
KUALA LUMPUR: Here is a recap of the announcements that made headlines in Corporate Malaysia. Edelteq Holdings Bhd is venturing into upstream semiconductor manufacturing with a proposed 24% stake acquisition in Solid Point Precision Manufacturing Sdn Bhd for RM20.7mn via a mix of cash and shares from Singapore-based LIPO Precision Industry Pte Ltd. WCT Holdings Bhd has secured a RM365.2mn contract from Projek Lebuhraya Usahasama Bhd to expand the Sedenak–Simpang Renggam stretch of the North-South Expressway in Johor. Green Packet Bhd has welcomed European Credit Investment Bank Ltd as a new substantial shareholder after the Labuan-based investment bank acquired 141.1mn shares (5.77% stake) via open- and off-market trades on 3 July. Malaysia Aviation Group has exercised purchase rights for 20 additional A330neo aircraft from Airbus, with deliveries scheduled between 2029 and 2031. Capital A Bhd announced that AirAsia has signed an MoU with Airbus to purchase 50 A321XLR aircraft, with delivery confirmed by 2028. The deal, valued at US$12.25bn (RM51.72bn), includes rights for an additional 20 units. Mudajaya Group Bhd plans to raise up to RM26mn through a private placement of 265.7mn new shares, representing 10% of its enlarged share capital. Proceeds will be used to pare down bank borrowings, which stood at RM644.5mn as of 24 June. Mesiniaga Bhd has secured a RM148mn contract from KWAP to supply and commission a new pension system, with completion targeted by July 2028. MN Holdings Bhd has secured a RM29.3mn contract from Tenaga Nasional Bhd to extend new transformer bays at the existing transmission main intake in Tanjung Langsat Industrial Estate, Johor. Kretam Holdings Bhd has appointed Chiong Li Wei as executive director effective 5 July. Kim Hin Industry Bhd has received an unconditional takeover offer from its controlling shareholders, Kim Hin (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd and chairman Chua Seng Huat, to acquire the remaining 37.75% stake at 85 sen/share. TeamStar Bhd, a furniture fittings and hardware trader, has filed for an IPO on the ACE Market of Bursa Malaysia. ISF Group Bhd, a family-run piping system installer for industrial properties, has filed for an IPO on the ACE Market to fund its expansion plans.
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Is public transport meant to turn a profit? Five countries show it's not that simple
KUALA LUMPUR, July 7 — Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's administration said at the launch of the Kuala Lumpur Local Plan 2040 that public transport will be the backbone of all future development plans, amid growing calls to curb Malaysia's overreliance on private cars. The assertion again sparked a debate about who will fund these projects. Public transportation systems in Malaysia have long depended on government subsidies. But over the years, the discourse around public transit has included support for privatisation, the thinking being profitability — or at least break even — would make operators innovate and become more financially independent. Experiences of other countries, however, show that the issue around public transport funding is usually more complicated. Some countries have tried privatisation, but not all have enjoyed positive outcomes. 'Public transport is a social service' In Malaysia, policymakers are divided, although many are inclined to view public transport as a social service that should be financially backed by taxpayers. 'In my experience, return on investment is not the issue. The issue of efficiency and funds for expansion of services normally arises,' said Rajiv Risyakaran, the pro-public transport Bukit Gasing state assemblyman who had been involved in Selangor's city and town planning. 'I don't expect public transport to break even or be profitable. It's a social service the government provides for the people, and it's a net cost to the government. So, are there countries where public transport operators make money? Malay Mail looks at five countries with arguably the best public transportation systems, and analyses open-source information to see if operators there are financially self-reliant or subsidy-dependent. People walk past signs for the Tokyo Metro underground system inside Shimbashi Station in central Tokyo in this file photo taken on October 21, 2024. — AFP pic Japan Japan's public transport systems, particularly its rail networks, are known to be among the most efficient in the world. The train operations, including the famous Shinkansen (bullet train), are incredibly punctual with minimal delays. Japan's rail networks, among the world's most complex, were initially operated by public and private companies, but in the 1980s, policy favouring car ownership plunged the government-run entity Japanese Railways (JR) into heavy debt. This pushed JR to privatise by splitting into regional-based companies (JR East, JR West, JR Central and JR Kyushu) that gave it flexibility to tailor the unique needs of the service areas. Today, the Japanese privatisation programme is the exception in terms of profitability. But ticket sales are not the only income source. A key to its success is diversification into real estate and retail businesses around its stations, according to the World Bank. A file photograph shows public busses in Singapore. — TODAY pic Singapore Singapore's public transport system is internationally renowned, and public transport operators like SBS Transit in Singapore have shown to make profits according to media reports citing financial records. But Singapore operates through a unique model where the government often owns the infrastructure, such as tracks and stations, and the operators lease or run services on it. This helps manage the massive capital expenditure. Switzerland The Swiss public transport network, which includes rail systems, taxis, and buses has a total length of 24,500 kilometres and has more than 2,600 stations and stops, some even cutting across the Swiss Alps. The Swiss Federal Railways (SBB), the national railway operator, has seen a return to profit in recent years after pandemic-related losses, according to official statements published on a government website, but like Japan, much of the profit comes from diversification of income sources like rentals from real estate and its energy divisions. Generally, public transport operators there still rely on government subsidies to stay afloat, with half of their operating costs funded by taxpayers. Germany Germany's public transport system is a mix of public and private ownership, with the federal government, state governments, and private companies all playing a role. Local public transport, including buses, trams, and some regional trains, is primarily managed by state governments and municipalities. Deutsche Bahn (DB) is the main railway provider, a state-owned company, but it operates as a private entity and faces competition from other private companies such as SWEG, ODEG, and Flixtrain. Still, many of the operators rely heavily on federal subsidies. In 2021, at least 11.6 billion euros in federal funds were reported to have been invested in public transport, with more promised annually starting in 2025. Over the years, there has been growing criticism over the funding model. Travellers wait at the Eindhoven Airport. — AFP pic Netherlands Dutch public transport is frequently ranked among the best in the world for being well-organised, efficient, reliable, and covers the entire country. Its transport system is known for its integration of trains, buses, trams, and metros, making it easy to travel between cities and within urban areas. Like Germany and Switzerland, Dutch public transport operators rely heavily on government subsidies. But unlike Germany, there is strong public support for financial assistance of public transit systems because they view it as a social service first. Public transport in the Netherlands is funded through a combination of ticket revenue, government subsidies, and sometimes regional or local government contributions.
