logo
The Deng doctrine: How China weaponises rare earths to gain leverage in trade war with the US

The Deng doctrine: How China weaponises rare earths to gain leverage in trade war with the US

First Post07-06-2025
China has signalled for more than 15 years that it was looking to weaponise areas of the global supply chain, a strategy modelled on longstanding American export controls Beijing views as aimed at stalling its rise. read more
China has long indicated its intention to weaponise parts of the global supply chain—a strategy now visibly playing out through tighter control of rare earth exports. Modelled on longstanding US export restrictions that Beijing believes are designed to limit its technological rise, China is now turning similar tools to its own advantage.
The recent rush by companies to secure export licences for rare earth materials, culminating in a phone call between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday, highlights how Beijing has refined a powerful lever in the ongoing trade war.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Industry experts say China may approve more shipments in the near term but it has no plans to dismantle the new system underpinning those approvals.
Instead, China's new export licensing regime, closely mirroring the US model grants the government deeper visibility into global supply chokepoints including critical sectors such as electric vehicle motors and precision systems used in missiles. This level of control offers Beijing a potent means to retaliate in the trade dispute while asserting dominance in strategically vital markets.
China sharpens rare earth export controls in trade war playbook
As relations between the two countries sour and supply chains fracture, both Washington and Beijing appear determined to shift from broad tariffs to more focused, technical barriers—ones that could have lasting implications for industries worldwide.
'China originally took inspiration for these export control methods from the comprehensive U.S. sanctions regime,' Zhu Junwei, a scholar at the Grandview Institution, a Beijing-based think tank focused on international relations told Reuters.
'China has been trying to build its own export control systems since then, to be used as a last resort.'
After a phone call with Chinese President Xi Jinping, President Trump said the two leaders were 'straightening out some of the points,' particularly regarding rare earth magnets—key components in electric vehicle (EV) motors and high-tech weaponry. But Trump did not confirm whether Beijing had agreed to speed up export licensing, a sticking point since Washington imposed restrictions on chip design software and jet engines over what it calls China's deliberate slow-walking of approvals.
China, which holds a near-monopoly on rare earth magnets, added some of the most advanced types to its export control list in April. The move forces all exporters to seek government licences before shipping these materials, turning a once-obscure division of the commerce ministry—staffed by around 60 people—into a powerful gatekeeper of global manufacturing.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The export curbs, part of a broader retaliation package against US tariffs, have had ripple effects well beyond the US. Several European auto parts manufacturers were forced to shut down production lines this week after exhausting their supply of rare earth magnets, underscoring the global reach of Beijing's measures.
Though China's commerce ministry has not publicly commented on the issue, analysts say the blanket controls offer Beijing both leverage in its trade war with Washington and a strategic tool to reshape global supply chains in its favour.
'Beijing has a degree of plausible deniability – no one can prove China is doing this on purpose,' Noah Barkin, senior adviser at Rhodium Group, a China-focused U.S. thinktank told Reuters.
'But the rate of approvals is a pretty clear signal that China is sending a message, exerting pressure to prevent trade negotiations with the U.S. leading to additional technology control.'
China mines about 70% of the world's rare earths but maintains a near-monopoly on refining and processing, giving it a powerful position in global manufacturing. Even if export approvals accelerate, as U.S. President Donald Trump indicated after a call with President Xi Jinping, Beijing's new licensing system offers it unprecedented visibility into how companies use these critical materials.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
European and U.S. executives warn that by forcing exporters to apply for licences, China's government can now closely monitor supplier chokepoints in sectors ranging from electric vehicles to advanced weaponry, oversight that other governments lack due to the complexity of global supply chains.
Hundreds of Japanese companies are expected to need Chinese export approvals for rare earth magnets in the coming weeks, a person lobbying on their behalf told Reuters. Without timely licences, they risk production disruptions, underscoring how Beijing's new trade tools could reshape access to materials essential to modern industry.
'It's sharpening China's scalpel,' said a US-based executive at a company seeking to piece together an alternative supply chain who sought anonymity.
'It's not a way to oversee the export of magnets, but a way to gain influence and advantage over America.'
China's export controls deepen as fears grow over weaponisation of supply chain power
Fears that China could weaponise its dominance in critical supply chains first emerged in 2010, when it briefly halted rare earth exports to Japan during a territorial dispute. But those concerns have intensified in recent years as Beijing sharpens its trade tools and broadens export restrictions across strategic sectors.
As far back as 1992, former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping noted, 'The Middle East has oil, China has rare earths.' That sentiment has shaped policy: in 2020, China passed a sweeping Export Control Law allowing it to restrict exports of any items deemed vital to national security, including materials, technology and data.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Since then, China has built up its own sanctions arsenal in response to U.S. restrictions, investing heavily in alternative supply chains while tightening its grip on key exports. In 2022, the United States imposed broad curbs on chip and semiconductor tool exports to China, aiming to slow the country's military and AI advancements. But analysts say Beijing has continued to make headway despite those barriers.
In retaliation, China has steadily expanded its export controls. Last year it imposed licensing requirements for gallium, germanium, and certain graphite products—vital inputs for defence, electronics, and green technologies. Shipments of these minerals to the U.S. were banned outright in December. Then in February, China added five more metals to its control list.
Now, following a phone call between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping, attention has turned to whether China will ease its latest rare earth export curbs. But analysts warn of a lack of transparency.
'It's virtually impossible to know what percentage of requests for non-military end users get approved because the data is not public and companies don't want to publicly confirm either way,' said Cory Combs, an analyst at China-focused consultancy Trivium.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The opaqueness of Beijing's process and its expanding powers over chokepoint materials are reinforcing Western concerns that supply chains are becoming geopolitical battlegrounds.
With inputs from agencies
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bihar mimics 19th-century American South. Citizenship is now weaponised to exclude voters
Bihar mimics 19th-century American South. Citizenship is now weaponised to exclude voters

The Print

time15 minutes ago

  • The Print

Bihar mimics 19th-century American South. Citizenship is now weaponised to exclude voters

There is nothing wrong with re-stating the well-known constitutional principle that only citizens can vote. However, the way in which citizenship is to be established, and the list of documents required, would lead not to a vote by all citizens, but to disenfranchisement, especially of underprivileged citizens. What is, in principle, an inclusionary idea – namely, citizenship – will, in practice, become an exclusionary device. The democratic process in Bihar has been dealt a shock. The Election Commission of India (ECI) has announced that only those who can prove their citizenship will be allowed to vote in the forthcoming Assembly elections. Citizenship and subjecthood In modern political literature, a great distinction has always been drawn between subjects (praja) and citizens (nagrik). Subjecthood marked the polities of the pre-modern era, though it managed to bleed into modern times as well. Kings had subjects, whose privileges and entitlements depended on royal blessings (raja ki kripa). In contrast, born with the American and French Revolutions of the late 18th century, citizenship is a fundamentally modern concept. In principle, citizenship stands for membership in a political community and the rights that come with it. Citizenship rights do not depend on royal wishes. Citizenship is inclusionary and equalising, whereas subjecthood was exclusionary, as it came with a diverse set of privileges for different classes of people. In the 20th century, when more and more modern polities became democratic (though not all did), voting increasingly became a citizenship right without any distinctions of class, ethnicity, or gender. Universal franchise became the lifeblood of democratic citizenship after the Second World War. There have been instances in history when the inclusionary thrust of citizenship was severely curtailed. We need to keep such examples in mind as we think about the implications of what the ECI is trying to do in Bihar. The best-known case of citizenship truncation, even crushing, is the American South during the 1880s and mid-1960s. After the Civil War between the largely Republican-led North and Democrat-led South ended in 1865 – in which the North was a victor – the 13th Amendment of the US Constitution abolished slavery, the 14th Amendment gave Black Americans citizenship for the first time, and the 15th Amendment gave Black adult males the right to vote. By 1873-74, 80-85 per cent of southern Blacks had registered to vote. After 1876, Democrats started returning to power in southern states. One of their biggest political objectives was to deprive Blacks of their voting rights. How did they do it? By developing literacy tests, instituting poll taxes, and demanding various other documents. The literacy rate of Black Americans was very low, and their incomes were so meagre that they could not afford the poll taxes necessary for voting. Partly as a result, a vast majority of southern Blacks lost their voting rights, dropping from 84-85 per cent in the mid-1870s to a mere 4-5 per cent by 1904-05. Only in 1965 did universal franchise finally return to America, the vote truncation thus lasting nearly seven to eight decades. Also read: ECI's voter verification drive in Bihar is tailor-made to keep Dalits, Muslims, EBCs out Similarities with Bihar ECI's plans for Bihar have quite a few similarities. The basic similarity – and a big surprise – is that, much like in the US, the onus of registering voters is now being placed on citizens, when it was always the responsibility of the government. People must supply proof of their citizenship to vote. The assumption of India's founding figures was that the poor citizenry would not have the literacy, or wherewithal, to step forward and register for voting. The government would, therefore, use its great resources to reach out to the poor and include them in the electoral rolls. The second similarity has to do with literacy. According to the last Census (2011), Bihar's literacy rate was a mere 61.8 per cent (as against the all-India average of 73 per cent). Illiterate citizens, like many in Bihar, are unlikely to have documents ECI needs — birth certificates, passports, matriculation certificates – to prove their citizenship. For those temporarily residing outside of the state with or without documents registered in Bihar, the requirement is that they download the partially pre-printed enumeration form from a computer, fill them out, and upload them on the ECI's website or app. For millions of Bihar's migrants – working as doormen, watchmen, and labourers in cities such as Delhi, Mumbai, Bengaluru, and Chennai – this requirement is absolutely forbidding. Also read: The price of citizenship for Indians like Goa's Joseph Pereira—uncertainty, red tape, tears Weaponisation of citizenship The problem is compounded by the fact that the Government of India issues no single citizenship document. Very few Indians, including the literate ones, have birth certificates or passports. Citizenship is inferred from a variety of documents. The long-lasting practice is that if citizens say they are citizens and would like to vote, they are presumed to be one unless challenged by others and issued a notification. To try to solve the problem of ineligible voters via a documentation process, for which citizens are wholly responsible, is to inflict exclusion. It is well known in social science research that the idea of documentary adequacy works against the poor and those who have low literacy (which they did not choose but had to suffer). Which communities will be disenfranchised as a result of this exercise? Most of Bihar's poor are Dalits, Muslims, and lower OBCs (The Adivasi community constitutes a very small share in Bihar). The electorate will be disproportionately based among the upper castes and upper OBCs. Voting data shows that these are also the communities that heavily vote for the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Whether or not one can prove that the ECI wanted this to happen, the effect of the new documentary process will tilt the scales in favour of the BJP. Fair and inclusive elections have been a well-known hallmark of Indian democracy. India needs to return to it. Disenfranchisement by institutional fiat is profoundly undemocratic. Citizenship, an inclusive political idea in principle, is being weaponised to exclude citizens in practice. Ashutosh Varshney is Sol Goldman Professor of International Studies and the Social Sciences and Professor of Political Science at Brown University. Views are personal. (Edited by Zoya Bhatti)

PM Modi Offers Full Assistance Following Tragic Bangladesh Air Force Crash
PM Modi Offers Full Assistance Following Tragic Bangladesh Air Force Crash

Hans India

time15 minutes ago

  • Hans India

PM Modi Offers Full Assistance Following Tragic Bangladesh Air Force Crash

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has conveyed India's complete solidarity with Bangladesh following a devastating aircraft accident in Dhaka that claimed multiple lives, with many victims being young students. The Indian leader has assured comprehensive assistance to the neighboring nation during this difficult time. Expressing profound grief over the tragedy, Modi described his shock and sadness at the significant loss of life in the aviation disaster. He particularly emphasized the heartbreaking nature of the incident, given that numerous young students were among the casualties. The Prime Minister extended heartfelt condolences to all families affected by this tragic event. In his official statement posted on social media platform X, Modi emphasized India's commitment to providing whatever support Bangladesh might require. He assured that India remains prepared to offer all forms of assistance and aid to help the nation cope with this emergency situation. The Prime Minister also conveyed prayers for the rapid recovery of those who sustained injuries in the crash, demonstrating the humanitarian concern that has characterized India's response to the crisis. The devastating incident involved a Bangladesh Air Force training aircraft that went down shortly after takeoff on Monday, July 21, 2025. The Chinese-manufactured F-7 BGI training plane crashed directly into the Milestone School and College campus located in Dhaka's Uttara neighborhood, causing widespread destruction and casualties. According to official reports and eyewitness accounts, the crash resulted in at least 19 fatalities, with the majority being children who were present at the educational facility. Additionally, dozens of individuals sustained various degrees of injuries from the impact and subsequent emergency response efforts. The timing and location of the crash made it particularly tragic, as the aircraft struck an active educational institution where students and staff were present during regular hours. Emergency responders, including firefighters and military personnel, immediately rushed to the scene to conduct rescue operations and manage the aftermath of the disaster. This incident highlights the ongoing risks associated with military training operations conducted near populated areas, particularly those housing educational institutions. The Bangladesh Air Force will likely conduct a thorough investigation to determine the exact cause of the crash and implement measures to prevent similar occurrences in the future. India's immediate offer of support reflects the strong bilateral relationship between the two South Asian neighbors and demonstrates the country's commitment to regional solidarity during times of crisis. The gesture underscores the diplomatic ties and mutual cooperation that have characterized India-Bangladesh relations in recent years.

Tesla's California cool aura faces big test on Indian terrain
Tesla's California cool aura faces big test on Indian terrain

Time of India

time15 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Tesla's California cool aura faces big test on Indian terrain

As Tesla gears up for its next showroom unveiling, this time in Delhi following the recent Mumbai debut, it is clear that the brand remains a big draw despite its limited numbers and high price tag. This was more than evident from the media hysteria accompanying the Mumbai event which dominated the headlines through the day. 'Tesla is a much admired brand, not just in India but all over the world. In India, it is always seen as a cool brand given the fact that it is very popular with the Silicon Valley IT crowd and the budding tech millionaires in India also want to own one. So do the stock brokers and equity traders.' says Ambi Parameswaran , noted brand strategist and author. Observers believe the charm lies in its disruption. On US roads, a Tesla is as common as a Toyota Camry and yet it still carries the sheen of Silicon Valley sophistication. It represents something far beyond transportation. In India, this halo still exists, albeit dimmed by sticker shock. According to Sandeep Goyal, Chairman, Rediffusion, 'More than anything else, it is the badge value. To be one amongst your social and work group to own a Tesla gives you bragging rights - the glow of that social esteem is incomparable!' Diminishing aura The fact that the company has lost its aura in recent times thanks to competition from Chinese carmakers, especially BYD, could be of little consequence to buyers in India. Many are also aware that the electric movement is already underway here thanks to local brands which have thrown their hats into the ring. 'Maybe the Indian-made cars from Tata and Mahindra may be better, or BYD may be better, but Tesla has the California cool aura, so there will be a long waiting list,' says Parameswaran. Vinay Raghunath, Partner, Automotive and Mobility Sector Leader, EY India, echoes these sentiments. 'Tesla's arrival marks a milestone in India's electric mobility journey. It will elevate consumer awareness, set benchmarks in connected and autonomous mobility, and prompt OEMs and ecosystem players to invest and innovate.' Tesla is also about the charisma of its CEO, Elon Musk, who has a huge fan following among India's young techies who almost revere him. This kind of hero worship may not resonate across the US and Europe where the Tesla chief has faced a lot of heat in recent times. The Elon Musk factor He has also had a publicised falling out with US President, Donald Trump, and subsequently exited the White House administration. Musk has raised the hackles of many people in the West with his provocative comments but India could not care less. 'Tesla is an Elon Musk statement. It is a statement of futuristics married to technology. Therefore, Indians love the Tesla story,' reiterates Harish Bijoor, Business & Brand Strategy Expert, Founder – Harish Bijoor Consults Inc. Perhaps, this may not be entirely true, argues V.G. Ramakrishnan, Managing Partner, Avanteum Advisors LLP. 'Tesla's aura in India has faded slightly from five years ago. Back then, it was the ultimate symbol of aspiration. Today, some of that sheen has worn of partly due to its pricing, Musk's polarising leadership and partly because American brands have struggled to localise in India. Apple is the exception; most others—Coke, Pepsi, Domino's—had to adapt to survive.' High levies In its turn, the company cannot ignore India either even while there have been constant cribs about the high import duty levels prevalent here. The Model Y shipped from Shanghai will, consequently, cost a bomb at over INR 60 lakh and it remains to be seen if this will still attract customers by the droves to Tesla showrooms. The price tag immediately sparked a wave of memes online, with some branding the vehicle 'TAX‑LA.' On offer is the base Autopilot suite (Level 2 ADAS), while Tesla's full self-driving (FSD) package—currently restricted by Indian regulation—remains off-limits. Yet, this is of little consequence when the top priority is to test the waters here. "Tesla or for that matter any other brand in the world of auto cannot ever ignore India. India is just too big to ignore. We host the largest number of potential consumers in the world, a wee bit of a notch above China as well. India is a "never mind the price" market at the top of the pyramid hierarchy of auto. This fact is scented by Tesla,' says Bijoor. Gauging market response The market response will also give the carmaker a better idea of its longterm business plan and if it makes sense to manufacture in India. Tesla's India debut has been long in the making—delayed by red tape, regulatory uncertainty, and Musk's well-documented standoff with India's high import duties. "In many ways, Tesla delayed an Indian entry as far as possible till friendly tariffs fell into place. This is just yet to happen, but might just. Tesla does pack charm. Its charm is in its differentiation,' continues Bijoor. While no 'friendly tariff' resolution is yet in place, Tesla has decided to test the waters. And true to its style, it arrives not as a mass-market disruptor, but as a high-end provocateur. It's no secret that the Centre tweaked its electric vehicle policy to suit Tesla except that the company was in no mood to bite the bait. Whether the India-US trade pact will offer import duty concessions is also a moot point since there is now no love lost between Trump and Musk. Tesla's influence is catalytic, rather than competitive—at least for now. With luxury EVs forming just 4 per cent of the 1.5–1.6 lakh EVs sold in the first half of FY25 (roughly 5,000–6,000 units), Tesla's positioning is elite, aspirational, and niche. It does not rival Tata, MG or Mahindra on volumes but its arrival will compel everyone, from automakers to policymakers, to look up and take notice. To what extent this attention or adulation will translate into sales remains to be seen.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store