
The big AI shake-up
'Initially, the invoice details were documented on paper, and later entered manually into the system. Now, the job is being done by AI, which extracts details from the soft copies of invoices,' says Vijay (name changed), who is overseeing the project and a few other AI initiatives at the hospital.
According to him, automation brought down human intervention in the process by at least 50%. 'No one has been laid off. People were only repurposed,' he says while admitting that the development may affect recruitments in the future.
Hima (name changed), a consultant at one of the biggest accounting firms, was part of an office meeting recently where people were encouraged to share their apprehensions on the firm's AI implementations. 'Some of our coders were very upbeat about the introduction of AI. There is a resource crunch in the coding team, and they are often very stretched. But with the firm investing in AI tools and code assistants, they say life has become easier for them,' she notes.
Multifaceted effects
As AI reshapes the workforce across sectors, its effects are proving to be multifaceted, and far from uniform.
Bengaluru is today home to more than a lakh AI professionals. The city was also recently ranked among the top five AI ecosystems in the Global Startup Ecosystem Index. With Bengaluru positioning itself in the thick of AI advancements and the Karnataka government now on the cusp of launching the next IT policy, the State's Information Technology and Biotechnology Department recently launched a survey to assess the impact of AI on the workforce.
Among other things, it aims to understand how AI is being integrated into day-to-day operations across organisations, which business functions are seeing the biggest changes, and which job roles are most vulnerable to automation.
The survey is an indication of the State taking serious note of the big shake-up that is on our doorstep.
The AI-augmented future
From enhancing precision in surgeries to detecting fraud in banking and finance, enabling robotic automation in manufacturing, powering personalised recommendations in retail, and optimising traffic control in cities, AI is becoming increasingly ubiquitous and almost indispensable. According to the United Nations, the global AI market is projected to reach $4.8 trillion by 2033.
The other side of this, however, is the fears of lay-off and displacement, especially in jobs involving routine and repetitive tasks, coupled with a growing sense of overwhelm as workers struggle to adapt to an ever-evolving workplace. A recent report by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development predicted that AI would impact 40% of the jobs worldwide and widen inequality. Amazon CEO Andy Jassy's recent comment about the company moving to a smaller corporate workforce due to the adoption of generative AI tools and agents has not helped allay fears, particularly as the tech giant has laid off more than 27,000 employees since 2022.
What is going to be the net result of this disruption and how is it going to play out in India?
'I think, in the future, all of us will be AI-augmented humans,' says Guruprasad Mudlapur, vice-chairman of the Confederation of Indian Industry, Karnataka, vice-president of Bosch Group in India, and managing director of Bosch Ltd. While acknowledging the possibility of significant disruption across industries, he believes the net outcome will be positive.
Skilling crucial
While it is clear by now that the IT and ITeS workforce stands to see the biggest impact of the technology, changes are expected in sectors such as financial services, manufacturing, healthcare, and e-commerce.
'Skills in general will undergo massive change. The skills required in the new world of AI will necessitate a high level of digital literacy. AI-ML (machine learning) skills even in non-technical roles will be very essential now,' remarks Mudlapur.
According to him, while Bengaluru, or Karnataka at large, can boast of the highest AI-ready talent pool, specialist AI talent — which is required to develop an AI model, for example — is in short supply.
'We can see why we have not built a GPT of our own,' he points out, while adding that universities also need to take note of the requirements of the future and act on training students accordingly.
Initiatives in skilling
Karnataka's IT-BT Minister Priyank Kharge notes that shaping strategic interventions under the government's skilling initiative, NIPUNA Karnataka, is among the aims of the AI survey. The survey is the first such initiative by a State government and a serious step in the direction of skilling.
'There is a strong need to understand the actual disruption that is happening. A lot of people are saying a lot of things, but is that disruption going to result in actual job loss, or is it something that can be addressed through reskilling or upskilling? It is to understand this that we have reached out to stakeholders through the survey... If you see the way AI and other emerging technologies have disrupted over the last four years, we would require some collective feedback from the industry so that we would be able to give out the most conducive policy for growth,' he says.
With technology poised to change the way the IT and ITeS sectors work, companies too have been moving in the direction of skilling.
'I'm constantly trying to repurpose my people to shift them towards the demand,' says Ravi Vasantraj, Global Delivery Head, Mphasis. 'I'm now changing my talent management systems to start allowing for people to get trained or hyper-personalised in their training. Let's say someone is a full-stack Java developer, but we are seeing demand for people with React.js or Node.js skills. We will start prodding this person to get trained in them, showing his chances to get higher billing and hence higher compensation,' says Vasantraj who likes to see AI as 'an intelligent assist — like J.A.R.V.I.S. to Stark in Avengers.'
Sindhu Gangadharan, MD of SAP Labs India and chairperson of the National Association of Software and Service Companies, notes that the company offers curated learning journeys tailored to individual skill profiles, leveraging internal platforms, global partners, and partnerships with institutions such as IIM Bangalore, IIIT Bangalore, BITS Pilani, and Northwestern Kellogg. 'The result is a future-ready workforce empowered to lead with an AI-first mindset. Today, 50% of our employees are already AI-enabled. Over the past year alone, they've completed more than 35,000 courses and clocked over 2,00,000 learning hours,' she says.
Multiplying demand?
With almost every corporate investing in AI and demand for AI agents and tools increasing, the number of AI roles has also risen, creating a large demand for people trained in the same. A recent report by Naukri JobSpeak recorded a 25% year-on-year rise in hiring for AI and ML roles in India.
'It (AI) will create more than it will alter,' says Vasantraj, who believes that not only will the technology not take away jobs, but will probably multiply the demand 10 times and enhance the productivity of employees.
'The combined industry of North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific spends anywhere between $1.8 trillion and $1.9 trillion to support legacy technology. This is known as tech debt. People are worried that they will lose their jobs to AI. But our premise is that these $1.9 trillion will come into the market because now it's viable.'
According to him, the latent demand from clients who were earlier reluctant to deploy AI is now getting activated. Mphasis witnessed its pipeline jumping up by an unprecedented 70% between quarters three and four in the last financial year, he notes.
The other half
The high demand for AI talent in IT/ITeS is, however, only half the story, say sources within the industry. While there is demand, the elephant in the room is the immense pressure on AI development teams within companies, says Radhika (name changed), who works as a project manager at the Bengaluru office of a global technology and service supplier.
'Companies like ours have purchased AI technologies from behemoths like Google or OpenAI for huge prices. The investment has been massive, and they need returns. To get the desired results, they put immense pressure on AI development teams, often pushing them to the brim,' she notes.
According to her, most IT and ITeS companies have so far not been able to achieve the expected efficiency or profits by deploying AI in place of people. 'Coding assistance is the only use case that is working to some extent,' she says. The way forward then, has been to extract more out of the remaining employees, alleges Radhika.
'Even when they haven't fixed the issues with the existing AI tools, they invest in more. This will not only burden the employees, but also reduce the quality of products and services in the industry going forward,' she says, citing the example of the customer services function, where several companies witnessed lower customer satisfaction after trying to replace executives with AI bots.
A case in point is Klarna, a Swedish fintech company which fired around 700 of its employees two years ago to replace them with AI. After coming under fire from customers for lower service standards, the company has now announced a recruitment campaign to bring back human beings.
Technology vs. labour
Balaji Parthasarathy, professor at IIIT Bangalore and principal investigator of the Fairwork India project, argues that in India, the impact of AI on the workforce will pan out differently as compared with the West. He points out how some companies, for example, have abstained from deploying AI in certain roles in India, simply because the labour is cheap and pliant, and labour laws are loosely enforced.
'If you look at the warehouses of big companies like Amazon in the U.S., there are high levels of automation. In many parts of the world, they are experimenting with drones for delivery. But in a country like India, where labour is relatively inexpensive, it doesn't make as much sense. It may, in fact, be costlier for companies to bring in these technologies. Here, workers are replaced easily because there is high levels of unemployment and labour rights are not strictly enforced.'
Sector-specific debate
He notes that the AI vs. jobs debate is also sector-specific and a function of whether the AI tools can deliver on the organisational priorities.
'In areas where you require precision or the job is hazardous, deployment of AI or robotics is critical. If there are tasks that can be easily automated at very low costs, AI will be used for them. Then there are fields where the technology will enter but will require human beings to know how to use them to augment what they do, rather than displace them. I think the word 'augment' is not considered enough,' says Parthasarathy.
The fear of job loss is not entirely baseless though, admits Mudlapur. Repetitive manual skills may be the most vulnerable, and these might involve job roles such as coding, invoice processing, accounting, and research assistance. Mid-skilled white-collar jobs like analyst might also get replaced if they do not have deep domain knowledge, he remarks.
'We see the coding efficiency going up by 30% if we adopt AI, GPTs, and other tools to enhance the codes. But we can also say we may not require 30% of the software talent. But a positive way to look at it is this 30% could do more sophisticated work, like building models and so on,' he says. 'Overall, there will be a shake-up in the job market. That is very clear.'
The shape-shifters
Vasantraj of Mphasis feels the anxieties, at least concerning the job losses in the IT and ITeS sectors, are part of the usual fears before any new technology takes off.
'Our industry evolves very quickly. This industry was written down after Y2K. But we are shape-shifters, and we keep learning. My view is that there will be a decoupling between revenues and headcount, which means that with the same number of people, you'll be able to multiply revenues,' he notes, attributing the lay-offs at the companies to macroeconomic factors rather than AI.
According to Vasantraj, regulations, responsible AI, and data breaches should be the bigger concerns.
'If AI is combined with quantum, you have a real problem. Your Gmail could be hacked in 30 seconds. Given the kind of geopolitical situations, there will be characters that might start using it in an obtuse manner. It's similar to nuclear energy in that sense. If you have a J.A.R.V.I.S. with Stark, you will also have a Thanos somewhere. But that's a problem for tomorrow,' he says.
(Edited by Giridhar Narayan)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
UNLEASH leads USD 1.6mn investment in GenAI-powered fintech infra startup Neurofin
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills UNLEASH Capital has announced its lead investment in a $1.6 million seed funding round for Neurofin, a GenAI-first enterprise platform that is driving operations and compliance automation across India's banking and financial services (BFSI) sector. The funding round also saw participation from investors such as Pentathlon Ventures, Fintech Yatra, and Antler, underscoring strong confidence in Neurofin's mission to modernise and streamline financial infrastructure with cutting-edge generative AI technologies. Neurofin is transforming the operational backbone of the BFSI sector using a modular suite of AI-powered agents that automate documentation, audits, compliance, and fraud checks— enabling same-day disbursal of complex secured loans that traditionally take up to seven days."We are thrilled to partner with Vijay and the Neurofin team on their journey to build India's category-defining GenAI infra company in banking," said Natsuki Sugai, Managing Partner at UNLEASH Capital . "At a time when financial institutions are struggling with legacy systems and rising compliance pressure, Neurofin's intelligent agents are redefining what operational efficiency and auditability can look like," he in May 2024 and headquartered in Bengaluru, Neurofin is already working with marquee clients like Tata Capital, Muthoot Fincorp, and Jio Payments Bank. The company is on track to scale to $3 million in annual revenue by FY26 based on current offerings alone.'We believe operations is the final frontier for fintech innovation,' said Vijay Makhijani, Founder and CEO of Neurofin. 'With UNLEASH's backing, we'll double down on product expansion and distribution, enabling financial institutions to serve more customers, faster and with greater compliance confidence.'Neurofin's platform targets a large market for documentation and operations automation in India's secured lending industry, with a total addressable market of over $850 investment is part of its thesis on backing category-creating, tech-led infrastructure startups in large but under-digitised sectors.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
19 hours ago
- First Post
'Not just in words but in action': Modi invokes India's legacy in Namibia's freedom fight
Prime Minister Narendra Modi said that Namibia has become the first African nation to adopt India's Unified Payments Interface (UPI) technology, marking a major milestone in bilateral digital cooperation. read more Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday invoked the shared legacy of struggle and solidarity between the two nations, reminding lawmakers that India had supported Namibia's liberation even before gaining its own independence. In a historic address to Namibia's Parliament on Friday, PM Modi said 'The people of India stood proudly with Namibia during your liberation struggle. Even before our own independence, India raised the issue of South West Africa at the United Nations… It was an Indian Lieutenant General, Dewan Prem Chand, who led the UN peacekeeping force in Namibia. India is proud to have stood with you, not just in words but in action…" STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD #WATCH | Windhoek: Addressing the Parliament of Namibia, PM Narendra Modi says, "The people of India stood proudly with Namibia during your liberation struggle. Even before our own independence, India raised the issue of South West Africa at the United Nations... It was an Indian… — ANI (@ANI) July 9, 2025 PM Modi also said that Namibia would become the first African nation to adopt India's Unified Payments Interface (UPI), a digital payments system that has revolutionised financial inclusion across India. 'Soon, a Himba grandmother in Kunene or a shopkeeper in Katutura will be able to go digital with just a tap, faster than a Springbok,' Modi said, drawing applause as he invoked local imagery to underscore the speed and reach of the technology. We are thrilled that Namibia is the first country to adopt India's UPI. People will soon be able to send money faster than one can say 'Tangi Unene',' he added. #WATCH | Windhoek: Addressing the Parliament of Namibia, PM Narendra Modi says, "We are thrilled that Namibia is the first country to adopt India's UPI-Unified Payment Interface technology. Soon, people will be able to send money faster than one can say "Tangi Unene". Soon, a… — ANI (@ANI) July 9, 2025 STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Reflecting on the broader India-Namibia partnership, Modi said bilateral trade had crossed $800 million, but likened it to 'just warming up' before a big game, promising, 'we will score faster and score more.' The Prime Minister also announced India's offer to supply Namibia with the Bhabhatron radiotherapy machine for advanced cancer care. 'Developed in India, the Bhabhatron has already helped nearly half a million patients in 15 countries. India is ready to support Namibia with this critical technology,' Modi said. He also invited Namibia to join India's Jan Aushadhi initiative to improve access to affordable and quality medicines. Recalling India's role during the COVID-19 pandemic, Modi said India stood with Africa when others hesitated. 'Our Aarogya Maitri initiative supports Africa with hospitals, equipment, medicines, and training,' he said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Modi struck an emotional chord while thanking Namibia for its role in reintroducing cheetahs to India. 'We are deeply grateful for your gift. I had the privilege of releasing them into Kuno National Park. They have sent a message for you — everything is fine. They are happy and have grown in number,' he said. #WATCH | Windhoek: Addressing the Parliament of Namibia, PM Narendra Modi says, "You helped us in reintroducing Cheetahs in our country, we are deeply grateful for your gift. I had the privilege of releasing them into the Kuno National Park. They have sent a message for you-… — ANI (@ANI) July 9, 2025 Receiving Namibia's highest civilian honour, Modi called it 'a symbol of the friendship between our peoples.' Drawing a parallel with the country's resilient national plant, he said, 'Like your Welwitschia Mirabilis, our friendship only grows stronger with age and time.' Modi also reminded the Parliament of India's longstanding solidarity with Namibia during its struggle for independence. 'Even before our own independence, India raised the issue of South West Africa at the United Nations,' he said, noting that Indian Lieutenant General Dewan Prem Chand led the UN peacekeeping force in Namibia.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
a day ago
- First Post
Trump's trade wars expose chink in global economic order
The United Nations and the Bretton Woods institutions, established in 1945 in a different era, have failed to accommodate the changes in the balance of power since then read more At the end of last week, US President Donald Trump shook the global economic firmament with yet another aftershock, this time claiming that he would be sending 'letters' to about a dozen countries intimating the imposition of tariffs between 10 to 70 per cent. The announcement came days before the 90-day moratorium set in April was to end on 9 July. Meanwhile, negotiations have resulted only in two deals, with the UK and Vietnam respectively, and an interim agreement with China. The UK deal resulted in lower tariff rates on British automobiles and eliminated tariffs on the UK aerospace industry but the steel and aluminum exports remain outstanding. With Vietnam, the agreement resulted in reduction of tariffs from 46 per cent to 20 per cent, with duty-free access for US goods in return! STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Recent negotiations between the US and China have led to both sides lowering tariffs as an interim measure from an all-time high of 145 per cent by the US and 125 per cent by China, with some easing of the chokehold by China on exports of rare earth magnets. So far, no deals have been reached with the EU, Japan or India. Meanwhile, Trump has threatened 10 per cent tariffs on BRICS member states, including India, for the grouping's 'anti-American policies'. The US-China trade war is at the heart of the tariff war. The US has long chafed at the bit with regard to its trade deficit of nearly $300 billion. China also holds about $1 trillion in US treasury bonds, accounting for a substantial part of the treasury bonds held by foreign entities. The tariff war unleashed on the global economic order highlights the close linkage between geopolitics and geo-economics today. Countries around the world are also discovering that the private interests of political leaders, political parties and corporates can drive strategic choices and shape national policies. Today, private entrepreneurs and Big Tech are working in tandem with sovereign governments whether in the West or in China. This is not unlike the colonial age in which explorers like Vasco de Gama and Christopher Columbus had the financial and military backing of their sovereigns for their expeditions to distant lands for trade and treasure, with the spoils being equitably shared later with the sovereigns. The larger question to be posed is why the global economic order is so weakened and vulnerable today. Why is there geo-economic fragmentation with a growing yen for protectionism and regional or bilateral free trade arrangements? The genesis of major power contestation lies in the inability of the existing global order to reform adequately. The United Nations and the Bretton Woods institutions, established in 1945 in a different era, have failed to accommodate the changes in the balance of power since then. The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) in 1948 was a by-product of the Bretton Woods institutions, and it segued into the Uruguay Round of trade negotiations in 1986, following by the establishment of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) which came to symbolise the opportunities offered by the conduct of free trade in a rules-based system in an era of globalisation. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In many ways, the broad consensus held for a few years even after the entry of China into the WTO in 2001, but the subsequent Global Financial Crisis debilitated the Western economies and reordered the balance of economic power. China has exhibited a far more combative posture, backed by far greater financial and economic wherewithal since 2008. After President Xi Jinping's ascendance to power in 2013, this trend has only strengthened with the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) complementing several other Chinese initiatives such as the establishment of the AIIB and the NDB of Brics. In a new era of global friction and issue-based alignments, both trade and technology are being increasingly weaponised. China's monopoly over critical supply chains has signalled to others the potential for manipulation and driven home the need for diversification and risk mitigation. The most recent challenges concern the long-term availability of critical supply chains, whether semiconductors, critical minerals or rare earth magnets for EVs. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The acceleration of the US-China competition has resulted in the imposition of binary choices upon the vast majority that continue to have trade and economic ties to both the powers. For the US, unilateral imposition of tariffs, re-shoring and protectionist measures have taken precedence over the logic of market forces or cooperation with strategic partners. This has resulted in a high degree of uncertainty, pushing the majority towards membership of exclusive blocs even though crystallised alliances are not easy to form in an era of hedging and multi-alignment. A tit for tat approach only compounds problems as do export controls, sanctions and denial regimes. The tariff war points to the Trump administration's notion that the massive adverse balance of trade with China can be used as a leverage since tariffs are more likely to impact Chinese exports to the US than the other way around. US tariffs on China are no doubt aimed at reducing the trade deficit and encouraging US and Western companies to de-risk and move away from the strong gravitational pull of the Chinese economy. The calculus could be that slower growth rates in China would promote economic stress, put a brake on China's military modernisation, and limit its prospects for overtaking the US economy in the near future. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Until recently, globalisation was underwritten by the World Trade Organisation which was created to ensure a fair and equitable multilateral rules-based trading order. However, the WTO was unable to prevent unfair practices that border on exploitation. Not all of the 166 members benefited equally from globalisation. Ironically, both the US and China are blaming one another. The US, and many others around the world, believe that China has failed to play by WTO norms. On its part, China accuses the US of abandoning the liberal trading order and resorting to economic coercion. To wit, the WTO is ill-prepared for the largest economy, that is, the US, turning its back on the multilateral trading order and dispute settlement mechanism. For that matter, the WTO is also ill-equipped to deal with the challenge of a hybrid Chinese economy which continues to be a 'non-market economy' 24 years after the country's admission to the WTO. US tariffs do not distinguish between friend or foe. Tariffs on Southeast Asian countries, even EU nations, are aimed at discouraging Chinese companies from relocating their operations to ASEAN economies or to Europe as a means of bypassing US tariffs. The US focus on 'rule of origin' is meant to shut out Chinese goods and components. The US appears keen to reorient Asian economies with itself as the core, and perhaps weaken the RCEP which revolves around the Chinese economy. In any case, the US is absent from the CPTTP. Four years on, China's application to join the CPTTP still languishes and is unlikely to be approved. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, a point to note is that any weakening of the economic partnership between China and Asian economies at this juncture would have a deleterious effect on China's GDP growth rates. After all, China's trade with Asia, particularly Asean, is growing at a much faster rate than trade between China and the US or the EU. Today, ASEAN is China's largest trading partner accounting for 16.8 per cent of its total foreign trade. Intra-Asian trade has proved mutually beneficial for China and Asean. Therefore, higher US tariffs on goods from China and ASEAN countries may provide a fresh impetus to intra-Asian trade and investment flows. For the US, tariffs are also intended to boost domestic manufacturing through reshoring. That is easier said than done. The US has neither the supply chain ecosystem nor the labour cost arbitrage to substitute China as a manufacturing hub. This means that China will continue to be a preferred source of goods and components for major Asian and European economies as they prioritise controlling consumer prices and inflation. The manufacturing industry in many countries, whether for domestic consumption or exports, is in any case heavily dependent on China-centric supply chains. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Reforms are imperative if the WTO is to work well as a non-discriminatory rules-based system. India attaches importance to tackling non-tariff barriers that restrict market access, addressing distortions caused by non-market economies, and reviving the WTO's dispute settlement system. India considers agriculture and dairy to be sensitive sectors in trade negotiations. In his remarks at the session on Reform of Global Governance and Peace and Security at the BRICS Summit in Brazil on 6 July, Prime Minister Modi stated that global governance institutions such as the UN Security Council, IMF, World Bank, and WTO must undergo urgent reform to reflect contemporary realities. Institutionally, US primacy survives in the IMF for instance, where it wields a veritable veto with nearly 17 per cent voting share against the requirement of a majority of 85 per cent consensus for bringing about any change. China-backed institutions such as the AIIB epitomise multi-alignment, with several close US allies such as the UK, France and Australia being members. AIIB too needs to move away from its current focus on infrastructure financing to a broader thrust on poverty alleviation and human indices if it is to compete with the established Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs). STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Lack of reforms in global financial, trade and economic institutions is a setback for the realisation of the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, including climate action, as well as food and energy security. The worst affected by a global gridlock in decision-making, as always, are the countries of the Global South. Regional cooperative structures can play an important role at a time when multilateralism represented by the UN and the WTO stands weakened. They can enhance economic stability, promote infrastructure, connectivity and facilitate regional FTAs. However, it is imperative that the national priorities of certain member states do not dominate the discourse within a regional mechanism. For regional economic structures to succeed, they must be inclusive and must eschew combative postures. India is today the fastest growing large economy. It is the fourth largest and will soon be the third-largest economy. India's focus is on inclusive growth and development. India is emerging as an attractive destination for trade, investment and supply chain diversification as part of global risk mitigation. The philosophy of vasudhaiva kutumbakam, which was the leitmotif of India's successful G20 presidency, can help the world forge a better values-based normative consensus for development and prosperity around the world. The author is the Director General of the Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses; views expressed are personal.