Lancashire will get elected mayor, deputy prime minister says
All of Lancashire's 15 councils have been asked to submit initial plans for how they will reorganise themselves into new authorities.The government wants councils to merge to create single unitary authorities to provide all the services in their area under an elected mayor.Devolution minister, Jim McMahon, told the conference: "It's about giving local leaders the power to get on and do the job and a mayor is really important in that, they do make a difference."The devolution white paper, published two months ago, stated that it was the government's "strong preference" that local areas opted for mayor if they did not already have one – but it also held out the alternative prospect of a non-mayoral "strategic authority", like the Lancashire Combined County Authority (CCA) that came into being last month, to oversee its existing devolution deal.That "level two" agreement gives Lancashire powers including control of the adult education budget and some aspects of local transport, as well as a one-off £20m innovation fund.
However, a top-grade "level three" deal would see the creation of a long-term investment cash pot, with an agreed annual allocation, along with a say over local rail and greater control over brownfield regeneration.The leaders of Blackpool and Blackburn with Darwen councils, Lynn Williams and Phil Riley, two of the three current devolution deal signatories, have previously expressed hope and confidence that Lancashire would end up part of the government's devolution priority programme of places where mayors would be in place by next May. Lancashire County Council leader Phillippa Williamson, the other devolution partner, has previously stressed the lack of local agreement over a mayor, but had not ventured a particular preference on behalf of her own authority.However, district council leaders are openly split over the issue – with the likes of Chorley's Alistair Bradley and Preston's Matthew Brown having come out in favour of a mayor, but others including Wyre leader Michael Vincent and Ribble Valley's Stephen Atkinson staunchly against.
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Lancashire on BBC Sounds and follow BBC Lancashire on Facebook, X and Instagram and watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
9 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
I love democracy. That's why your referendums terrify me
As a Swiss citizen, I have to ask, is life just too boring for you? Whenever you hold a referendum, it's always about these gigantic issues like 'Shall we quickly become an independent country?' Or 'Shall we leave the EU?' I admire your fearless spirit. Truly. But tell me: is it the adrenaline you crave? Do you just love a gamble? I don't mean to offend – as a Swiss person, I'm obliged to remain neutral – but honestly, couldn't you maybe try something... a little less high-stakes? In Switzerland, we live in a system of direct democracy. Every three months or so, we vote nationwide, usually on multiple issues at once. 'Should we expand the motorway network?' 'Should pensions be increased?' And 'Should we buy new fighter jets?' I'm not saying we're especially good at these debates, we're just very used to them. Decision-making in referendums is a complex blend of media coverage, political lobbying and pub conversations. READ MORE And even with all that practice, we still often get swept up in short-term moods. Populist ideas have it easy. For example, a majority voted to ban face covering in public spaces. A "burka ban" – even though, in Switzerland, it's estimated that only about 14 people actually wear a burka. A majority also banned the construction of new minarets – when there are currently only four minarets in the entire country. And let's be honest, it's not like you can even see them among all the mountains. Often, initiatives that tap into fear or target a minority have the best chances. Or ones that are cleverly packaged in populist terms. Not long ago, the Swiss voted that retirees should receive not 12 monthly payments a year, but 13 – without any clear plan for the funding, and despite knowing our population will soon look like a flock of David Attenboroughs. Still, I'm grateful to live in a direct democracy. I believe it's important not to leave everything to the politicians. And after every vote in Switzerland, there's a national autopsy of the results, a new debate about which arguments were overrated or underrated. We try to learn something for the next round. Occasionally we succeed. In Scotland, since 1975, you've held five national referendums. Roughly one every ten years. But of course, your referendums are never Swissy-tame. You bet the house: 'Shall we leave the EU?' 'Shall we declare independence?' What's next: 'Shall we join another solar system?' I'm curious, why don't you try something a little smaller – just once – Swiss-style? Maybe your next referendum could be 'Should we commit to holding at least three referendums a year?' Because the more you practise referendums, the better the outcomes. Or to put it another way, voting is like brushing your teeth: if you don't do it regularly, rot sets in – when you actually could dazzle. Michael Elsener is a Swiss comedian and talk show host. His show How to Live in Paradise is on at the Gilded Balloon 1-21 August.
Telegraph
9 hours ago
- Telegraph
Labour's ‘toxic' tax will demolish the ‘Reynolds effect', warns Wrexham
Labour's plans to roll out a 'toxic' tourist tax on Welsh towns will discourage visitors as well as putting local jobs at risk, councillors have warned. It comes as Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, backs proposals to allow councils to charge similar levies to boost their budgets. Wrexham city's head of tourism said the tax would deter those who travel from as far as America and Australia following the success of the Welcome to Wrexham TV series about the town's local football club. Tourism in the city has soared since Hollywood actor Ryan Reynolds' takeover of Wrexham FC in 2020, and a tax on entry would be 'detrimental' to the local economy, the councillor said. Wrexham council's Cllr Nigel Williams said: 'As lead member with responsibility for tourism, I would currently not be in favour of introducing the tax. 'Any decision on tourism tax would need to be taken by the council's executive board, but over the year I've been out speaking with businesses in the hospitality and tourism sector, and currently none of those I've spoken to would welcome the new tax. They feel it would be detrimental to the sector.' Ms Rayner is said to be lobbying Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, to give councils more of a say in how their budgets are decided, and has previously called for a 'devolution revolution'. Welsh Labour's proposals would impose a £1.30 surcharge per person, meaning a family of four staying in a hotel or Airbnb for a two-week stay would pay £72.80 in tourism tax to the local authority. Visitors staying in caravan sites or hostels would pay a reduced rate of 75p per night – an extra £42 on the family holiday. The earliest the levy – which is expected to raise £33m a year – could be introduced is in 2027. However, it is at the discretion of local authorities whether they choose to implement it or not. Sam Rowlands, the chair of the Senedd's Cross-Party Group on Tourism, said local businesses were 'extremely worried' about the levy. He said: 'I really couldn't believe it when this toxic tax was passed earlier this month, as in this current climate, the last thing we should be doing is discouraging people from visiting North Wales. 'One of the biggest employers in my region is the tourism sector, which supports around 46,000 jobs and, in normal times, generates over £3.5bn annually to the local economy. We should be supporting our hospitality industry – not hindering its growth.' Wrexham's tourism boom It comes as businesses battle a soaring tax burden after the Chancellor's decision to increase employers' National Insurance contributions. Official figures show that since Welcome to Wrexham first aired, North Wales's tourism revenue has risen 20pc year on year and almost 50pc in five years. Internet searches for trips to North Wales have also soared as Wrexham AFC has gone from strength to strength, securing three back-to-back promotions. Last month, more than 300,000 people in the US alone searched for Wrexham content on Reddit. Mark Pritchard, the council leader, said he would not support a tax 'as we want to welcome people to Wrexham without charging them additional taxes on their visit'. He added: 'The current visitor and tourism economy within Wrexham is growing as a result of many factors, including the increased profile we enjoy from the football club as well as ongoing local and multi-agency work promoting Wrexham and Wales as a destination. 'We want to encourage tourists to visit and spend their hard-earned money here. Putting an additional levy or tax on their visit could mean they choose to visit somewhere else and spend their money elsewhere.'
BBC News
12 hours ago
- BBC News
New Cottam Parkway railway station faces funding shortfall
Only about half the funding needed to build a new railway station in suburban Lancashire is currently available for the long-planned Cottam Parkway in Preston was first mooted a decade ago to serve the rapidly-growing population of the north-west of the for land between Lea Road and Sidgreaves Lane, it would offer passengers journey times of five minutes into Preston city centre and 20 minutes to estimates in 2020 put a price tag of £24m on the new station and accompanying park and ride, but the Local Democracy Reporting Service has learned that the bill has since doubled to more than £55m. The Treasury announced last week that it was allocating £28.4m to Lancashire County Council (LCC) to deliver the scheme - located on the South Fylde line - subject to approval of a business case. It followed the completion of the Labour government's spending review, which was published last shortfall - driven at least in part by inflation - means the project is still stuck in the sidings. 'Situation is a mess' It is understood that the station is at an advanced stage of design and work could begin quickly if the funding could be found in councillor John Potter, who represents the Preston West division – within which the station would be built – said the situation was "a mess"."This just sounds like another [instance] where residents are expecting something, then a whole load of delays happen – and then the excuses seem to come forward," he said."So we need to get to the truth of which figure is right when it comes to the cost." Potter added: "We cannot allow North West Preston to just be homes and not have the infrastructure it requires."Funding was previously allocated for the Cottam Parkway project via the last government's Transforming Cities Fund back in was awarded £40m for a series of schemes, with £22.3m earmarked for the new suburban station, with a further £2.1m due to be contributed from the Preston, South Ribble and Lancashire City Deal – the government-backed plan to deliver the infrastructure needed to facilitate the building of 17,000 new homes in the wider it is unclear whether – and how – the tranche of cash intended for the station was ultimately used, or even whether the money announced by the Treasury last week is a renouncement of any part of the Transforming Cities Fund has been approached for comment. Listen to the best of BBC Radio Lancashire on BBC Sounds and follow BBC Lancashire on Facebook, X and Instagram and watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer.
