I love democracy. That's why your referendums terrify me
Whenever you hold a referendum, it's always about these gigantic issues like 'Shall we quickly become an independent country?' Or 'Shall we leave the EU?'
I admire your fearless spirit. Truly.
But tell me: is it the adrenaline you crave? Do you just love a gamble? I don't mean to offend – as a Swiss person, I'm obliged to remain neutral – but honestly, couldn't you maybe try something... a little less high-stakes?
In Switzerland, we live in a system of direct democracy.
Every three months or so, we vote nationwide, usually on multiple issues at once. 'Should we expand the motorway network?' 'Should pensions be increased?' And 'Should we buy new fighter jets?'
I'm not saying we're especially good at these debates, we're just very used to them.
Decision-making in referendums is a complex blend of media coverage, political lobbying and pub conversations.
READ MORE
And even with all that practice, we still often get swept up in short-term moods.
Populist ideas have it easy. For example, a majority voted to ban face covering in public spaces. A "burka ban" – even though, in Switzerland, it's estimated that only about 14 people actually wear a burka.
A majority also banned the construction of new minarets – when there are currently only four minarets in the entire country.
And let's be honest, it's not like you can even see them among all the mountains.
Often, initiatives that tap into fear or target a minority have the best chances.
Or ones that are cleverly packaged in populist terms.
Not long ago, the Swiss voted that retirees should receive not 12 monthly payments a year, but 13 – without any clear plan for the funding, and despite knowing our population will soon look like a flock of David Attenboroughs.
Still, I'm grateful to live in a direct democracy.
I believe it's important not to leave everything to the politicians. And after every vote in Switzerland, there's a national autopsy of the results, a new debate about which arguments were overrated or underrated.
We try to learn something for the next round. Occasionally we succeed.
In Scotland, since 1975, you've held five national referendums. Roughly one every ten years.
But of course, your referendums are never Swissy-tame. You bet the house: 'Shall we leave the EU?' 'Shall we declare independence?' What's next: 'Shall we join another solar system?'
I'm curious, why don't you try something a little smaller – just once – Swiss-style?
Maybe your next referendum could be 'Should we commit to holding at least three referendums a year?'
Because the more you practise referendums, the better the outcomes.
Or to put it another way, voting is like brushing your teeth: if you don't do it regularly, rot sets in – when you actually could dazzle.
Michael Elsener is a Swiss comedian and talk show host. His show How to Live in Paradise is on at the Gilded Balloon 1-21 August.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
33 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Joan Collins, 92, oozes sophistication in a chic white dress as she joins husband Percy Gibson, 60, at lavish dinner party in Saint-Tropez
Joan Collins cut a stylish figure as she and her husband, Percy Gibson, attended Frederic Merlin's lavish dinner party in Saint-Tropez, France, on Friday. The actress, 92, showcased her timeless sense of style at the event, held at the upscale beachside Italian restaurant Gigi Ramatuelle. For the occasion, she oozed sophistication in a chic white dress paired with a matching blazer, which featured cape sleeves and intricate flamingo and palm tree embroidery. She added height with a pair of white open-toed heels as she arrived arm-in-arm with Percy, who is 32 years her junior. Meanwhile, Percy, 60, looked dapper in a grey checked double-breasted blazer layered over a pale pink shirt. He completed the summery look with white skinny jeans and cream loafers. Percy is the Dynasty star's fifth husband, with the pair tying the knot at London's Claridge's in February 2002. The American Horror Story star was previously married to Maxwell Reed, Anthony Newley, Ron Kass and Peter Holm. Originally from Peru, Percy is a noted Hollywood producer, known primarily for producing Who Wants to Be a Millionaire. Their outing comes after it was revealed that Joan regards Donald Trump as one of her 'closest lifelong friends,' according to sources who say the Hollywood icon has 'never been shy about her love' for the politician. The Dynasty star raised eyebrows earlier this year after she was named as a pro-MAGA patriot while attending a 'pre-inauguration celebration' with right-wing friends. The iconic actress was seen having a 'lovely dinner with friends' in a picture shared by conservative actor James Woods to his X account. Seeing the star alongside Woods and other outspoken MAGA fanatics led many fans to share their surprise that Joan is associated with the group. However, a source exclusively explained to that it should come as 'no surprise at all' as the president-elect is one of her 'closest friends.' 'To Joan, Donald is not just a former president and soon-to-be MAGA president, but he is also one of her closest lifelong friends,' the insider began. 'She has run in his circle for 40 years, and they have so much love for one another.' The source noted that Joan has openly praised Trump for helping to inspire her beloved Dynasty character, Alexis Carrington Colby. 'It is no secret that Joan modelled her famous Alexis character on Dynasty after Donald,' the insider continued. 'She has discussed her inspiration countless times over the years and said it was half Donald Trump and half another friend of hers. 'She took Donald's 'ruthlessness' for Alexis. Joan has never been shy about her love for Donald.' The source also highlighted Joans' close relationship to both Trump and his late ex-wife, Ivanna. The insider added: 'But it was not only Donald that is a huge part of her life, but Donald's ex-wife Ivanna, Ivanka's mom. Joan and Ivanna were so beyond close and remained friends until Ivanna's death. 'Joan was heartbroken when Ivanna passed because she was one of the only people who truly got her. She never let Donald and Ivanna's divorce change her love and respect for each of them.' Opening up about the British icon's decision to support her friend amid his political campaigns at the time, the insider continued: 'Joan has always been quiet about her political affiliations because she does not believe this needs to be broadcast.' contacted reps for Joan for comment at the time. Collins' fifth husband, Percy, was also at the gathering, which had started out as a 'post-Christmas dinner.' Woods explained in the picture caption: 'It evolved from a post-Christmas dinner to a pre-Inauguration celebration. Not often in Hollywood you can be surrounded by patriots. What a joyous night.'
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Newshour Trump moves nuclear submarines after Russian ex-president's comments
Russian media have dismissed Donald Trump's announcement that he will deploy nuclear submarines closer to Russia. Mr Trump said his decision was prompted by 'provocative comments' on social media by the former Russian president, Dmitry Medvedev. Mr Medvedev said in a post on X on Monday that President Trump was playing "the ultimatum game" with Russia, and that such an approach could lead to a war involving the United States. Also in the programme: The world's first legislation to control artificial intelligence starts coming into force in the EU today; and from Gaza, the sixteen-year-old with a dream to become a great violinist. (Photo: Dmitry Medvedev was Russia's president in 2008-12. Credit: Reuters)
The Guardian
7 hours ago
- The Guardian
Europe's trade deal with the US was dead on arrival – it needs to be buried. Here's how to do it
Ursula von der Leyen's Turnberry golf course deal has been rightly called a capitulation and a humiliation for Europe. Assuming such an accord would put an end to Donald Trump's coercion and bullying was either naive or the result of a miserable delusion. The EU should now steel itself and reject the terms imposed by Trump. Is this deal really as bad as it sounds? Unfortunately, it is, for at least three reasons. The blow to Europe's international credibility is incalculable in a world that expects the EU to stand up for reciprocity and rules-based trade, to resist Washington's coercion as Canada, China and Brazil have, rather than condoning it. Economically, it's a damaging one-way street: EU exporters lose market access in the US while the EU market is hit by more favoured US competition. Core European industrial sectors such as pharma and steel and aluminium are left by the wayside. The balance also tilts in the US's favour in important sectors such as consumer goods, food and drink, and agriculture. Tariffs tend to stick, so this is long-term damage. The EU even gives up its right to respond to future US pressures through duties on digital services or network fees. To top it off, von der Leyen's defence and investment pledges (for which she had no mandate) go against Europe's interest. The EU's competitiveness predicament is precisely one of net investment outflows. As international capital now reallocates under the pressures of Trumponomics and a weakening dollar, the case for Europe to become a strategic investment power was strengthening. Von der Leyen's promise of $600bn in EU investment in the US is therefore disastrous messaging. How could this happen? All EU member states wanted to avoid Trump's 30% tariff threat and a trade war, but none perhaps as much as Germany and Ireland, supported by German carmakers and US big tech firms. Yet Irish sweetheart digital tax deals, as well as BMW and Mercedes's plans to move production hubs to the US (also to serve the EU market), cannot be Europe's future. EU governments were distinctly unhelpful in building the EU's negotiating position. But in the end, it was von der Leyen who blinked and she has to take responsibility. Her close team took control in the closing weeks and went into the final meeting manifestly prepared only to say yes, which made Trump's steamrolling inevitable. Let's think of the counterfactual: if von der Leyen had stepped into the room and rejected these terms, Trump's wrath and some market turmoil may have ensued. But ultimately it would very likely have come to a postponement, a new negotiation and, at some point, a different deal that would not be so lopsided or unilaterally trade away deep and long-term European interests and principles. Instead, von der Leyen became a supplicant to a triumphant Trump. The situation is reminiscent of the final rounds of the Brexit negotiations five years ago when von der Leyen similarly was giving in to unacceptable demands from Boris Johnson, only to U-turn under pressure from a steelier EU chief negotiator and a quartet of member states. Today, von der Leyen runs Brussels with a strong presidential hand and has largely done away with internal checks and balances inside the commission. That is her prerogative and her style, but the upshot should not be weak, ineffective and unprincipled dealings on Europe's major geopolitical challenges, from Trump to Gaza. The 'deal' in Scotland is in reality an unstable interim accord. Nothing is yet inked or signed; Washington and Brussels are already locking horns on its interpretation and negotiations on the finer (and broader) points are ongoing. The 27 EU governments will inevitably get involved as the final deal needs to be translated into an international agreement and EU law. Some big powers – Germany and Italy seemingly – are on board, reluctant or not. However, internal political dynamics may change their calculations. Opposition parties and rightwing contenders who are a real political threat to leaders in Germany and France are already lambasting the deal. Unless von der Leyen strikes a dirty bargain with the member states, the European parliament will also have a say. The longtime chair of its trade committee, Bernd Lange, has set the tone for how the deal would be viewed there, calling it 'asymmetry set in stone' and even 'a misery'. As details seep out on what von der Leyen has really agreed to and what the US expects from the EU, and all the consequences become clear, an already unpalatable deal may become even more so. Weakening US economic data and returning stock market jitters show that Trump's negotiation footing is fragile. His new tariff threats come with new extensions, up to 90 days in the case of Mexico, as his position is overstretched. For Europe, the lesson from the Brexit negotiations – one that von der Leyen ought to have grasped before now – is that nothing is agreed until everything is agreed. There is now an opportunity for EU governments and the European parliament to course correct and salvage something from this train wreck. Georg Riekeles is the associate director of the European Policy Centre, and Varg Folkman is policy analyst at the European Policy Centre
