
Thai-Cambodia ceasefire wobbles as fiery new accusations fly
Thai and Cambodian army commanders met for lunch on Tuesday (July 29) and initially appeared to put a halt to their six days of what has been characterized as the bloodiest fighting between the two neighbors in a decade.
Thailand blamed Cambodia for violating the first day of the ceasefire on Tuesday (July 29) and into the morning of Wednesday (July 30) with small arms fire and grenade assaults at Phu Makua and two other areas in northeastern Thailand, the nation's foreign ministry claimed.
'Such acts of aggression constitute once again a clear violation of the ceasefire agreement by Cambodian forces and their apparent lack of good faith,' the ministry said. Cambodia's defense ministry denied the reports, saying it remains fully committed to implementing the ceasefire, according to wire reports.
On Monday (July 28), Thai and Cambodian leaders appeared with mediating Malaysian leader Anwar Ibrahim, who hosted the ceasefire talks in Kuala Lumpur in his capacity as ASEAN rotating chairman, sitting alongside US and Chinese diplomats.
The deal was done after Trump threatened both Thailand and Cambodia, which face potential 36% tariffs on their exports to the US, would not be given trade deals until the hostilities ceased.
A delegation of diplomats, foreign military attaches to Cambodia and relevant parties will visit the Cambodia-Thailand border to observe 'the actual situation,' Cambodian Defense Ministry spokesperson Maly Socheata said in a statement reported by wire agencies.
As part of the ceasefire, Thai and Cambodian troops have agreed to coordination teams to resolve any new conflicts and prevent their recurrence, those reports said.
Cambodia publicly presents itself as an innocent victim of Thai aggression, emphasizing that Phnom Penh is much poorer, less armed and had no motive or desire to fight a war against wealthier, heavily armed Thailand.
Thailand projects its case as the opposite, insisting that Cambodians fired the first shots. Satellite imagery during the past three months above the disputed Emerald Triangle region can purportedly prove Cambodian troops were advancing, digging trenches and 'encroaching' on Thai soil.
'The Cambodian military forces have violated the agreement by launching continuous and indiscriminate attacks on Thai territory across various areas along the border, even after the agreed ceasefire time had passed,' the Thai government said on Tuesday (July 29).
Bangkok detailed the violations in a report for Washington, Beijing and Southeast Asian governments 'who bore witness to yesterday's dialogue and negotiation, to inform them of Cambodia's lack of sincerity,' the government said.
Beyond the battlefield, the fighting may be bolstering the hawkish, highly politicized Royal Thai Army's influence, which appears to be gaining some domination over Bangkok's fractured elected coalition government after officials indicated the military was being allowed to unilaterally make decisions where and when to open fire.
Thailand is a non-NATO US ally. After decades of repeatedly seizing power in more than a dozen coups, including most recently in 2014, the Thai army lost swaths of popular support during the past few years, especially among university students and the rural poor.
Now strident, jingoistic cheering of the military is being vociferously voiced by Thailand's mainstream and online media, public opinion, politicians and at dinner tables, prompting human rights activists to worry the army's new popularity will enable it to increase its manipulative political power.
'The soldiers will continue to do their job at full steam –Thais do not worry – until the government has reached a clear agreement that there is no danger for the people, and to ensure we maintain the country's interests, in order to bring the peace we want to see,' Thailand's Acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai said on July 27.
Cambodia's authoritarian regime could also be strengthened by the patriotism and nationalism stirred by the worst fighting in a decade between the two Buddhist-majority countries.
The fighting along Cambodia's northern border with Thailand coincides with a dangerously destabilizing breakup between the two nations' dynastic ruling families after decades of tight interlocking personal relations.
Both countries' authoritarian de facto leaders and former prime ministers, Thailand's Thaksin Shinawatra and Hun Sen in Cambodia, and their families are openly warring against each other over public betrayals, lies, threats and leaked confidential audio recordings.
Thailand flew its US F-16 warplanes and Swedish jet fighters across the frontier and repeatedly bombed Cambodia during their six-day border feud. On the other side, China assists Cambodia's development projects, investments and infrastructure and offers some military training and weaponry.
During six days of aerial, artillery, mortar and drone attacks, both sides repeatedly blamed the other for firing first or causing the most death and damage.
At least 40 people, including Thai and Cambodian civilians, have been killed and 300,000 displaced since fighting escalated on July 24 along their disputed frontier.
The contested border relies on controversial century-old French colonial maps dividing jungles, cliffs and the scattered locations of revered ancient Hindu-Buddhist temple ruins. The area includes the Emerald Triangle, where military-reinforced northern Cambodia meets heavily fortified eastern Thailand and southern Laos.
After postponing their scheduled breakfast meeting on Tuesday (July 29) to quell the ceasefire's violations during the tropical morning, Thailand's 1st and 2nd Army Region commanders met their counterparts from Cambodia's Military Region 4 and 5, at two different border crossing checkpoints at lunchtime.
In a meeting in Thailand, commanders and their aides, all wearing camouflage uniforms, met face to face while seated opposite each other in a businesslike setting at a long table.
A second meeting in O'Smach, Cambodia, was described as 'informal' by Cambodian officials.
A third meeting was held online with Thailand's Border Defense Command chief of Chanthaburi and Trat provinces chatting with Cambodia's Military Region 3 commander.
They all agreed to stop shooting, stop reinforcing their troops, not to sneak into each other's territory and halt all military movements along the border unless sick or injured troops need an ambulance to a hospital.
The commanders also told each other there must be no firing at civilians, and both sides should choose quick action resolution teams who could communicate and coordinate directly with troops along the 500 miles of their curved border.
Thailand repatriated the remains of a dozen Cambodian soldiers on Monday (July 28) at a temporarily opened border crossing.
Arrangements need to be made to return additional dead and injured soldiers, and social media's vicious 'meme wars' between Thai and Cambodian propaganda artists, satirists, and activists must not cause misunderstandings, they said.
The commanders agreed to wait until August 4, when a Thailand-Cambodia Joint Boundary Commission (JBC) meeting is scheduled to review the ceasefire and any violations.
Both sides have accused the other of 'war crimes' and breaking the Geneva Conventions, pointing at Thailand's use of US-built F-16 warplanes and Swedish Gripen jets to bomb Cambodia, and for Cambodia's firing deadly, unguided rockets into civilian areas, hitting at least one hospital and a fuel station.
On July 24, Senate President Hun Sen reportedly told Thailand not to 'boast of your superior military power, or think of invading,' because Cambodia was 'fully prepared for combat.' 'You will face the most severe retaliation,' Hun Sen said. 'We won't just resist, we will strike back.'
Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet, Hun Sen's 47-year-old son, wrote online: 'The sooner the fighting stops, the sooner the affected people, especially the displaced, can return to their homes and resume their livelihoods.
'At a time when the nation and our people are facing hardship, I may look a little older because of the gray hairs. Even if I look older and feel a little less strong than I did 10 years ago, my determination to face these challenges remains unwavering.
'Let's wait until the army and people are safe, and the country has returned to peace – then it won't be too late to dye my hair,' the Cambodian prime minister said, according to Agence Kampuchea Presse.
Bangkok insists all discussions about their disputed border remain between Thailand and Cambodia and confined to the JBC, with no outsiders or external powers deciding the issue.
Cambodia, however, demands the bloodstained case be settled once and for all at the International Court of Justice in The Hague, which has ruled twice in Cambodia's favor, awarding it the coveted clifftop Preah Vihear temple ruins, which are one of several crumbling stone architectural wonders in harm's way because of rocket attacks.
Troubling, unverified media has appeared online, including a video supposedly showing a group of shouting Thai men beating a Cambodian man in an urban street, while a separate photograph showed men circling a hapless-looking person who was described as a Thai spy captured inside Cambodia.
During July, landmines injured several Thai troops who were described by Thai officials as walking on the accepted Thai side of the border.
The Phnom Penh Post, however, said in an editorial: 'The Thai military's recent allegations – especially those made by Lt. Gen. Boonsin Phadkhang of the 2nd Army Region that Cambodia deliberately laid new landmines resulting in injuries to Thai soldiers – are not only unfounded but recklessly irresponsible.
'No credible investigation has been made public, no transparent evidence has been presented,' the paper said. Bangkok said the landmines were new, Russian-made and recently secretly planted by Phnom Penh.
Thailand hosts the US Pentagon's biggest international military exercise in Asia, Cobra Gold, each year. China plays a broader role in Cambodia, funding huge investments, offering some training to Cambodia's military, and developing the country's infrastructure, including ports and shipping canals.
That includes the strategic Ream Naval Base, which China is dredging and developing to allow its massive warships to make port calls in the Gulf of Thailand, giving it a potential valuable southern flank in the South China Sea. The US military previously was involved in developing the base's facilities, but was expelled in favor of China.
Thailand's 360,000 active-duty army, air force and navy are three times larger than Cambodia's much weaker military forces. Bangkok's military is backed largely by the US and other foreign training and weaponry, including in the sky, where Thai pilots easily dominate due to Cambodia's lack of an effective warfighting air force.
In addition to Thailand's US F-16 warplanes, older F-5s, Cobra attack helicopters and Black Hawk transport choppers, Bangkok also wields about a dozen Swedish Gripen fighter jets.
Thailand's weapons and equipment also come from Israel, Russia and elsewhere, including 60 Chinese VT-4 tanks, which augment dozens of older US tanks. Thailand mobilized the Chinese tanks in border areas during the recent clashes, according to news reports.
Thailand's 600 artillery pieces far outnumber and outgun Cambodia's much weaker artillery strength, according to the International Institute for Strategic Studies. Cambodia depends on about 200 Chinese and Soviet tanks and a few dozen Chinese and Soviet helicopters.
However, at the height of the hostilities on July 27, Thailand's Second Army Region warned Cambodia was withdrawing troops from front-line positions in preparation for firing China-made, truck-fired PHL-03 missiles, which have a range of 130 kilometers.
The Thai military claimed the weapon's range would have allowed Cambodia to hit multiple provinces outside of affected border areas, including Maha Sarakham, Roi Et and Nakorn Ratchasima, which, if launched, would have marked a dangerous escalation of the conflict.
Richard S Ehrlich is a Bangkok-based American foreign correspondent reporting from Asia since 1978, and winner of Columbia University's Foreign Correspondents' Award. Excerpts from his two new nonfiction books, 'Rituals. Killers. Wars. & Sex. — Tibet, India, Nepal, Laos, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka & New York' and 'Apocalyptic Tribes, Smugglers & Freaks' are available here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South China Morning Post
4 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump tariff threats loom over China's Russian oil purchases, following his move on India
Even in the face of threats by US President Donald Trump to levy tariffs on countries that import Russian goods, analysts expect that China 'will not stop' buying oil from its northern neighbour, given their mutually beneficial relationship of energy cooperation. Oil from Russia will continue to flow south over the long run because 'China's strategic goals require a stable and secure supply of critical resources such as oil', said Matt Gertken, chief geopolitical strategist at BCA Research in Canada. His comments came with Trump sharpening his threat of sanctions on Russia if it fails to engage in a ceasefire in Ukraine, where Moscow has waged war for the last three and a half years. Previously, both the United States and the European Union announced blanket sanctions on Russia, and they also tried to cut off its lifelines by threatening secondary sanctions on those helping it. 'The US said at the time that it would implement those [tariff] threats by August 7-9 if trade with Russia was not curtailed by then, and affirmed that China would be a target,' Gertken added. 'The US has already taken action on India, so China is next in line.' Russia is China's top source of crude imports, supplying a record high 108.5 million tonnes, or 19.6 per cent of its total imports, last year. Guo Jiakun, spokesman for China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said at a press conference last week that 'China will take energy supply measures … based on national interests', while 'tariff wars have no winners'.


AllAfrica
5 hours ago
- AllAfrica
Is Trump really winning his trade war?
Last week, US President Donald Trump issued an executive order updating the 'reciprocal' tariff rates that had been paused since April. Nearly all US trading partners are now staring down tariffs of between 10% and 50%. After a range of baseline and sector-specific tariffs came into effect earlier this year, many economists had predicted economic chaos. So far, the inflationary impact has been less than many predicted. However, there are worrying signs that could all soon change, as economic pain flows through to the US consumer. Trump's latest adjustments weren't random acts of economic warfare. They revealed a hierarchy, and a pattern has emerged. Countries running goods trade deficits with the US (that is, buying more than they sell to the US), which also have security relationships with the US, get 10%. This includes Australia. Japan and South Korea, which both have security relationships with the US, were hit with 15% tariffs, likely due to their large trade surpluses with the US. But the rest of Asia? That's where Trump is really turning the screws. Asian nations now face average tariffs of 22.1%. Countries that negotiated with Trump, such as Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Pakistan and the Philippines, all got 19%, the 'discount rate' for Asian countries willing to make concessions. India faces a 25% rate, plus potential penalties for trading with Russia. Students from an art school in Mumbai, India, created posters in response to Trump's latest tariff announcement. Photo: SOPA Images / Getty via The Conversation In the current trade war, it is unsurprising that, despite threats to do so, no countries have actually imposed retaliatory tariffs on US products, with the exception of China and Canada. Doing so would drive up their consumer prices, reduce economic activity, and invite Trump to escalate, possibly limiting access to the lucrative US market. Instead, nations that negotiated 'deals' with the Trump administration have essentially accepted elevated reciprocal tariff rates to maintain a measure of access to the US market. For many of these countries, this was despite making major concessions, such as dropping their own tariffs on US exports, promising to reform certain domestic regulations, and purchasing various US goods. Protests over the weekend, including in India and South Korea, suggested many of these tariff negotiations were not popular. Even the European Union has struck a deal accepting US tariff rates that once would have seemed unthinkable – 15%. Trump's confusing Russia-Ukraine war strategy has worried European leaders. Rather than risk US strategic withdrawal, they appear to have simply folded on tariffs. Some deals are still pending. Notably, Taiwan, which received a higher reciprocal tariff (20%) than Japan and South Korea, claims it is still negotiating. Through the narrow prism of deal-making, it is hard not to escape the conclusion that Trump has gotten his way with everyone – except China and Canada. He has imposed elevated US tariffs on many countries, but also negotiated to secure increased export market access for US firms and promised purchases of planes, agriculture and energy. Imposing tariffs on goods coming into the US effectively creates a tax on US consumers and manufacturers. It drives up the prices of both finished goods (products) and intermediate goods (components) used in manufacturing. Yet the Yale Budget Lab estimates the tariffs will cause consumer prices to rise by 1.8% this year. This muted inflationary impact is likely a result of exports to the US being 'front-loaded' before the tariffs took effect. Many US importers rushed to stockpile goods in the country ahead of the deadline. It may also reflect some companies choosing to 'eat the tariffs' by not passing the full cost to their customers, hoping they can ride things out until Trump 'chickens out' and the tariffs are removed or reduced. Despite Trump's repeated claims that tariffs are a tax paid by foreign countries, research consistently shows that US companies and consumers bear the tariff burden. Already this year, General Motors reported that tariffs cost it US$1.1 billion in the second quarter of 2025. A new 50% tariff on semi-finished copper products took effect on August 1. That announcement in July sent copper prices soaring by 13% in a single day. This affects everything from electrical wiring to plumbing, with costs ultimately passed to US consumers. The average US tariff rate now sits at 18.3%, the highest level since 1934. This represents a staggering increase from just 2.4% when Trump took office in January. This trade-weighted average means that, on typical imported goods, Americans will pay nearly one-fifth more in taxes. Earlier this year, many companies raced to bring inventory to the US before tariffs were imposed. Photo: Robyn Beck / AFP / Getty via The Conversation The US Federal Reserve is concerned about these potential price impacts, and last week opted to maintain interest rates at their current levels, despite Trump's pressure on Chairman Jerome Powell. And on August 1, economic data released in the US showed significant slowing in job creation, some worrying signs in economic growth, and early signs of business investment paralysis due to the economic uncertainty unleashed by Trump's ever-changing tariff rates. Trump responded to the report by firing the US Bureau of Labour Statistics commissioner, a shock move that led to widespread concerns that official US data could soon become politicized. But the worst economic impacts could still be yet to come. The domestic consequences of Trump's tariff policies are likely to amount to a massive economic own goal. Peter Draper is professor and executive director, Institute for International Trade, and director of the Jean Monnet Centre of Trade and Environment, University of Adelaide and Nathan Howard Gray is senior research Fellow, Institute for International Trade, University of Adelaide This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.


South China Morning Post
5 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
‘China is next in line': after India, Trump tariff threats loom over Russian oil purchases
Even in the face of threats by US President Donald Trump to levy tariffs on countries that import Russian goods, analysts expect that China 'will not stop' buying oil from its northern neighbour, given their mutually beneficial relationship of energy cooperation. Advertisement Oil from Russia will continue to flow south over the long run because 'China's strategic goals require a stable and secure supply of critical resources such as oil', said Matt Gertken, chief geopolitical strategist at BCA Research in Canada. His comments came with Trump sharpening his threat of sanctions on Russia if it fails to engage in a ceasefire in Ukraine, where Moscow has waged war for the last three and a half years. Previously, both the United States and the European Union announced blanket sanctions on Russia, and they also tried to cut off its lifelines by threatening secondary sanctions on those helping it. 'The US said at the time that it would implement those [tariff] threats by August 7-9 if trade with Russia was not curtailed by then, and affirmed that China would be a target,' Gertken added. 'The US has already taken action on India, so China is next in line.' Advertisement Russia is China's top source of crude imports, supplying a record high 108.5 million tonnes, or 19.6 per cent of its total imports, last year. Guo Jiakun, spokesman for China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said at a press conference last week that 'China will take energy supply measures … based on national interests', while 'tariff wars have no winners'.