Einstein wins again! Quarks obey relativity laws, Large Hadron Collider finds
Is there a time of day or night at which nature's heaviest elementary particle stops obeying Einstein's rules? The answer to that question, as bizarre as it seems, could tell scientists something very important about the laws of physics governing the cosmos.
In a first-of-its-kind experiment conducted at the world's most powerful particle accelerator, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), scientists have attempted to discover if the universe's heaviest elementary particle — a particle not composed of other smaller particles — always obeys Einstein's 1905 theory of special relativity.
More specifically, the team operating the LHC's Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) detector wanted to know if one of the rules upon which special relativity is built, called "Lorentz symmetry," always holds for top quarks.
Lorentz symmetry states that the laws of physics should be the same for all observers who aren't accelerating. That means that the results of an experiment should be independent of the orientation of the experiment, or the speed at which it runs.
However, some theories suggest that, at extremely high energies, special relativity fails as a result of Lorentz violation or Lorentz symmetry breaking.
The laws of physics could therefore differ for observers in different frames of reference. That would mean that experimental observations would depend on the orientation of the experiment in space-time (the four-dimensional unification of space and time). That would result in a shakeup in many of our best theories of the cosmos, including the standard model of particle physics, which is founded on special relativity."Remnants of such Lorentz symmetry breaking could be observable at lower energies, such as at the energies of the LHC, but despite previous efforts, they have not been found at the LHC or other colliders," the CMS collaboration wrote in a statement.
The CMS team set about searching for such remnants of Lorentz symmetry breaking using pairs of nature's heaviest elementary particle, the top quark.
Quarks are the particles in the standard model of particle physics that bind together and comprise particles like protons and neutrons.
There are six "flavors" of quark with increasing masses: up, down (found in protons and neutrons), charm, strange, top, and bottom. The heaviest of these is the top quark, possessing around the same mass as a gold atom (about 173 giga-electronvolts).
The CMS researchers reasoned that, if the collisions between protons accelerated to near-light-speeds in the LHC depend on orientation, then the rate at which top-quark pairs produced by such events should vary with time.
That is because, as Earth rotates, the direction of the proton beams generated for particle collisions in the powerful particle accelerator changes. Thus, the direction of the top quarks created by such collisions should change, too.
Wildly, that means that the number of quarks created should depend on what time of day the collisions occur!
Thus, if there is a preferred direction in space-time and signs of Lorentz symmetry breaking, there should be a deviation from a constant rate of top quark pair production in the LHC dependent on the time of day the experiment is conducted!
Using data from Run 2 of the LHC, which was conducted between 2015 and 2018, the CMS collaboration found no such deviation.
That means that they found no sign of Lorentz symmetry breaking, and thus no evidence of top quarks defying Einstein no matter what way proton beams are orientated (or what time of day collisions occurred).
So, Einstein's theory of relativity is safe around the clock. Well, for now, at least.
Related Stories:
—Weird particle physics stories that blew our minds in 2023
—A tiny, wobbling muon just shook particle physics to its core
—A strange new Higgs particle may have stolen the antimatter from our universe
The upgraded LHC's third and more powerful operating run began in 2022 and is set to conclude next year. The team will look for signs of Lorentz symmetry breaking in higher-energy proton-proton collisions.
"The results pave the way for future searches for Lorentz symmetry breaking based on top-quark data from the third run of the LHC," the CMS collaboration wrote. "They also open the door to scrutiny of processes involving other heavy particles that can only be investigated at the LHC, such as the Higgs boson and the W and Z bosons."
The team's research was published at the end of 2024 in the journal Physics Letters B.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
Scientists hit quantum computer error rate of 0.000015% — a world record achievement that could lead to smaller and faster machines
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Scientists have achieved the lowest quantum computing error rate ever recorded — an important step in solving the fundamental challenges on the way to practical, utility-scale quantum computers. In research published June 12 in the journal APS Physical Review Letters, the scientists demonstrated a quantum error rate of 0.000015%, which equates to one error per 6.7 million operations. This achievement represents an improvement of nearly an order of magnitude in both fidelity and speed over the previous record of approximately one error for every 1 million operations — achieved by the same team in 2014. The prevalence of errors, or "noise," in quantum operations can render a quantum computer's outputs useless. This noise comes from a variety of sources, including imperfections in the control methods (essentially, problems with the computer's architecture and algorithms) and the laws of physics. That's why considerable efforts have gone into quantum error correction. While errors related to natural law, such as decoherence (the natural decay of the quantum state) and leakage (the qubit state leaking out of the computational subspace), can be reduced only within those laws, the team's progress was achieved by reducing the noise generated by the computer's architecture and control methods to almost zero. Related: Scientists make 'magic state' breakthrough after 20 years — without it, quantum computers can never be truly useful "By drastically reducing the chance of error, this work significantly reduces the infrastructure required for error correction, opening the way for future quantum computers to be smaller, faster, and more efficient," Molly Smith, a graduate student in physics at the University of Oxford and co-lead author of the study, said in a statement. "Precise control of qubits will also be useful for other quantum technologies such as clocks and quantum sensors." Record-low quantum computing error rates The quantum computer used in the team's experiment relied on a bespoke platform that eschews the more common architecture that uses photons as qubits — the quantum equivalent of computer bits — for qubits made of "trapped ions." The study was also conducted at room temperature, which the researchers said simplifies the setup required to integrate this technology into a working quantum computer. Whereas most quantum systems either deploy superconducting circuits that rely on "quantum dots" or employ the use of lasers — often called "optical tweezers" — to hold a single photon in place for operation as a qubit, the team used microwaves to trap a series of calcium-43 ions in place. With this approach, the ions are placed into a hyperfine "atomic clock" state. According to the study, this technique allowed the researchers to create more "quantum gates," which are analogous to the number of 'quantum operations' a computer can perform, with greater precision than the photon-based methods allowed. Once the ions were placed into a hyperfine atomic clock state, the researchers calibrated the ions via an automated control procedure that regularly corrected them for amplitude and frequency drift caused by the microwave control method. In other words, the researchers developed an algorithm to detect and correct the noise produced by the microwaves used to trap the ions. By removing this noise, the team could then conduct quantum operations with their system at or near the lowest error rate physically possible. Using this method, it is now possible to develop quantum computers that are capable of conducting single-gate operations (those conducted with a single qubit gate as opposed to a gate requiring multiple qubits) with nearly zero errors at large scales. This could lead to more efficient quantum computers in general and, per the study, achieves a new state-of-the-art single-qubit gate error and the breakdown of all known sources of error, thus accounting for most errors produced in single-gate operations. This means engineers who build quantum computers with the trapped-ion architecture and developers who create the algorithms that run on them won't have to dedicate as many qubits to the sole purpose of error correction. RELATED STORIES —'The science is solved': IBM to build monster 10,000-qubit quantum computer by 2029 —Scientists forge path to the first million-qubit processor for quantum computers after 'decade in the making' breakthrough —'Quantum AI' algorithms already outpace the fastest supercomputers, study says By reducing the error, the new method reduces the number of qubits required and the cost and size of the quantum computer itself, the researchers said in the statement. This isn't a panacea for the industry, however, as many quantum algorithms require multigate qubits functioning alongside or formed from single-gate qubits to perform computations beyond rudimentary functions. The error rate in two-qubit gate functions is still roughly 1 in 2,000. While this study represents an important step toward practical, utility-scale quantum computing, it doesn't address all of the "noise" problems inherent in complex multigate qubit systems.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Rogue black hole found terrorizing unfortunate star in distant galaxy
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. A rogue, middle-mass black hole has been spotted disrupting an orbiting star in the halo of a distant galaxy, and it's all thanks to the observing powers of the Hubble Space Telescope and Chandra X-ray Observatory. However, exactly what the black hole is doing to the star remains in question as there are conflicting X-ray measurements. Black holes come in different size classes. At the smaller end of the scale are the stellar-mass black holes born in the ashes of supernova explosions. At the top end of the scale are the supermassive black holes, which can grow to have many millions or billions of times the mass of our sun, lurking in the hearts of galaxies. In between those categories are intermediate-mass black holes (IMBH), which have mass ranging from hundreds up to 100,000 solar masses, or thereabouts. "They represent a crucial missing link in black hole evolution between stellar mass and supermassive black holes," Yi-Chi Chang of the National Tsing Hua University in Hsinchu, Taiwan said in a statement. The problem is that intermediate-mass black holes are hard to find, partly because they tend not to be as active as supermassive black holes or as obvious as a stellar-mass black hole when its progenitor star goes supernova. However, occasionally, an IMBH will spark to life when it instigates a tidal disruption event. This happens when a star or gas cloud gets too close to the black hole and gravitational tidal forces rip the star or gas cloud apart, producing bursts of X-rays. "X-ray sources with such extreme luminosity are rare outside galaxy nuclei and can serve as a key probe for identifying elusive IMBHs," said Chang. In 2009, Chandra spotted anomalous X-rays originating from a region 40,000 light-years from the center of a giant elliptical galaxy called NGC 6099, which lies 453 million light-years from us. This bright new X-ray source was called HLX-1, and its X-ray spectrum indicated that the source of the X-rays was 5.4 million degrees Fahrenheit (3 million degrees Celsius), a temperature consistent with the violence of a tidal disruption event. But what followed was unusual. The X-ray emissions reached a peak brightness in 2012 when observed by the European Space Agency's XMM-Newton X-ray space telescope. When XMM-Newton took another look in 2023, it found the X-ray luminosity had substantially dwindled. In the meantime, the Canada–France Hawaii Telescope had identified an optical counterpart for the X-ray emission, one that was subsequently confirmed by Hubble. There are two possible explanations for what happened. The first is that Hubble's spectrum of the object shows a tight, small cluster of stars swarming around the black hole. The black hole might have once been at the core of a dwarf galaxy that was whittled down — unwrapped like a Christmas present — by the gravitational tides of the larger NGC 6099. This process would have stolen away all the dwarf galaxy's stars to leave behind a free-floating black hole with just a small, tight grouping of stars left to keep it company. But the upshot of this is that the cluster of stars is like a stellar pantry to which the black hole occasionally goes to feast. It seems certain that a tidal disruption event involving one of these stars is what Chandra and Hubble have witnessed, but was the star completely destroyed? One possibility is that the star is on a highly elliptical orbit, and at its perihelion (closest point to the black hole) some of the star's mass is ripped away — but the star managed to survive for another day. This would potentially explain the X-ray light curve: The emission from 2009 was as the star was nearing perihelion, while the peak in 2012 was during perihelion, and the latest measurements in 2023 would be when the star was farthest from the black hole and not feeling its effects so much. We might then expect another outburst of X-rays during its next perihelion, whenever that might be. However, there's an alternative hypothesis: The star may have been stripped apart a piece at a time, forming a stream of material around the black hole. When Chandra first detected the X-ray emission from the tidal disruption event, this stream was just beginning to wrap back on itself, the self-intersection giving rise to shock-heating that produced X-rays. Then, the 2012 measurements would have been of a fully-fledged hot accretion disk of gas, the star by now completely ripped apart. The material within this disk would have spiraled into the black hole's maw, thus depleting the disk, which would explain why it is much less luminous in X-rays in 2023. Picking out the correct scenario apart will require further surveillance. "If the IMBH is eating a star, how long does it take to swallow the star's gas? In 2009, HLX-1 was fairly bright. Then, in 2012, it was about 100 times brighter, and then it went down again," Roberto Soria of the Italian National Institute for Astrophysics (INAF), who is a co-author of a new study describing the observations of HLX-1, said in the statement. "So now we need to wait and see if it's flaring multiple times, or if there was a beginning, a peak, and now it's just going to go down all the way until it disappears." Making new observations of an IMBH such as HLX-1 is key to better understanding the role they play in the black hole ecosystem. One model suggests that supermassive black holes might form and grow through the merger of many IMBH, but nobody knows how common intermediate-mass black holes are in the universe. "So if we are lucky, we're going to find more free-floating black holes suddenly becoming X-ray bright because of a tidal disruption event," said Soria. "If we can do a statistical study, this will tell us how many of these IMBHs there are, how often they disrupt a star, [and] how bigger galaxies have grown by assembling smaller galaxies." RELATED STORIES — Rogue black hole spotted on its own for the first time — Astronomers may have discovered the closest black holes to Earth — Hubble Telescope sees wandering black hole slurping up stellar spaghetti Alas, Chandra, XMM-Newton and Hubble all have small fields of view, meaning that they only see small patches of the sky. Because we don't know where the next tidal disruption event might take place, the chances of our space telescopes looking in the right place at the right time are slim. In essence, Chandra got lucky back in 2009. Fortunately, help is now on hand. The Vera C. Rubin Observatory comes fully online later this year to begin a 10-year all-sky survey, and spotting the flares of tidal disruption events will be a piece of cake for it. Once it finds such an event, Hubble and Chandra will know where to look and can follow up on it. IMBHs have remained mostly hidden for now, but their time in the shadows is coming to an end. The findings were published on April 11 in The Astrophysical Journal.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Scientists gave mice flu vaccines by flossing their tiny teeth — and it worked
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Scientists have developed a new, needle-free way to deliver vaccines: through the gumline. In a new proof-of-concept study, researchers successfully vaccinated mice against influenza by cleaning their teeth with dental floss coated with inactive flu viruses. Most vaccines are administered using a needle, an approach that has its drawbacks. For example, apprehension about pain from the injection and needle phobias can deter people from getting vaccinated. Additionally, injections require more medical expertise to administer than needle-free options, like mouth drops or nasal sprays, and are more challenging to store and distribute. But a floss-based vaccine could eliminate the pain and logistical challenges surrounding injections and "even be distributed through the postal mail," the researchers behind the development wrote in their study, published July 22 in the journal Nature Biomedical Engineering. Such a vaccine could potentially be deployed in "resource-limited settings with minimal training," they added, and be especially helpful in active outbreaks when vaccine coverage needs to be boosted quickly. Previous studies have shown that vaccinations delivered in the cheek or under the tongue trigger satisfactory immune responses. But it can be difficult to deliver adequate doses of these vaccines through mucosal tissues in the mouth — the lining that acts as a barrier between our body and the environment. Related: Acne vaccine: Experimental shot for common skin condition reaches clinical trials. Here's what you need to know. The researchers behind the vaccine floss found a creative solution: Researchers focusing on gum disease have found particular areas in the mouth that are very permeable, meaning molecules are easily absorbed by the tissue. One of these areas is called the junctional epithelium (JE). The JE is found on the tissue between teeth, at the spot where the tooth's surface meets the gum line. By secreting different molecules, the JE detects and defends against pathogens that try to get in through the gums. The study researchers thought that the JE's ability to allow molecules through and to stimulate an immune response made it a potential candidate for a vaccine site. To reach it, they needed something that could get into that small crevice between tooth and gum. So, they went out and bought some dental floss. To explore this concept, the researchers tested their hypothesis in mice. Once they'd figured out how to floss a mouse's teeth — turns out, it's a two-person job — they set up a flossing schedule to expose 50 mice to an inactive flu virus. Killed, or "inactivated" viruses cannot cause infection and are a common component of vaccines; they're used to immunize humans against diseases such as hepatitis A and polio, for example, and are found in some types of flu shot. One group of mice had their teeth flossed with the virus-coated floss three times, with two weeks between each dose. Then, a month after their final dose, they were exposed to an active flu virus. All survived, while a comparison group of mice that was left unvaccinated all died. Further testing found that the mice that had been vaccinated via the floss had a strong immune response, producing ample antibodies and many immune cells. This immune defense was found throughout the body — known as systemic immunity — and in their saliva and feces. "The floss-based vaccination induced both systemic and mucosal immunity, while conventional intramuscular shots largely stimulate systemic immunity," first study author Rohan Ingrole, a chemical engineer at Texas Tech University, told Live Science in an email. "Mucosal immunity is important because most of the pathogens enter through the mucosal routes," he emphasized. In theory, vaccine floss could thus have an edge over syringe vaccines by triggering this additional protection, but the team would like to directly compare the two methods in the future to validate this idea. RELATED STORIES —2-in-1 COVID-flu vaccine looks promising in trial — but experts say approval may be delayed —At-home flu vaccine approved by FDA — what to know —What are mRNA vaccines, and how do they work? Next, the researchers wanted to know if flossing could transfer compounds to the JE in humans. As an early test, they used a fluorescent marker and blue food coloring to coat a dental pick and had healthy volunteers floss their teeth with it. Photographs confirmed that a fair amount of the dye was transferred to the space between their teeth and gum, though just over 41% was left on the floss. The next step, the researchers said, is to translate the research to larger animals, which "can then lay the foundation for human testing in the near future," senior study author Harvinder Gill, a bioengineer at North Carolina State University, told Live Science in an email. This article is for informational purposes only and is not meant to offer medical advice.
