Save the Children halts ties with BCG over Gaza displacement work
In a staff-wide email dated 8 July, CEO Inger Ashing referenced Financial Times reporting that BCG helped launch the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) and supported the US security firm providing armed personnel for GHF-run aid sites in Gaza.
GHF, a militarised aid programme serving Israeli war objectives, has faced widespread condemnation from humanitarian agencies. The organisation is backed by both the US and Israel.
The FT also revealed that BCG developed cost estimates for forcibly relocating large numbers of Palestinians out of Gaza—work Save the Children slammed as unethical and dehumanising.
'The modelling of a plan to forcibly relocate Palestinians from Gaza, and the calculation of a per person cost for displacement, devoid of any humanity, disregards fundamental rights and dignity, and raises serious ethical and legal questions,' Ashing wrote.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
25 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
At least 13 civilians, mostly children, killed in Israeli strikes on Gaza
At least 13 Palestinian civilians, most of whom are children, were killed and others wounded on Monday afternoon local time in a series of Israeli strikes in the Gaza Strip. Wafa news agency reported that nine civilians were killed and others wounded after an Israeli drone strike targeted a displacement tent in Khan Younis, in southern Gaza. In a separate attack, four civilians were killed and more wounded after Israeli forces bombed a shop in al-Bureij refugee camp, in central Gaza. Several others were also wounded following another Israeli strike targeting a group of people in Khan Younis refugee camp.
Middle East Eye
25 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Ex-Israeli prime minister calls Gaza 'humanitarian city' a concentration camp
Israel's plan to forcibly confine more than two million Palestinians to a small area in the southern Gaza Strip amounts to a "concentration camp", former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has said. "It is a concentration camp. I am sorry," the 79-year-old told The Guardian on Sunday, when asked about a plan outlined by Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz last week, which would see an initial 600,000 Palestinians held in an area built on the ruins of Rafah city. According to Katz, Palestinians in the area would undergo security screenings and would not be allowed to leave. Eventually, the entire civilian population would be concentrated in the same location. Katz also said Palestinians would then be encouraged to "voluntarily" leave the Gaza Strip for other countries as part of an "emigration plan". Responding to the proposal, Olmert said: "If [Palestinians] will be deported into the new 'humanitarian city', then you can say that this is part of an ethnic cleansing", adding that ethnic cleansing was the "inevitable interpretation" of the plan. Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert is pictured in Paris, on 9 June 2025 (Stephane de Sakutin/AFP)
The National
32 minutes ago
- The National
Palestinian ambassador wants concrete EU measures on Gaza before summer break
Foreign ministers from the European Union's 27 countries must take concrete steps to pressure Israel to end its war on Gaza, including a suspension of weapons exports or academic research relations, a senior Palestinian diplomat has told The National. "It's not only about what is happening to the Palestinians and the genocide that Palestinians have to endure, but about the EU actually respecting its own commitments," said Palestine's ambassador to the bloc, Amal Jadou. The EU should not restrict itself to a financial role, but to a more active political role Amal Jadou, Palestine's ambassador to the EU "If it really is satisfactory for leaders to go home and enjoy vacations while a nation is being killed and massacred, I think that we have a real issue with our humanity." Gaza will be high on the agenda at Tuesday's gathering in Brussels, the last formal meeting before a summer break. Nearly a week has passed since the EU's foreign affairs chief, Kaja Kallas, struck a deal with Israel to allow more aid into the embattled enclave. The deal came after her services circulated on June 20 an eight-page document that found that Israel had breached its human rights obligations in Gaza, following a request for a review of relations with Israel by a majority of EU countries. They had expressed concern over Israel's months-long aid blockade and breach of a ceasefire agreed with Hamas in March. New deal concerns A few days later, Ms Kallas then launched discussions with Israel was to allow more aid into Gaza, adding that that if that was achieved, no action would be taken against Israel. The agreement struck last week laid out Israeli promises of a "substantial increase" in aid lorries delivering food and other supplies, in addition to opening more border crossing points. This was supposed to have been introduced "within days" but has yet to materialise. More than 30 Gazans were killed by Israel on Sunday as they were collecting aid, bringing the total number of dead in Gaza to nearly 58,400. Ms Kallas' team have insisted the deal remains relevant, describing it to news website Politico as a "vital step forward." Yet the lack of a clear timetable is a worrying signal, Ms Jadou said. "We welcome any agreement that allows the basic needs of Gazans to be met," she said. "But it really depends on Israel abiding by this agreement and we have seen it break many agreements in the past." There can be no role for the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, she added, and the UN must be reinstated as the main aid distributor. The agreement announced by Ms Kallas made no reference to the GHF, despite most EU members voicing their displeasure at the UN being sidelined and the high death rate associated with the GHF's distribution activities. Nearly 800 people have been killed by the Israeli army in the vicinity of distribution hubs or on the route of aid convoys since late May, the UN says - a figure rejected by the GHF and Israel. Israel also rejects the use of the word "genocide", increasingly used by human rights organisations and countries such as Ireland. Ministers at dinner Tuesday's meeting is to be preceded by a dinner involving EU foreign ministers and their counterparts from Palestine and Israel as part of an EU-Southern neighbourhood ministerial meeting. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar and his Palestinian counterpart Varsen Aghabekian Shahin will be in the same room but will not speak. Issues that Ms Shahin will raise include an ongoing review of relations between the EU and Israel, and the need to implement an embargo on weapons sales to Israel, Ms Jadou said. "She's here to bring all these issues from the ground to the table of foreign ministers," she added. This is the first meeting between the EU and the 10 partner countries region in a new format aimed at revitalising relations that will be announced by Commissioner for the Mediterranean Dubravka Suica in October. Gulf countries will be invited to join the so-called New Pact. The EU's inertia on Gaza is fuelled by its own divisions, with a number of nations, including Germany, refusing to appear critical of Israel because of the country's historic role in the Second World War. This has led some countries to make decisions at national level, such as Ireland's recent move towards complying with an advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice to stop trading with occupied territories. Last month, nine countries, led by Belgium, asked the European Commission to analyse the impact of the year-old ICJ's decision on the common market. In a letter to Ms Kallas, they pointed out that there had been no follow-up after a statement by the EU Commission issued in January saying it would do so. "This discrepancy, in my opinion, will impact the way the international community perceives the EU and its standing, especially in its geopolitical relations with the [Global] South," Ms Jadou said. "We see that when there are other conflicts in Europe, the EU takes a very strong stance. But when the conflict is outside Europe, then the EU hesitates to take strong steps." At the same time, the EU is the biggest financial contributor to the Palestinian Authority, with a €1.6 billion ($1.75 billion) package announced in April. It views the organisation as the only viable option to replace Hamas rule in Gaza though it has called for governing reforms. "We're grateful to the EU for taking such a step," Ms Jadou said. "I also think that the EU should not restrict itself to a financial role but to a more active political role in line with international law, and with its values and principles." Yet another issue that will be raised by Ms Shahin in Brussels will be the blockage of taxes collected by Israel on behalf of the PA by Israel's far-right Finance minister Bezalel Smotrich. Ms Jadou added that she hoped more European countries would recognise Palestinian statehood, as France and Saudi Arabia prepare to co-chair a UN conference on the two-state solution. So far, 11 EU countries have recognised Palestine. European diplomats welcomed last week's deal and said that while they would look closely at its implementation by Israel, it was unlikely that any further decisions would be made on Tuesday. Ms Kallas had also circulated a paper outlining 10 possible retaliatory options to Israel's human rights breaches. They included a full suspension of relations, which necessitates an unlikely consensus from the EU's 27 countries. Decisions based on a qualified majority vote, such as suspending preferential trade relations, Israel's participation in the Erasmus+ student exchange or Horizon academic research programmes, were also listed. Ms Jadou said that while she backed a full suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, she understood this was impossible because it would be vetoed by a number of member states. But other options outlined in Ms Kallas option paper should remain on the table. "Why should the EU be complicit in the crimes that Israel is committing?" Ms Jadou said. Speaking ahead of the meeting, a senior EU diplomat said the options paper would be discussed, but declined to elaborate on further steps. "Whether the discussion on Tuesday will lead to concrete decision on specific measures, I don't know," he said.
