CII moots GST rate rationalisation and joint skills fund
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
New Delhi: Industry body CII Thursday pitched for rationalisation of goods and service tax (GST) rates, reduction in tax litigation, establishment of a joint skills acceleration fund (between public, private and CSR), and introduction of a capital support scheme for small and medium enterprises.New CII President Rajiv Memani said the Indian economy was expected to grow by 6.4-6.7% in FY26, driven by strong domestic demand amid global uncertainties."We must remember that in all these cases we don't have 100% winners," said Memani, referring to the India-US trade negotiation to seal a bilateral deal before July 9. "The Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between India and US will be done in tranches, with tricky areas, which have greater political ramifications and require more consultations, to be dealt with later," he added."I feel very confident that the government understands the challenges facing Indian industry and they will be adequately addressed. We are hopeful of the way the current government has prepared, and it gives a lot of comfort," he said.India's growth in FY26 will be driven by strong domestic demand, even as geopolitical uncertainty poses downside risks, said Memani. "India appears as a steady hand in a fractured global economic model, with strong growth numbers and macroeconomic parameters holding up well."India's gross domestic product (GDP) grew 6.5% in FY25."There are obviously some risks. A lot of those risks are external risk, geopolitical risks, global trade risk, but I think a lot of them have been factored in, and there are some upsides, so hopefully they should get balanced out," said Memani.With 'accelerating competitiveness' as its theme for 2025-26, CII identified six key areas to drive India's growth - next-generation reforms, manufacturing, technology & AI, sustainability & energy transition, livelihoods and trust.It recommends rationalising the goods and service tax (GST) structure from five slabs to three, with 5% for essential items, 28% for luxury and sin goods, and a uniform 12-18% for all others. CII also suggests adoption of a three-tier import tariff structure, with customs duty on raw materials and inputs at 0-2.5%, intermediate goods at 2.5-5%, and final goods at 5-7%.Further, it advocates the creation of state fiscal councils to evaluate state budgets and fiscal risks, improved dispute resolution & decriminalisation measures, as well as tax reforms.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
36 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Indian designer A. Balasubraman wins U.K.'s Hills Millennium Award
The first Indian to receive the Hills Millennium Award, professor A. Balasubramaniam, 64, will be felicitated in Birmingham, U.K., on July 12. The award is given annually by the UK-based IED (Institute of Engineering Designers est. 1945) to an international designer who has made significant contributions in the fields of product design and/or engineering design. Recipients are chosen by the Council, and its delegates, from nominations. The late professor Peter Hills who presented the cup to the IED in 2000 to mark the millennium, was the President of IED at that time. Past winners include Moroccan-born Spanish American automobile designer Frank Stephenson, and Marcus Engman, Creative Director at Ingka Group (IKEA Retail). Bala, as he is known fondly in design and academic circles, is a NID graduate and director at the Institute of Design at JKLU, Jaipur. Inspired by thinkers like MP Ranjan, Don Norman and Peter Hills, Bala has been a passionate advocate of design. His 2015 blog post pushing for a Ministry of Design went viral with 4,000 hits the first day. Cited as an educator to watch out for in the Higher Education Digest 2023, this win for Bala is a timely acknowledgement of India's contribution to design and design education. The designer-educator talks to us about the award and the product design scene in India. Can you tell us about getting the Hills Millennium Award? It was a surprise. I got a message from one Harrison Stocker at IED on LinkedIn saying, 'You have won an award'. I had worked with Hills, an engineering designer, years back when he came to India as an external consultant to NSIC (National Small Industries Corporation Ltd.), which is now MSME. I was a bit miffed that they needed a foreigner for expert advice, but later, we hit it off. We put together the design initiative at NSIC called PRIDE (Prototype Initiative for Design Excellence). While Hills was heading IED, I wrote an article on the state of Indian design. Over casual conversations, we found out that we both shared a birthday. I'd drop him a greeting card every year, along with a letter venting my joys and frustrations about design in India. This correspondence went on over 20 years. This year when I sent him a letter, his wife Jane wrote back saying he'd passed away in September last year. He would have been 90 this year. What does the award mean for you personally, and what does it mean for designers in India? For one, it is acknowledging an individual's contribution to the profession. This is important. At JKLU, I began the Design Guru award in honor of MP Ranjan. We celebrate one senior designer every year. In 2020 we picked Don Norman as he has been evangelizing design for a while. I'm very happy Don accepted it. Industrial designer and educator Shuchi Mathur said to me once, 'You start from nothing and you build it into something.' I was invited in an advisory role to JKLU, as founder Pramath Raj Sinha wanted to start a school of design. They already had engineering and management. Sinha was excited with my vision document, which began with a quote from Don Norman — 'Design education has to move away from schools of art and architecture and move into the schools of science and engineering.' I was the first employee at JKLU's Institute of Design and I put a team together. We decided on 4 disciplines: Interdisciplinary Design, Product Design, Interaction Design and Integrated Communication. You have practiced since the 1980s when design was not well understood in India. How did you address its perception? We would identify industries that manufactured products — like Usha – and make a design presentation. Basically, we would educate the client about design to get a project. My interest in teaching began right here. It was a 3-stage pitch-to-project process that worked. One of my earliest products was a flashlight for Eveready, with a reach to rural areas. The brief was — inexpensive to make but cannot look cheap. My product cost was just 7 rupees, including the graphics. It sold for 35 rupees a piece. They went on to manufacture 30,000 pieces on 3 shifts a day. If only I had asked for royalty! What are some issues young designers face in the field today? Are there still communication hurdles in addressing clients and industries, or funding a prototype? It is relatively easy to do product design today. There are plenty of opportunities. This generation also understands users much better, and software — they pick up many aspects on their own from YouTube. It becomes far more challenging for faculty to contribute. Projects are well-funded, and the Indian Government is getting into design. The MSME scheme was such a game changer, as it acknowledged designers' contribution to small industries. There's a charm in working for this sector as you can make a greater impact. I worked with grassroots innovators, commissioned by the National Innovation Foundation, one of Government of India's launchpads for design. I designed a multipurpose processor for a client in Haryana to process tomatoes. He thought we were going to steal his idea! We developed a safe, ergonomic and stylish prototype and told him, 'Go ahead, make it.' How has your approach facilitated your evolution as an educator and designer? Educating clients was a starting point. I like converting people, building a constituency for design. My first blog post was 'Demand good design.' Else design won't flourish and we won't have good products. It was all about — 'By now, you would have had your bath and started your day. Did the cistern save water? Did the water splash in the washbasin? Could you hold your newspaper? If all this worked, it was done by a designer.' Name some culture-specific Indian products that stand out for you. How can India become a global contender? In the 1980s, designers from Tesseract made a desktop Idli Wet Grinder — Elgi is still the best. In terms of artisanal work, I like Mukul Goyal's work, using the lost wax process. But it seems we still need a Prada to come and tell us that we have world-class design! The problem starts with the consumer. We need to be ruthless about good stuff. Living with mediocrity irritates me. My latest post is 'Demand Good Designers' with a push to advocate for aspiring graduates. Design still needs evangelizing and I am happy to continue promoting design in all forums. The writer is a brand strategist with a background in design from SAIC and NID.
The Hindu
38 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Naidu seeks GST exemption for mango pulp, Central aid of ₹130 cr. for procuring Totapuri mangoes
Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu has appealed to Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman to exempt mango pulp from the Goods and Services Tax (GST) and reduce the GST rate on fruit-based juices to safeguard the interests of mango farmers and fruit processors. He stated in a representation to Ms. Sitharaman on Friday that the mango processing industries, particularly in Chittoor district, the largest mango-producing region in the country, were facing serious challenges. With over 80,000 hectares under mango cultivation and an annual output of nearly 7.50 lakh metric tonnes, Chittoor district supports the livelihood of more than 1.20 lakh farmers. The district also hosts around 42 mango pulp processing units with a combined annual capacity of 4 lakh metric tonnes. Approximately 30% of the processed pulp is being exported, primarily to markets in the Middle East and Europe. However, a recent slump in exports coupled with weak domestic demand has led to a crisis, leaving over 1.50 lakh metric tonnes of mango pulp unsold. In this context, the All India Food Processors' Association and the Chittoor District Fruit Processors' Federation have jointly submitted representations, seeking relief under the GST framework. Endorsing the appeal, Mr. Naidu called for exemption from the 12% GST levied on mango pulp, which undergoes minimal thermal processing and contains no preservatives or additives, and a reduction of GST on fruit-based juices from 12% to 5% to promote the consumption of healthier, natural beverages. This step was expected to boost demand for fruit pulp and benefit farmers by improving raw material offtake. Similar issues were being faced by mango farmers and processors in Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra and Karnataka, the Chief Minister stated, calling for immediate policy attention for reviving the sector. In a separate letter to the Union Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan, Mr. Naidu sought a Central financial assistance of ₹130 crore for procuring Totapuri mangoes in the State. He highlighted the dire situation of mango farmers, particularly in the erstwhile Chittoor district — which now comprises Chittoor, Tirupati, and Annamayya districts, pointing out that the region was expected to produce nearly 6.50 lakh metric tonnes (MTs) of mangoes this season from approximately 80,000 hectares. As the market prices fell causing much distress to the farmers, the A.P. Government announced a support price of ₹4 per kg with an equal contribution of ₹2 each from the State and Central governments. In addition, traders and processors were urged to offer ₹8 per kg to enable farmers to receive a total procurement price of ₹12 per kg. To fulfil this commitment, the State government has to bear ₹130 crore, for which it sought a matching contribution from the Central government.
Mint
39 minutes ago
- Mint
Soham Parekh used India-Pak conflict to delay work, lied about 'drone strike' near Mumbai home amid moonlighting row
Soham Parekh, an Indian tech professional accused of secretly working for several US-based startups at the same time, has been accused of emotionally manipulating his former boss by using the India-Pakistan conflict as an excuse. Arkadiy Telegin, co-founder of Leaping AI, made these claims in a recent post on X. According to Telegin, Parekh falsely claimed that he was living close to a conflict zone in Mumbai during the tensions between India and Pakistan in May. He alleged that Parekh messaged him saying, "They shot a drone in the air near my house 10 mins away," to explain delays in work. Telegin further claimed that Parekh blamed him for being slow with coding tasks, saying, "Soham used to guilt-trip me for being slow on PRs when the India-Pakistan thing was going on, all while he was in Mumbai." He jokingly added, "The next person should hire him for the Chief Intelligence Officer role." Telegin also shared screenshots of their chats to support his claims. The messages were exchanged during a tense period of military action between India and Pakistan, following Operation Sindoor. The operation came in response to the terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, where 26 civilians lost their lives on April 22. Later, Parekh reached out to Telegin to apologise for the "trouble" he had caused. Sharing a screenshot of this apology, Telegin captioned it, "Soham character arc that I hoped to see." In a separate post on X, Suhail Doshi, former CEO of Mixpanel, accused Parekh of juggling multiple jobs at once. Doshi claimed that Parekh had been working with "34 startups at the same time" and accused him of faking his CV to secure these jobs. He said that Parekh was fired within a week of being hired but allegedly continued to deceive other startups. Warning others in the startup community, Doshi wrote, "PSA: there's a guy named Soham Parekh (in India) who works at 3-4 startups at the same time. He's been preying on YC companies and more. Beware," adding, "He hasn't stopped a year later. No more excuses." Responding to the controversy, Parekh admitted his actions and said, "I'm not proud of what I've done. But, you know, financial circumstances, essentially. No one really likes to work 140 hours a week, right? But I had to do this out of necessity. I was in extremely dire financial circumstances." He also said that he completed the work himself, without using AI tools or help from other engineers. Despite the backlash, Parekh has now joined a new AI startup called Darwin, based in San Francisco. He said he will no longer be taking on multiple jobs. Darwin's CEO and founder, Sanjit Juneja, defended the hiring, saying, "Soham is an incredibly talented engineer, and we believe in his abilities to help bring our products to market." On June 3, Parekh posted on X, reflecting on the fallout from the controversy. "I've been isolated, written off and shut out by nearly everyone I've known and every company I've worked at. But building is the only thing I've ever truly known, and it's what I'll keep doing," he wrote.
