Over 5,100 sign online petition calling for electoral reforms in Singapore
The petition, which calls for wide-ranging electoral reforms, was unveiled during a press conference on 18 May.
Chee described the initiative as non-partisan and aimed at addressing long-standing concerns about fairness and transparency in Singapore's political system.
'These are foundational principles of good governance and democratic integrity,' he said.
Hosted on Change.org, the petition outlines six major proposals for reform.
Petition lists six proposals to enhance electoral transparency, media freedom, and boundary fairness
Chief among them is the removal of the Elections Department from the Prime Minister's Office, intended to ensure impartial oversight of electoral processes.
Another key proposal is the abolition of the Group Representation Constituency (GRC) system, which the SDP argues facilitates gerrymandering and disadvantages opposition candidates.
The petition also calls for a minimum campaign period of three weeks to give voters ample time to evaluate party platforms and candidates' policies.
Additionally, it proposes a mandatory six-month buffer between the release of new electoral boundaries and the dissolution of Parliament.
The petition further advocates for the revision of the Newspaper and Printing Presses Act to support independent media, and the creation of an impartial Electoral Boundaries Review Committee.
As of 23 May, the petition had already garnered over 4,800 signatures, reflecting growing public interest in the issue following the recent General Election.
Concerns about election conduct
During the 18 May press conference, Chee sharply criticised the conduct of the 2025 General Election.
He characterised the election as a 'smash-and-grab' operation carried out with 'unseemly haste' by the ruling People's Action Party (PAP).
He stated that the compressed campaign timeline left voters with inadequate time to absorb the issues at hand.
This concern was especially pronounced among younger and first-time voters, who reportedly felt overwhelmed and disoriented.
'The electorate hardly had time to grasp the weighty national concerns that affect our society,' he said.
Chee emphasised that these problems point to systemic flaws within the electoral framework and that the petition was not a reactionary move but a principled push for deeper reform.
He also spoke on the disruptive impact of sudden boundary changes ahead of the election.
The dissolution of Bukit Batok SMC—a constituency where he had campaigned for nearly a decade—forced him to contest in the newly formed Sembawang West SMC.
In the closely fought contest, Chee received 46.82% of the vote, narrowly losing to PAP's Poh Li San. The result made it the third-closest race of the election.
Chee argued that such abrupt constituency changes hinder both candidates and residents, eroding community bonds and voter engagement.
He reiterated that an independent and transparent approach to boundary delineation is crucial to preserving public trust in the electoral system.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
a day ago
- Straits Times
Listen first, post later: Gen-Z-ifying the general election
Christie Chiu and Wong Yang were first-time voters, but also rookies to election reporting. Their brief was slightly different – cover Singapore's 2025 General Election, but for TikTok and Instagram. This sent them scuttling from Boon Lay to Bedok, Gen-Z-ifying rally speeches and devising skits, gags and punchlines. They look back at how they put a different spin on The Straits Times' tradition of covering elections. Screenshots of ST journalists Christie Chiu and Wong Yang in a (left) PAP Fullerton rally video wrap-up, and in a video talking about cost of living as an electoral issue. Christie (C): A lukewarm comment at a party struck me some weeks before the general election. 'Don't take this personally, I don't read ST's political coverage,' she said. I had just asked the crowd of 20-somethings what kind of election content they would like to see from The Straits Times. Call it a spur of the moment bit of user research. That The Straits Times might not be a young person's top pick was not news to me, but hearing it unvarnished still landed like a punch. She had her reasons for saying what she did, but it reminded me that others like her – those who shut the door tight – do exist. Finding a way to open it a crack falls on us. Many who scroll past our articles still stumble upon our social media posts – a vital doorway of its own. That offhand remark, humbling as it was, became an unsaid yardstick as we set out to cover the general election on social media. It made the weight of our work clear: It is often the first – and sometimes only – point of contact between The Straits Times newsroom and a generation that has no shortage of media outlets courting their attention. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore HSA intensifies crackdown on vapes; young suspected Kpod peddlers nabbed in Bishan, Yishun Singapore Man charged over distributing nearly 3 tonnes of vapes in one day in Bishan, Ubi Avenue 3 Singapore Public healthcare institutions to record all Kpod cases, confiscate vapes: MOH, HSA Singapore Man allegedly attacks woman with knife at Kallang Wave Mall, to be charged with attempted murder Singapore Singapore boosts support for Timor-Leste as it prepares to join Asean Singapore UN aviation and maritime agencies pledge to collaborate to boost safety, tackle challenges Singapore High Court dismisses appeal of drink driver who killed one after treating Tampines road like racetrack Singapore 18 years' jail for woman who hacked adoptive father to death after tussle over Sengkang flat Yang (Y): That speaks to how young people consume news today. With content creators and alternative media, people around our age are less reliant on traditional media as their primary source of news. So how do we report on the general election for people who are not just digital natives, but 'social natives' – those who grew up with social media, and for whom being able to comment on and share content with friends is intrinsic to their way of being in the world? New age, new tools C: This generation's connection to social media as a way of life exists also within the orbit of another term of the era: brain rot. It was the 2024 Oxford Word of the Year , and refers to the decline of one's mental or intellectual state from excessive consumption of low-quality online content. Our team's task was to push against that: creating fun, short video explainers on the election's key concepts and developments, without cheapening the analysis. Becoming part-time comedians was an unexpected, and frankly welcome, addition to the job. Getting paid to crack jokes with colleagues? A dream. But fun for fun's sake quickly wears thin when the content doesn't mean anything. What value were we adding to our audience's lives? Were we helping them become more informed voters? Those were questions that grounded our approach – while keeping the brain rot at bay. Y: The first step towards answering these questions was to simply listen to our audience. We did this through several initiatives led by our supervisor, assistant news editor Danson Cheong – an audience survey in 2024, phone interviews, a focus group discussion, and a small audience panel on Telegram. We asked them what they were concerned about heading into the election, the questions they wanted answered, and what they thought of our drafts and final videos. This helped us respond directly to topics and concerns that interested young people, rather than approach election coverage in a way that evoked a top-down sense of 'here's why you should care about this'. We put the audience front and centre, fretted less over 'sounding Gen Z' and just tried to be honest. Carrying on traditions C: In the paper's 180-year history, just a sliver – the last 10 years or so – has focused in earnest on elevating online coverage, we learnt in a recent chat with Straits Times associate editor Zakir Hussain. Still, much of the ethos behind our videos is not exactly a reinvention. Putting the audience first, decoding dense information and bridging gaps in knowledge – these are classic tenets of journalism. Just rebooted for the screen instead of the page. We took a slightly different path, but we, too, felt we were part of the paper's enduring tradition of covering elections. The ST team's – (from left) video journalist Chong Lii, senior audience growth specialist Farzanah Friday and journalists Wong Yang and Christie Chiu – last shoot for the 2025 General Election. ST PHOTO: DANSON CHEONG Our rally wraps – where we broke down the key points of candidate speeches – reminded us of the stories Zakir shared about his first general election as a rookie reporter back in 2006. He recalled how in those days before smartphones, a group order going around for digital voice recorders set each reporter back a hefty $200. A hack was used for stories that needed speed: An intern or junior reporter would head over to the rally with a fully charged cellphone, dial a landline in the office and hold the phone aloft in the crowd, so the team back at HQ could follow along and take notes in real time. Reporters on the ground back then took notes – with pen and paper, and the soon-to-be lost art of Teeline shorthand. They would then call in or quickly cab back to the office to debrief editors, file a quick first cut, and refine it before off stone (printing time) to ensure the story earned a spot in the morning paper. In 2025, the newsroom again made a bulk order – this time for smartphone-compatible microphones and tripods, which reporters picked up before heading out to assignments. It also subscribed to artificial intelligence transcription services, which allowed the newsroom to monitor what was happening as long as someone was on the ground to hit record. Our project was helmed by a team of five, including our colleagues from the audience and video teams – Farzanah Friday, Vera Ang and Chong Lii – double hatters who produced and edited the videos. At the rallies we covered, Yang and I took notes on our smartphones. We were usually accompanied by Danson, who would clear our 'first cut' – the video script and raw footage of us presenting on site, filmed with a humble smartphone on a tripod. The other team members in the office would work their magic from there, polishing the final video for different editors to vet before releasing it the next day – just in time to catch the morning traffic. The digital age is a bittersweet companion. Its tools lighten the load but raise the demands. You have to be faster, fuller, sharper. Yet some things don't change: the thrill of front-row seats to democracy in motion, the privilege of capturing a moment in history, and the responsibility of conveying these vignettes to audiences accurately, fairly... Y: ...and fairly quickly. ST journalists Wong Yang and Christie Chiu debriefing their supervisor over the phone from Cavenagh Bridge about the PAP's Fullerton lunchtime rally on April 28. ST PHOTO: CHRISTIE CHIU What the audience said Y: Producing the videos sometimes felt like sending things out into the void, or adding to what was already a noisy media landscape. After coming up with the caption, deciding on a thumbnail and hitting 'post', would people latch on to the videos when there was already an information overload? To our surprise – and relief – viewers commented that they found our videos engaging, accessible and refreshing. People who might have previously been averse to reading The Straits Times were pleasantly surprised by this alternative approach. This was a great boost for the team. It affirmed that what we did had resonated with viewers, and we managed to cut through the noise in some ways. Our young democracy C: While researching the electoral journey of Pulau Ubin, an archival binder with weathered clippings of Straits Times articles, which we'd borrowed from the company's resource centre, struck a chord with me. The clippings dated back to 1959, and we learnt that the island had its own polling station until the 1990s, when residents started riding ferries to the mainland to vote. It hit me that despite the hundreds of faded, blurry newspaper scans we sifted through each day researching on past elections, Singapore's democracy is still a young one. An archival binder from the SPH library that offers a glimpse into Pulau Ubin's past, such as its electoral history. ST PHOTO: CHRISTIE CHIU This year marks the paper's 180th birthday, yet it also marks only the nation's 14th general election since independence. Our democracy, it turns out, is less than half as old as The Straits Times itself. This truth has revealed itself in several ways, especially in my own experience existing on people's feeds this election. The scrutiny of my mannerisms, appearance and voice by thousands of anonymous usernames often left me wondering – did these people even hear the message? The scripts we spent countless late-night hours crafting? It also deepened my empathy for the women politicians, who were often reduced to superficial comparisons – how attractive they were, rather than the substance of their political arguments. Our videos, engaging as they were, were a drop in the hours upon hours of work professional journalists put into the 2025 General Election. But when we tackled issues such as the cost of living, the significance of the Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC walkover, or rally speeches, we tried to spark conversation – to plant a seed that would lead viewers to dig deeper or read more. That, to me, was the value of a cross-media publication: the ability to weave a tapestry of interconnected viewpoints. Videos, visuals and traditional reporting all play a part in painting a fuller story. ST executive producer Vera Chong (in pink) and video journalist Chong Lii orchestrating a scene for an explainer video that unpacks the significance of the Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC walkover. Journalists Wong Yang and Christie Chiu are seen here preparing to fight for a 'seat' in Parliament. ST PHOTO: DANSON CHEONG Y: As Christie and I stood among Singaporeans of all ages and persuasions at the rallies, what stood out – as we listened to the crowd cheering and jeering – was the sheer diversity of views simmering in our political cauldron. These views all come from somewhere: they are shaped by every individual's unique lived experience and ever-expanding modes of 'being Singaporean', be they in the way we think of success, love, family or what the good life looks like. So, if going to the polls is about voting for the Singapore we want to see, how can we as journalists arm our audience – who hold these varied perspectives and aspirations – with the knowledge to make an informed decision at the ballot box, and in a way that speaks to them? As this experience covering the general election and working with our audience has shown, in a world full of sound and fury, it doesn't hurt to listen first.
New Paper
5 days ago
- New Paper
PSP's new leadership signals fresh start after GE2025 loss, says Stephanie Tan
Recent changes to the Progress Singapore Party's (PSP) senior leadership represent "the first step" of its plans to come back from a disappointing performance at the 2025 General Election, said PSP's Ms Stephanie Tan. Besides nurturing new leaders, the PSP intends to update its image by putting more of its younger members in the public eye, and to find new ways to engage Singaporeans on important national issues, Ms Tan told Straits Times correspondent Natasha Ann Zachariah and host of ST's The Usual Place podcast during a live stream on July 10. On July 5, PSP announced that party founder and chairman Tan Cheng Bock had stepped down from its central executive committee (CEC), alongside vice-chair and former Non-Constituency MP (NCMP) Hazel Poa. Party treasurer S. Nallakaruppan also relinquished his position. In their place, Ms Tan, 37, was co-opted as a new CEC member, together with Mr Sani Ismail and Mr Lawrence Pek. The three of them had been first-time PSP candidates in the May general election. Speaking on the podcast show, Ms Tan said PSP had been gathering feedback from Singaporeans in the two months since GE2025 to "know where we went wrong and how we can do better". PSP had fielded 13 candidates in six constituencies, but saw its vote share decline compared with its first electoral outing in 2020. It also failed to keep its parliamentary presence unlike in the previous term, when it had two NCMPs. "We might seem to have been a bit slow in coming up with a response right after the GE, but that's because we were hard hit, to be honest, and we took time (to) come up with a new plan to see how we can steer this ship forward," said Ms Tan, who ran in Pioneer against the PAP's Mr Patrick Tay. "In the next four to five years, we want to continue to make an impact even if we have no parliamentary presence." Ms Tan said one of the main things PSP is tackling is perceptions by some that it is an ageing political party, and added that the latest leadership shake-up has the support of party chief Leong Mun Wai and the CEC. "The party does have a pool of young talent," she said, citing the two elected CEC members who are younger than her: deputy organising secretary Soh Zheng Long, 36, and youth wing head Samuel Lim, 30. "It is just that, for the past few years, they have been working mostly behind the scenes." Going forward, the party will give more opportunities to its younger members to raise their public profile, although this has to be balanced with each individual's comfort level at being openly associated with an alternative party. PSP also intends to hold outreach events targeted at specific demographics, alongside the usual walkabouts and house visits. This could include visits to nursing homes to understand issues faced by elderly residents, their family members and the staff, which could be due to "certain gaps in the policies that we have", said Ms Tan. The party is also thinking of starting a podcast, and wants to up its game on social media to keep putting out its views on key issues, she added. On Dr Tan's move to step down as PSP's chairman, Ms Tan said this is to give party leaders "a clean slate to work from, away from his shadow". Dr Tan, 85, has been designated party adviser. Having set its foundations and core values, he trusts that the other party leaders can take PSP forward in the long political journey to come, said Ms Tan. "He said that he will not interfere on his own initiative. He will help when help is asked for," she said. A homemaker and former lawyer, Ms Tan said she sees her role on the CEC as a progression from leading her own campaign during the election, to making decisions at the party level. While the party is no longer in Parliament, she hopes that Singaporeans can take a long-term perspective on the PSP's journey. She noted that other opposition parties like the Workers' Party and Singapore Democratic Party have been around for decades, and their experience showed that it takes a lot of time and consistent effort to build a political party and gain the trust of voters. "Our commitment to Singaporeans is still that we want to continue to build ourselves to be a credible, rational alternative political party, to give Singaporeans a choice at the ballot box," she said.
AsiaOne
5 days ago
- AsiaOne
All 12 government parliamentary committees to get new chairpersons, 19 first-term PAP MPs included as members , Singapore News
Government parliamentary committees are set up by the People's Action Party (PAP) to scrutinise the legislation and programmes of the 16 ministries PUBLISHED ON July 11, 2025 1:35 AM By Sean Ler When the 15th Parliament opens on Sept 5, there will be new chairpersons for all 12 government parliamentary committees (GPC). Among the 12 chairpersons, three have prior experience heading a GPC. MP for Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC Tin Pei Ling, who heads the Transport GPC, was the chair for the Digital Development and Information GPC, while MP for Sembawang GRC Vikram Nair moves from chairing the Defence and Foreign Relations GPC to Home Affairs and Law. Both of them are fourth-term MPs. Saktiandi Supaat, a third-term MP for Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC, will move from Transport to chair the Finance and Trade and Industry GPC. Among the nine other GPC heads, three of them — Alex Yam, Daryl David, and Henry Kwek — are in their third term. Yam, another fourth-term MP and Mayor for Northwest Community Development Council, will head the Culture, Community and Youth GPC. He was formerly the deputy chair for the Digital Development and Information, and Defence and Foreign Relations GPCs. Henry Kwek and Daryl David, both serving third terms, will head the National Development and Education GPCs respectively. Daryl was the deputy chair for the same GPC in the 14th Parliament. The other six chairpersons are all MPs in their second term. Sembawang GRC MPs Mariam Jaafar and Poh Li San will head the Health and Sustainability and the Environment GPCs respectively, while MP for Pasir Ris-Changi GRC Sharael Taha will chair the Digital Development and Information GPC. Poh was formerly deputy chair in the same GPC. Meanwhile, the Manpower and Social and Family Development GPCs will be led by Punggol GRC MP Yeo Wan Ling and Jurong Central SMC MP Xie Yao Quan respectively. Completing the chairpersons line-up is Yio Chu Kang SMC MP Yip Hon Weng who will head the Defence and Foreign Affairs GPC. Of the 26 first-term PAP MPs, seven — Dinesh Vasu Dash, Goh Hanyan, Goh Pei Ming, Jasmin Lau, David Neo, Jeffrey Siow, and Syed Harun Alhabsyi — have either been, or will be appointed as political office holders. The remaining 19, including Lee Hong Chuang and Victor Lye who were fielded in opposition wards in the 2015 and 2020 General Election, have been included in the GPCs. The GPCs have between seven and nine members, with Education being the largest with nine members. Introduced in 1987, GPCs were set up by the ruling party to scrutinise the legislation and programmes of all 16 ministries. Some committees have a portfolio corresponding to more than one ministry. For example, the GPC on Finance and Trade and Industry covers both the Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Trade and Industry. [[nid:719076]] editor@ parliamentMembers of Parliament This website is best viewed using the latest versions of web browsers.
